cadre of graduates who value experimentation as an essential and natural part of solving engineering problems; 4) to prepare students for industry as well as advanced courses and research and development oriented careers;Hardware DescriptionThe students are given a tutorial that leads them through the experiments, describing thehardware apparatus and the actions to be performed in each step. The hardware apparatusused in this experiment, shown in Figure 1, consist of: 1) a DC-DC switch-mode powerstage converter9, 2) a 14-bit PCI Data Acquisition Processor (DAP 840/103)10, 3) atermination board (MSTB 010-06-C1Z) [15], 4) a Pentium III 550-MHz personalcomputer (PC) with Windows NT 4.0, and 5) a micro-controller (PIC16F877)11
the Industrial Distribution Program choose sales as their careers and creatingthis one page handout helps them in their career. Students also think that working on the projects is challenging especially when they haveto interact with the company representatives to get information. However, they get exposed to Page 22.1226.4communicating officially and also providing lead time for the company representatives torespond. The students generally like the NEDA competition better because of their competitivespirit.Course DeliveryThere was one primary instructor for the class but several guest speakers were invited to presentvarious current
above 75 hours was defined as high attendance.End-of-Term Overall Scores. Traditionally, student academic performance is measuredby a wide range of indicators, which reflect how much they accomplish after certainlearning processes. According to Checchi, Franzoni, Ichino, and Rustichini (1999),academic performance is considered as the amount of human capital obtained duringstudents’ academic career, which includes “both elements of quantity and quality” (p. 2).For a class offered in blended-learning format, students’ end-of-term overall scores arecomposed of the calculated assessment of both onsite and online quality and quantity ofperformance based on the weighted weekly and daily individual sub-scores.Comprehensive grading rubrics are usually
that they have studied and onethat pays well. Third, to have a positive and enjoyable learning environment; which is a functionof many things including: the course instructor, access to the course instructors, classmates, theclassroom environment, the physical location and facilities, course materials, and even course Page 22.1272.3topics. Fourth, to gain practical insight or practical experience that will prepare them for theirjobs or their careers as part of the educational process. Fifth, to obtain these things at areasonable cost and a cost that is a good value for the students (or whomever is funding theireducation). There may be many
disciplines. As in today’s world most engineering projects arecompleted by teams, it is imperative that the students understand what teamwork is at an earlystage. Most of the freshmen students at TAMUQ have had limited exposure to teamwork in theirhigh school careers, hence they need to be provided with the opportunity to develop these skillsand be given appropriate feedback tools. In our global age, we need to interact with individualsfrom different cultures and disciplines, therefore teamwork skills are considered of utmostimportance. These include strong leadership, effective communication, proper decision-makingand conflict management. These skills might not come naturally to certain individuals and needto be cultivated.In the ENGR111 course, the
). The remainder of the schools will notcomplete a post-course survey until late May or early June. An analysis of differences pre- topost-course is not meaningful until all data is collected.Student Responses – Pre-Course Survey Page 22.1644.6Figures 2 and 3 illustrate student responses to college and career interests regarding STEM. Figure 2 Student Interest on Studying STEM Disciplines in College Figure 3 Student Interest in Engineering & Technology CareersFigures 4 – 6 illustrate the perceived significance of instruction, activities, and interactions in
school, receiving encouragement andsupport, work and career satisfaction, learning perspective and alternative solutions to theirproblems, less work and non-work conflict, and gaining individual recognition, confidence andself esteem. The mentor’s role is to listen, refer, advise, help the mentee gain perspective, and toserve as a role model. Mentors and mentees discuss problems and recurring themes. The peermentoring program is voluntary. Mentees who begin the peer mentoring program can opt out atany time. When the teacher quality improves, the students’ achievements also improve8. Mentorsfeel an even greater commitment to engineering and enjoy the experience of helping others.ObjectivesThe objectives of this study are to (1) provide new
before coming to University of Wisconsin-Platteville. His research interests are in the areas of thermo-mechanical design and engineering education. Page 22.533.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Effect of Math Competency on Success in Engineering Science CoursesAbstractA few decades ago, only students with a strong math and science background would seriouslyconsider pursuing a career in engineering. Today, with the exception of highly selective colleges– it is common among many engineering programs around the nation to admit
