thesignificance of connecting these experiences to students’ academic and professional goals,promoting a reflective and meaningful learning journey.IntroductionEngineering education in the 21 st century faces a distinctive challenge in adjusting to a swiftlyevolving technological landscape, where ideas and innovations transcend geographical bordersand distances. Numerous major technological companies in the United States maintain robustglobal presence across their business, research, development, and production sectors, andengineering projects and teams often collaborate across multiple countries and culture. Eventhough technical expertise remains crucial, engineers must possess skills such as globalawareness, effective communication across diverse
Education, 2024 Student Experiences with Parsons Problems in a First-Year Engineering CourseAbstractComputational skillsets have become ubiquitous in introductory engineering courses to equip thenext generation of engineers to solve modern-day problems during the technological age.Computing Education Researchers focused on improving computing curriculum development,assessment mechanisms, and computational activities to support learning in these contexts.Programmers in the elementary stages of development are challenged with disentangling thedense syntactical thinking prescribed in code creation requiring innovative approaches topedagogical decisions in aligning activities that proactively mitigate these challenges
Paper ID #41650Summer Bridge Programs for Engineering Students: A Systematic LiteratureReviewDr. Julie M. Smith, CSEdResearch.org Dr. Julie M. Smith is a senior education researcher at CSEdResearch.org. She holds degrees in Curriculum & Instruction and Software Development. She also completed a doctoral program in Learning Technologies at the University of North Texas. Her research focus is computer science education, particularly the intersection of learning analytics, learning theory, and equity and excellence. She was a research assistant at MIT’s Teaching Systems Lab, working on a program aimed at improving equity
Paper ID #43613Exploring Outcome Expectations in Artificial Intelligence and Internet ofThings in First-Year Engineering Students (Work in Progress)Ing. Andrea Ramirez-Salgado, University of Florida Andrea is a doctoral candidate in Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Florida, specializing in Educational Technology. Her work centers on understanding the dynamics of teaching and learning approaches that shape the identity of computer engineers to support computer engineering career choices, particularly in women first-year engineering students. She is committed to designing inclusive curricula that cater to the
factors that affect our ability to cope: • Situation: Timing, duration, and nature of the transition. • Self: Personal characteristics, values, and coping abilities. • Supports: People and resources, quality, accessibility, and willingness to accept help. • Strategies: Coping mechanisms for managing stress and change. Ability to develop new strategies as needed.The timing and nature of engineering transitions, influenced by modern events like the globalpandemic, pervasive AI integration, and evolving business expectations, play crucial roles.Engineers, facing unprecedented challenges, must showcase resilience and adaptability. Personalcharacteristics gain significance, particularly in embracing technological advancements like
for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 6476–6483, 2020.[10] M. Kalamas Hedden, R. Worthy, E. Akins, V. Slinger-Friedman, and R. Paul, “Teaching sustainability using an active learning constructivist approach: Discipline-specific case studies in higher education.” MDPI, 2017.[11] M. Daun, A. Salmon, T. Weyer, K. Pohl, and B. Tenbergen, “Project-based learning with examples from industry in university courses: an experience report from an undergraduate requirements engineering course,” in 2016 IEEE 29th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET), IEEE, 2016
participation through robotics education, employing learning technologies and storytelling to craft inclusive educational experiences that foster student belonging.Siddhant Sanjay Joshi, Purdue University Siddhant is a Ph.D. Candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research aims to uncover the role that metaphors and language play in understanding different cultures, emotions, and worldviews of researchers, participants, and students in engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Metaphors in engineering education research: Prisms to analyze the epistemological spectrum.Introduction
informal learning spaces, and in both national and global contexts. She explores diversity and equity issues in the STEM pipeline, and also researches embodied and transdisciplinary learning practices that increase engagement for underrepresented populations in STEM courses. Greenhalgh-Spencer also researches blended / personalized learning (BL/PL) and the ways that BL/PL can create diverse pathways and increased opportunities for all students.Dr. Tim Dallas P.E., Texas Tech University Tim Dallas is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Texas Tech University. Dr. Dallasˆa C™ research includes developing educational technologies for deployment to under-served regions of the world. His research group has
