Paper ID #41461Board 33: Enhancing Self-Efficacy Among Transportation Engineering UndergraduatesUsing Hands-On Pedagogy.Mr. Adebayo Iyanuoluwa Olude, Morgan State University Adebayo Olude is a doctoral student and research assistant at Morgan State University’s Department of Civil Engineering in Baltimore, Maryland. Adebayo formerly worked as a Graduate Research Assistant at Eastern Mediterranean University in North Cyprus, where he earned his master’s degree in civil engineering. He also worked as a project Analyst with AgileP3 after graduating with a Bachelor of Engineering (B.Eng) in civil engineering from Covenant
Paper ID #43597Board 408: Toward Building a Human-Computer Coding Partnership: UsingMachine Learning to Analyze Short-Answer Explanations to ConceptuallyChallenging QuestionsHarpreet Auby, Tufts University Harpreet is a graduate student in Chemical Engineering and STEM Education. He works with Dr. Milo Koretsky and helps study the role of learning assistants in the classroom as well as machine learning applications within educational research and evaluation. He is also involved in projects studying the uptake of the Concept Warehouse. His research interests include chemical engineering education, learning sciences, and
projects or ideas with various degrees of guidance andfreedom using the resources available within the community [13]. Studies of qualitative natureindicate that this structure can be associated with positive learning experiences, because it allowspeople to develop their technical and design knowledge, explore solutions to problems, anddevelop a working proficiency with tools and equipment used for creating and prototyping [14],[15]. In the current literature, however, there are few quantitative studies that provide large-scaleevidence of the impacts of makerspace in learning [2], [3], [16], potentially because there is noframework that enables such an assessment.To address this gap and create an instrument that effectively measures the learning
that experiments form a key part of the engineeringway of knowing.Laboratories and the Engineering CurriculumLaboratories are one of three major modes through which engineering education is deliveredalong with engineering theory which is often delivered through lecture and assignments, anddesign projects. These modes are not all together distinct as will be seen by considering anexample. A course in fluid mechanics will present theory related to pumps and flow in pipes.Learning is often evaluated by analytical problems with one correct solution. On the other hand,a design project may use the same ideas in the service of creating a drinking-water system, or afire-fighting robot. Such projects have many possible solutions and involve criteria
ErrorsHaving been edited since the original draft publication (Sottile, 2023), the first ethics scenariopresented respondents with a scenario featuring the issue of concealment of errors. Thequantitative portion of the first scenario prompt was: Please consider the following scenario when answering questions on this screen: Imagine that you are a junior engineer working under the direction of a senior licensed professional engineer (P.E.) with many years of experience in bridge design. During a late- stage design review, significant concerns were expressed about the team’s design possibly leading to an unacceptable level of vibration. The P.E. overrules the concerns without discussion and prepares the bridge design for delivery to the project sponsor
Paper ID #41866Teaching Strategies that Incorporate Social Impacts in Technical Courses andEase Accreditation Metric CreationMs. Ingrid Scheel, Oregon State University Ingrid Scheel is a Project Instructor at Oregon State University in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. She teaches Electrical and Computer Engineering fundamentals and design courses, and as a graduate student in Education is focused on curriculum design. Scheel’s industry experience includes prototype development, test article instrumentation, data acquisition, data analysis, and reporting. She contributes to the International Society for Optics
students. The Engineering+program at Oregon State University exemplifies this approach by combining traditional lectureswith small-group studios and socially relevant projects. Previous research indicates that students'engagement correlates directly with academic progress. This is especially relevant in theEngineering+ setting, where students are in the process of choosing their majors and planningtheir futures. Students take three courses on varying topics to explore their interests and practicefundamental engineering skills during their first year. Therefore, enhancing student engagementin these courses not only aids in a deeper understanding of the offered materials but alsofacilitates social interactions that can inform better decision-making
understanding the characteristics of thosestudents who persist within their studies through graduation.The next stage of this project is to expand the use of the survey instrument to other PSIs within the BCTransfer System, including both those hosting engineering schools and those from which studentstransfer to engineering schools after their first year of studies. It is expected that the instrument willcontinue to evolve, and support work to develop resources for engineering programs that enhanceequity, allyship, and representation. Additionally, these tailored resources provide opportunities forlike-minded students to establish support systems, fostering a sense of belonging that produces aunified, resilient, and persistent student body.1.0
