supportsustainability-focused projects. The evolution of the IE curriculum at QU reflects a commitmentto producing engineers equipped to address the complex challenges of a sustainable future.IntroductionThis work-in-progress manuscript discusses ongoing efforts to integrate a strong focus onsustainability and societal impact into the Industrial Engineering (IE) program within the Schoolof Computing and Engineering (SCE) at Quinnipiac University (QU).QU, a private institution located in the northeastern United States, boasts a comprehensiveacademic structure encompassing nine distinct units, including SCE. Notably, sustainabilityfeatures prominently in QU's strategic plan [1][2]. A dedicated sustainability committee drivesvarious campus-wide initiatives, and
integration aligns withethical and equitable practices and ensures a more comprehensive and impactful approach tosustainability efforts.People of Color and Environmental OrganizationsOf the 43 websites analyzed, only 34 featured images of people. We noted that organizationswith an explicit mention of words with the root “just” in their mission statement were morelikely represent people of color (PoC) both in images, and, more importantly, in leadershippositions, as well as to display the pronouns used by their staff and/or board members. It is worthnoting that while University at Buffalo Sustainability did not explicitly articulate justice in theirmission, they were one of the three organizations to publish their staff’s pronouns and had anabove
Building Better Engineers: Teaching Chemical Engineers to Troubleshoot in the Laboratory George Prpich, Anukriti Shrestha, Caroline Crockett, Natasha Smith University of VirginiaAbstractThe Chemical Engineering Laboratory is a crucial training ground for students to acquirefundamental professional skills. Among these skills, troubleshooting is exceptionally valuableand significant, yet it is often underemphasized in the engineering curriculum. This studyexamines the efficacy of structured troubleshooting training modules in enhancing students'troubleshooting skills. Modules were integrated into laboratory lectures to introducetroubleshooting concepts, followed by a hands-on exercise to evaluate
andintellectual development such as that exemplified by a liberal-arts curriculum [13]. Debatesbetween these positions can consume considerable oxygen in department meetings, butregardless of one’s beliefs about the purposes education should serve, the technologies createdby engineers continues to make systems larger and more interconnected.In this practice-focused paper we report on introducing system maps in a design course to givethird-year engineering students practice using tools that enable causal connections of their workto social and global issues. Over the five semesters the course has been taught an ongoingchallenge has been having engineering students who are acculturated to quantitative and linearmethods of problem solving meaningfully
Paper ID #42606Board 306: Improving Retention Rate and Success in Computer Science ScholarsDr. Jung Won Hur, Auburn University Dr. Jung Won Hur is a professor in the Department of Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology at Auburn University. Her research interests encompass computer science education, diversity in STEM, culturally responsive teaching, and emerging technology integration in the classroom.Dr. Cassandra Thomas, Tuskegee University Dr. Cassandra Thomas is an Associate Professor of Computer Science at Tuskegee University. She earned a BS (from TU) and an MS in Computer Science and an Ed. D. in
and open-ended questions wasconducted in an R1, land-grant, public university. The survey was distributed to allundergraduate students enrolled in the College of Engineering and 156 valid responses wereanalyzed. The results of this study are intended to help this institution, as well as otherengineering programs, support necessary skills for success in upper-level engineering courses.IntroductionEngineers must acquire professional and technical skills to meet global demands. Technicalskills are highly emphasized in the engineering curriculum; however, technical skills may not beeffective unless they are built around non-technical (professional) skills. Professional skills, orsoft skills, are career competencies and abilities that help the
influenced by the learner’s environment such that it impacts how futureknowledge is integrated [16], [17]. While expected to be proficient in MATLAB® by their senioryear, students may have difficulty applying past knowledge without having adequate practicalexperience from the time the course was taken up until required to do so in their senior designproject.The following module was intended to serve as a refresher for concepts that may have beencovered in introductory programming courses while also incorporating practicalrecommendations on how to write a code to minimize errors and debugging difficulties. It wasdesigned as an interactive manual such that students could click on hyperlinked tables andfigures relevant to specific questions or topics
