didn't think there'd be as much focus on the regulatory pathways as it was.”This quote exemplifies students’ misconceptions that design entails only CAD and prototyping.Our course, and the exposure students receive to different medical device industry roles, attemptsto ameliorate this limited belief, broadening students’ future career path options.Students felt the three selected medical device units (surgical staplers, breast pumps, and stents)allowed them to achieve the course goals. For example: “Overall, the projects definitely did a good job at accomplishing the course goals because they were so inclusive of everything we’d been working on and learning. I did appreciate that all the devices were very unique from each other. You
] • Endorsed by top academic administrators at each institution, this Form a powerful study has a coalition to guide it. guiding coalition • Utilize learning communities that include faculty at all participating institutions in each of the engineering disciplines. • While this study has formed an overarching vision to build a Develop a vision framework to improve equity in engineering, this project utilizes and strategy learning communities to allow faculty to be the catalyst in developing a vision and strategy for change using the data we collect Communicate the • The overarching vision and plan were communicated to faculty by
dialogue to incorporate other ways of knowing and being, and finally applying whatthey have learned to their engineering work.ModulesDevelopment of the modulesThis work is meant to help instructors promote questions, activities, and conversations aroundsocial and environmental justice. We intend to provide instructors with tools to raise awarenessof the social and environmental implications of our engineering work, promote dialogue to shareideas and understandings of critical thinking around the engineering work, and find ways toapply the discoveries to team classroom activities and projects. At the individual or self-level, theinstructor is whom initially uses the framework to adapt their own beliefs to their class activities.Then, the instructor
Paper ID #41518Impacts of a Free-body Diagram Mobile App on Content Mastery and Women’sSelf-EfficacyDr. Andrew R. Sloboda, Bucknell University Andrew Sloboda is an Assistant Professor at Bucknell University where he teaches a variety of mechanics- based courses. His research interests lie primarily in the fields of nonlinear dynamics and how context impacts student learning.Dr. Kimberly LeChasseur, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kimberly LeChasseur is a researcher and evaluator with the Worcester Polytechnic Institute. She holds a dual appointment with the Center for Project-Based Learning and the Morgan Teaching and
, including theestablishment of personal relationships with students, the effective organization of course contentand class activities, strategies for motivating students, and the integration of course content withreal-world applications. During the lightning talk, we will share a comprehensive overview ofthe study's research findings as well as the importance of student-centered teaching practices inengineering education.Background and MotivationThe contemporary education of engineers remains a challenging domain, and a key area needingmore focus on identifying effective teaching practices, particularly in middle and upper-levelengineering classes. This lessons-learned paper, which emerged from an NSF-funded project(masked for review), explores
“Describe how you Connect the Arts withEngineering in your Teaching”Code Example Quotes “When I'm having students write, even their technical research papers, we always talk about theWriting story of the paper and telling the story, which is inherently creative and artistic.” “Designing solutions that people want to use and incorporate into their life to add beauty as wellDesign as function.”Imagination & "[When a previously program I worked on was in operation, a] student built an interactive audio-Creativity kinetic tensegrity sculpture that they studied as a structural dynamical system for their thesis, and also used it for their final project in a
, INSPIRES, and two annual Project Showcases. Magda is the Principal Investigator of the Texas A&M University I-Corps Site grant and has been active in promoting entrepreneurship both at the local and national level. Member, Institute for Engineering Education & Innovation. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: The missing link in I-Corps Entrepreneurship Engineering Education at a Southwestern InstitutionAbstractEntrepreneurship education has made its way at most engineering institutions. Lean methods andthe I-Corps culture have gained notoriety and momentum across the United States. At aSouthwestern institution, designated as an I-Corps
research exists on its influence on classroom practices in first-yearengineering courses. The central question driving this research is: How does instructors'pedagogical knowledge influence their pedagogical practices for first-year engineering courses?For this study, we chose the model of teacher professional knowledge and skill (TPK&S), whichincludes pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). A descriptive case study was utilized as amethodology for this work to delve into the phenomenon. The context of the study was a first-year introductory engineering course offered at a large public research institution. This is a pilotstudy for an NSF-funded project “Advancing Student-Centered Teaching for DisciplinaryKnowledge Building in Engineering