presents a significant issue for assessment. How is aneducator able to formatively identify student misconceptions precisely, accurately and quicklywhen the topic is so complex?The result is that a troublesome percentage of students fail the course or drop their engineeringmajor because of the class. For example, a study across 55 offerings of introductorythermodynamics over eight years and nine instructors at the University of Texas, San Antonio,reports that only 52.7% of course enrolments led to completion, with subsequent attempts havinglower rates than initial attempts [6].In this Work in Progress paper, we describe a project to develop a fine-grained assessment ofcore thermodynamic concepts embedded within an interactive simulation
Paper ID #43868Tracing Black Transfer Students’ Success in Engineering: A ComparativeInsight into Transfer-Student Trends at Two State Minority-Serving InstitutionsMr. Daniel Ifeoluwa Adeniranye, Florida International University Daniel Adeniranye embarked on his academic journey with a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering and dual master’s degrees in petroleum engineering and project development. He further enhanced his skills with a master’s in project (Engineering) Management. Daniel is currently a Research Assistant at the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education at Florida
real worldmuch more flexible than their artificial course deadlines, but by holding these rigid deadlinesthey were preventing students from learning to manage their time and projects [4]. Anotherauthor realized that being compassionate about deadlines builds community with the studentsand that some of the best work was turned in after the deadline [7]. Fairness was a concern, asstudents who turned in things late had more time to work on them and consider the problem.However, they conceded that few if any students complained about flexible deadlines beingunfair.Deadlines and DiversityIn a 2016 article, Boucher framed rigid deadlines as contributing to student stress and imposingunfair consequences on the most vulnerable students [8]. For
subdiscipline, 3) design an activity that gives students hands-on experiencetesting that physical concept.With this simple approach in mind, we planned one lecture and one lab for each module. Thelecture consisted of two components: 1) A broad overview of the civil engineering subdiscipline for that module, including discussion of the societal role played by practitioners of that subdiscipline, relevant and well-known projects, and examples of typical day-to-day responsibilities 2) A basic qualitative explanation of physical concepts relevant to that subdiscipline, emphasizing connections to other courses students might already be familiar with, such as chemistry and physicsWe designed hands-on lab
andcomparative analysis.When a green roof and vegetative weight are added to the structure of a roof, it can consequentlyincrease the structural material needed for a project. This is especially true for green roofs withplants that need deeper soil and more water than other plant types. This additional structure willincrease the material needed to construct the building and affect the carbon footprint of thebuilding, specifically the embodied carbon. Embodied carbon is derived from the construction ofthe building, transportation and manufacturing of materials, and the installation of products inthe building. It is a calculated value that is used to understand the total carbon emission outputthat it takes to make a new construction happen. It is
. 2013 2023 100 90 80 70 % Departments 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Courses Figure 4. Percent of departments offering different categories of electives over the past two years, 70 respondentsAt the 42 institutions offering advanced core electives, the most popular electives were advancedtransport and research/projects, as shown in Figure 5. The “other” category included 7% whooffered engineering math/statistics as an advanced core elective
Paper ID #41248Infusing Sustainability into Diverse Courses and Programs Using Open SourceEngineering for One Planet (EOP) Teaching ResourcesCynthia Anderson, Alula Consulting Cindy Anderson (she/her/hers) is a sustainability consultant with Alula Consulting, and a strategy consultant for Engineering for One Planet with The Lemelson Foundation. Cindy specializes in innovative sustainability-focused research and curriculum projects for academic institutions, non-profits, government and corporations. Cindy has taught thousands of people through courses and workshops, around the world and online, in the fields of biology
