software used in design projects and laboratory was alsobriefly discussed. The authors used the characteristics of the learning systems, their effectivenessbased on students’ performance, student skills developed using the learning systems, and studentfeedback as their comparison criteria. Most of the methods reviewed used computer technologyand multimedia to provide interactivity and visualization. Most of these methods were found toimprove student performance and help develop their skills. Overall, student feedback andcomments were positive and encouraging.Engineering students often face difficulties comprehending the first and second laws (Meltzer [9]),particularly the concepts of heat, work, and cyclic processes. According to Meltzer, students
. The ADALM 1000 is aUSB-powered educational device that is been used to teach Ohm’s Law and other basic electricalengineering topics. The ADALM 1000 was specifically used for several projects because of itsmultipurpose function. When combined with ALICE (A Learning Interface for CircuitExploration) software, students may create signals, measure voltages, and see real-time circuitbehaviors, which makes hands-on learning easier (Figure 5). The ADALM 1000 can be used tomeasure the currents that arise from applying various voltages across a resistor in an Ohm’s Lawexperiment. Plotting these measurements helps students better comprehend electrical resistance byallowing them to see the linear relationship between voltage and current, as stated in
styles increased when project-basedlearning was used [7]. Many of these studies also compared end of semester grades to see ifteaching style affected those, but there were no statistically significant results in student scoresfor courses with different teaching styles.The field of engineering has seen a significant shift in implementation of innovative coursedesigns in the last few decades. These changes are heavily supported by engineering educationresearch and faculty connections made. Through these faculty connections, discussions aboutteaching the same courses and addressing similar classroom issues spur further innovation inclassroom designs. The conversations are rarely about the course content but rather how thatinformation is delivered
ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2017, pp. 1–9.[19] A. Heimdal, R. T. Thorstensen, and P. Svennevig, “Investigations on the use of Student Peer Review to Improve Supervision of Capstone Courses in the Civil Engineering Education,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, The Design Society, 2020. doi: 10.35199/EPDE.2020.54.[20] R. A. Flores and F. Rios, “Incorporating peer review techniques to enhance students’ communication skills and team performance in engineering capstone projects,” he International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1969–1982, 2019.[21] M. Mandala et al., “Impact of collaborative team peer review on the
deployment andconfiguration of technology, the general course management strategies, and the experiences ofthe students as well as the instructional team. Our results and lessons learned provide insights forthe evolution of engineering and technology education, particularly the role of CAD in thedevelopment of digital enterprise curricula.BackgroundModern engineering and technology education is tightly coupled with the concept of “Industry4.0,” which focuses on the digitization of the manufacturing ecosystem [7]. Universities aredevoting large amounts of resources to develop curricula, programs, and facilities to align withindustry practices, standards, and tools, while active, experiential, and project-based learningapproaches provide the theorical
trainingreceived by engineers.ConclusionTo be a self-regulated learner, students must make proper and accurate judgments of theirlearning. Students must also use that information to make meaningful decisions about how toproceed when they are solving problems. This project shows that it is possible to improvestudents’ metacognitive monitoring and performance during problem-solving and, in particular,in their work with open and complex problems. It also demonstrates the potential for curriculafocused on engineering reasoning to promote stronger perceptions of efficacy in bothengineering and mathematics, particularly among students who may be under-prepared for andare often under-represented in engineering.AcknowledgementsThis project was funded by the
participants,as well as an audio recording of their verbalizations and the resulting transcript of the interview.These data were analyzed using thematic analysis with a provisionally determined rubric [31,32]based on the chosen knowledge transfer framework. Multiple investigators conducted theinterviews and analyzed the resulting data before peer debriefing within the project team wasused to develop and integrate the resulting themes and discuss patterns in the data.Findings and DiscussionThe initial interview protocol and data (n=11) that was analyzed to examine expert and noviceapproaches to problem solving were highly useful in demonstrating where student participantsfaced difficulties in transferring their knowledge and understanding. Findings