curriculum can bechallenging because of an already busy curriculum and a lack of pedagogical guidance forinstructors. Not addressing these challenges can thus hinder institutions’ ability to developsocially and environmentally responsible engineers. Due to technological and scientificdevelopments, the engineering curriculum is frequently expected to cover more and moretechnical content, which makes the incorporation of other aspects more challenging [10]. Ahorizontal integration of social and environmental justice is an effective approach to dealing withthis issue, and it simultaneously helps defuse faculty resistance to non-technical content[11,12,13]. It has also been pointed out that social justice in engineering contexts usuallynecessitates the
. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. K. Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, and A. D. Mead, “The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decisionmaking in Project-based Design Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods.” Presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June, 2014. 10.18260/1-2--23130[2] National Society of Professional Engineers. “NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers.” NSPE.org. https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics [accessed Jan. 4, 2023].[3] C. Moos, L. Dougher, L. Bassett, M. Young, and D. D. Burkey, “Game-Based Ethical Instruction in Undergraduate Engineering,” NEAG Journal, no. 1, pp. 20–37, Mar. 2023, doi
, students will take additional interdisciplinary coursework focused on trainingstudents in entrepreneurship and applied psychology to conduct user experience research for thepurposes of integrating user feedback into the technical design features of the robots andautonomous systems in development. Replicating the design of the course evaluation, retrospectivesurveys coupled with content analysis of students’ problem-based learning projects will be used toevaluate the development of an interdisciplinary mindset, communication, teamwork, researchethics, and project management skills. Together, this work will shed light on the pivotal role ofinterdisciplinary education in shaping the engineers of tomorrow, poised to transform thelandscape of robotics
disposal. In thiswork-in-progress paper, we examine the first stage of a four-year curriculum initiative to developthese skills in engineering students. Specifically, we have implemented several assignments in anupper-level Sustainable Energy Systems Design course where students must address equityconcerns in four project assignments.This work-in-progress paper presents assignments used elicit the students’ ability to navigatecomplex questions of equity and the related trade-offs. We conduct an initial assessment of thestudents’ capacity to identify design alternatives to mitigate the negative effects on marginalizedpopulations. The paper provides re-designed activities based on this analysis along with aproposed pre- and post-assessment of the
Paper ID #43291Longitudinal Assessment of Spatial Skills Development in MET StudentsDr. Steven Nozaki, Pennsylvania State University Ph.D. Engineering Education - The Ohio State UniversityDr. Nancy E. Study, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Nancy E. Study is an Associate Teaching Professor in the School of Engineering at Penn State Behrend where she teaches courses in engineering graphics and rapid prototyping, and is the coordinator of the rapid prototyping lab. Her research interests include visualization, haptics, curriculum development, and graphics standards. ©American Society for
is most important, whereas for the teacher it is the learningand the curriculum goals that are fore fronted (cmp., Norström, 2016, pp. 37–39; Tomasi, 2008).McConville et al. (2017) have identified at least three challenges for realizing the pedagogicalpotential of role-playing in engineering education. These include challenges of clearlycommunicated learning outcomes, a shortage of teaching expertise, and adoption of an approachthat students are not familiar with. In this regard, our study shows that integrating authenticteaching approaches are very demanding for the teacher, even when teachers are highlyexperienced. In our case, the systematic implementation of the project was made possible thanksto the experience and background of the
supports Engineering and Science undergraduate students as they serve as camp counselors in his work at the Caruth Institute for Engineering Education. He directly manages the deployment of STEM integrated activities that surface Engineering to Middle and High School students in the Dallas area in an informal learning environment through the Hammon Engineering camps. He is also engaged in outreach programs that are seeking to serve underrepresented populations in Engineering. In his program manager role at the Institute, he contributes in fostering relationships and developing STEM activities for Voices of Hope and Jubilee Park. He is also part of the Maker Education project as his previous experiences developing
implemented changes to the delivery of our senior design course. The newframework allows for engaging alumni, guest speakers, field trips, and professional societies in acentralized holistic manner. Details regarding this integrated approach to senior design deliveryare discussed below, along with the findings from surveys we conducted to understand studentperceptions.Delivery Format:The delivery format designed as an academic year long experience was based on theidentification of four major activities as essential to enhance the overall student experience.These include course instruction, technical design content, professional development, andindustry support. The basic framework for an efficient and enhanced delivery of the capstonedesign, shown in
