value can bemade. Page 22.845.10References1 Carlson, C., and Wilmot, W. “Innovation: The Five Disciplines for Creating What Customers Want,” CrownBusiness, ISBN 13:978-0-307-33669-9, 2006.2 Thursby, M., Fuller, A., and Thursby, J., “An Integrated Approach to Educating Professionals for Careers inInnovation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 8, No. 3, 389–405, 2009.3 Sager, B., Fernandez, M., and Thursby, M., “Implications of a Multidisciplinary Educational and ResearchEnvironment,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18, pp. 57-69, 2006.4 Kingon, A. I., Thomas, R., Markham, S. K., Aiman-Smith, L., Debo, R.. “An
2009-304.8. W. Akili, Integrating practical experience in a geotechnical/foundation engineering class: The role of the adjunct faculty, proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 8423-8436. Page 22.862.109. S. Nasrazadani and R.A. Mirshams, Teaching heat transfer through industry participation, proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, paper AC 2007-832.10. S.D. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby and W.M. Sullivan, Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field, Jossey-Bass, San
implementing thechosen option(s). Even so, implementing the menu of CT tools that are currently beingdeveloped will require the leadership and time of experienced experts. It is also essential to keepresources and training models up to date based on the needs of the ISU community andcoordinate these efforts with current related research findings.To sustain these three areas of strength and institutionalize ADVANCE successes, three areas oftraining have been identified – some focused on audience (e.g. department chair or searchcommittee training), some on the training topic (systemic unintended bias).DEPARTMENT CHAIR TRAINING:In collaboration with the university level administration, ADVANCE-ISU has provided trainingworkshops for all department chairs
-948, Oct. 2006.[5] A. Gadre, D. Maczka, D. Spinello, B. McCater, D. Stilwell, W. Neu, M. Roan, and J. Hennage, “Cooperativelocalization of an acoustic source using towed hydrophone arrays,” in Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, 2008.AUV 2008. IEEE/OES, Oct. 2008, pp. 1-8.[6] E. Marques, J. Pinto, S. Kragelund, P. Dias, L. Madureira, A. Sousa, M. Correia, H. Ferreira, R. Goncalves, R.Martins, D. Horner, A. Healey, G. Goncalves, and J. Sousa, “AUV control and communication using underwateracoustic networks,” in OCEANS 2007-Europe, June 2007, pp. 1-6. Page 22.986.13
., Cabral, M. T.,Frodeman, R., Hogenhuis, C., Heyd, T., Lemons, J., McKinstry, R., Lutes, M., Meulller, B., Domingos,J., Miguez, G., Munasinghe, M., Muylaert de Araujo, M. S., Nobre, C., Ott, K., Paavola, J., Pires deCampos, C., Pinguelli Rosa, L., Rosales, J., Rose, A., Wells, E., Westra, L., (2006), White Paper on theEthical Dimensions of Climate Change, The Collaborative Program on the Ethical Dimensions of ClimateChange, accessed from the Internet, January 2011.[3] Brown, D., 2002, American Heat, Ethical Problems with the United States Response to GlobalWarming, Roman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland Page 22.906.9Appendix ASTS 201 Ethics
methodology.2. Overview of QFDQFD method was documented in Japan in the mid 1970’s and was first introduced to theUnited States in 1983 by Professor Yoji Akao. Since then, remarkable development andimplementation of QFD for curriculum design and improvement have been observedworld-wide 5. QFD method is a technique linking customer demands and productdevelopment. Ranking system in QFD method helps to identify and prioritize customer’svoice clearly.One of the main principles used in QFD is to determine directly from customers whatthey expect in a particular product or service viz., quality of curriculum in the instantcase. This is called Voice of Customer in parlance of QFD. There are different
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Keys to Success in the IEEE Region 3 Student Hardware CompetitionAbstractSince the 1980’s, IEEE Region 3 has had an annual conference, named SoutheastCon, thatinclude student and professional programs. The student hardware competition is considered thecentral event within the student programs. It continues to maintain its original focus of thedesign and building of Robots that compete by performing a pre-defined task. Earlier names ofthis competition were solar car contest, “seeker” car and design contest. On the average about 49of the 101 member universities participate in the student competition each year. Electricalengineering programs continue to take advantage of this contest