always disappointed in myself if that’s where I end up”. Several studyparticipants stated that because they were fairly new to construction education, they relied onthe transmission perspective too often. “I consider myself an expert in construction. I have spent 30 years in the industry and so therefore I’m very comfortable with the content. However, as someone that’s relatively new to academia I think it’s easy for me to fall into a transmission style.“Another stated, “Initially I was very transmission, but as I move along and develop in my career I’m finding that the developmental and apprenticeship styles are becoming more important. I think that’s a natural transition as we become more comfortable in what
elementary, middle and highschool levels of the State of Campeche by creating high quality learning environments thatpromote interactive classrooms and contribute to a better understanding of science andmathematics while promoting careers in science, engineering and technology.Previous work2 on P-12 Mexican teachers’ perceptions about engineers revealed that thispopulation perceives engineers as “thinkers” rather than “doers.” Given that teachers’ ideas,knowledge and attitudes towards engineering and science might influence their students’perceptions toward these fields, it is necessary to explore the conceptions held by students toprevent (or correct) potential misconceptions. Addressing potential misconceptions is of criticalimportance since it
Engineering Graphics course, severalimprovements were implemented. The enhancements to the existing Engineering Graphicscourse are discussed.1. IntroductionFor the past 75 years, Kettering University has provided its students with top quality classroominstruction, state-of-the-art laboratory facilities and career-oriented work experience in industry.Kettering offers Bachelors Degree programs in engineering, science, mathematics, andmanagement. Kettering students begin a unique five year cooperative education program in theirfreshmen year by alternating 12-week period of classroom studies with related work experiencein over 600 corporate affiliates. The corporate sponsors of Kettering University students includeover 600 other companies as well as the
todemonstrate the inclusion of diversity. It must include diverse viewpoints among participantsand prepare graduates for careers in the global context. Students must be exposed to culturalpractices other than their own. Also, the institution must establish and enforce expectations forethical behavior by administrators, faculty and students.While ABET is focused mainly on what a student learns in terms of outcomes, AACSB has aslightly greater emphasis on the environment in which a student learns. However, similarly toABET Criteria, AACSB sets Standards which the institution must demonstrate they meet. Thismeans the assessment of learning portion of the two accreditation bodies is actually quite similarin scope and detail. The process of outcomes
purpose of this first phase of a multi-phase study is to describe,from the perspective of grade 7 students, what engineering means. They will be asked how they Page 22.601.2define and interpret, or recognize and value, the word ―engineering‖ through the use of writtensurveys and interviews. Based upon the results of this investigation, it is anticipated thatoptimized assistive programs can be developed for teachers to provide broader awareness of, andencouragement for, the engineering profession as a career choice. It is also expected that thisresearch will assist in making improvements to current outreach and engineering
for responsiblemanagement roles in the design, construction, and operation of major construction projects. Thefocus of the program is on the fundamental concepts and technical skills required to create awide range of career paths in the construction profession. This paper shows that by introducinghands on project opportunities, field trip to under-construction projects, introduction to relatedsoftware, hands-on lab work, contemporary education, financial support and through propermentoring, the enrollment, retention and successful graduation of underrepresented minority(male and female) can be significantly increased which will lead to a balanced workforce andimprove the national economy.BackgroundIn an increasingly competitive and technology
AC 2011-2493: EOE FIRST YEAR INTEREST GROUPS: SUCCESS IN EN-GINEERING STARTS HERE A PROGRESS REPORT ON SUCCESSES &ONGOING IMPROVEMENTSAndrea M. Ogilvie, University of Texas, Austin Andrea M. Ogilvie is the director of the Equal Opportunity in Engineering (EOE) Program at The Uni- versity of Texas at Austin. Andrea came to the University as EOE director in July 2001 after six years in industry, where she had a very successful career as a structural engineer for Kellogg Brown & Root and HDR Engineering, Inc. As EOE Director, Andrea leads Cockrell School of Engineering efforts to recruit and retain ethnically underrepresented students as well as students who have backgrounds or experiences that will contribute