issues into the existing curriculum, rather than create an add-on for students.Courses taken for the Option all must be taken for a grade (not pass/fail) and in the followingthree areas: 1. Impact of Technology (1 course): These types of courses help students focus on how technology impacts marginalized communities. Examples of such courses are courses entitled “Race, Science, and Justice” and “Rehabilitation and Robotics.” These courses allow engineers to assess the needs of society and its marginalized communities and develop strategies to ensure that future technology solutions consider them. 2. Community Impact (1 course): These courses help students to develop and apply their knowledge of the interaction between
. In fact, many of the ideas presented by theassociation are extracurricular in nature, which has been found to be ineffective for reachingengineering graduate students, according to meta-synthesis [1]. While librarians are oftenspecialized in the areas engineering graduate students lack and seek personal mentorship in, theyare often stuck in providing that support by ineffective means. The typical engineering curriculum does not have courses on research methods, few havecourses on research integrity or publication ethics, proposing research, writing, peer reviewing,or how your worldview influences your research [4, 5]. Published engineering literature, in fact,often leaves many of these important aspects of research as assumed [5
, 22–261.Uziak, J. (2016). A project-based learning approach in an engineering curriculum. 18, 119–123.Wu, T.-T., & Wu, Y.-T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631Zhou, C. (2012). Integrating creativity training into Problem and Project-Based Learning curriculum in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(5), 488–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.714357
10 1.88 4 10 reliable than the breadboard. The custom PCBA better prepared me for real- 11 7.23 8 10 2.74 2 10 world applications than the breadboard. I would prefer to use the custom PCBA board 12 8 8 10 2.16 4 10 in future lab exercises over the breadboard.In conclusion, the survey data supports the hypothesis that the integration of custom PCBs intothe electrical engineering curriculum enhances the learning environment by streamlining thepractical application of theoretical concepts. The findings suggest that students benefit from theuse of
mitigate the injustice issue.As a result, integrating environmental justice themes into environmental engineering courses hasbecome more prevalent in university programs over the years [3-5], which has helped shift thecurriculum toward a justice-minded framework for the discipline. Even in chemical education,the incorporation of environmental justice themes in chemistry courses has increased and manyarticles describing its inclusion in the curriculum can be found in the chemical educationliterature [6-14]. It is worth noting that environmental justice is an integral part of social justice.Although the two are interconnected and overlap in their impact on marginalized communities,social justice encompasses fair and equal social and economic
forefront of this transformation. STEM students,as future innovators and leaders, need to be well-equipped with knowledge and skills in thisdomain. However, the key to effective learning lies in inclusivity and hands-on experience. Thispaper aims to elucidate strategies for integrating inclusive experiential learning with sustainablerobotic agriculture in STEM education.The student participants from science and engineering explored the potential benefits andchallenges of technologies such as Farmbots (an open-source farming technology that combinesrobotics, automation, and software to facilitate precision farming in small-scale agriculturalsettings) while considering the equitable distribution of resources, the three P’s (People, Planet,and Profit
degree-seeking years [13], to the inseparable impact of the state of the world onto the state of theclassroom (especially students who do not fit the tradition and dominant paradigm of white andmale-presenting) [14]. Microaggressions have been revealed to have an intense net-negativeeffect on people from marginalized communities working and studying in academic spacesperpetuated by systemic social structures that reinforce white-body supremacy [15]. Work tocounter legacy or traditional pedagogical practices where technical course topics are siloed fromhumanitarian efforts include the sociotechnical integration of human-centered design withengineering coursework [16], and discursive “micro-insertions” of ethics into technical coursesfor a
. Kent J. Crippen, University of Florida Kent Crippen is a professor of STEM education in the school of teaching and learning at the University of Florida and a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Towards A Survey Instrument For Use In Proactive Advising This paper focuses on developing a survey instrument to support proactive advisingstrategies based on data analysis. Proactive advising strategies aim to identify at-risk studentsearly, as these students often delay seeking support, and engage them effectively in the supportprocess[1]. An advising curriculum can be created to provide structure for the
