raphic_10_27_20.pdf[7] Hernández-Perlines F., Ariza-Montes A., Blanco-González-Tejero C. “Intrapreneurship research: A comprehensive literature review.” Journal of Business Research, 153:428– 444 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.015[8] Siegel, J., & Krishnan, S. “Cultivating invisible impact with deep technology and creative destruction.” Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 6-19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_008.003_0002[9] Abbass H., Bender A. Gaidow S., Whitbread P. “Computational Red Teaming: Past, Present and Future.” IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 6 (1) 30-42 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2010.939578[10] Budden, P., Murray F. “Strategically Engaging with
Paper ID #43637Teacher’s Perceptions of the Fertility in Implementing Project-based Learningin Engineering CoursesDr. Octavio Mattasoglio Neto, Instituto Mau´a de Tecnologia Undergraduate in Physics (1983), master in Science (1989) and phd at Education (1998) all of them from Universidade de S˜ao Paulo. Professor of Physics at Mau´a Institute of Technology, since 1994 and President of Teacher’s Academy of the same Instituttion.Gabriel Monesi Souza ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Teacher’s perceptions of the fertility in implementing Project Based Learning in
represents the statements that technical standardsProfession education and experience are requirements for engineering students and working engineers. Multiple responses affirmed that technical standards knowledge is a critical component of the engineering profession and part of the core identity of an engineer.Employer/Business This low-order theme represents the benefits individuals with technical standards knowledge and experience provide their employer(s) and the world of business. Additionally, this category includes the negative repercussions associated with a lack of technical standards knowledge. The inverse
Paper ID #41245Implementation and Evaluation of Experiential Learning to Reinforce Research& Development Skills in a Biopharmaceutical Process Development CourseDr. Deborah Sweet Goldberg, University of Maryland, College Park Deborah S. Goldberg is a full-time senior lecturer in the Fischell Department of Bioengineering at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is passionate about teaching and mentoring students to prepare them for diverse careers in bioengineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Implementation and Evaluation of Experiential Learning to
transportation of property ϕ. with no sourceConsider the source free 1D convection-diffusion equation in the form d d dϕ (ρϕu) = Γ 0≤x≤1 (30) dx dx dxwhich represents the transport of the property ϕ through convection and diffusion inone-dimensional domain shown in Figure 10. The boundary conditions are: ϕ(x = 0) = ϕ0 = 1and ϕ(x = L) = ϕL = 0.Solve this equation numerically using the Finite Volume Method and the following parameters:u = 0.1 m/s, L = 1.0 m, ρ = 1.0 kg/m3 , Γ = 0.1 kg/m.s. Compare the results against the exactsolution of
fall, so I conducted my own experiment. I stood on top of my bed standing straight up and fell five times while my roommate recorded the time it took, the times are shown in Figure 7. The average time of the five trials came out to be 2.82 s.”In terms of overall engagement level (which was calculated as the sum of the 3 categories), students had anaverage score of 32% in 2022 (calculated as the ratio of engagement to the maximum engagement scoreobtained in the same cohort). In 2021, behavioral engagement scores were approximately 10 percentagepoints higher than those scores in 2022; this higher score in version 2 of the IDEAL framework was mainlythe result of students’ trying multiple different combinations of the keywords to unlock
Edition, 2024.[3] R.B. Whitner and O. Balci, “Guidelines for Selecting and Using Simulation Model Verification Techniques,” in Proceedings of the 1989 Winter Simulation Conference, Piscataway, New Jersey, 1989, E.A. MacNair, K.J. Musselman, and P. Heidelberger, Eds. 1989. pp. 559-568.[4] O. Balci, “Verification, Validation and Accreditation of Simulation Models,” in Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, December 7-10, 1997, S. Andradottir, K. J. Healy, D. H. Withers, and B. L. Nelson, Eds. 1997, pp. 135–41
-Release: The latest incremental release of SysML v2., 2023. URL https://github.com/Systems-Modeling/SysML-v2-Release. [6] Christian Nigischer, S´ebastien Bougain, Rainer Riegler, Heinz Peter Stanek, and Manfred Grafinger. Multi-domain simulation utilizing sysml: state of the art and future perspectives. Procedia CIRP, 100:319–324, 2021. [7] Joe R Gregory. A Model-Based Framework for Early-Stage Analysis of Spacecraft. PhD thesis, University of Bristol, 2022. [8] Azad M Madni and Michael Sievers. Model-based systems engineering: Motivation, current status, and research opportunities. Systems Engineering, 21(3):172–190, 2018. [9] Joe Gregory, Lucy Berthoud, Theo Tryfonas, Alain Rossignol, and Ludovic Faure. The long and winding
