/ 6/ 23543 039/ chatg pt- school- distr icts- ban- block- artificial- intel ligen ce- open- ai5. Susnjak, Teo, “ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?”, December 2022.6. M. Barber, L. Bird, J. Fleming, E. Titterington-Giles, E. Edwards, and C. Leyland. Gravity assist: Propelling higher education towards a brighter future - office for students, 2021. URL https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/publications/gravity-assist-propelling-higher-education- towards-a-brighter-future/.7. K. Butler-Henderson and J. Crawford. A systematic review of online examinations: A pedagogical innovation for scalable authentication and integrity. Computers & Education, 159:104024, 2020.8. S. Coghlan, T. Miller, and J. Paterson. Good proctor
, University of Oklahoma Haley Taffe is an Accelerated Masters student in Biomedical Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. She focuses on first year students and self-reflection opportunities within the classroom to enhance learning. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Examining the Engineering Self-Efficacy, Design Self-Efficacy, Intentions to Persist, and Sense of Belonging of First-Year Engineering Students through Community-Partnered ProjectsAbstractCommunity-partnered projects (CPP) have been used in education from the 1990’s and have beenshown to demonstrate effective learning by working on real-time problems which are diverse andcultural, social, and environmental
. Porter and M. Kilbridge, Eds., Cambridge, MA: MIT Laboratory of Architecture and Planning, 1978, pp. 551–660.[7] S. Dinham, “Research on Instruction in the Architecture Studio: Theoretical Conceptualizations, Research Problems, and Examples,” presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-America College Art Association, 1987.[8] NCTQ, “Classroom Management.” National Council on Teacher Quality, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.nctq.org/review/standard/Classroom-Management[9] B. M. Dewsbury, “Deep teaching in a college STEM classroom,” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 169–191, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11422-018-9891-z.[10] A. Thompson, B. Sattler, and J. Turns, “Understanding a studio environment: A complex
been used in education to assessstudent understanding of specific concepts and as a tool for curricular planning [10], [11], [12].We focus on the latter purpose.Jonassen and Marra [13] advanced a theoretical perspective on concept mapping grounded in aconstructivist framework. We offer three salient items from this perspective that aim to supporteducators’ creation of concept maps as tools for curriculum design and reflection. Conceptmapping functions from a constructivist perspective in that engaging in this activity presents itscreator(s) with the task of internally negotiating their own knowledge and understanding about aparticular topic or domain [13]. As a result of this negotiating process, they argue that creating anexternal
platform to improve e-learning in civil engineering,” 2020 ICETC ‘20: Proceedings of the 12th InternationalConference on Education Technology and Computers, October 2020, pp. 21-26,https://doi.org/10.1145/3436756.3437015[8] Crespo, S., Rodriguez-Paz, M.X., Carrasco, L.H.H. “ A Challenge-based Teaching modelfor Structural Analysis Courses with Strategic Industry Partners,” Paper presented at 2022ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, https://peer.asee.org/a-challenge-based-teaching-model-for-structural-analysis-courses-with-strategic-industry-partners[9] Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L.S., Admiraal, W., “A review of project-based learning inhigher education: Student outcomes and measures,” International Journal of EducationalResearch,Volume 102
] R. Robbins, “Peering into the Future: Using Peer Advisors to Assist Our Changing Student Populations,” NACADA Summer Institute, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Portals/0/Events/SummerInst/2012/T1-PeerAdv_PP1.pdf[2] S. E. Kuba, “The Role of Peer Advising in the First-Year Experience,” ProQuest LLC, 2010. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED522152[3] H. Koring, “Peer Advising: A Win-Win Inititative,” NACADA Natl. Acad. Advis. Assoc., 2005, [Online]. Available: https://nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Academic-Advising- Today/View-Articles/Peer-Advising-A-Win-Win-Initiative.aspx[4] H. Koring and D. Zahorik, Eds., “Peer Advising and Mentoring: A Guide for
). All comparisons between pre- and post- responses for each question were statistically significant (p < 0.0001).We analyzed the open-ended responses to uncover themes related to professional skills andempathetic design. When asked the question in the post-survey “What was/were the mostbeneficial aspect(s) of the course to you?” the overwhelming response by 50 of the 52 totalresponses mentioned that the customer interviews, which were a requirement for the businessmodel reports, were the most beneficial. Several other students mentioned that they will utilizecustomers’ perspectives when working in the future: “The most beneficial aspects [of the course] were definitely from the insights and connections