, which can enable students to understand and identify the characteristics ofsuccessful AI-driven product development projects. The ability for students to learn andperform an end-to-end data science workflow without writing a single line of code, all withinthe context of materials design, has the potential to enhance their educational experience butwill also improve their employability in a rapidly advancing field. Figure 3: Citrine Platform ‘branched’ workflow for investigating materials development using AI/ML without the need for computer programming.Following 3D printing and material characterization, students curate the material propertydataset so that it can be ingested in the Citrine Platform to train a ML model. The output ofthis
social, ethical, and environmental dimensions of their future roles as engineers, fostering a sense of responsibility and promoting socially conscious practices within the field. ● Learning how to learn – the framework and the case studies analyzed will provide students with the proper foundational knowledge necessary to recognize and avoid inequities in future infrastructure projects. They will also encourage students to be intentional and continue to seek additional knowledge and connections to solve problems they can relate to and care about.ResultsAs the authors engaged in discussions about how to develop the framework presented in thispaper, they identified foundational building blocks to define equitable
sufficient data on the information skill level of transferstudents. Therefore, the librarians chose to study this topic with a survey of incoming transferstudents. Ultimately, Grigg found that a partnership with the Transfer Student Office was a major“win” of the project as that would be necessary to continue to grow library outreach efforts fortransfer students [10]. This paper demonstrates that librarians need to consider transfer studentswhen it comes to information literacy instruction. It also highlights the importance of librarianspartnering with the appropriate groups and people outside of the library to ensure long-termsuccess.Gregor and McBridge also talk about the importance of building relationships with units outsideof the library to
%, respectively (ASEE,2019). The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2019) projected higher job growth for computationalroles (12%) compared to mechanical, electrical, and computer hardware engineering (4-6%).Reflecting this demand, computer science and computer engineering faculty emerged with thehighest salaries in academia, surpassing their engineering counterparts (ASEE, 2022).These disciplinary distinctions permeate beyond academic and professional spheres, influencingsocialization, enrollment, and persistence, and carrying significant implications forunderrepresented groups. Hocker and colleagues (2019) pinpoint challenges in academiacontributing to a noteworthy doctoral dropout rate in engineering, particularly impacting womenand URMs. The prevalence
psychosocial outcomes it becomes increasingly important to examinepotential links between students identifying as having a disability and their sense of belonging.Coupled with the understanding that enrollment of students with disabilities is increasing inpostsecondary STEM programs, this paper presents findings of the link between disabilityidentity and sense of belonging as part of a larger research project investigating student outcomesof engineering undergraduate students (NCSES, 2023). This preliminary work is guided by thefollowing research question: is there a link between students' disability status and undergraduateengineering students’ sense of belonging? MethodSample and Procedures Data for
learning activities within specific engineering contexts; and (3) developing a replicable andadaptive training infrastructure to enable instructors to use the learning activities. The workdescribed in this paper relates to Objective 1 and engages an interdisciplinary team of faculty,administrators, and graduate students from the fields of engineering, education, and sociology inresearch efforts to inform the development, implementation, and study of the framework. Theearly phases of the team’s work have focused on the development of the framework. Subsequentphases will focus on researching its implementation. As the project has evolved, the three TEECenter objectives have become more interconnected and mutually supportive. To date
partnerinstitutions. In an effort to look at engineering undergraduate’s experiences over time, this paperincludes evaluation findings from both awards who attended the 4-year undergraduateengineering degree program at UCSB. It is important to note that in ESTEEM 2, some of theseScholars first joined ESTEEM as community college students and continued as Scholars aftertransferring if they transferred into an engineering major at UCSB.MethodsThis paper focuses on a secondary analysis of evaluation reports and data from UCSB Scholarswho participated in ESTEEM from 2011 to 2023, spanning two project funding cycles.Evaluation reports included both quantitative data from tracking surveys and qualitative datafrom open-ended survey questions and focus groups
human topics please see ourprevious work [3]. Figure 4. Q1 GAI-generated topics mapped to human-generated topics (themes) The GAI and the manual qualitative coding approach identified several main topicsrelated to the online learning experience during the pandemic, suggesting alignment in capturingcore student concerns. Both highlighted topics around interactivity/engagement, communication,instructor support, feedback, instructions/resources, flexibility, and teaching methods. Forexample, the "Interactivity and Engagement" topic from the GAI aligned with human codesaround class participation, teamwork, and project assignments - all factors impacting howengaged students felt. The "Feedback" topic also directly matched between GAI