-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2022-2023/ (accessed.[3] "The Engineering for One Planet Framework: Essential Learning Outcomes for Engineering Education," Engineering for One Planet, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringforoneplanet.org/wp-content/uploads/eop_engineering-for-one- planet_framework.pdf[4] C. G. Bocean, M. M. Nicolescu, M. Cazacu, and S. Dumitriu, "The Role of Social Responsibility and Ethics in Employees’ Wellbeing," vol. 19, ed: MDPI, 2022.[5] N. Idoiaga Mondragon, I. Yarritu, E. Saez de Cámara, N. Beloki, and L. Vozmediano, "The challenge of education for sustainability in higher education: key themes and competences within the University of the
more effort and dedicate more time."The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect theofficial policy or position of the United States Military Academy, Department of the Army,DoD, or U.S. Government."References[1] 2020, C. on the E. of, & Engineering, N. A. of. (1900). Educating the engineer of 2020:Adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academies Press.[2] ABET General Criterion 7 – Facilities. https://www.abet.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/01/2022-23-EAC-Criteria.pdf[3] Chandrupatla, T. R., & Dusseau, R. A., & Schmalzel, J. L., & Slater, C. S. (1996, June),Development Of Multifunctional Laboratories In A New Engineering School Paper presented at1996 Annual
deviations indicate that international students’ experiences in their graduate programs arediverse. These variations imply that while certain aspects of their experiences meet withsatisfaction, others present challenges that may require targeted attention for support systems forinternational students.Significant results include a very strong positive correlation between Q1 degree completeconfidence and several items (Q3 Advisor relationships, Q4 Support Network, Q5 Belongingness,Q10 Goals, and Q11 Cost) with r > 0.7 and p <0.01. Additionally, Q3 Advisor relationships andQ4 Support Network are highly correlated (r = .886, p Could you describe the event(s)? (Text box) Intention to dropout Q9 In the past month, how often did
,” Organization Science, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 876–890, 2008. [13] S. Carless and C. dePaola, “The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams,” Small Group Res, pp. 71–88, 2000. Day One Activities and Reflection ExercisesActivity 1: Spaghetti TowerTask: Build a free-standing structure to support three marshmallowsMaterials – Every team receives the following material: • 20 sticks of spaghetti • 1 yard of tape • 1 yard of string • 3 marshmallowsInstructions: 1. Form teams of four 2. Collect materials 3. Build a structure in 15 minutesGrading Criteria: • Tower height (taller is better)Activity 2: Paper Airplane LauncherTask: Build a paper airplane launcher using a three-step Rube Goldberg
proposes a focus on the process of problem-solving and does not want to limitthe process to particular kinds of problems but to those that "influences one's adaptivefunctioning in the real-life social environment" (and engineering problems are some of those.)D'Zurilla et al.'s model uses the term social Problem-Solving for such problems. The modeldevelops the concepts of "problem-solving," "problem," and "solution," specifying that problem-solving "refers to the process of finding a solution." In contrast, "solution" refers to "carrying outthose solutions in the actual problematic situations." The model comprises "problem orientation"and "problem-solving skills." Through these components, they developed the Social Problem-Solving Inventory, which
Education Institutions," in Active Learning -- Beyond the Future, Intech Open, 2019.[3] S. Hartikainen, H. Rintala, L. Pylvas and P. Nokelainen, "Susanna Hartikainen, Heta Rintala, LauraThe Concept of Active Learning and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: A Review of Research in Engineering Education," Education Sciences, vol. 9, no. 4, 2019.[4] H. Leary, A. Walker, M. Lefler and Y.-c. Kuo, Self-directed Learning in Problem-based Learning, Wiley, 2019.[5] D. B. Markant, A. Ruggeri, T. M. Gureckis and F. Xu, "Enhanced Memory as a Common Effect of Active Learning," Mind, Brain, and Education, vol. 10, no. 3, 2016.[6] M. J. Myers and A. B. Burgess, "Marcella JInquiry-based Laboratory Course Improves Students Ability to Design
and example of sections that were repeated for each class period. Figure 2. Examples of open-ended sections of workbook.The Impact Portfolio included four distinct sections, three of which explicitly connected to theKEEN 3Cs. The curiosity section asked students to find a video and article that connected withtheir professional interests and provide a summary of main takeaways and connection to theiroverall interests and goals. A section emphasizing connections required students to identify onesustaining and one disruptive innovation in their field of interest, the innovation process thecreator(s) took to implement, and the impact the innovation has had on the specific field andsociety. The creating value section asked students
knowledge and use of different institutionalsupport services [28]. A Cronbach's Alpha of 0.878 was attained during the validationprocess. At the same time, a factorial analysis yielded an adjustment of factors to 4dimensions with a cumulative explanation percentage of 65 % (with a KMO equal to 0.812and a Barlett's test of sphericity equal to 0.000). The Exploratory Factor Analysis performedin this study was Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation. Table 1 showssample items of each dimension and the corresponding Cronbach´s Alpha.The survey response scale is of the Likert type that starts at 1. Strongly disagree, up to 5.Strongly agree. We included a dimension called "Perceived Institutional Support" with fiveitems. The initial statement
