recent years, there has been a shift of pedagogicalemphasis in engineering away from the laboratory and small group sessions to lecture based andweb-based education [3]. This is thought to be due to several reasons, including larger class sizes,cost of maintenance and upgrading laboratories, and poor alignment of laboratory and lectureoutcomes [4]. On the other hand, students around the world used to learn only theory, which ledthem to have little experience in practicing what is seen in theory [5–9]. According to Shaaban,Practical experience by the hand of theory can be more advantageous for students rather thantheory alone [10]. By interacting with a professor who has had field experience, too, students canbe motivated and have a better
Paper ID #42212Specifications Grading in an Undergraduate Engineering Dynamics CourseDr. David A. Copp, University of California, Irvine David A. Copp received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Arizona and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of California, Irvine in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Prior to joining UCI, he was a Senior Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories and an adjunct faculty member in
quantities and their Measures; b) Measuring instruments; c) Graphanalysis and Interpretation and d) Experiments and Physical modeling.The Physics subject aims to develop the following Physics modeling competencies and softskills of First-Year Students in engineering courses:• Being able to model phenomena, physical and chemical systems, using mathematical,statistical, computational and simulation tools, among others.• Predicting system results through models.• Checking and validating the models using appropriate techniques;Thus, based on previous academic experiences [1-8] and an active learning approach [9],[10]; [11] and [12], in the Physics laboratory, aiming to analyze the understanding of first-year engineering students regarding elastic force
assessment, attendance, and their own record of thought processes. Thesepredictions are not graded, but attendance and participation are typically acknowledged. In themodified version, this stage is very similar. The instructor conducts a demonstration withmeasurements (often involving graphs collected with microcomputer-based laboratory tools)displayed or shared on a suitable platform (such as multiple monitors, an LCD, or a computerprojector). In the modified ILD methodology, students engage in a group experiment related tothe scenario presented by the professor, utilizing PhET simulations. They complete a resultssheet, where they are encouraged to write their conclusions and compare them with theirpredictions.Table 1. Original ILD [21] versus
merits and rigor ofactive learning over passive learning as well as providing faculty with ongoing pedagogicaltraining will be necessary to realize the advantages of active learning in higher education.Experiment-centric pedagogy is an innovative active learning pedagogy that has transformedlearning and teaching experience in the classroom and laboratory. As described by Authors [10],experiment-centric pedagogy places students at the center of the learning process. Experiment-centric pedagogy (ECP) focuses on inexpensive and safe hands-on tools and activities to promotelearning in STEM subjects. As presented by Connor et al. [5], and Authors [6], ECP engageslearners and improves their comprehension, familiarity, and retention of knowledge
, this approachprovided additional supporting evident of meeting ABET Criterion 3 on Student Outcome #6: anability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze, and interpret data, and useengineering judgment to draw conclusions.We intend to continue this work by expanding it to other topics students encountered difficultiesin their understanding. We also plan to explore further the ideas of letting students design theirown lab as well as projects to improve student learning in various engineering curriculum.References[1] E. G. Cantonwine, "Creating an Active Learning Environment in the Laboratory with Prepared Slides," APS Education, 2014.[2] A. A. Sewagegn and B. M. Diale, "Empowering Learners Using Active Learning in Higher
project conducted a comprehensive investigation into solar radiationdata, accessible on the solar position and intensity (SOLPOS) calculator available on NationalRenewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) websites [8], to understand its significance on thepositioning and enhancing the solar panel efficiency. How the introduction of texture on thesurface could increase the efficiency of solar cells by minimizing reflection and maximizingabsorption of incident sunlight through multiple internal reflections [9-12] was also studied.The electricity generated from a photovoltaic system can be estimated by [13]: E = A × r × H × PR (1)Where, E is the energy output from photovoltaic cell (W
Institutes of Health, and the Paso del Norte Health Foundation have funded his research on older adults. The US Army Research Laboratory has funded Dr. Pennathur’s research on workload assessment. Dr. Pennathur has also been recently awarded two grants from the National Science Foundation in Engineering Education. In one of the grants, he is modeling how engineering faculty plan for their instruction. In a second grant, he is developing a model for institutional transformation in engineering which balances access and excellence. Dr. Pennathur is the author/co-author of over 100 publications in industrial engineering and human factors engineering. He is on the editorial board of the International Journal of Industrial