studentlearning.AcknowledgmentsThe views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not purport to reflect the position ofthe United States Military Academy, the Department of the Army, or the Department of Defense. Page 22.917.15Bibliography1. Boettner, D., Norberg, S., Melnyk, R., Highley, J., Rounds, M., and Arnas, A. Ö., 2006, “Teaching theFundamentals of Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics through an Integrated Systems Approach,” Proceedings ofthe International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 5-10, 2006, Chicago, IL, Paper #:IMECE2006-13815.2. Boettner, D.D. and B.G. Crawford, “Consistency Considerations for Integrated Thermodynamics
writtenreflections after each focus group, the students are instructed to follow the SAID framework inwhich they describe specific situations (S), their reaction (affect) to that situation (A), theirinterpretation of the incident (I), and their decision making as a result of the incident (D).[19-21]For the process reflection report, students are instructed to look back at their progress over thesemester by referring to their journals and their written reflections. They then write a processreflection report that describes their learning and development over the semester. This reportprovides a synthesis of each student's learning over the course of the semester and is based onmultiple forms of reflection.Narrative ResearchThis phenomenological study used
Summit on the Future of Mechanical Engineering. Washington, D.C., April 16-18.4 National Academy of Engineering (2004). The Engineer of 2020. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.5 National Academy of Engineering (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.6 Duderstadt, J. (2008). Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education. The Millennium Project, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, http://milproj.dc.umich.edu.7 National Academy of Engineering (2008). Changing the Conversation. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.8 Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. (2009
] Celebrating 50 Years of Robotics, www.icra2010.org.[8] From Internet to Robotics: The Next Transformative Technology, Computing Communication Consortium Roadmap, 2009. Available at www.us-robotics.us/ and www.cra.org/ccc/robotics.[9] Engineering Criteria 2000, 2nd Edition, Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc, Baltimore, MD, 1997.[10] Kinzel, G., Kumar, V. and Wei, S., “An educational experiment in teaching mechanism design and manufacturing using multi-university teams,” Proceedings of the 4th National Applied Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Cincinnati, OH, Dec 10-13, 1995.[11] David Cappelleri, James Keller, Terry Kientz, Peter Szczesniak and Vijay Kumar
based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.0930229. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Page 22.1271.10
science and technology students the institution wanted to know more about the current status and health of STEM majors. As is happening at many campuses over the past few years the university has become majority female. That fact coupled with the institution‟s strong liberal arts tradition makes it an interesting place to test ideas about attracting and retaining females and underrepresented groups into STEM. In the national context it is well known that women are still not represented in the sciences in accord with their numbers in the population though the representation varies by field where about half of undergraduate degree earners in the life sciences are female but only 25% in physics are female. Women earn 35% of the chemical
:[1] TIME.com (Partners with CNN), (February 4 2010), The Unsustainable U.S. Health Care System, http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/02/04/the-unsustainable-u-s-health-care-system/. (Web visited in December of 2010).[2] CardioNet, see http://www.cardionet.com/. Visited in May of 2009.[3] V. Shnayder, B. Chen, K. Lorincz, T. R. F. F. Jones, and M. Welsh, “Sensor networks for medical care,” Technical Report TR-08-05, Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University , 2005.[4] Ohno-Machado et al., “SMART: Scalable Medical Alert Response Technology,” http://smart.csail.mit.edu/.[5] Lenert et al., “WiiSARD :Wireless Internet Information System for Medical Response in Disasters
://www.nanoscience.com/index.html15. Veeco Caliber User Manual , www.veeco.comAcknowledgementThis paper is based upon work supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation underGrant DUE # 0737204. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material arethose of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation Page 22.1668.12
/acquisitionworkforce, April 2010. 2. The Defense Acquisition University provides a full range of basic, intermediate, and advanced certification training, assignment-specific training, applied research, and continuous learning opportunities for DoD personnel. Information can be found at http://www.dau.mil/default.aspx . 3. Bloom B. S., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc., 1956. 4. Anderson, L.W., and D. Krathwohl (Eds.), A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York, 1956. 5. Information regarding graduate programs at the Air Force Institute of Technology can be found at