] S. E. Chang, “Computer anxiety and perception of task complexity in learning programming-related skills,” Comput Human Behav, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 713–728, Sep. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.021.[6] T. James and A. Magana, “Evaluating Self-paced Computational Notebooks vs. Instructor-Led Online Lectures for Introductory Computer Programming,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, ASEE Conferences, 2023. doi: 10.18260/1-2--43422.[7] J. Goopio and C. Cheung, “The MOOC dropout phenomenon and retention strategies,” Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 177–197, 2021, doi: 10.1080/15313220.2020.1809050.AppendixAll content for the long lesson course
. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference (pp. 19-25). IEEE.Lönngren, J., Adawi, T., Berge, M., Huff, J., Murzi, H., Direito, I., & Tormey, R. (2020). Emotions in engineering education: Towards a research agenda. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, Sweden, 2020, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273951.Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application. Springer.Maddux, J. E., & Gosselin, J. T. (2003). Self-efficacy. The Wiley Handbook of Positive Clinical Psychology, 89-101.Willis, D. A., Krueger, P. S., & Kendrick, A. (2013). The influence of a research experiences for undergraduates program on student perceptions and
Engineering is Elementary” In Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 13-479) June 2008.[5] J. Singer, J. Ross, & Y. Jackson-Lee, “Professional Development for the Integration of Engineering in High School STEM Classrooms”, Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 6(1), Article 3.( 2016).[6] R. Hammack & T. Ivey “Elementary teachers’ perceptions of engineering and engineering design”, Journal of Research in STEM Education, 3(1/2), 48-68, (2017).[7] D. Shernoff, S Sinha, D. Bressler & D. Schultz, “Teacher perceptions of their curricular and pedagogical shifts: Outcomes of a project-based model of teacher professional development in the next
] M. H. M. Sidek, N. Azis, W. Z. W. Hasan, M. Z. A. Ab Kadir, S. Shafie, and M. A. M.Radzi, “Automated positioning dual-axis solar tracking system with precision elevation andazimuth angle control”, Energy, Vol. 124, pp. 160-170, 2017.[4] A. Al-Othman, Y. Tariq, I. Al-Adwan, M. Al Khawaldah, H. Alauthman, M. Alkhedher, andM. Ramadan, “An experimental study on hybrid control of a solar tracking system to maximizeenergy harvesting in Jordan”, Solar Energy, Vol. 263, p. 111931, 2023.[5] I. Abadi, A. Musyafa, and A. Soeprijanto, “Design and implementation of active two axessolar tracking system using particle swarm optimization based fuzzy logic controller”,International Review on Modelling and Simulations, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 640-652, 2015.[6
. Shiel and D. Murchan, “Understanding and Applying Assessment in Education,” Apr. 2017. Accessed: Jan. 07, 2024. [Online].[12] D. Wiliam and P. Black, “Meanings and Consequences: a basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment?,” Br. Educ. Res. J., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 537–548, Dec. 1996, doi: 10.1080/0141192960220502.[13] R. L. Linn, E. L. Baker, and S. B. Dunbar, “Complex, Performance-Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation Criteria,” Educ. Res., vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 15–21, Nov. 1991, doi: 10.3102/0013189X020008015.[14] A.- Umam, F. P. Mauludi, and M. K. Wardana, “STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF PERFOMANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION,” J. Engl. Lang. Learn., vol. 5, no. 2
High School Students: A Case Study,” Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2015, 38(4), 428-446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215607325 5. Christenson, S., “Engaging students at school and with learning: A relevant construct for All Students,” Psychology of the Schools, Vol. 45(5), 2008, Wiley Periodicals, DOI: 10.1002/pits.20302 6. Kumar, P., Khalid, A., ‘Blended Wing Body Propulsion System Design,’ International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, Vol. 4 (2017), issue 4, October 8, 2017 7. Kumar, P., Khalid, A., ‘Box Wing Design Optimization using Aspect Ratio and Winglet Height,’ International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, Vol. 1, Issue 4, Article 6, 2014 8
students. Qualitative assessments from the Course Exit Survey questionnaireunveiled students' receptiveness to this approach, enabling them to engage in independentthinking and articulate the project progress from their unique perspective. Reference:[1] A. Kohn, "The case against grades." Educational Leadership 69.3 (2011): 28-33.[2] A. Kohn, “Speaking My Mind: The Trouble with Rubrics.” The English Journal, vol. 95 no. 4, 2006, pp. 12–15. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/30047080. Accessed 7 Feb. 2024.[3] A. Kohn, and S. D. Blum. Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead). West Virginia University Press, 2020.[4] M. Wilson, "Why I won't be using rubrics to respond to students' writing." English Journal