Brodersen also explored students’preferences for instructional modes in an introductory computing course and discovered theyprefer laboratory over lecture and consider laboratory settings useful especially when learningmore challenging themes [14]. In this project, we will compare the attitudes and self-efficacytoward programming of mechanical and industrial engineering students and analyze how thecurricula of the two streams prepare students for programming mentally and emotionally. Theresearch questions are: (1) How do differences in mechanical and industrial engineering curriculaimpact students’ attitudes and self-efficacy toward programming? (2) How do the computing labactivities affect the students’ attitudes and self-efficacy toward
gardens, implementing drip irrigation systems,incorporating renewable resources such as solar panels, and integrating more quality views intobuildings should be considered.Establishing a living laboratory that educates occupants on sustainable design could be particularlybeneficial. This living laboratory not only provides valuable learning experiences for constructionmanagement students but also serves as an attractive marketing point. Eventually, the campus canaspire to become a net-zero facility, enhancing the learning and working experiences for occupantswhile empowering students to carry firsthand sustainable practices into society, therebycontributing to a more sustainable future. Construction management students will benefit the mostfrom a
feel discouraged because they cannot complete tasks that seem easy to theircolleagues. This leads students to consider switching to other majors that do not require highspatial-visual abilities and thus negatively affects the students' educational performance andpsychological health. Given this issue, this work aims to examine the students' spatialvisualization skills development using state-of-the-art Mixed Reality (MR) technology. The goalis to utilize the features and functionalities of MR to design and implement an interactive MRmodule that allows for developing engineering students’ spatial visualization skills, integrate themodule into Fluid Power laboratories, and conduct a research study to test and examine thedevelopment of the
courses withhistorically high failing rates. Such courses are being restructured, and a set of open educationalresources (OERs) are being developed, implemented, and tested [11]. OERs include lecture,laboratory, and recitation materials in electronic form, homework and laboratory assignments, adedicated website, and other materials such as recordings from instructors covering coursecontents. OERs will be made available in two languages: English and Spanish. Three courses areincluded in this effort: Differential Equations and Linear Algebra, Numerical Methods, andThermodynamics. Academic performance, retention, and students’ feedback obtained throughsurveys and interviews will be used to measure curricular outcomes. Websites to disseminateOERs
Laboratories from 1988-1990. His research interests include optical spectroscopic studies of novel magnetic and superconducting materials at high pressures, high magnetic fields, and low temperatures. Since 2013, he has co-taught (with Celia Elliott) a graduate-level technical writing course each spring to physics and engineering graduate students.Julie L Zilles, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Zilles is a Research Associate Professor in the Department of Crop Sciences at the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign. She received her B.S. in biology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and her Ph.D. in Bacteriology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In addition to research at the intersection of
, many lab experiments are still divorced from what worklooks like as an engineer. To encourage student engagement with engineering technical contentin a realistic manner, a set of laboratories is in development for a sequence of two coursescovering statics, solid mechanics, and material properties. These courses are part of a non-disciplinary engineering program and start second semester sophomore year and continuethrough first semester junior year. The labs are inquiry-based and meant to be completed in oneto two 100-minute lab periods, providing students with multiple distinct problems to addressthroughout the courses.The labs are motivated by design briefs providing a real-world problem. Students must apply thecontent learned in class to
in a First-Year Design Course," in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[4] A. Phillips, K. M. Kecskemety, and D. A. Delaine, "First-year Engineering Teaching Assistant Training: Examining Different Training Models and Teaching Assistant Empowerment," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[5] L. B. Wheeler, C. P. Clark, and C. M. Grisham, "Transforming a Traditional Laboratory to an Inquiry-Based Course: Importance of Training TAs when Redesigning a Curriculum," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 1019-1026, 2017/08/08 2017.[6] C. Robinson and J. Collofello, "Utilizing undergraduate teaching assistants in active learning environments," in 2012
