of batterychemistries, i.e. NiMH or Li-Ion battery in the future. The development of the second bench unitis ongoing.Bibliography1. Ronning, J. and Grant, G., “Global hybrid electric vehicle markets and missions,” Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) paper 1999-01-2946, 1999.2. Hirose, K., Abe, S. and Killmann, G. “Overview of current and future hybrid technology,” SAE paper 2002-33- 0016, 2002.3. Liao, G., Weber, T. and Pfaff, D. “Modelling and analysis of powertrain hybridization on all-wheel-drive sport utility vehicles,” Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 218(10), 2004, 1125-1134, 2004.4. Hisamitsu, Y., Abe, T., Kinoshita, T. et al., “Research and Development Work on High-Performance Lithium
,"Educational Technology, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2000, pp. 57–60.5 D. Millard, M. Chouikha, and F. Berry, "Improving Student Intuition via Rensselaer‛s New Mobile StudioPedagogy", ASEE 2007 Annual Conference, Honolulu, HW, June 2007.6 C. J. Bonk, The Perfect E-Storm: Emerging Technologies, Enhanced Pedagogy, Enormous Learner Demand, andErased Budgets (London: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education, 2004). Page 22.545.13
students as part of the summer program offerings. These programs are Page 22.560.11an excellent opportunity for the engineering students to become familiar and comfortable withthe world in which they will have to operate while at the same time learning to look at issue froma different perspective and getting to know cutting edge research and technology overseas.References 1) Johnston, S. F. “Towards culturally inclusive global engineering?” European Journal of Engineering Education Mar2001, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p77-89, 13p 2) ABET link: http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2009- 10%20EAC%20Criteria
packages available to students.References1. Hey, J., Van Pelt, A., Agogino, A., Beckman, S., Self-Reflection: Lessons Learned in a New Product Development Class, Journal of Mechanical Design, ASME, Vol 129, No. 7, July 2007, pp. 668-676.2. Pink, Daniel, A Whole New Mind: Why Right-brainers will Rule the Future, Riverhead Publishing, 2005. Page 22.575.12
-world projects at their new positions. Page 22.613.11AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the Little Rock National Airport Executive CommissionersDeborah Swartz and Ronald Mathieu for their support during the project. The authors would alsolike to acknowledge two other students that worked on the project, Rodney L. Arnold and TaraN. Lancaster.References 1. Caldwell, B. S., Perspectives on Systems Engineering and Impacts on SE Education, Proceedings of the Annual Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Miami, FL, May 2009. 2. Sage, A. P., Systems Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and
Exposition, June 14-17, Austin Tx.6. Mahan, K., Huget, J., Chappell, J., Woodbury, K. and Taylor, R., 2009, “Excel in ME: Extending and Refining Ubiquitous Software Tools,” AC 2009-2295, 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14-17, Austin Tx.7. John, James E. and Keith, Theo G., 2006, Gas Dynamics, 3rd edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.8. Dennard, John S. and Spencer, Patricia B., 1964, Ideal-Gas Tables for Oblique-Shock Flow Parameters in Air at Mach Numbers from 1.05 to 12.0, NASA TN D-2221, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C. Page 22.665.19
. (2003). Working Hard Is Still Not Enough. North Carolina Justice and Community Development Center. May,20034. North Carolina Board of Science and Technology. (2003). Tracking innovation: North Carolina innovation index 2003. http://www.ncscienceandtechnology.com/5. Council on Competitiveness. (2004). Innovate America. http://www.compete.org/ pdf/NII_Final_Report.pdf6. Barrows, H. S. (1986). A Taxonomy of Problem Based Learning Methods. Medical Education, Vo. 20, 1986, pp. 481-486.7. Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C. & Berger, C.: 1999, Teaching Science: A Project-Based Approach, McGraw-Hill College, New York8. Hill A. M.: 1998, ‘Problem Solving in Real-Life Contexts: Alternatives for Design in
UIDapproach, we can create more inclusive learning environments that are more flexible and canaccommodate different learner characteristics. Our future work will investigate ways ofimproving the process of finding and mitigating inaccessible language used in all levels ofengineering education, in addition to making the environment more accessible and inclusive forstudents.References1 Synergies (2008 Annual Report). Rep. National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering. Web. .2 Vision, the NACME Continuum (2010 Annual Report). Rep. National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering. Web. .3 Variawa, C., and S. McCahan. 2010. Design of the learning environment for inclusivity. Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for