Paper ID #42821From Mind Full to Mindful: Proposing Mindfulness as a Proactive Strategyfor Safeguarding Mental Health in Engineering Education.Vanessa Tran, Utah State University Vanessa Tran is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Utah State University (USU). She earned a Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Architecture (UAH) and a Master’s in Global Production Engineering and Management from the Vietnamese-German University (VGU) in Vietnam. Her research interest lies in enhancing the well-being of engineering students and educators. She is currently working on an NSF-funded project
, and VR were investigated to determine the correlations between these preferencesand academic outcomes in the courses. This exploration extends to understanding the impact ofvarious factors on student outcomes when engaged with different instructional modes.The research questions explored in this study are: 1. What are students’ instructional mode preferences? 2. How do these preferences relate to their academic performance in engineering modules such as statistics, material jetting, and Python programming?MethodsThis study is part of a larger NSF project exploring the impact of educational modules ondifferent populations (industry professionals and students) to gain knowledge that contributes toAdditive Manufacturing and Data Science
: • RQ1: What are the curriculum complexity and study abroad participation rates for the largest majors at Purdue University? • RQ2: What is the correlation between curriculum complexity and study abroad participation at Purdue University? • RQ3: Is there a significant difference in curricular complexity or study abroad participation across colleges at Purdue University?Our project can provide insights to engineering programs seeking to improve study abroadparticipation about the challenges that may arise from curricular complexity and what strategiesmay help address this issue. Background In this section we will first describe perceptions of how challenging it is to study
collaborative research projects focused on broadening participation in STEM academia. Dr. Mendez’s research centers on the creation of optimal higher education policies and practices that advance faculty careers and student success, as well as the schooling experiences of Mexican-descent youth in the mid-20th century.Jennifer Tygret ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Improving University Postdoctoral Affairs Offices: Viewpoints from Engineering Postdoctoral Scholars of ColorAbstractAn instrumental case study (Stake, 1995) explores the perceptions and opinions of engineeringpostdoctoral scholars of color about ways to improve university postdoctoral affairs offices tobetter
measuredfrom ‘1’= strongly disagree to ‘5’ = strongly agree. In question 8, students were given multiplechoice selections on the average time they spend using AI tools per week. In question 9, studentschoose the main reasons they use them, whether for help with complex topics, research, orwriting. The survey results are outlined in Table 1, providing insights into the current use of AItools by CEE students with implications for educational approaches in engineering.The Institutional Review Board (IRB) has determined that this project, 'Integrating ArtificialIntelligence into Electrical Engineering Education: A Paradigm Shift in Teaching and Learning,'is exempt from review by the IRB for the Protection of Human Subjects.The survey was conducted in a
Paper ID #42273Pilot Study: Incorporating the study of engineering history into engineeringcourses.Dr. Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology Gloria Ma is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering program at Wentworth Institute of Technology. She has been teaching robotics with Lego Mindstorm to ME freshmen for several years. She is actively involved in community services of offering robotics workshops to middle- and high-school girls. Her research interests include dynamics and system modeling, geometry modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing, artificial intelligent in
the needsof the user. Additionally, including comprehensive tutorials, guides, and instructional resourcesempowers educators, researchers, and enthusiasts to build, program, and use the robot in the mostappropriate way for their needs. Since the entire project follows the principles of open-sourcehardware, it fosters collaboration and knowledge sharing, thereby enabling a global community oflearners and innovators. Finally, there will be a discussion on how open-source robotics, combined with modularityand accessible educational materials, revolutionizes robotics education by providing acustomizable, hands-on learning experience to serve as a valuable resource for diversecommunities, fostering a passion for technology, and