Paper ID #41957Experiences of Students with Physical Disabilities in Engineering: A LiteratureReviewJulian Rodrigo Sosa-Molano, Florida International University Julian is a graduate research assistant at Florida International University. He holds a BSc in Electronics Engineering from Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Colombia and a MSc in Electrical and Computer Engineering from The University of Arizona. He is pursuing his PhD degree in Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has professional experience in Information Technology, Semiconductors, and Telecommunications in international
framework considers how multiple characteristics—in thisresearch, race and gender affect an individual socially in contrast to separating the characteristicsfor individual examination. Minorities, specifically Black females, continue to contributesignificantly to the underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) inacademia and in the workforce, particularly electrical engineering. The barriers indicated in thisrepresentation often lean toward interest, gender biases, preparedness, and the invisibility of self-identification in mentors. Using mixed methods including literature reviews and questionnaires,this paper examined those methods and compared them to existing social and balanced identitytheories and interventions to
for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for 20 years.Dr. Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Eva Andrijcic is an Associate Professor of Engineering Management at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her major interests are in the areas of organizational change management, leadership education, and risk education.Dr. Sriram Mohan, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Sriram Mohan is a Professor of Computer Science and Software Engineering at Rose-Hulman institute of Technology. Sriram received a B.E degree in Computer Science and Engineering from the University of Madras and M.S and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science
Paper ID #43424Exploration of Career and Ethical Challenges of Analytics and GenerativeArtificial Intelligence in an Engineering Leadership CourseDr. B. Michael Aucoin P.E., Texas A&M University B. Michael Aucoin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University, an Adjunct Instructor in the School of Leadership Studies at Gonzaga University, and President of Electrical Expert, Inc.Zhendi Zhang, Texas A&M UniversityMiles O. Dodd, Texas A&M University Miles Dodd is currently pursuing a Master’s degree in Engineering Technology at Texas A&
relationships. Interactions within mentoringrelationships can be negatively impacted if there is a lack of self-awareness for one or moreparties. To increase an individual’s self-awareness, practices in self-reflection may provideopportunities to gain insight, leading to a deeper level of understanding. However, there islimited research in the field of engineering education that considers self-awareness specificallyas an aspect of research mentoring relationships. The goal of this study was to assess the currentclimate of STEMM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine) graduatestudent researchers’ self-awareness using the Self-Reflection and Insight Scale, with emphasis onengineering graduate students. The aspects of self-awareness
Paper ID #44272Integrating Computational and Physical Lab Modules in Materials Scienceand EngineeringJonathan R. Brown, The Ohio State University Jonathan Brown (B.S., M.S. Mathematics, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology; Ph.D. Materials Engineering, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology) is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at The Ohio State University. His background is in computer simulations and theory of polymer glasses and block copolymers for energy applications. He teaches introduction to materials science and engineering and computational
., “Integrating Ethics Into A Civil Engineering Course”, Paperpresented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. https://peer.asee.org/1291[3] Bowers, S., & Maccarone, E. M., & Ricco, G. D., "On the Integration of Ethical, Legal, andSocietal Issues into a Computer Science Senior Design Capstone Program". Paper presented at2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.https://peer.asee.org/25826[4] S. Rajan et al., "Incorporating Ethics in Engineering Education." Journal of ElectricalEngineering & Technology, 30 (2017): 164-171.[5] Hedayati Mehdiabadi, A., and James, J. O., & Svihla, V., “Ethical Reasoning in First-YearEngineering Design Paper”, presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
Technology," Technology Interface, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1523-9926, 2009.[3] R. K. a. J. Krivickas, "Laboratory instruc on in engineering educa on," Global Journal of Engineering Educa on (GJEE), vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 191-196, 2007.[4] B. Robinson, T. Tre er, J. Lewis and N. Hawkins, "Capturing First-Year Engineering Students’ Situa onal and Individual Interest via a Formal Makerspace Course," in 130th Annual American Society for Engineering Educa on (ASEE), Bal more, MD, USA, 2023.[5] B. Robinson, T. T., J. Lewis and N. Hawkins, "Measuring First-Year Engineering Majors' Interest in Engineering," in 128th Annual American Society for Engineering Educa on (ASEE), Virtual, 2021.