skills to prepare them for the challenges of this evolving world.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is a Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Technology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC), Dr. Alemdar made significant contributions to the fields of STEM education. Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher professional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Dr. Alemdar currently serves as PI and co-PI for research on various NSF funded projects that focuses on engineering education, teacher networks and STEM
in Environmental Engineering. Her participatory research on environmental risks in rural Colombia was conducted under the NSF-supported ”Responsible Mining, Resilient Communities” project. Gibson earned dual B.S./B.A. degrees in Biological-Agricultural Engineering and Spanish Language from the University of Arkansas and served as a Fulbright scholar in Mexico.Dr. David A. Butler, National Academy of Engineering David A. Butler, PhD, is the J. Herbert Hollomon Scholar of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) of the U.S. National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, and is the Founding Director of NAE’s Cultural, Ethical, Social, and Environmental Responsibility in Engineering program. Before joining
education has recently been challenged as problematic, and infact prohibitive of an optimal learning experience [13]. These questions, taken together, led to thepresented work, which holds the course design, facilitator, and general student body the same overdifferent modalities (i.e., spanning different virtual deliveries, as well as an in-person comparisonpoint) of a lab-based measurement and instrumentation class.MethodsThis project considered student experiences and learning outcomes in an upperclassmen-level lab-based measurement and instrumentation class at Oregon State University, which uses a “lab kit-in-a-box” model. We collected data from versions of the course that varied instructionsynchronicity and setting, as further explained below
of the final versions of the curriculum alongside the community educators, by gatheringdata throughout the curriculum design process. We will also utilize resources from the NASAPLACES project to encourage educators to consider how they are communicating with studentsabout data fluency in a place-based manner6. We will ensure our curriculum is place-based byaddressing the five essential characteristics listed below, which will be used in training thecommunity educators and developing the curriculum activities7-8. 1. Its content focuses explicitly on the geological and other natural attributes of a place. 2. It integrates, or at least acknowledges, the diverse meanings that a place holds for the instructor, the students, and the
Paper ID #43848Board 19: Work in Progress: Towards Self-reported Student Usage of AI toDirect Curriculum in Technical Communication CoursesKavon Karrobi, Boston University Kavon Karrobi is a Lecturer in the Department of Biomedical Engineering, as well as the Manager of the Bioengineering Technology & Entrepreneurship Center (BTEC) at Boston University. As a Lecturer in BME, Kavon teaches and mentors students in courses on biomedical measurements, analysis, and instrumentation. As Manager of BTEC, Kavon provides guidance, training, and mentorship of student projects that use BTEC ranging from student-initiated
Chemical Engineering and BioengineeringFosbre, RJ, Adesope, OO, Dutta, P, Thiessen, DB, Gartner, JK, Oni, TA, Islam, MS, Rahimi, F,Clark, PM, Van Wie, BJ, Progress in Evaluating Hands-on Learning Module Implementation andConsiderations of Social Cognitive Theory, American Society for Engineering Education, June23-26, 2024, Portland, OR.Over the course of a five-year study, our NSF IUSE team created and disseminated several Low-Cost Desktop Learning Modules (LCDLMs) used to teach college students difficult engineeringprinciples. The goal of this project is not only to allow students to experience the engineeringconcepts they are learning about in a hands-on manner, by lowering the associated cognitiveload, but to allow them an opportunity to work
. As a capstone, teachers developed research projects synthesizing this interdisciplinarycontent with their own interests and background. As a result, the teachers have submitted severalposters with abstracts to the 2024 ACM SIGCSE and IEEE ISEC conferences and will bedelivering grant-related lessons in their classes during the current academic year.1 Introduction and MotivationDeveloping and understanding data fluency is increasingly important given the rapid changesrelated to living, learning, and working in the knowledge society of the 21st century. Meeting thiscommitment requires well-prepared teachers with proper support, including tools and resources,and yet, professional development and teacher preparation around data fluency is spotty
