. Krivickas and J. Krivickas, “Laboratory Instruction in Engineering Education,” GlobalJournal of Engineering Education, Volume 11, No. 2, June 2007.[7] D. A. H. Samuelsen and O. H. Graven, “Remote Laboratories in Engineering Education – anOverview of Implementation and Feasibility,” 14th International Multi-Conference forEngineering, Education, and Technology: Engineering Innovations for Global sustainability, SanJose, Costa Rica, July 2016.[8] A. Yousuf, A. Wong, and D. W. Edens, “Remote Circuit Design Labs with Analog Discovery,”2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2013.[9] S. Abbasi, E. M. Kim, and T. F. Schubert, “Digilent Analog Discovery and Bench-topInstruments: A Comparison,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
efficient and scaleable manner.References[1] D. Clark and R. Talbert, Grading for growth: A guide to alternative grading practices that promote authentic learning and student engagement in higher education. Taylor & Francis, 2023.[2] L. B. Nilson and C. J. Stanny, Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving faculty time. Routledge, 2015.[3] J. Elsinger and D. Lewis, “Applying a standards-based grading framework across lower level mathematics courses,” PRIMUS, vol. 30, no. 8-10, pp. 885–907, 2020.[4] H. Ritz, “WIP: Implementing an alternative grading scheme in a large enrollment differential equations course: Lessons learned,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023.[5] S. Wagner and H. Ritz
Business Research, vol. 101, pp. 507-515, 2019/08/01/ 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.049.[5] S. Wilkins, "Two decades of international branch campus development, 2000–2020: A review," International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 311-326, 2020.[6] T. Heffernan and D. Poole, "In search of “the vibe”: Creating effective international education partnerships," Higher Education, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 223-245, 2005/09/01 2005, doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6352-2.[7] R. Hickey and D. Davies, "The common factors underlying successful international branch campuses: towards a conceptual decision-making framework," Globalisation, Societies and Education, pp. 1-15
theCATME evaluation (13% in each year). However, all enrolled students were included in thestudy as CATME ratings from their teammates were still available.Description of teamwork assignmentsStudents were placed into teams of 4-5 members based on responses to the CATME teamformation survey. For the first team project, each team chose one of the 14 Engineering GrandChallenges [8] and were tasked with researching the challenge. The purpose of the project was toinvestigate the societal problem(s) the Challenge seeks to address and to identify recentengineering advances that address their chosen Challenge. Teams were instructed to create awritten report and a short (3-4 min) video to share their findings with the rest of the class.In Fall 2022, the
. If a car had finished several laps during its two minutes of time, then the besttiming was considered for the lap. The first team was from The Citadel with timing of 10.73 s,the second team weas from The Citadel again with timing of 11.45 seconds and third team wasfrom Military Academy with timing of 12.16 seconds. Figure 5. Amazon DeepRacer car running on the track [7]PerformanceWhen training of the model is finished in the simulator, the results can be evaluated in theevaluation section. Figure 6 shows the results of two sample models, the left one is a highperforming model, and the right one is a low performing model. These graphs have three distinctlines. The green line represents the value of the reward variable and
learning objectives. J Med Libr Assoc. 103, 152– 153. (2015).5. M. T. Chandio, S. M. Pandhiani, R. Iqbal, Bloom’s Taxonomy: Improving Assessment and Teaching-Learning Process. Journal of Education and Educational Development 3, 203-221 (2016). Supplementary-Materials: Integrating Problem-Solving Studio into 75-minute Chemical Reaction Kinetics Sessions1. Supplementary Material 1: Example of A Well-Defined Problem2. Supplementary Material 2: Example of A Not Well-Defined ProblemGroup Members: Date: CHME 3321Complete the following in a group of 2-3 students, and
reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. K. G. Wolfinbarger, R. L. Shehab, D. A. Trytten, and S. E. Walden, "The influence of engineering competition team participation on students' leadership identity development," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 925-948, 2021.2. A. B. Hargadon, "Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation," Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 24, pp. 41-85, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(02)24003-4.3. A. B. Hargadon, "Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation," California Management Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 209-227, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2307/41165951.4. J. Saldaña, The
, Institute of Electrical andElectronics Engineers, 2013, 19 (12), pp. 2396 - 2405.[2] Jansen, Y. Dragicevic, P. Isenberg, P. Alexander, J. Karnik, A. Kildal, J. Subramanian, S. andHornbæk, K. Opportunities and Challenges for Data Physicalization. CHI 2015, April 18–23,2015, Seoul, Republic of Korea.[3] Data Physicalization Gallery, http://dataphys.org/list/gallery/[4] Noë, Alva. “What Art Unveils.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 5 Oct. 2015,archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/10/05/what-art-unveils/.[5] Rohit Ashok Khot, Larissa Hjorth, and Florian ‘Floyd’ Mueller. Understanding PhysicalActivity through 3D Printed Material Artifacts. CHI 2014, April 26 - May 01, 2014, Toronto,ON, Canada.[6] Vetria L. Byrd. Usability of
also working to integrate specificfeatures such as titles, summaries, and keywords. These fields will hopefully allow us to developsoftware to automatically build a SCHOLAR tutorial index with the option of exporting theentire repository as a website.The SCHOLAR lessons and examples will continue to be refined and shared as a git repositoryfor any interested instructors. As the SCHOLAR type of lessons are adopted, it will be possibleto share the resources across institutions building a robust framework and resource for learning.References[1] “Git.” Accessed: Aug. 22, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://git-scm.com/[2] S. Downes, “Models for Sustainable Open Educational Resources,” Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects
Enhance Problem-based Learning,” Med Educ Online, vol. 2, no. 1, 1997, doi: 10.3402/meo.v2i.4289.[9] M. K. Pallikonda and R. C. Manimaran, “Research Problems: A Pathway to Introduce Industry 4.0 in Undergraduate Education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2023. doi: 10.18260/1-2--44122.[10] P. Guo, N. Saab, L. S. Post, and W. Admiraal, “A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures,” Int J Educ Res, vol. 102, p. 101586, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.IJER.2020.101586.
Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, EDUCAUSE, Association for Advancement of Computing in Education, International Society for Technology in Education, Society for Design and Process Science, American Society for Engineering Education, Human Computer Interaction International Conference, and International Academy, Research, and Industry Association) in USA, Canada, England, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal and Romania. Her work was also presented by co-authors at conferences in Brazil, Taiwan and S. Korea. Among Dr. Marghitu’s honors and awards are the following: 2011 AccessComputing Capacity Building Award, the 2012 Auburn University
experimentalconditions in teaching and mentoring strategies. Acknowledging the limitations of specific levels ofselected factors, this paper not only suggests future research to explore additional levels and factors for amore refined understanding but is an apply avenue to demonstrate the real-world constrains to students.References[1] Immanuel Edinbarough, P. N. Rao, and K. Das, “Incorporating Sustainability throughout theManufacturing Engineering Technology Curriculum,” Papers on Engineering Education Repository(American Society for Engineering Education), Sep. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--20623.[2] H. Zghair and R. Nathan, “Implementing i4.0 Tech to Engineering Systems Lab for SmartManufacturing Learning.” ASEE PEER 2023.[3] B. Li, S. Jimmy
included letters and/or numeric for the used printer (M for MakerBotor S for PRUSA), layer height (100, 150, or 200 μm), material (P for PLA), percentage infill (20%,40%, or 70%), infill pattern (D for Diamond, L for Linear, or H for Honeycomb), and number ofshells (2, 3, or 4). The layer height and number of shells were fixed after to 200 μm and 2 early onas they were both discovered to have no significant effect on the dimensions. An example of codedspecimen is M200P70H2-2 which is the second specimens of a batch that was printed withMakerBot printer with 200 μm layer height, PLA, 70% infill, Honeycomb pattern, and 2 shells. db3 L
Underrepresented Youth Increase STEM Degrees. (EdWorkingPaper: 22-607). 2022, Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/wc1x-8k13. 8. Baran E, Canbazoglu Bilici S, Mesutoglu C, Ocak C., The impact of an out‐of-school STEM education program on students’ attitudes toward STEM and STEM careers. School Science and Mathematics. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12330.9. Todd, C., Collaborations Between Under-Resourced High School Students and STEM Professionals to Increase Participation in Science and Engineering Fairs, European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, www.ej-edu.org, ISSN: 2736-4534, Vol. 3, Issue 1, 6 pages, January 1, 2022 (online).10. Salvad´o, Z., Garcia-Yeste, C., Gairal-Casado, R
thechallenges they face and offering better quality of support. We hope to share the personas withinstitutional stakeholders to build empathy and perspective for nontraditional students inengineering.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grantnumber 2044347 within the IUSE program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References[1] National Center for Education Statistics, “Demographic and Enrollment Characteristics of Nontraditional Undergraduates: 2011-12.” [Online]. Available: https
Information Technologies,Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10849-w.[6] S. Ghanbari, “Learning across Disciplines: A Collective Case Study of Two UniversityPrograms That Integrate the Arts with STEM.,” International Journal of Education and the Arts,vol. 16, no. 7, Jun. 2015.[7] C. Rodier, M. Galaleldin, J. Boudreau, H. Anis, and L. Peyton, “STEAM – Arts IntegrationFrameworks for Transdisciplinarity,” Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering EducationAssociation (CEEA), Jun. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi0.14918.[8] K. Visscher, “Theatrical technology assessment: A role-play simulation fortransdisciplinary engineering education,” in In 48th SEFI Annual Conference on EngineeringEducation, SEFI, Societe
members from the ECE department. This expansion aims to increase the number ofparticipants as well as to understand faculty’s perspectives, ultimately contributing to thedevelopment of comprehensive guidelines for mentoring meetings. These guidelines will beparticularly beneficial for new faculty members who are leading these sessions for the first time,enhancing the overall effectiveness of the mentoring process.References[1] M. S. Jaradat and M. B. Mustafa, “Academic advising and maintaining major: Is there a relation?” Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 151, 2017.[2] A. M. Lucietto, E. Dell, E. M. Cooney, L. A. Russell, and E. Schott, “Engineering technology undergraduate students: A survey of demographics and mentoring,” 2019.[3] J. K
[1] P. C. Brown, H. L. Roediger III and M. A. McDaniel, Make It Stick, The Science of Successful Learning, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014.[2] B. Oakley, B. Rogowsky, and T. J. Sejnowski, Uncommon Sense Teaching: Practical Insights in Brain Science to Help Students Learn, United Kingdom: Penguin Publishing Group, 2021.[3] I. H. L. Roediger and J. D. Karpicke, "The Power of Testing Memory," Perspectives on Psychological Science, pp. 181-201, Sep 2006.[4] Y. Weinstein, C. R. Madan and M. A. Sumeracki, "Teaching the Science of Learning," 24 January 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0087-y.[5] B. Hurst, R. R. Wallace and S. B. Nixon, "The