integrals, parametric equations and polar coordinates, andinfinite sequences and series. The author taught both linear systems courses in addition tofollow-on control courses before and after these pre-requisite changes were implemented andwas successful in transitioning learning achievement to the new pre-requisite scenario.Both courses are gateway, required courses for the BSEE, often are first courses in the major thatchallenge students theoretically, and either or both may become a barrier to success; as such,they have higher rates of students earning a D or an F or withdrawing from the class with a W(i.e., DFW rates). Many required courses and technical electives in the junior and senior yearsdictate proficiency in foundational linear systems
improve the retentionof all undergraduate students.Several changes were made to improve retention, both in terms of retaining students inengineering and, failing that, at least retaining them as students at the college. These include theimplementation of a math placement exam, a modification of the engineering curriculum basedon best practices used at other engineering programs for improving retention, and the intentionalgrouping of first-year engineering students in a college success course that was led by anEngineering faculty member and a peer mentor who was a returning engineering student.All of these engineering-focused efforts were coupled with college-wide efforts at improvingretention which included an increase in staffing for the
participants' baseline knowledge provides contextnecessary to support scaffolded learning. This study compares pre-intervention and post-intervention knowledge to assess theeducational module’s direct impact, excluding prior knowledge and extraneous influences. Such abefore-and-after comparison is crucial for determining effectiveness in improving learningoutcomes. Additionally, our research includes a retention assessment to evaluate the intervention'slong-term effects on knowledge sustainability and its enduring impact on participants. Thisanalysis provides insights into the lasting benefits and applicability of an educational intervention. One of the tools used in assessing learning and knowledge integration are mental modelsor mind
aspects while mitigating any drawbacks will be pivotal in harnessing the fullpotential of ChatGPT as a transformative tool in higher education.3. Exploring Solutions to Teaching Challenges ChatGPT can be integrated into education as a valuable support tool, contributing to variousfacets such as curriculum design, teaching practices, educational assessment, and the organizationof teaching materials. However, the efficacy of ChatGPT in education is contingent on thejudicious utilization and skills of both instructors and learners. Numerous studies underscore anotable concern regarding the accuracy and credibility of information generated by ChatGPT [14],potentially impinging on its effectiveness in an educational context. Consequently, there is
enhancingteamwork skills among STEM students, underscoring the importance of behavioral theory ineducational strategy development.IntroductionTeamwork in STEM education holds paramount significance as it mirrors the collaborativenature of modern professional workplaces. STEM field involves solving complex problems thatrequire multidisciplinary approaches with effective teamwork [1]. This necessity is reflected inthe curriculum of STEM education, which frequently incorporates project work and groupassignments to simulate real-world challenges. These educational strategies are not just aboutteaching technical skills; they are also about fostering an environment where students learn tocollaborate effectively, share ideas, negotiate solutions, and manage group
B.S. degree from Cal Poly Humboldt was in EnvironmentalResource Engineering with a minor in Native American studies of Culture and Community. Currently Iam finishing a Master's in Engineering and Community practices from the same institution. My passionand focus lies around collaborating and supporting communities' capacity towards energy autonomy,climate resilience, and health and habitat restoration.Our positionalities and who we are is an integral part of this work as the purpose of this WIP paper is toexplore centering Indigenous knowledge and ways of being in a collaborative autoethnographic researchproject. This mirrors the spirit of the program which is among the first of its kind in the United States asan Indigenous-centered graduate
various authors, some of the competencies that a training program must haveare research, management, innovation in engineering pedagogy, time management,effective interaction, improvement of learning interactivity, systems analysis in education,psychology and pedagogical communication, interaction with interested parties, sustainabledevelopment, digital education, problem-based, project-based, and practice-orientedlearning, assessment of learning outcomes, course design, engineering innovationprocesses, and lifelong learning [4], [17].The IGIP Annual Symposium contributes to integration processes in professional trainingand promotes academic mobility. Engineering pedagogy centers are accredited according tointernational IGIP standards. An