public, are recognizing the critical need for the ethical production andmanagement of AI. As a result, society is placing immense trust in engineering undergraduateand graduate programs to train future developers of AI in their ethical and public welfareresponsibilities.In this paper, we investigate whether engineering master’s students believe they receive thetraining they need from their educational curricula to negotiate this complex ethical landscape.The goal of the broader project is to understand how engineering students become public welfare“watchdogs”; i.e., how they learn to recognize and respond to their public welfareresponsibilities. As part of this project, we conducted in-depth interviews with 62 electrical andcomputer engineering
, Mankato. Kaitlyn received her Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from Minnesota State University, Mankato in 2017. She strives to support and guide students throughout their education so they can be highly successful in their professional careers.Mr. Andrew Lillesve, Minnesota State University, Mankato Andrew Lillesve is originally from Grand Rapids, Minnesota. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering and a Master’s degree in Business Administration both from Michigan Technological University. Since 2011, he has worked at Iron Range Engineering, a program under the Integrated Engineering Department at Minnesota State University Mankato. There, he has held the roles of Coordinator, Project Mentor
explores how the integration of school safety strategies with disciplinary practices, often under zero-tolerance policies, blurs the lines between them, suggesting that both are byproducts of the school-to-prison pipeline.Dr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Roberta Rincon, Ph.D., is the Director of Research and Impact for the Society of Women Engineers. She is responsible for overseeing the research activities for the organization, including collaborative research projects with external researchers and dissemination of SWE research through academic conferences, the SWE Research website, and the annual SWE State of Women in Engineering magazine issue. She is the Principal Investigator for the NSF INCLUDES
research10. Making oral presentations. project. 11. Defending an argument when asked 3. Problem-solving in general. questions. 4. Formulating a research question that 12. Explaining my project to people outside my could be answered with data. field. 5. Identifying limitations of research 13. Preparing a scientific poster. methods and designs. 14. Keeping a detailed lab notebook. 6. Understanding the theory and 15. Conducting observations in the lab or field. concepts guiding my research project. 16. Using statistics to analyze data. 7. Understanding the connections among 17. Calibrating instruments needed for scientific disciplines
, participants in a non-ECP group were exposedto conventional teaching methods.The keystone of this pedagogical transformation was the "Heart Rate" experiment, whereinstudents utilized a mobile application to quantify heart rate fluctuations following variousphysical activities. The study employed pre- and post-surveys to assess student engagement,while pre- and post-signature assessments were administered to gauge their understanding of theexperiment's core concepts. Project assignments were used to evaluate practical application andunderstanding.Using statistical software like SPSS and Excel, meticulous data analysis was conducted toprovide a comprehensive look at the students' performance over these three semesters.Results showed that students who
categories of schoolwork also indicates thewidespread usage of these tools.Respondents indicated they were aware of many different uses of GenAI in their computingcourses (Figure 5). However, knowledge of understanding/summarizing home or project promptsreceived the most responses. This result suggests that project or assignment prompts might bepoorly written or overly verbose to the point that students struggle to even understand them.Additionally, considering this usage of GenAI tools does not register as one that might breakacademic integrity rules, students could be the most aware of it because they either understandthemselves or have been told by an instructor that this is an accepted way to use Gen AI forschool.We then asked users if they used
Paper ID #44537Comparative Study of Digital Electronics Learning: Using PCB versus TraditionalMethods in an Experiment-Centered Pedagogy (ECP) Approach for EngineeringStudentsMr. Ojonugwa Oluwafemi Ejiga Peter, Morgan State University Ejiga Peter Ojonugwa Oluwafemi, currently thriving as a Graduate Assistant at Morgan State University, Baltimore, is deeply engaged in the innovative ”Experiment Centered Pedagogy Project” within the Department of Engineering. His academic journey began at the Federal University of Technology, Minna, where he earned a Bachelor of Technology in Computer Science, laying a solid foundation for his
. Agreeableness involvespositive interactions with people. Finally, openness to ideas allows for an individual to seek outcreative solutions to helping others and the inclusion of groups that are often overlooked.This study uses longitudinal interviews with engineering students and early-career engineers atthree timepoints over seven years to characterize the moral exemplars selected by participantsand, in turn, to use these moral exemplars as a tool for assessing the ethical perceptions of theinterviewees. This study is part of a series of ongoing longitudinal projects focused onengineering students’ and early-career professionals’ views of engineering ethics and socialresponsibility [13], [14].MethodsThis study is part of a longitudinal research
, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a Research Scientist in the Designing Education Lab in Mechanical Engineering and co-founder of the Integrative Learning Portfolio Lab in Career Education at Stanford University. She earned her undergraduate degree from UCLA and her PhD in Communication with a minor in Psychology from Stanford. Her scholarship is focused on engineering and entrepreneurship education, portfolio pedagogy, reflective practices, non-degree credentials, and reimagining how learners represent themselves through their professional online presence.Prof. George Toye Ph.D., P.E., is adjunct professor in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. While engaged in teaching project based engineering
that canuncover cultural opportunities and challenges for advancing equity-related work, and how thisapproach to understanding an organization can be replicated at other institutions. We will discussthe first three drafts of the survey, the feedback process for each draft, and how this process hasinformed how we see the utility of this survey in our context. 1.2. Overview of Larger Project This work is one part of a larger collaborative NSF-funded project (Award # 2217640).The goal of the larger project is to establish a Center for Equity in Engineering (CEE) focused onorganizational transformation for graduate education at a single predominately-white institution.To this end, a team of practitioners and researchers have been
wasessentially an attendance grade. Students had weekly homework assignments. Homework wascompleted by hand and submitted on paper, which the instructor graded as well as annotated withfeedback. As the semester progressed and became increasingly busy, time constraints influencedthe annotated feedback to appear less frequently. Students in the control group also completedthree exams, a final group project which included a written report, and a final exam as part of thecourse. Although the final project includes a writing aspect, the grade students receive isessentially for completion (i.e., students who meet the requirements receive full credit). BecauseHCC does not employ a +/- grading system, all grades assigned are straight letter grades where A= 90
engineering technologyfaculty may hold regarding their students' needs:Strong Technical Foundation: Faculty members often emphasize the importance of a solidunderstanding of core engineering principles and concepts. They believe that students shouldhave a strong foundation in mathematics, physics, and other relevant technical subjects.Practical Application: Practical application is often considered crucial in engineeringtechnology programs. Faculty members believe that students should have ample opportunities towork with equipment, conduct experiments, and engage in real-world projects to applytheoretical knowledge.Problem-Solving Skills: Engineering technology faculty often stress the development ofproblem-solving skills. They believe that students
education. The presented findings emanate from the fourth phase of anextensive multiphase mixed-method research project. The project seeks to elucidate theimpediments that underrepresented students, particularly women, face in pursuing graduateengineering degrees and the potential solutions to overcome those barriers.Our methodology in this phase encompassed a comprehensive mixed-method survey, garneringresponses from over 600 undergraduate and graduate engineering students within the Faculty ofEngineering. Preliminary analyses revealed that the decision to pursue graduate studies isinfluenced by intersectional identity variables.In the sphere of engineering education, the pursuit of diversity, inclusion, and equity has longbeen recognized as
quite a bit of knowledge on data science and machine learning, spurred by the wide range of emerging applications. Through various projects, he has gained extensive experience with deep learning models and data interpretation. As such, with an emphasis on theory and a strict adherence to the machine learning pipeline, he is always keen on delivering tried and tested products.Sarah Louise Langham, University of Florida Sarah Louise Langham is a graduate of the University of Florida with a Bachelors of Science in Materials Science and Engineering. She is a format and content reviewer for EQuIPD grant Data Science/AI curriculum development. She has researched polyelectrolytes and rheological behavior under Dr. Neitzel
into a tool can make a sequence ofactions effortless, but also has the potential to prevent further developments to practice. AsWenger writes (p. 59), “… I want to preserve the connotations of excessive concreteness and projected reality that are suggested by the dictionary definition. Indeed, no abstraction, tool, or symbol actually captures in its form the practices in the context of which it contributes to an experience of meaning.”Given the noted lack of attention to variability in engineering research [10] and education [11],we expected the student participant-researchers in this study to struggle to identify the presenceand relevance of variability in their engineering coursework. Reification as