guidelines toassist faculty members during the process of institutional transformation from a teaching-basedto a research-based university.IntroductionRegardless of whether it is primarily teaching-oriented or research-oriented, a university needsdedicated teachers, productive researchers, and effective administrators1. In engineering collegesin particular, where research productivity often outweighs teaching effectiveness, facultymembers might struggle to maintain balance among a multiplicity of roles and responsibilities.Lacking the skills to effectively balance teaching, research, and service workloads, with limitedpedagogical training at the graduate and/or post-doctoral level, novice faculty often adopt trialand error techniques2. Although
decisions. Our results also show that despite a perceived lack of autonomy, some GTAscontinue to act autonomously when faced with decision-making in the classroom. These resultscan help inform faculty as they seek to support GTAs in the GTAs‟ teaching responsibilities.IntroductionFor many years, graduate students have served as laboratory assistants and graders forundergraduate engineering courses. Due to recent efforts to increase hands-on activities inengineering education, many institutions are now also employing graduate teaching assistants(GTAs) as course instructors and lecturers 1-3. While researchers have studied GTAs in thehumanities and physical sciences, little is known about GTA experiences in engineering. Thepurpose of this study is to
Programs In a review of the development and characteristics of future faculty preparationprograms2, it is pointed out that they can provide a smooth transition between graduate schooland faculty positions. These programs evolved from TA training programs that proliferatedbetween 1960 and 1990. Establishment of the Preparing Future Faculty (PFF) program in 1993formed a base for a sustained national initiative to transform doctoral education. The PFFprogram has three core features3 of 1) addressing the full scope of faculty roles andresponsibilities, 2) students have multiple mentors and receive reflective feedback and 3) bothare addressed in the context of a cluster of institutions typically involving a doctoral degree-granting institution
between students’ self-rating and their GPA (r= .8, n = 152, p < .0001) suggesting that their self-report scores are fairly reliable. Thecorrelation between students’ academic performance, their past migration within engineering,and their intention to graduate with an engineering degree was also tested and was found to besignificant (Table 2).Previous migration outside engineering was found to have a strong negative correlation with Page 22.689.5entering college as an engineering major suggesting that while some students enter engineeringafter starting in a major other than engineering, but it is rare for a student to start in engineering
and academic success of engineering students is a critical issuethat will generate a profound impact upon the nation‟s economy and prosperity.1 According tothe American Society of Engineering Education, enrollment in baccalaureate programs increased14% between 2000 and 2005, but the number of engineering graduates remained relativelyunchanged since 2005.2 The demand for qualified engineering graduates will grow 11% between2008 and 2018 based on the most recent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projections.3 Therefore,preparing a qualified engineering workforce is a national issue particularly since the scientificand technological leadership of the U.S. has “experienced a gradual erosion”4 of its position.Considering the critical role played by
interesting students, a female student who had designed and soldher own jewelry, with the proceeds going to aid women in an underdeveloped country. At Howard’s engineering school, they are very competitive for one main demographic --African American students. Clearly, other HBCUs are obviously in competition with Howard forthis student pool. In addition, Howard does derive a student population from internationalstudents, mostly Carribbean and African, who feel very comfortable with Howard’s message,role and history. Howard respondents told us “because of Howard’s legacy we get people whoseparents have graduated from Howard and they are middle class, upper middle class and then youhave other people who are in the first generation college, so those
this time, the researcher made a judgment about the student’s voiceprojection. Quieter students were asked to wear a lapel microphone. Audio/video recording wasdone to capture the participants as they verbally worked through the problem, as well as, to showwhat participants were reading, drawing, and so on. The documents used in administering theproblem were colored to help the observer differentiate between information (blue), problemdefinition (yellow) and student work (white).Three hours were allotted for students to complete the design task, although the average studentcompleted the problem prior to the administrator stopping the session. During the participant’sdesign session, a member of the research team acted as the administrator of
addition, Professor Walton received MSU’s Teacher-Scholar award in 2010 and was a 2010-2011 MSU Lilly Teaching Fellow.Amanda M Portis, Michigan State UniversityEldred H. Chimowitz, University of Rochester Eldred Chimowitz is a professor of chemical engineering at the University of Rochester. He teaches courses in process design and control to undergraduates and statistical mechanics and thermodynamics to graduate students. He is the author of a textbook titled: ”Introduction to Critical Phenomena in Fluids” which was published by Oxford University Press in 2005. It was nominated for an American Associa- tion of American Publishers Award for Excellence in Scholarly Publishing. Jennifer Condit who helped prepare this