HU aregeographically well-positioned to support diverse, local, STEM-interested students, barriers existthat prevent NCC and HU from successfully doing so. The iAM Program is intended toovercome those barriers.The major goals of the project to be accomplished over six years are to: 1. Increase academic success, graduation, and career entry of STEM students broadly and local high school students in particular 2. Strengthen curricular pathways between CC and 4-year institutions 3. Evaluate adaptability, transferability, and institutionalization of the Program modelTo achieve these goals, we created a pathway for students from four local high schools, throughNCC and HU, culminating in a STEM BA/BS degree. Expanding to include NCC
Based Engineering Education1. IntroductionThis paper presents a description of the second year of implementation of the Iron Range EngineeringSTEM Scholars, funded by the NSF S-STEM award (Award #2221441). The scholarship programincludes financial support as well as additional mentorship support for scholarship recipients within theIron Range Engineering (IRE) program. IRE is a practice-based, upper-division engineering program, inwhich students recruited primarily from community colleges around the country, complete their 300- and400-level engineering courses for a B.S. in Engineering while completing co-ops or industry projects. Thepaper outlines first the format of the scholarship program and a summary of the second year ofimplementation
, andpersistence (Table 1). We used the framing agency survey [6, 7], which incorporates research-based measures of design self-efficacy [8, 9] and engineering identity [1, 10].Table 1. Survey questions and constructs measured Construct Items (7-point scale, with ends named in question) Individual consequentiality How responsible or not responsible have you felt: The extent to which an • for making decisions personally? individual reports that the • for coming up with your own ways to make progress on the problem changed, or their design project? understanding changed as a • for the outcomes of the design project? result of decisions made
Master in Technological Innovation from Federico Santa Maria University (Santiago, Chile) and a BA in Design from Diego Portales University (Santiago, Chile). She is the Course Director of the Design and Digital Animation programmes at the School of Design and Creative Industries, San Sebastian University (Santiago, Chile)Ema Huerta Torres, Universidad Cat´olica de Norte Psychologist, Gestora Unidad de Innovaci´on Docentes de las Ingenier´ıas (UIDIN)Mr. Erick Vaclav Svec, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile Erick is a project manager at the Engineer Education Unit and the Research and Innovation Unit at the School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile. He is also an Adjunct Faculty member
research focus is on biomedical device innovation, AnthroDesign for healthcare, qualitative research methods, mentoring, engineering, and pre-engineering education.Alissa Burkholder Murphy, The Johns Hopkins University Alissa is the founder and director of the Multidisciplinary Design Program at Johns Hopkins, where engineering students from various disciplines collaborate to tackle design challenges with project partners in industry, medicine, and the Baltimore community. Alissa previously taught at Stanford’s d.school before coming to Hopkins. Prior to her transition to academia, Alissa worked as a mechanical engineer in the medical device industry of the Bay Area and in agricultural product design in Myanmar
his Ph.D. he began working in the Aerospace Industry where he spent over 10 years as a Stress Analyst/Consultant. At present he enjoys working on Distributed Electric Propulsion (DEP) with his students, designing, analyzing, constructing and flying Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Dr. Nader won a few awards in the past few years, among these are the College of Engineering Award of Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching (2023), Excellence in Faculty Academic Advising for the College of Engineering and Computer Science (2020). In addition, he is also a Co-PI on the NSF-supported HSI Implementation and Evaluation Project: Enhancing Student Success in Engineering Curriculum through Active e-Learning and High Impact Teaching
fields [4], [5], [6].In recent years, course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) have been gainingpopularity as a way to engage undergraduate students in authentic scientific inquiry on a largescale [7]. While CUREs have many similarities to traditional laboratory courses or courseresearch projects, the work students do as part of a CURE is framed in a fundamentally differentway. Research projects within CUREs ideally have direct and indirect impact on the broaderscientific community and offer students the opportunity to share study findings with externalstakeholders [8]. Consequently, CUREs represent an overlap between the triumvirate of studentlearning, stakeholder impact, and promotion of a faculty’s research program.In this work