studentsfrom majors other than engineering. Page 22.65.13References 1. Bransford, J., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2. McKenna, A.F., B. Yalvac, and G.J. Light. 2009. The role of collaborative reflection on shaping engineering faculty teaching approaches. Journal of Engineering Education 98(1): 17-26. 3. Ohland, M. W. Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eirs, O., Chacra, D., & Layton, R. A. (2008). Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs, Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3), 259-278. 4
encouraged.AcknowledgementsThis work presented herein was supported in part by Texas Workforce Commission under theaward number 2908WSW000 and U.S. Department of Education ARRA grant award numberS397A090044.Bibliography1. U.S. NRC, “Combined License Applications for New Reactors,” Sep 22, 2010, available online at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html.2. U. S. Energy Information Administration, “Electric Power Industry 2009: Year in Review,” Nov 23, 2010, available online at http://www.eia.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epa_sum.html.3. K. Bozynski and J. D. McCowan, “Recruitment to the Profession: A Student-Led Approach,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 257-261, July 1995.4. J. Gleason, K. Boykin, P. Johnson, L. Bowen, K. Whitaker, C. Micu
Annual Conference & Exposition (2004)3 A project-based learning approach to design electronic systems curricula, Macias-Guarasa, J.,Montero, J.M., San-Segundo, R., Araujo, A., Nieto-Taladriz, O., IEEE Transactions onEducation, 49 3, 389-3974 Project based learning as a pedagogical tool for embedded system education Rui Hong Chu.Lu, D.D.-C., Sathiakumar, S., IEEE Transactions on Education, 51 1, 108-1135 PeopleMover: an example of interdisciplinary project-based education in electricalengineering Daems, W., De Smedt, B., Vanassche, P., Gielen, G., Sansen, W., De Man, H.,IEEE Transactions on Education, 46 1, 157-1676 Online Labs and the MARVEL Experience Dieter Müller and José M. Ferreira, International Journalon Online Engineering, 1 1, p
of these groups are involved with another group in the decision making process,there is a high probability that there will be conflicts in their value systems that must beovercome.References1. Morris, William T. 1977. Decision Analysis. Grid Publishing. Columbus, OH. 290 p. Page 22.164.122. Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J.,and Greco, S. 2010. Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer, Inc. New York,NY3. Giron, F. J., and Martinez, M. 1998. Applied Decision Analysis.Kluwer Academic. Boston, MA. Page 22.164.13
University. 1991; 66: 201-208.2. Alkhasawneh R, Hobson R. Summer transition program: A model for impacting first-year retention rates forunderrepresented groups. American Society for Engineering Education. 2009; AC 2009-926.3. Bernold LE, Spurlin JE, Anson CM. Understanding our students: A longitudinal-study of success and failure inengineering with implications for increased retention. Journal of Engineering Education. 2007; 96(3): 263-274.4. Conley DT. Rethinking college readiness. New Directions for Higher Education. 2008; 2008(144): 3-13.5. Evenback S, Hansen MJ, Williams GA. The influence of a summer bridge program on college transition. StudentLearning Outcomes, Academic Performance, and Retention. 48th Annual Forum of the Association for
, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006, pp. 101,97, 111.12. S. K. Foong, D Kiang, P Lee, R H March and B E Paton, How long does it take a bouncing ball to bounce aninfinite number of times? Physics Education, January 2004, 40- 43.13. Audacity(http://audacity.sourceforge.net/ ). Retrieved on January 4, 2011.14. Goldwave (http://www.goldwave.com/ ). Retrieved on January 4, 2011.15. Holly M. Matusovich, Ruth A. Streveler and Ronald M. Miller, Why do Students choose Engineering? AQualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Students’ Motivational Values, Journal of Engineering Education, October2010, October 2010. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3886/is_201010/ai_n56442207/?tag=content;col1Retrieved on January 4, 2011.16. Holly M
serviceenvironment:information services for and by the millennial generation”, Reference Services Review, Vol. 38 No.1,pp. 108-124[2] Nolan, M., Tschirhart,L., Wright, S., Barrett, L., Parsons, M. and Whang, L. (2008). “Science Experiments:Reaching Out to Our Users”, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. http://www.istl.org/08-fall/article1.html[3] Barratt, C.C., Acheson, P. and Luken, E., "Reference models in the electronic library: The Miller LearningCenter at the University of Georgia", Reference Services Review, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp.44-56[4] Faix, A.I., Bates, M.H., Hartman, L.A., Hughes, J.H., Schacher, C.N., Elliot, B.J. and Woods, A.D. (2010), “Peerreference redefined: new uses for undergraduate students”, Reference Services Review, Vol.38 No.1, pp. 90