argument, and he made plans and tookaction to close the gap.Goal setting and monitoring in the portfolio studio also enabled students to look across theirgoals and determine if they complemented one another. Jessica had a chance to consider herpersonal and professional goals and saw a potential conflict. Rather than change her goals, sheworked on her self-confidence, which she felt was a critical component in the achievement ofthose goals. It remains to be seen how Jessica will find a balance between her personal andprofessional goals and/or remake those goals to suit her needs better.Many students have goals that are lofty but lacking in detail. Goal setting and monitoring in theportfolio studio enabled Nolan to clarify his goals and plan
attrition rate in such offerings is substantial. Inchemical engineering, it is not uncommon for students who have done well in freshmanyear to struggle with their first chemical engineering course: mass and energy balances(MEBs). This difficulty is curious, as the course is based largely on concepts firstencountered in high school chemistry (conservation of elemental mass, stoichiometry)and first year physics (conservation of energy). The central intellectual activity for our MEB course, using the now classic text1by Richard Felder and Ron Rousseau(F & R), is reading problem statements, creatingprocess flowsheets and solving the associated algebraic equations which result. Thegeneral solution approach is efficiently described as a series
not for profit boards. His interests include the integration of faith in all types and aspects of business including engineering and architecture, and the use of business in international community development.Tyler Scott Helmus, Calvin College TYLER S. HELMUS is a student currently enrolled in Calvin College’s engineering program. He expects to graduate in 2012 and hopes to attend graduate school after. research interests include robotics and control systems.Steven H. VanderLeest, Calvin College STEVEN H. VANDERLEEST is a Professor of Engineering at Calvin College, Vice-President of Re- search & Development at DornerWorks, Ltd., and partner at squishLogic LLC. He obtained the M.S.E.E. from Michigan
introduce underrepresented,underprivileged high school students (mentees) to engineering and help them prepare for thechallenges of an undergraduate engineering degree program. DREAM has three main goals thathave evolved and come into focus over the four years of the program’s existence. First, DREAMseeks to change mentees’ perceptions of what is possible, leading them to a better quality of lifethrough college education and subsequent rewarding and lucrative engineering and STEMcareers. Second, DREAM prepares mentees for the rigors of undergraduate STEM education byforming connections between engineering applications and high school classes, and promotingenrollment in upper-level math and science courses. Third, DREAM prepares mentees for
Hitachi or Toshiba nor even university graduates employed in engineering positions. Engineering education was most congruent with the new metric of progress when it effectively de-‐emphasized the identities of graduates qua engineers. Global engineering education to provide protective competencies The neatness of this relationship between experiences in engineering education and lifetime employment within a corporate household began to erode with increased multi-‐national flow of major Western corporations. The image of economic competitiveness was not itself felt as news across Japan. What was news was the scale and scope that the expansion of
, learning outcomes assessment, and intercultural learning. She is also the Director of the Intensive English Institute at Illinois.Aaron Daniel Lewicki, University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana I am currently a graduate student in the College of Education at the University of Illinois studying organi- zation development and strategic design. I have interests in professional identity development and social cognitive learning experiences and their impact on college students.Valeri Werpetinski, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Valeri Werpetinski is a Specialist in Education in the Center for Teaching Excellence at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Seung Won Hong, University of Illinois at Urbana
. Page 22.913.2 IntroductionThere is an increasing demand from industry, and a responsive desire by academics, to providemore professional practice skills and experiences to BS graduates of engineering programs. Thisis actually not a new phenomenon, as engineering programs have changed emphasis frompractical training to theory and research often over the past 100 or more years. We are at a timenow, however, when global competitiveness in innovation combined with an ever increasingknowledge base and complexity of the problems we as engineers face, is driving the need for aneffective balance between theory and practice in the engineering curriculum.The methods of providing practical training to
models for thinking about gender and race in the context of engineering education. She was recently awarded a CAREER grant for the project, ”Learning from Small Numbers: Using personal narratives by underrepresented undergraduate students to promote institutional change in engineering education.”Jordana Hoegh, Purdue University Jordana Hoegh, M.S., is a doctoral student in the Department of Sociology at Purdue University. Her research interests include early adult life course and transitions, self and identity, sociology of the family, work and organizations, and social networks. She is currently conducting her dissertation research on the role of motherhood in the career paths of women with engineering