with specific outreach goals. Ultimately, the varied learning, social, and logicalmodels being used to shape engineering and physics outreach which can aid in programtransferability are showcased along with how pedagogical theories can advance the goals ofengineering and physics outreach programs.Introduction Motivated by a desire to introduce new solvers into the world, there is a national push toincrease the number of students pursuing and obtaining science, technology, engineering, andmathematic degrees. University-driven outreach to preschool through 12th grade students is oneway to encourage this next generation. Outreach programs exist from single day events [1] toweek long summer camps, to more continuous STEM clubs [2]. Many
’ Transitioninto Positive Fatherhood, Implications for Science, Technology, Engineering and MathematicsEducation,” International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research andDevelopment (Online), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 8585–8596, Jan. 2020, doi:10.24247/ijmperdjun2020816.[26]. L. Nair and O. A. Adetayo, “Cultural competence and ethnic diversity in healthcare,”Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open, vol. 7, no. 5, p. e2219, May 2019, doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000002219.[27]. K. Lundby, J. A. Jolton, and A. I. Kraut, Going global : practical applications andrecommendations for HR and OD professionals in the global workplace. 2010. [Online].Available: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB03267460[28]. Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Peter Franklin. "What
. Ringleb received a B.S. in biomedical engineering from Case Western Reserve UniverMr. Francisco Cima Francisco Cima is a PhD student of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Old Dominion University. He obtained his Masters in Business Planning and Regional Development from the Technological Institute of Merida. His areas of interest are innovDr. Orlando M Ayala, Old Dominion University Dr. Ayala received his BS in Mechanical Engineering with honors (Cum Laude) from Universidad de Oriente (Venezuela) in 1995, MS in Mechanical Engineering in 2001 and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 2005, both from University of Delaware (USA). Dr. Ayala is currently serving as Associate Professor of Mechanical
illustrate that librarians face a challenging task in supportingresearchers who need to access such diverse formats as blogs, datasets, fact sheets, memoranda,research proposals, and myriad others. Some, though certainly not all, of the most commonformats of GL used by engineering scholars and practitioners include standards, patents,technical reports, conference proceedings, case studies, preprints, datasets, and dissertations andtheses.Historically, because these resources are not produced by commercial publishers withstandardized distribution networks and because their formats are so diverse and numerous, GLhas been difficult to identify, locate, and access. Lawrence summarizes some of the issues drivenby major technological advances surrounding
UnderstandingIntroduction and BackgroundEngineers have the potential to contribute great benefits to society or enact great harm throughtheir work. This is evident in media reports of large-scale engineering failures (e.g. [1] ), publicdebates about emerging technologies [2], and the commonplace ethical dilemmas that engineersmight confront in everyday practice [3]. As a result, engineering students’ and professionalengineers’ perceptions and understanding of the ethical implications of their work is of greatimportance.In this paper, we use the moral exemplars identified by engineering students as a tool to exploretheir ethical perceptions over their years of undergraduate studies and the subsequent transitionto professional practice or graduate school. Moral
Paper ID #41372Benchmarking Architectural Engineering Capstones Part 3: Exploring TechnicalStudies and IntegrationDr. Ryan Solnosky P.E., Pennsylvania State University Ryan Solnosky is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Architectural Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University at University Park. Dr. Solnosky has taught courses for Architectural Engineering, Civil Engineering, and Pre-Major Freshmen. He is the recipient of several teaching awards both within Penn State and Nationally. Ryan’s research centers on technology for teaching, capstones, and active learning in design classes.Prof. John J
-Champaign with the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences (LAS) Outstanding Young Alumni Award, Career Communications Group with a Black Engineer of the Year Award for college-level promotion of engineering education and a National Science Foundation CAREER Award in 2023 to advance his work that centers engineering identities of Black men in engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Illuminating Growth Among Women in Engineering: A Retrospective on ASEE Data1 Introduction and Purpose The U.S. education community has fixated on Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM) content, including computer science, in PreK-20 levels