specific goalsrelated to increasing diversity and inclusion in enrollment and degree attainment. The pledgecommits the signatory programs to engage in four activities to promote diversity in enrollment,retention, and graduation rates which will lead to increased diversity in the workforce andengineering faculty. Applicants must be members of the ASEE Engineering Deans Council(EDC) or the Engineering Technology Council (ETC). The program is projected to have threelevels of recognition: Bronze, Silver and Gold. Currently applicants can apply for bronze status,reaffirmation of bronze status, direct to silver status or silver status (for current bronzeinstitutions).Literature ReviewSelection and persistence of STEM majors has been attributed to four
Paper ID #42249Board 97: Work-in-Progress: TextCraft: Automated Resource Recommendationfor Custom Textbook CreationXinyuan Fan, University of Toronto Xinyuan (Elva) Fan is currently pursuing a Master’s degree in Electrical & Computer Engineering at the University of Toronto, following her Honours Bachelor in Computer Science from the University of Waterloo. At the University of Toronto, she worked on a research project focusing on web crawler-driven automated textbook creation. She can be reached at elva.fan@mail.utoronto.ca or elvafan625@gmail.com.Dr. Hamid S Timorabadi P.Eng., University of Toronto Hamid Timorabadi
investigate this as theexperiment was to observe if the critical reading of the paper resulted in students suspecting this.In this section, we will describe the fake paper experience in both 2018 and 2021.2018 - Fake Paper ClassIn 2018, we used the work by SCIgen project(https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/archive/scigen/) to create a fake paper purelywith the tool. The paper is titled ”Exploring Routing Using Optimal Architectures”, and theauthor was Moshe Krieger (a tribute to my undergraduate advisor). The citations in this paper areall made up using researchers’ names in the FPGA research space. Additionally, there are notables or figures in this generated publication. The fake publication can be viewed athttp://drpeterjamieson.com/html_papers
complex, technical information. 3) Revise documents for content, organization, and writing style. 4) Using library research skills and knowledge of citation practices, conduct self-directed inquiry to identify, critically evaluate, and cite relevant literature. 5) Provide feedback to others on their writing, speaking, and teamwork abilities. 6) Demonstrate ability to work in teams and manage team projects. 7) Design and deliver effective oral presentations. 8) Understand ethics and sustainability in engineering.The students completed four major assignments where they used our scaffolded approach torevision: Job Documents, Research Poster, Lab Protocol, and Technical Report. (Detaileddescriptions of all major assignments are
Paper ID #42510 My name is Clara Templin, and I am from New Orleans, Louisiana. In terms of my educational interests, I am very curious about sustainability and ways to get rid of existing plastic pollution. In my senior year of high school, I conducted my own research project to see how plants grow when fertilized with normal mealworm poop compared to mealworm poop from a styrofoam diet. I am interested in exploring more topics like this. I am a third-year student in Materials Science and Engineering at Tech, and I am minoring in Industrial Design.Jill Fennell, Georgia Institute of Technology Jill Fennell, the Frank K. Webb Chair in Communication Skills at the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical
insights into the potential importance of socioculturalinterventions within engineering classrooms to improve the engineering climate, engagement, andretention of women and Black, Latino/a/x, and Indigenous (BLI) students. INTRODUCTION This research paper investigates predictors of engineering identity at the beginning of afirst-year engineering course as part of a larger project to understand continued enrollment inengineering courses. Retaining interested undergraduate students in engineering tracks requires aclear understanding of the predictors and influences on continued enrollment in engineeringcourses. Particularly, the retention of women of all races/ethnicities, and students who identify
that most of the papers with a focus onstudent engagement (139 in total) that were published between 2003 to 2023 reported howvarious educational interventions, such as use of distinctive pedagogies (e.g., project-basedlearning [2]; service learning [3]; game-based learning [4]), could enhance student engagement.While these studies contribute to identifying effective pedagogical approaches to enhancing theengagement of students at large, they were not designed to investigate who were more, or less,engaged in the educational practice; therefore, they do not inform how those students who wereless engaged in learning could be better supported to achieve optimal learning outcomes
to four-year universities to studyengineering bring a diverse range of experiences and perspectives, which greatly contribute to thefield of engineering and help national and regional workforce development. However, thesestudents face specific challenges, referred to as the vertical transfer penalty, when they transfer tofour-year universities. This can lead to lower completion rates for community college starterscompared to students who start at four-year universities. The issue seems to be related to factorsregarding the students' experiences, institutional characteristics, and geographic location. Thisstudy marks the initial stage of a comprehensive research project aiming to compare historicaltransfer student data over the past two