. IntroductionEngineering education faces the continuous challenge of incorporating the latestresearch findings into its curriculum to ensure graduates are well-equipped totackle current and future technological challenges. Traditional methods ofcurriculum development often struggle to keep pace with the rapid advancementof technology and emerging research areas [1, 2]. Current approaches tointegrating research into engineering education primarily involve the introductionof elective courses, predetermined laboratory classes, or the occasional inclusionof term papers from existing courses. However, these methods have limitations,including insufficient coverage of new technologies and the lag in updating coursecontent to reflect the latest research developments
(2023) 2161–2170. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2022.10.095. 6. E.K. Smith, S.M. Barakat, O. Akande, C.C. Ogbaga, P.U. Okoye, J.A. Okolie, "Subsurface combustion and gasification for hydrogen production: Reaction mechanism, techno-economic and lifecycle assessment," Chemical Engineering Journal, (2023) p.148095. 7. J.A Okolie, P.U. Okoye, "The Infusion of Gamification in Promoting Chemical Engineering Laboratory Classes," Encyclopedia. 3(3) (2023) 1058-66. 8. J.-C. Chen, Y. Huang, K.-Y. Lin, Y.-S. Chang, H.-C. Lin, C.-Y. Lin, H.-S. Hsiao, "Developing a hands‐on activity using virtual reality to help students learn by doing," Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 36 (n.d.) 46–60. https
]. Ruhala, R. (2010, June), Four Free Vibration Laboratory Experiments Using Two Lumped Mass Apparatuses with Research Caliber Accelerometers and Analyzer Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. 10.18260/1-2—16303[6]. McDaniel, C. C., & Archer, G. C. (2013, June), Full-scale Mechanical Vibrations Laboratory Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2—19642[7]. Cornwell, P. (2008, June), Vibrations Labs to Help Achieve a Resonance In Learning Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1- 2—3100[8]. Keltie, R. F. (2015, June), Incorporating a Graduate Research Activity in an
URMs.Research has shown that post-baccalaureate programs provide participants knowledge on thegraduate school and employment application process and keys to success in STEM careers orgraduate studies [7].The project's goal was to provide an enriching experience to students unable to participate inresearch due to the restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic or academic schedules.This just-in-time experiential educational opportunity aimed to provide post-baccalaureates to:(1) acquire another professional credential to make them more marketable in the STEMworkforce, (2) gain laboratory knowledge should they decide to pursue an advanced certificate ordegree as part of their long-term goals, and (3) attend professional development workshops
Paper ID #41393Pathways to Entrepreneurship (PAtENT): Addressing the National AcademiesRecommendationsDr. David K. Pugalee, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. David Pugalee is a full professor, and Director of the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. The recipient of millions of dollars in grant-funding, Dr. Pugalee has also published works on STEM teaching and learning.Praveen Ramaprabhu Praveen Ramaprabhu is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering & Engineering Sciences at UNC Charlotte, where he heads the Laboratory for Multiscale Computational
Laboratory: During this field trip,students were able to see and try common protocols for CPR, IV injections, intubation andrespiratory rescue on complex mannequins. In the respiratory section, students were shown howprofessionals in training use the mannequins and equipment to practice procedures for criticalmedical situations. Students got the chance to intubate the mannequin and to visualize how arespiratory assistance machine works on the body using a pig’s lung. In the CPR section,students practiced CPR on a mannequin. In addition, students had the opportunity to operate a daVinci surgical system through a game exercise. Lastly, students played a scavenger hunt on amannequin looking to identify several medical equipment placed on the patient
reach a single idea. Unsuitableideas can simply be crossed out and newer iterations can be drawn alongside the discardeddrawings. In this way, the practice of visual representations will stimulate creative thinking skills17 by paving new ways for idea generation in an individual generation-reflection-interpretationcycle 18.Similarly, students face many engineering problems that require first grasping the underlyingprinciples of the problems, reflecting and interpreting them from their own experiences andperspectives, and then transforming them into practical solutions. While confronting engineeringproblems, students need to nurture creative problem-solving skills in daily classroom settingswhere resources such as lectures, laboratories
professionals. This article examines the guest presentationsdelivered by materials manufacturers in two undergraduate lab courses within the field ofMaterials Science and Engineering (MSE). Additionally, it presents findings from a survey studyconducted to evaluate the impact of the guest lecture initiative, involving an average class size of55 undergraduate students in each of the two courses.In Fall and Spring of 2022 and 2023, industry presentations were integrated into MSE 3021 andMSE 4022 materials properties and processing laboratory courses to enhancethe students' understanding of real-world applications and industry practices. Presenters wereinvited from diverse sectors of industry, including metal, ceramic and polymer processing(Applied