-2023/[3] F. Chiarello, P. Belingheri, and G. Fantoni, “Data science for engineering design: State of the art and future directions,” Computers in Industry, vol. 129, p. 103447, 2021.[4] J. Dastin, “Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women,” in Ethics of data and analytics, Auerbach Publications, 2022, pp. 296–299.[5] A.-B. Gran, P. Booth, and T. Bucher, “To be or not to be algorithm aware: a question of a new digital divide?,” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1779–1796, 2021.[6] D. Milmo, “Twitter admits bias in algorithm for rightwing politicians and news outlets,” The Guardian, 2021.[7] Z. Obermeyer, B. Powers, C. Vogeli, and S. Mullainathan, “Dissecting racial bias
., December 2018. [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED590474.pdf[4] F. S. Education, "2022 Progress report on the implementation of the federal STEM education strategic plan," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-updates/2023/01/31/nstc-2022-progress-report- on-the-implementation-of-the-federal-stem-education-strategic-plan/.[5] Y. Jin, C. Qian, and S. Ahmed, "Closing the Loop: A 10-year Follow-up Survey for Evaluation of an NSF REU Site," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Aug 23 2022 Minneapolis, MN. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/41048. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/41048[6] VEX Robot Event. "Robotics education &
environment in which to properly self-assess? Understanding these questions can provide valuable information to instructors to guidefocus in future course iterations.To answer these questions, a broad knowledge survey was issued in conjunction with a validatedintellectual humility scale. Does the outcome of the IH assessment indicate how students willself report on a knowledge survey? The knowledge survey implemented here considered the self-report levels of students with respect to course topics in a broad context compared to theinstructor(s) estimate of where they should rate themselves. Initial results do not indicatesignificance in correlation between KS deviations from instructor(s) targets and intellectualhumility scores, but there are trends
.2018.00092.[2] CLAS. "CLAS: Collaborative Learning Annotation System." UBC Arts ISIT. https://clas.ubc.ca (accessed June 1, 2023).[3] C. Mulryan-Kyne, "Supporting reflection and reflective practice in an initial teacher education programme: an exploratory study," European journal of teacher education, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 502-519, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1793946.[4] S. Ledger and J. Fischetti, "Micro-teaching 2.0: Technology as the classroom," Australasian journal of educational technology, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 37, 2020, doi: 10.14742/ajet.4561.[5] H. Crichton, F. Valdera Gil, and C. Hadfield, "Reflections on peer micro-teaching: raising questions about theory informed practice," Reflective
Quality of Life in the Late Life at Day Care Centers of Shiraz, Iran: A Randomized Controlled Trial," International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 136-145, 2018.[9] R. Charon, "Narrative Medicine: A Model for Empathy, Reflection, Profession, and Trust," JAMA, vol. 186, no. 15, pp. 1897-1902, 2001.[10] L. G. Perks and J. S. Turner, "Podcasts and productivity: A Qualitative Uses and Gratifications Study," Masss Communication and Society, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 96-116, 2019.[11] S. Lemeround and L. Camacho Rourkes, Digital Voices: Podcasting in the Creative Writing Classroom, Great Britain: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2023.[12] S. Tobin and R. Guadagno, "Why People Listen: MOtivations and Outcomes of
. Rodriguez Bua, “El cubano, el rey del invento – MEMORIAS DE UN CUBANO.” Accessed: Feb. 23, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://carlosbua.com/el-cubano-el-rey-del- invento/[11] N. Radjou, J. Prabhu, and S. Ahuj, “Jugaad: A New Growth Formula for Corporate America,” Harvard Business Review, Jan. 25, 2010. Accessed: Dec. 09, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hbr.org/2010/01/jugaad-a-new-growth-formula-fo[12] G. Verma, “Jugaad Thinking: Contextualized Innovative Thinking in India Through Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education?,” in Science Education in India: Philosophical, Historical, and Contemporary Conversations, R. Koul, G. Verma, and V. Nargund-Joshi, Eds., Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp. 209
Harcourt, 2020.[3] R. Rothstein, The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America, WW Norton, 2018.[4] D. E. Armanios, S. J. Christian, M. L. McElwee, J. D. Moore, D. Nock, C. Samaras and G. J. Wang, "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Civil and Environmental Engineering Education: Social Justice in a Changing Climate," 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2021.[5] J. L. Martina and J. A. Beeseb, "Moving Beyond the Lecture: Inspiring Social Justice Engagement through Counter-Story Using Case Study Pedagogy," The Educational Forum, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 210-225, 2020.[6] The White House, "Fact Sheet: The Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal," 6 November 2021. [Online
extend this alliance to both inside and outside the CSUsystem. In addition, we are sharing all the curriculum and research with the wider community ofCS educators.ResultsEvaluation plan Our evaluation team includes a member dedicated to evaluating the alliance andstudent related outcomes (Objectives 1, 2 and 4) led by Dr. Hubbard Cheuoua and a memberdedicated to understanding the outcomes related to the faculty learning community (Objective 3),led by Dr. Hug.Evaluation of Objectives 1, 2 and 4: Led by Dr. Hubbard Cheuoua, the evaluation has focusedon gathering formative and summative feedback on the alliance (Objective 4) and impact onstudents (Objectives 1 and 2). Using [31]’s methodology, a set of indicators for early-stagecollective impact