. 2022, pp. 1557–1566. doi: 10.21125/iceri.2022.0408.[11] J. Labrie, C. Russell, and A. Kaur, “Board 226: Building data center career pathwaysthrough K-12 industry externships,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Baltimore, Maryland, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/42661[12] Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 2-Year and 4-Year STEMDegrees, Board on Science Education, Policy and Global Affairs, National Academy ofEngineering, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Barriers andOpportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees: Systemic Change to Support Students’Diverse Pathways. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2016, p. 21739. doi:10.17226/21739.[13] A. Lucietto, S
learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities.”, Comp. in Hum. Behavior, vol 55, pp 1185 – 1193, 2016.[11] S. Zappe, R. Leicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger, H.W. Lee, “’Flipping’ The Classroom To Explore Active Learning In A Large Undergraduate Course”, 2009 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference. Classroom Engagement in Educational Research and Methods. Austin, TX. June 2009. pp 14.1385.1 – 14.1385.21.[12] E. Alfonseca, R.M. Carro, E. Martin, A, Ortigosa, P. Paredes, “The impact of learning styles on grouping for collaborative learning: a case study”, User-Model-User-Adap. Inter., vol 16, pp 377 – 401, 2006.[13] H. Pachler, M
Engineering Cornerstone Robotics Design Project. In2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028610[5] Wengrowicz, N., Dori, Y. J., & Dori, D. (2017). Meta-assessment in a project-based systemsengineering course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 607-624.https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1173648[6] Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A., Tudón Martínez, J.C. et al. (2019)Activelearning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices, and experiences. IntJ Interact Des Manuf 13, 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00557-8[7] Reis, A. C. B., Barbalho, S. C. M., & Zanette, A. C. D. (2017). A bibliometric andclassification
foundational skills identified by studies in the field. The feedback from both theworkforce and graduating students highlights the demand for hands-on experiences that directlyapply classroom knowledge to real-life design challenges.By systematically guiding students through open-ended experiments, the presented methodologyaims to bridge the gap between theoretical concepts and practical application. This work-in-progress reflects our commitment to continually advancing engineering education, ensuring thatstudents are equipped with the multifaceted skills demanded by the contemporary job market.References[1] B. Yu, L.-A. DiCecco, A. Lucentini, G. Tembrevilla, S. Earle, and M. Arshad, “Making Learning Fun: Implementing a Gamified Approach to
developed as part of the requirements for a Senior CapstoneDesign Project course for the Electrical Engineering Technology program at Kennesaw StateUniversity. The Senior Capstone Design Project course is designed to align with the ABET ETACstudent outcomes (1-5) for baccalaureate electrical/electronic(s) programs. The course encouragesthe development of original innovative projects ideas that seek to address societal needs, and thatmay be suitable for further development into commercial products. The MouseHead project designteam consisted of two senior students, one of whom served as the team leader. The entrepreneurial value added to this Capstone course included teaching students how toapply economic methods in cost and revenue
, 2015.[6] O. Ozyurt, “An analysis on distance education computer programming students’ attitudes regarding programming and their self-efficacy for programming,” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 16, no. 2, 2015.[7] M. S. Gunbatar, “Examination of undergraduate and associate degree students’ computer programming attitude and self-efficacy according to thinking style, gender and experience,” Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 354–373, 2018.[8] M. Derya GURER, I. Cetin, and E. Top, “Factors affecting students’ attitudes toward computer programming,” Informatics in Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 281–296, 2019.[9] D. Ronan and D. Cenk Erdil, “Impact on computing
and understandable statements, or phrases, to accurately complete forms commonly used in business and industry. 08.02 Read and understand graphs, charts, diagrams, and common table formats. 08.03 Read and follow written instructions. 08.04 Demonstrate an understanding of; and ability to follow oral instructions. 08.05 Demonstrate knowledge of technical language and technical acronyms. 08.06 Explain the benefits of teamwork.09.0 Demonstrate appropriate math skills. The student will be able to: 09.01 Solve problems for appropriate scalars. 09.02 Calculate tolerance(s). 09.03 Use different unit systems appropriately. 09.04 Convert between different units and unit systems. 09.05 Use