) large cs classes with (too) few resources: An experience report,” in Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, ser. SIGCSE 2023. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, p. 4–10. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569788 [9] R. M. Parizi, P. Spoletini, and A. Singh, “Measuring team members’ contributions in software engineering projects using git-driven technology,” in 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2018, pp. 1–5.[10] J. J. Sandee and E. Aivaloglou, “Gitcanary: A tool for analyzing student contributions in group programming assignments,” in Proceedings of the 20th Koli Calling International Conference on
, Tan and Tan, talk about a course “for expanding students’ knowledge of how ancient engineering has shaped human history and in return, how people have shaped engineering and technology.” The course was developed as a General Education Curriculum (GEC) course for the Engineering Education Innovation Center (EEIC) at the Ohio State University and includes “such topics as our ancient engineers, stone and hafted tools, the quest for fire, ancient arts, primordial farms, early water-raising devices, the engineering of clayware, early metallurgy, simple machines, military engineering, mechanical and water engineering, and time measurement.” The course is offered to engineering and non-engineering students, with a
Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) stresses the significance of incorporating criticalthinking instruction, along with other general engineering expertise (e.g., soft skills) inengineering curriculum through their published student outcomes (Claris and Riley, Email: mshokrolahshirazi@marian.edu2012). Since the connection between CT and problem-solving in engineering is a recurringtheme in the literature, teaching and learning critical thinking should equip differentlevels of problems with varied features that involve appropriate hypotheses, methodsfor experiments, and structuring open design problems (Ahern, Dominguez, McNally,O’Sullivan, and Pedrosa, 2019). On the other hand, the challenging level of the problems is another key
Engineering, University of California, Irvine. She is also the Faculty Director of International Programs at the Henry Samueli School of Engineering. Dr. Wu is responsible for implementing, overseeing and assessing the freshmen engineering program and international programs to enhance and support the engineering education at the School of Engineering. Dr. Wu received her Ph.D. degree in Engineering, with a concentration in Materials and Manufacturing Technology, from the University of California, Irvine with primary research focuses on the design, development and integration of microfluidic systems for biomedical applications. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Assessing Best
Paper ID #41442Exploring Effective Team Formation Strategies for First-Year EngineeringProjectsDr. Rui Li, New York University Dr. Li earned his master’s degree in Chemical Engineering in 2009 from the Imperial College of London and his doctoral degree in 2020 from the University of Georgia, College of Engineering.Dr. Jack Bringardner, Colorado School of Mines Jack Bringardner is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of Education Innovation at Colorado School of Mines in the Engineering, Design, and Society Department. He teaches the first-year engineering Cornerstone design course. His primary focus is developing
mathematics and science is absolutely necessary; a good knowledge ofwritten and spoken English is a further requirement” [6, p. 188]. In following decades,engineering educators addressed this need by including courses on technical writing in theircurricula. But some educators felt that approach was insufficient and they debated whetherwriting courses should be elective or required. For example, Davis, a professor of English at theAir Force Institute of Technology who surveyed 245 professional engineers in 1975 on theimportance of technical writing in their careers, summarized the situation at the time: “Althoughtechnical writing is coming to be accepted as a respectable course offering in engineeringprograms, it is still regarded as an ‘add-on’ by
Paper ID #41230Engineering Major Selection: Impacting Factors and Facilitating ClassroomStrategiesDr. Shaghayegh Abbasi, University of Portland Shaghayegh (Sherry) Abbasi received her B.S. in electrical engineering from Sharif University of Technology in Tehran, Iran. She continued her education in the Electrical & Computer Engineering Department of the University of Washington where she received her M.S. in 2007 in the field of self-assembly of electronic devices and earned a Ph.D. in 2011 in electrical and computer engineering with an emphasis in novel metal deposition techniques. Her current research interests are