construction where undergraduates are mostlikely to cheat in colleges. Most professional organizations are trying to address the issues byincluding strict professional guidelines. Recently the American Association of EngineeringSociety (AAES), an umbrella organization of eleven engineering organizations summarized theirprofessional codes and giving more importance on ethics. That is one of the reasons ethics isbecoming an essential part of professional education because it helps students deal with issuesthey will face in professional practice. The best way to teach ethics is by using cases—not justthe negative cases that make the news, but the kinds of cases that an engineer or contractor ismost likely to encounter in their professional career
AC 2011-211: BENEFITS OF MENTORING STUDENTS IN DESIGN COM-PETITIONSScott F. Kiefer, Michigan State University Scott Kiefer began his career at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez where he spent two years. He then spent six years at Tri-State University (now Trine University), a small teaching college in Angola, Indiana. He then taught at Michigan State University for two and a half years, and is currently at York College of Pennsylvania.Dr. Craig W. Somerton, Michigan State University Craig W. Somerton is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. He teaches in the area of thermal engineering including thermodynamics, heat transfer, and thermal design. He has also taught
evaluations – All of us adopted some form of this approach at the Page 22.301.3 beginning of our own teaching careers and continued it as we mentored new professors, sometimes with the help of the student club. Our current role is to facilitate this process and provide people with several sample forms to use on their own, rather than taking direct action.• A University level Teaching and Learning Enhancement Fund (TLEF) proposal was awarded to support a workshop on educational assessment (2008-2009). Professor Royce Sadler (Griffith University, Australia) presented a plenary lecture and a two day workshop in April, 2009 along with individual
AC 2011-2407: COLLECTIVE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF THE IN-TERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE: RISING SOPHOMORE ABROAD PRO-GRAMElizabeth M. Tront, Virginia TechJoseph G. Tront, Virginia Tech Electrical & Computer Engineering Faculty Director of Extended Campus Programs for ECE Page 22.338.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Collective Review and Assessment of the International Experience: Rising Sophomore Abroad ProgramAbstractDeveloping global leadership in engineering is dependent upon getting students involved ininternational leadership experiences early in their college career
ObjectivesAfter the successful pilot project had been completed, a proposal was submitted to NSF in theCCLI Phase 1 program. When funding was secured, the project team began planning fordevelopment of laboratory modules that could be implemented in ECE 125 each semester for thegrant period of two years (four semesters). The goal of the proposed laboratory was to exerciseand enhance the creative process in lower level ECE students. It was our desire to emphasizecreativity and visual appearance in the design of a product. The project objectives included: 1) Making ECE more appealing to students early in their academic career; 2) Demonstrating that engineering is a creative process; and 3) Prompting students to think about problems in a
working careers in an increasinglyglobalized economy. 2 This is particularly true for engineering and engineeringtechnology students in school now who will function in a workplace flooded withproducts, standards, technologies, and quality systems with origins outside the U.S.Growth and economic opportunity will be associated with countries like India and Chinawith expanding populations and rapid growth rates. It is common now for companies tohave engineering centers in several countries so that the work proceeds 24 hours a dayand communication via the internet is constant and instantaneous. It is incumbent on U.S.universities to continue to internationalize their students’ educational experience
, and IEEE ICC 2006-09, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Confer- ence 2007-08, and IEEE International Sensors Conference 2004, etc. She served as an Associate Editor for IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications for 2006-2008. She has been a senior member of the IEEE since 2007. She is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award in 2009. Page 22.436.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Design of Simulink Projects for an Undergraduate Communications CourseAbstractThis paper describes a set of six Simulink based laboratory
discourage them topursue careers in the nanoelectronics field.The main idea on how to teach introductory course on quantum mechanics is in the developmentof a new combined lecture/lab course where students learn the fundamental laws and principlesof quantum mechanics by using the study of nanostructures as a vehicle. The new notions thatstudents acquire in lecture rooms can be applied when they carry out lab experiments and virtuallabs using educational Java applets. Such combination of learning tools helps students with verydifferent educational backgrounds to comprehend the novel quantum-mechanical concepts1 andapply them for the solution of problems in nanoelectronics. The developed lab manualcomplements the textbook2 written specifically for