. In: IEEE EDUCON Annual Conference, 01, Madrid, 2010. The Future of Global Learning in Engineering Education. Madrid: IEEE, 2010.[04] http://www.ppgect.ufsc.br/dis/66/Disse_jl.pdf[05] Ciampi, M. M.; Brito, C. da R. Engineering and Technology Education Innovating for Growth. In: International Conference on Engineering and Technology Education, 11, Ilhéus, 2010. Engineering and Technology Education Innovating for Growth. Ilhéus: INTERTECH 2010.[06] Longo, W. P. e; Telles, M. H. C. Programa de desenvolvimento das Engenharias: Situação Atual. Revista de Ensino de Engenharia, 18. Rio de Janeiro: ABENGE, 1998, p.74-82.[07] Naisbitt, J.A. Megatrends 2000: Ten New Directions for the 1990’s. New York: AvonBooks, 1999. 416p.[08] JC e-mail 2426, de
. 1, 2003, pp. 85-90.4. M.I. Hoit, and M.W. Ohland, "The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 87, No. 1, 1998, pp. 79-86.5. D. Woods, R Felder, A. Rugarcia, and J. Stice, “The Future of Engineering Education. III. Developing Critical Skills,” Chemical Engineering Education, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2000, pp. 108–117.6. S. Sheppard, and R. Jenison, “Examples of Freshman Design Education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1997, pp. 248-261.7. M. Prince, “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, No. 3, 2004, pp. 223-231
Students", Computers & Education Vol. 49, No. 3, 2007, pp. 640-661.[5] Ye, Z., W. Peng, Z. Chen, and Y.-Y. Cai," Today’s Students, Tomorrow’s Engineers: an Industrial Perspective on CAD Education", Computer-Aided Design Vol. 36, No. 14, 2004, pp. 1451-1460.[6] Morozov, A., D. Kilgore, and C. Atman, "Breadth in design problem scoping: Using insights from experts to investigate student processes", 114th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.[7] Brand-Gruwel, S., I. Wopereis, and Y. Vermetten," Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill", Computers in Human Behavior Vol. 21, No. 3 SPEC. ISS., 2005, pp. 487-508.[8] Christiaans, H
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Program: http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2010- 11%20EAC%20Criteria%201-27-10.pdf 2. Koh, M.-S., Rodriguez-Marek, E., & Talarico, C. (2009). Development of Course-Assessment Metrics to Measure Program Outcomes Against ABET Criteria in a Digital Circuits Class. Proceedings of 2009 ASEE Conference, (p. 236). 3. Mason, G., & Dragovich, J. (2010). Program Assessmetn and Evaluation Using Student Grades Obtained on Outcome-Related Course Learning Objectives. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice , Submitted. 4. Das, N. (2008). Assessment and Evaluation of Engineering Technology Program
visit, sponsored some projects, donated money and equipment, and hired MSWC graduates.References 1. U.S. Fire Administration (2001, December), Wildland Fires: A Historical Perspective, Topica Fire Research Series I(3), http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/downloads/pdf/tfrs/v1i3.pdf, Retrieved September 1, 2010. 2. Absolute Astronomy (2007, October), October 2007 California wildfires, http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/October_2007_California_wildfires, Retrieved September 5, 2010. 3. V. Dharanalakota, S. Reddy, F. Maradona, and V. Gona (2010, January), Wildfire Detection and Monitoring System, Master’s Project Report in the area of Wireless Communications, National University, San Diego, CA, (www.nu.edu
] Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board. (2008, Accreditation criteria and procedures. Canadian Council of ProfessionalEngineers.[2] V. R. Neufeld and H. S. Barrows. (1974, 11). The "McMaster philosophy": An approach to medical education. J. Med. Educ.49(11), pp. 1040-1050.[3] M. Harris and R. Cullen. (2009, 06). A model for curricular revision: The case of engineering. Innovative Higher Education34(1), pp. 51-63.[4] M. Savin-Baden. (2008, 04). Problem-based learning in electronic engineering: Locating legends or promising problems? IntJ Electr Eng Educ 45(2), pp. 96-204.[5] W. E. Eder and V. Hubka. (2005, 02). Curriculum, pedagogics and didactics for design education. J. Eng. Des. 16(1), pp. 45-61.[6] D.A. Kotys-Schwartz, D. Knight, G. Pawlas
q. ITEC 3290 Technical Writing r. ITEC 3292 Industrial Safety s. ITEC 3300 Technology Project Management t. ITEC 3800 Cost and Capital Project Analysis u. ITEC 4293 Industrial Supervision v. ITEC 4300 Quality Assurance Concepts w. CHEM 1020 General Descriptive Chemistry Page 22.392.8 x. ITEC 3200 Introduction to Statistical Process Control y. MATH 1074 Applied TrigonometryIssues with a Bearing on the Creation of the New BS-PSET Program:Two additional issues that were identified as extremely important in the structuring of theprogram were the selection of the accreditation agency