following: RQ 1. How do graduate engineering and design students commonly conceptualize interdisciplinary education across two universities? RQ 2. What are the variations in students’ conceptualizations of interdisciplinary education across the two universities?MethodsStudy BackgroundStudy Site 1: A United States UniversityOur first project site was an interdisciplinary graduate program (referred to as the IDR Programfrom here) funded through the National Science Foundation (NSF) Research Traineeshipprogram at a large land-grant university in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. As theNSF website states, “The NSF Research Traineeship (NRT) Program is designed to encouragethe development and
, project management, process improvement, and culturally sustaining pedagogies. She serves as a co-advisor for National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) at Western New England University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 GIFTS: Transforming First-Year Engineering Curriculum with Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Entrepreneurial-Minded Learning Lisa K. Murray Western New England University, Springfield, MA 01119 First Year Program, College of EngineeringAbstractThis Great Ideas For Teaching (and Talking With) Students (GIFTS) paper presents a plan topromote diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI) and
and project management. Her focus was on students’ professional development and support for underrepresented groups in engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Initial investigations into the link between spatial and technical communication skillsAbstract:ABET requires that all engineering graduates are able to effectively communicate technicalinformation; however, industry leaders often lament the technical communication skills of ourengineering student graduates. Despite years of concerted effort, at a national level, the situationdoes not appear to be improving. In contrast, the spatial skills of engineering students aretypically well above
Cimino, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Richard T. Cimino is a Senior Lecturer in the Otto H. York Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research interests include the intersection of engineering ethics and process safety, and broadening inclusion in engineering, with a focus on the LGBTQ+ community. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Initial validity evidence for a survey of skill and attitude development on engineering teamsAbstractThis research paper discusses an emerging project that 1) seeks to gather validity evidence for asurvey of engineering student teaming attitudes and skill
California San Diego & San Diego StateUniversity3 Associate Teaching Professor in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California Irvine4 Teaching Professor in Cell and Developmental Biology at the University of California San Diego5 Associate Teaching Professor in Chemistry and Biochemistry at the University of California Santa Cruz 2 AbstractLatine and Hispanic engineering students rarely see a faculty member whose background mirrorstheir own. The NSF AGEP (Alliances for Graduate Education and The Professoriate) HiringInterventions for Representation and Equity (HIRE) project
26 30–60–minutequalitative interviews during the 2023 Fall semester to understand the students’ institution–specific experiences of inclusion and exclusion. Additional interviews with students, faculty andadministrators will be conducted during the 2024-25 school year.During this project, five student research assistants conducted semi-structured interviews withtheir fellow students. The interview data collected was analyzed and used to help createsuggestions for practices that might lead to a diverse and inclusive culture in our newmakerspace. By discovering what individual students and stakeholder groups value and expect ofan inclusive makerspace the research team was able provide guidance to campus leaders and themakerspace director to
? Her resulting lifelong exploration and collaboration with over 50 organizations and hundreds of individuals has led her to develop the NEIR System Change Model for Education. Her work continues.Dr. Sandra Staklis, RTI International Sandra Staklis, Ph.D. is senior research education analyst at RTI International. She is a specialist in mixed-method research designs and has conducted evaluations of STEM education and career and technical education initiatives and programs for state, federal, and private clients, including the U.S. Department of Education, the National Science Foundation, and the Citi Bank, Ford, and JPMorgan Chase foundations. For these clients, she designs and implements research project in
coverage is included in programs’ cores, how is the learning operationalized toreinforce it as being integral to engineering leadership practice? Proposals for embedding ethicsinstruction more integrally within engineering coursework have included increasing the emphasison human-centric approaches to design on engineering team projects [10, 17], mitigating orreducing the isolation of ethics instruction from other aspects of courses and projects [8, 13], andincreasing the use of experiential learning approaches for ethics instruction [12, 17 - 20], among 18 19others. As this paper’s central focus, we illustrate how an ethical reasoning challenge can