industrial training [9. p 340]. Theyreported little difference between dip.tech examinations and those set in the universities. Second,both in terms of student expectations and work actually done as graduates the distinction madeby the Percy Committee that universities should be the primary trainers of R & D personnel thatdip.tech students expected to go into R & D or Management. Among the diplomates from whom Page 22.777.11data was obtained 38% were in research suggesting that their courses had not prevented themfrom getting a research post. As for their future careers the diplomats in this sample lookedtoward having increased responsibility
andproductively as possible, recognizing that most students will experience some form of growingpains.1,13,14 In an attempt to facilitate the transition, the Capstone program decided to ask formerstudents, many that are in industry careers, to identify the challenges they had faced as Capstonestudents and to provide feedback to incoming students about how best to prepare for andsurmount such challenges.The remainder of this paper will explain how alumni feedback was gathered, document the majorfeedback trends and categories, and describe the implications of such feedback on the design ofengineering courses. The hope is that the voices and experiences of alumni will provideperspective, guidance, and confidence to students entering the Capstone program. It
indicated that they developed leadership skillsas a result of their involvement, and that PFP contributed positively to their overall collegeexperience. Participants also improved their communication and time management skills.Participants perceived less of a positive impact on their choice of career and major, and onlyslightly more that half of the participants believed that participation in PFP had a positive effecton their academic performance.The participants generally did not find their duties as mentors to be difficult, as shown in Figure5. The most difficult aspect of working with PFP was time management, followed by thetechnical challenges of working on the robots. A large majority of participants did not findteaching, managing the budget
AC 2011-2319: SURVEY OF THE UNIQUE CHALLENGES THAT MI-NORITY ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE STUDENTS ENCOUNTERAdrienne R. Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Michigan Tech having moved from Mississippi State University in Jan 2010, where she was a tenured Associate Professor. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame in 2003 and B.S. from Michigan Technological University in 1998. Adrienne’s research interests include electrokinetics and the development of biomedi- cal microdevices. She earned a 2007 NSF CAREER award; her group has published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Lab on a Chip, and had an
professional careers] as designers or managers”15This multidisciplinary awareness builds system safety literacy which can help engineeringstudents later in their careers contribute to accident prevention by seeking or facilitatingcoordination between themselves (the technical specialists), management, and workers/operatorsover system safety issues. In other words, it will help them seek and engage in productiveconversations pertaining to accident prevention and system safety with different stakeholdersfrom different backgrounds.It was noted in the Introduction of this work that system accidents, also termed “organizationalaccidents”, have an intrinsic organizational contribution to their occurrence beyond the technicaland human error
want to be involved. “ One of these programs, Women’s Technology Program (WTP), was started in electricalengineering and has been cloned in mechanical engineering. Women student engineers whowanted to find a way to encourage more women originally started it. WTP is an in-residentsummer program for rising high school seniors. It is specifically targeted at young women whohave strong aptitude in math and serious doubts about engineering: . . . so we occasionally annoy some parents when we turn down their daughter who has already done AP up the wahzoo and is clearly going to be an engineer. This is really aimed at young women where we want to get them here to understand that this is a career you could do – ‘there are other young women
neering and technology education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Thomas F. Wolff, Michigan State University Dr. Thomas F. Wolff is Associate Dean of Engineering for Undergraduate Studies at Michigan State University. In this capacity, he is responsible for all activities related to student services (academic ad- ministration, advising, career planning, women and diversity programs, etc.) and curricular issues. He is principal investigator on several NSF grants related to retention of engineering students. As a faculty member in civil engineering, he co-teaches a large introductory course in civil engineering. His research and consulting activities have focused on the safety