2007[4]. A. D. Koutsou, F. Seco, A. R. Jimenez, J. O. Roa, J. L. Ealo, C. Prieto, and J. Guevara, “ Preliminary Localization Results with an RFID based Indoor Guiding System”, IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing, Spain, Oct. 2007[5]. M, Philipose, K. P. Fishkin, Intel Research Seattle, D, Fox, university of Washington, D. Hahnel, W. Burgard University of Freiberg, “Mapping and Localization with RFID Technology”, Intel Research Corporation December 2003[6]. J. Brusey, C. Floerkemeier, M. Harrisoon, and M. Fletcher, “ Reasoning about Uncertainty in Location Identification with RFID, AUTOID LABS ( http:// www.autoidcenter.org), 2006[7]. Hinske, S
, 2010. 3. Page, Ann (Ed.) (2004). Keeping Patients Safe: Transforming the Work Environment of Nurses. Committee on the Work Environment for Nurses and Patient Safety. National Academy Press: Washington, D.C. 4. Bogner, S. (1994). Human Error in Medicine. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. 5. Powell-Cope, G., Neslon, A.L., Patterson, E.S. Chapter 50: Patient care technology and safety in Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nurseshdbk/. Accessed December 21, 2010. 6. Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Ashgate Publishing: Farnham, UK. 7. Medical Device Use-Safety
that, if the same survey is given each semesterto the same group of students over 6 semesters, the familiarity of the survey will alter the results– the students may tend to simply repeat their survey answers without great forethought to thequestions. By conducting the surveys during the first half of each academic year for thesophomores and juniors, students will not be taking back-to-back surveys over three years. Thisshould enable us to evaluate less-biased survey results..References 1. McCarthy, J.J. and Parker, R. S., “The Pillars of Chemical Engineering: A Block Scheduled Curriculum”, Chemical Engineering Education, 38 (4), 292–301, 2004. 2. Parker, R.S. and Shannon, S.L., “Pillars of ChE: Systems Eng. I. An Integrated Course
psychiatry. Medical Education 38:859-867.9. National Research Council, C.o.U.B.E.t.P.R.S.f.t.s.C.. 2003. Bio 2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.10. National Science Foundation. 1997. Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education, Report to the National Science Foundation. National Science Foundation, Division of Undergraduate Education, Advisory Committee. Page 22.1593.711. Mierson, S. 1998. A Problem-based learning course in physiology for undergraduate and graduate basic science students. American Journal of Physiology 275 (Adv
the jump into the workplace is extremelyvaluable.” - Brian Nelson“ This PACCE project has helped me to prepare for my future as a quality engineer.” - BenTerpening“It was very important to for us to have the opportunity to participate in a project like this tofurther our education.” - Paul WochinskiConclusions International exchange students valued primarily soft skills they acquired in the ELprojects. Traditional and non-traditional students valued both soft and hard skills they gainedfrom these projects, but emphasized the refinement of soft skills. The formal assessment of thecourse by the institution revealed that all students, without any exception, appreciated theirexperience from the EL projects.References1. Balachandran, S
. Evans, "The Use of Elluminate Distance-Learning Software in Engineering Education," Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, June, 2007.6. M. Plett, D. Peter, S. Parsons, and B. Gjerding, "The Virtual Synchronous Classroom: Real Time Off-Campus Classroom Participation with Adobe Connect," Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June, 2008.7. Dale N. Buechler, “Can Pen Tablets be used to improve the Performance of Place-Bound Engineering Students?,” Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, June, 2010.8. Mark Holdhusen, “A Comparison Of Engineering Graphics Courses Delivered Face To Face, On Line, Via Synchronous Distance Education, and In Hybrid Formats
a portable lab facility,students can apply the tools they use in the classroom in their personal projects. The mostobvious examples involve tinkering with cars (e.g., finding security system workarounds forsomeone building a car from an early 90’s GM drivetrain) and robotics (e.g., adding a realelectrical engineering component to a project for a robotics competition). Less obvious are thekinds of activities that show how exciting engineering can be provided by our students that makeus so proud of them (e.g. finishing that great idea they had in their high school science fair ontheir own or a handicapped driver visiting science classes in their old high school).Whenstudents share these real world experiences, they are providing the best kind