al.’s researcher identity scales, which aim to measure the sameconstructs as in the current research, originally contained 26 total items, but were reduced 16total items following the factor analyses of these scales and those of the related identities(scientist and engineering). One unique advantage of Perkin et al.’s approach is that many of theitems provided a more detailed reflection on the specific context of doctoral education. Forexample, the dissertation advisor is proposed as a critical external source of recognition and thusthe following item was added: “My advisor(s) see me as a RESEARCHER.”2 Similarly, thecompetence scale in Perkins et al. work focuses more on specific competencies associated withresearch, such as delivering
determine the best method of analysis and likely failure location(s). Whenfaced with more open-ended structural analysis problems, students frequently make incorrectassumptions about two-force members, action-reaction pairs, and internal loads that can lead toinappropriate or inaccurate analyses.Problem- and Project-Based Learning in StaticsPrior studies in undergraduate engineering education have introduced problem- and project-based learning (PBL) experiences for Statics courses that involve design challenges [1-8].Collectively, this body of research provides valuable exemplars about how PBL learningopportunities can advance students’ engineering knowledge and skills, yet there remain twosubstantial limitations. First, the prototyping component
task and promote self-regulation to task completion, Azevedo etal.’s research and others [19-21] have shown that the integration of adaptive, pedagogicalscaffolds catalyzes student performance, especially those with low prior knowledge or skill.Distributed scaffolds in project-based learning in the early years of postsecondary engineeringprograms has indicated positive student outcomes related to academic engagement, performanceon key assignments, and development and use of fabrication and prototyping skills necessary forthe profession. Allam et al. [22] found scaffolding in freshman engineering project-basedlearning yielded greater than normal student engagement in all phases of design and in overallproject management. Carpenter et al. [14
Phase 2 to collect data fromfive additional dis/abled STEM graduate students. After inductive analysis of the interviewtranscripts, a comparison with prior theoretical framings of dis/ability found that no single theorycaptured the experiences of the participants. Therefore the prior theoretical frameworks wereamalgamated into the paint bucket theory of dis/ability. In this paper the authors deductively mapselect conceptualizations of the participants' experiences in STEM disciplines to the paint bucketframework.The participantsThe seven participants were seeking master’s and/or doctoral degree(s) (or had previously soughta degree within one year of their interview) in STEM disciplines at institutions in the UnitedStates of America with varying
particularly thosewho participated in follow-up interviews. We believe your input will help mitigate barriers impedingequitable access to, and success within, engineering education for all students.REFERENCES[1] V. E. Díaz, S. McKeown, C. Peña, “The Collection and Use of Student Data on Race, Ethnicity, and Ancestry”, BCCAT e-publications. Available: https://www.bccat.ca/publication/reastudentdata/ [Available as of 23 Jan.2024][2] C. Verschelden, Bandwidth Recovery, Stylus Publishing, 2017[3] K.J. Cross, S. Farrell, B. Hughes (editors), Queering STEM Culture in US Higher Education, Routledge, 2022[4] J. Chen, J. M. Widmann, B.P. Self, “Intelligence Is Overrated: The Influence of Noncognitive and Affective Factors on Student Performance
. Zhyvotovska, “An intersectional technofeminist framework for community-driven technology innovation,” Comput. Compos., vol. 51, pp. 43–54, 2019.[9] S. A. Morimoto, A. M. Zajicek, V. H. Hunt, and R. Lisnic, “Beyond Binders Full of Women: NSF ADVANCE and Initiatives for Institutional Transformation,” Sociol. Spectr., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 397–415, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1080/02732173.2013.818505.[10] M. F. Fox and C. Colatrella, “Participation, performance, and advancement of women in academic science and engineering: What is at issue and why,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 31, pp. 377–386, 2006.[11] NSF, “Making Visible the Invisible - Understanding Intersectionality,” National Science Foundation, Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science
system. ● Probability of Transit (p(T)): This parameter measures the probability the student learns the skill after attempting a problem related to that skill. ● Probability of Guess (p(G)): This parameter accounts for the likelihood that the student guesses the answer correctly without actually knowing the skill. It helps distinguish between true knowledge and lucky guesses. ● Probability of Slip (p(S)): The slip parameter is the probability that the student, despite knowing the skill, incorrectly answers a problem. This could be due to mistakes, misunderstandings, or other factors unrelated to their actual knowledge level.Each of these parameters must be initially estimated for each student model variable. ForThermoVR