Design and Construction, BIM, Scheduling and Project Controls, Graphical Communication, and Virtual Design and Construction. He has been awarded the Fulbright Scholarship, the AGC Faculty Fellowship, and is currently the Microsoft Fellow for the TechSpark Immokalee in Florida.Dr. Diana Marcela Franco Duran, University of Virginia Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Director of the Construction Engineering and Management (CEM) concentration.Dr. Kenneth Stafford Sands II, Auburn University Kenneth S. Sands II is an Assistant Professor at Auburn University in Auburn, AL.David Gutierrez, University of VirginiaDeyrel Diaz, Clemson University ©American
instructors. Minneapolis: Center for Advanced Research onLanguage Acquisition, University of Minnesota, 2005.[11] B. T. Streitwieser and G. J. Light, “Student conceptions of international experience in studyabroad contexts,” in Higher Education, 75(3), 2018, pp. 471-487.[12] B. Mu, S. Berka, L. Erickson, I. Pérez-Ibáñez, “Individual experiences that affectstudents’ development of intercultural competence in study abroad,” in InternationalJournal of Intercultural Relations, 2022, 89, pp. 30-41.[13] M. Chédru and M. Ostapchuk, “The effect of study abroad and personality on culturalintelligence: A deeper understanding using the expanded model of cultural intelligence,” inInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 92, 2023, pp. 1-18.[14] M
grasp on the world (much as I did when I was in my early 20’s, only to figure out that I was a bit brash)” “There is a curiosity for the students on what they can do with their ChemE degree, beyond the obvious heavy- industry chemical plant design or academic route like their professors” “I really learn a lot about the University, the Chemical Engineering department, and how things have changed since I graduated in 2004. It is great to stay in touch with the University and current students. I get to re-live the wonderful memories I made as a student whenever I talk with them! To the extent I can pass any of my work experiences that can help students (especially those interested in non-traditional career paths, like in law or data analytics), I
clarificationand/or ask what the students think about what a question is asking. With the remaining classtime, students work in their groups and complete their team contract, which is due at the nextclass. The team contract helps the team to reflect on past teaming experiences and setexpectations for their current team.The following week, students have work days when the instructor moves from team to team tohelp out and direct their work. During this week, the instructor invites students who have alreadycompleted HT to come back and talk with the current students. They could be a senior(s) whocompleted the class and/or a graduate(s) who indicated the value of the course structure to theirlearning. (The instructor started inviting former students after a
gives workers the power to collectively negotiate with and pushback against capitalist corporate owners and the industries they extract profit through [3].NSPE and their Anti-Union Roots“The concept of Unionism in engineering was one of [the] real reasons for NSPE’s creation and amovement that D.B. Steinman [‘Father’ of NSPE] wanted to prevent with engineers. This topic iscovered frequently as early as the late 1930’s in [NSPE publication] The American Engineer.” -from The Complete PEI History of NSPE [19]“The [National] Society [of Professional Engineers] throughout its history has maintained aconsistent stance opposing collective bargaining for engineers.” - Paul H. Robbins, firstExecutive Director of NSPE [20]The National Society of
. and Technol. Educ 15, no. 1: 12-18, 2017. [2] A. Hofstein, and V. N. Lunetta. "The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty‐first century." Science education 88, no. 1: 28-54, 2004 [3] D. A. Bergin, "Influences on classroom interest." Educational Psychologist 34, no. 2: 87- 98, 1999. [4] N. Holstermann, D. Grube, and S. Bögeholz. "Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest." Research in science education 40: 743-757, 2010. [5] L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan. "Hands-on engineering: learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning program." International Journal of Engineering Education 15, no. 1: 20-31, 1999. [6] A. Johri, and B. M. Olds, eds
science in the digital age. Running on Empty, 2010. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:220884923. [8] E. B. Witherspoon, C. D. Schunn, R. M. Higashi, and R. Shoop. Attending to structural programming features predicts differences in learning and motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(2):115–128, 2018. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12219. URL https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12219. [9] S. Marwan, G. Gao, S. Fisk, T. W. Price, and T. Barnes. Adaptive immediate feedback can improve novice programming engagement and intention to persist in computer science. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, pages 194–203. ACM, August 2020.[10] Ismaila Temitayo Sanusi and Sunday