,” was written during a more radical moment in U.S. history. It was cutting in itscriticism in a way that was consistent with the general protest culture of the 1960s. Beginningwith the statement that, “Technology has brought mankind to a critical point in history. It is in aposition to destroy man; it may even be in a position to save him,” Olmstead‟s committeeadopted the stance that it was necessary to completely rethink how schools approached theliberal education of engineers. Students were to be trained to understand the role of technology“within the total human culture,” and to control its adverse effects. Considering the task at hand,the committee judged all prior attempts at engineering and liberal arts integration to be a failure,and
years. Some states have term limits while others do not.PE Boards, and PE Board members, have several basic functions. The primary and most timeconsuming function is the review of applications for licensure and the qualifications of theapplicants. Those applying to take the Fundamentals of Engineering examination (the “FEexam”) who are students or graduates of EAC/ABET engineering programs are typicallyapproved without much review. The educational qualifications of those with alternate educationbackgrounds are typically reviewed in detail by PE Board members. Board members typicallysplit up the task of detailed review of the education and experience of each individual applicationfor initial licensure as a professional engineer, and follow it
-based educational strategies across the engineering curriculum. As part of a"Sounding Board" of potential adopters, faculty will provide guidance, review componentsof redesigned courses, and participate in a series of workshops highlighting a variety ofproblem- and project-based instructional strategies1, 2.A “Test Bed” will act as a venue for the visible redesign of existing courses in ways thatemploy authentic learning and assessment activities--where students do real-worldengineering in the classroom. The redesigned courses will also help students inbound intotheir community of professional practice 3, 4. Project mentors drawn from a localprofessional engineering organization will help students to complete projects, and onlinewebinars/live
partnership between a four-year institution and a community college. I. IntroductionFor decades, engineering has been taught in an all too familiar method: Theory is imparted in aclassroom and reinforced in a laboratory where either a faculty member or a graduate studentassists students with their experiments. Student cohorts consists of a generally uniform group ofstudents who have just finished high-school, live in dormitories or apartments close to lecturehalls and have yet to have a taste of being part of the labor force. The few students not fittingthat description are denominated “non-traditional,” as they rarely amount to significantpercentage of the student population. Many of these non-traditional students never even make itto a
, there had not been an university-wide discussion. Amajor impetus behind the initiative described in this paper was to intentionally unite theserelated elements through creating an innovation ecosystem. An innovation ecosystem isthe result of interactions between diverse stakeholders in a community with a vision ofachieving goals through innovation or targeted creativity. Toward this end, facultyleaders in innovation from diverse disciplines gathered in a workshop to explore tactics tonurture, support and promote these activities and new initiatives. Specifically, this groupof faculty from engineering, management, arts, humanities and social sciences met to: 1. Build an awareness of all of the diverse activities and identify how they tie into
Engineering (RIFE) group, whose projects are described at the group’s website, http://feministengineering.org/. She is interested in creating new models for thinking about gender and race in the context of engineering education. She was recently awarded a CAREER grant for the project, ”Learning from Small Numbers: Using personal narratives by underrepresented undergraduate students to promote institutional change in engineering education.”Jordana Hoegh, Purdue University Jordana Hoegh, M.S., is a doctoral student in the Department of Sociology at Purdue University. Her research interests include early adult life course and transitions, self and identity, sociology of the family, work and organizations, and social networks
Education to theNew Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Olds, B. M. and R. Miller. 2004. The effect of a First-Year Integrated Engineering Curriculum on Graduation Ratesand Student Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Engineering Education 93 (1): 23-35.Ponton, M. K., J. H. Edmister, L. S. Ukeiley, and J. M. Seiner. 2001. Understanding the role of self-efficacy inengineering education. Journal of Engineering Education 90 (2): 247-251.Prince, M. 2004. Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3).R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation forStatistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.Schneider, L. and M. Terrell. 2010
Relation to IE“The Loyalty Quiz” A short quiz that helps Games and play learners identify the balance between being loyal to their friends and making wise decisions“6 Keys to Acting Ethically” Learners hunt for six “keys” in Games and play a treasure map; each key identifies a step in making an ethical decision“Discover Your Ethical Style” Instructions and layout for Games and play folding an origami box upon which learners answer