well as school and camp curriculums centered around Artificial Intelligence. Previously, he has worked as an instructor at Mathnasium, where he taught math to K-12, and as a lab assistant in an undergraduate laboratory at the University of Florida.Jacob Casey Yarick, University of Florida Jacob Yarick is an undergraduate student at the University of Florida pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science in Astrophysics. He works under the EQuIPD program where he designs, creates, and teaches lessons related to Python programming and Artificial Intelligence. Previously, he has worked at the Kika Silva Pla Planetarium, and the Calusa Nature Center & Planetarium. He has also tutored
see when preferential treatment was given to white students overstudents of color in engineering spaces. Often these events made participants questionwhether or not they belonged in the spaces they occupied because they were frequentlyremoved from those spaces automatically. For instance, Luz described her experience in thebiomedical engineering laboratory as she was doing research over the summer as detrimentalto her decision to continue in engineering for graduate school. She was under the supervisionof a white Ph.D. student, and worked in the lab with another Latina student and one whitestudent. She described the preferential treatment from the Ph.D. student toward his whitementee as follows: You could just tell, like, if we asked
includes development of biomaterials for regenerative engineering of craniofacial tissues. Her engineering education work has been published in biomedical engineering and biomaterials journals for the past few years and currently heavily interested in bridging the classroom and laboratory using her courses.Ms. Jillian Irene Linder, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Jillian Linder is a Master’s Student at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. Jillian has worked as a Teaching Assistant in the Biomedical Engineering Department for two semesters under Dr. Ozdemir. She also has worked with Middle Schoolers at Mission Middle School in Bellevue, Nebraska, to run a makerspace classroom during summer school to
-- and allowing it to guide one’s behaviorThe study of this domain focuses on determining what teaching practices produce the most positiveattitudes or connections to a concept and how feelings and behaviors change throughout theprocess of learning a concept/topic. This domain is harder to study and quantify since it is moreabstract compared to the cognitive domain. Also, it can be hard to separate positive feelingstowards the information and process of learning of a concept versus positive feelings created bygenerally positive social interactions during certain activities, such as during a laboratory session.Thus, our research aims to find general trends based on students' experiences, perceptions, and/orthoughts towards engineering classes and
University, PA. Nathan received his BS from the University of Mysore, a postgraduate diploma from the Indian Institute of Science, an MS from Louisiana State University, and a PhD from Drexel University. He worked in electronic packaging in C-DOT and then as a scientific assistant in the robotics laboratory at IISc. in Bangalore, India, and as a postdoc at the University of Pennsylvania in haptics and virtual reality. His research interests are in the areas of brain traumatic injury, unmanned vehicles, particularly flapping flight and Frisbees, mechatronics, robotics, MEMS, virtual reality, and haptics, as well as teaching with technology. He has ongoing research in brain traumatic injury, flapping flight, frisbee flight
around a project intended toinvolve students in the principles and practices of various areas within Civil Engineering,including structures, water resources, social science, systems of systems, and architecturalengineering. Students worked in teams to complete this final design project. The broad courseoutcomes were to describe civil engineering applications, recognize the impact of civilengineering in improving society, and work effectively in a team. Instructional activities varieddaily but included laboratory visits, several hands-on experiments, active learning activities, andtraditional lectures. Active learning classrooms were used due to their collaborative learningarrangement so students and instructors could work effectively with others
involve individual students working in faculty research laboratories with one-on-onementoring, typically spanning one or more semesters, although the activities and mentoringstyles may vary. Due to limited capacity, UREs are often competitive and have selection criteriasuch as grades, test scores, and previous experience or performance based in a class [19].In contrast, CUREs have a structured curriculum and are open to a broader range of students,placing higher demands on mentors to guide multiple students [18]. Duration is a critical factorin both UREs and CUREs, influencing outcomes significantly [18]. UREs and CUREs differ inselectivity, duration, setting, mentoring approaches, and associated costs. Notably, Burt andcolleagues [19] delve into