: 10.1002/jee.20190.[6] G. Potvin et al., “Gendered interests in electrical, computer, and biomedical engineering: Intersections with career outcome expectations,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 298–304, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TE.2018.2859825.[7] J. DeWaters and B. Kotla, “Using an open-ended socio-technical design challenge for entrepreneurship education in a first-year engineering course,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, no. May, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1198161.[8] C. A. Roberts and S. M. Lord, “Making Engineering Sociotechnical,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, vol. 2020-Octob, pp. 15–18, 2020, doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273957.[9] V. Svihla et al., “The Educative Design Problem Framework
T. K. K. B. Morgan, “Mechanisms by Which Indigenous Students Achieved a Sense of Belonging and Identity in Engineering Education,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Aug. 26, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/mechanisms-by-which-indigenous-students-achieved-a-sense-of-b Elonging-and-identity-in-engineering-education[8] M. D. Johnson, A. E. Sprowles, K. R. Goldenberg, S. T. Margell, and L. Castellino, “Effect of a Place-Based Learning Community on Belonging, Persistence, and Equity Gaps for First-Year STEM Students,” Innov High Educ, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 509–531, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10755-020-09519-5.[9] T. L. Strayhorn
of network professionals.References[1] E. Lampi, “The Effectiveness of using Virtual Laboratories to Teach Computer NetworkingSkills in Zambia,” Ph.D dissertation, Career and Technical Education, Virginia PolytechnicInstitute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2013. [Online]. Available:https://www.proquest.com/docview/1512636920[2] J. Allison, “Simulation-based learning via Cisco Packet Tracer to enhance the teaching ofcomputer networks,” Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology inComputer Science Education Vol. 1, Jul. 2022. doi:10.1145/3502718.3524739[3] S. Asadi, J. Allison, M. Khurana, and M. Nilashi, “Simulation-based learning for computerand networking teaching: A systematic literature review and
2014 report indicate thatneurodiverse individuals make up only around 3% of science and engineering doctoral degreerecipients [10].Graduate students face a unique set of challenges when compared to undergraduate students,with faculty advisors playing a large role in student success. Several studies have noted specificchallenges related to advisors, including work-life balance, which may be impacted by facultyexpectations, and hierarchical faculty-student relationships [11]-[13]. Satterfield et al.’s [14]literature review focused on the experiences of graduate students during their studies andexplored how individual factors (the influence of the student’s advisor), programmatic factors(isolation and teaching assistantships), and external
majored in Civil Engineering. He has served in a variety of assignments around the world to include Iraq, Kuwait, Germany, and Eastern Europe. LTC Biggerstaff served in the department from 2014-2016 and again from 2022 to present. Along the way, he earned Master’s degrees in Environmental Engineering (Missouri S&T), Management Science (Stanford University), and Civil Engineering (Stanford University) and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering (Stanford University). He has taught a number of courses in C&ME ranging from structural engineering and steel design to thermal fluid systems. His research interests include topics in sustainable construction materials and systems, decision analysis, and engineering education. He
-Access-New-Wiley-Survey-Reports/default.asp x[9] A. Kessler, R. Likely, and J. M. Rosenberg, “Open for whom? The need to define open science for science education,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1002/tea.21730.[10] S. Hanna, J. Pither, and M. Vis-Dunbar, “Implementation of an Open Science Instruction Program for Undergraduates,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 150–161, 2021, doi: 10.1162/dint_a_00086.[11] I. Steinhardt, “Learning Open Science by Doing Open Science. A Reflection of a Qualitative Research Project-Based Seminar.,” Educ. Inf., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 263–279, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3233/efi-190308.[12] K. S. Button, “Reboot undergraduate courses for reproducibility,” Nature, vol. 561, no. 7723, pp. 287–287, Sep. 2018, doi
relationshipwith your mentor (s)?” and “How has your participation in this program reinforced your identityas a Latina/o in Engineering?” Second interview responses informed and framed this study. Onaverage, interviews lasted 40 minutes. All interviews took place in the university facilities whenstudents were available. Researchers used consent forms to comply with the Institutional ReviewBoard (IRB) requirements. All interviews were recorded and transcribed; the transcriptions wereused for the analysis. Researchers used Dedoose, a qualitative tool to help in the data analysis.Researchers started with the unitization of data, that is, every piece of information that can beunderstood by itself is classified under a theme and then reclassified using