, and identify effective strategies. Attempt a truly open ended design experience for teachers; and observe subsequent results with students. Seek to establish collaborative teaching efforts with existing teachers and programs that already teach creativity; e.g., bring Art and STEM teachers together to lead students in an open ended design experience. Continue to promote international exchange of educators who have experience with the use of design at all levels of education (K-20).Bibliography 1. Macho, S. (2010). American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE): K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division, AC 2010-2063, and
. (1995). The problem-based learning approach as an enhancement factor of personal meaningfulness of learning. Higher Education, 29(1), 93-101. 7. Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. San Francisco: Jossey-‐Bass 8. Ford, M. E., & Nichols, C. W. (1991). Using goal assessments to identify motivational patterns and facilitate behavioral regulation. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 7: Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 57–84). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 9. Ford, M., & Smith, P. (2007). Thriving with
. “Employers are looking for[AEE’s] CEM…and did not know what the LTU CEEM was all about….” The graduate alsoimplied that adding a co-op or internship would help.On the same scale, graduates were asked to rate the statement, “The amount of work required toearn a CEEM was appropriate.” The average rating was 3.68 with 73.7% agreeing or stronglyagreeing. One of the graduates who disagreed commented that he wanted more hands-on work!Another graduate who agreed to the statement loved the practical experience and wanted more tosupplement the coursework. The authors are encouraged to add more.Next, the graduates were asked to complete the statement, “The level of material that we coveredin the course(s) was….” On a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being too easy and
/acquisitionworkforce, April 2010. 2. The Defense Acquisition University provides a full range of basic, intermediate, and advanced certification training, assignment-specific training, applied research, and continuous learning opportunities for DoD personnel. Information can be found at http://www.dau.mil/default.aspx . 3. Bloom B. S., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc., 1956. 4. Anderson, L.W., and D. Krathwohl (Eds.), A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York, 1956. 5. Information regarding graduate programs at the Air Force Institute of Technology can be found at
studentsfrom majors other than engineering. Page 22.65.13References 1. Bransford, J., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2. McKenna, A.F., B. Yalvac, and G.J. Light. 2009. The role of collaborative reflection on shaping engineering faculty teaching approaches. Journal of Engineering Education 98(1): 17-26. 3. Ohland, M. W. Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eirs, O., Chacra, D., & Layton, R. A. (2008). Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs, Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3), 259-278. 4
encouraged.AcknowledgementsThis work presented herein was supported in part by Texas Workforce Commission under theaward number 2908WSW000 and U.S. Department of Education ARRA grant award numberS397A090044.Bibliography1. U.S. NRC, “Combined License Applications for New Reactors,” Sep 22, 2010, available online at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html.2. U. S. Energy Information Administration, “Electric Power Industry 2009: Year in Review,” Nov 23, 2010, available online at http://www.eia.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epa_sum.html.3. K. Bozynski and J. D. McCowan, “Recruitment to the Profession: A Student-Led Approach,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 257-261, July 1995.4. J. Gleason, K. Boykin, P. Johnson, L. Bowen, K. Whitaker, C. Micu
Annual Conference & Exposition (2004)3 A project-based learning approach to design electronic systems curricula, Macias-Guarasa, J.,Montero, J.M., San-Segundo, R., Araujo, A., Nieto-Taladriz, O., IEEE Transactions onEducation, 49 3, 389-3974 Project based learning as a pedagogical tool for embedded system education Rui Hong Chu.Lu, D.D.-C., Sathiakumar, S., IEEE Transactions on Education, 51 1, 108-1135 PeopleMover: an example of interdisciplinary project-based education in electricalengineering Daems, W., De Smedt, B., Vanassche, P., Gielen, G., Sansen, W., De Man, H.,IEEE Transactions on Education, 46 1, 157-1676 Online Labs and the MARVEL Experience Dieter Müller and José M. Ferreira, International Journalon Online Engineering, 1 1, p
of these groups are involved with another group in the decision making process,there is a high probability that there will be conflicts in their value systems that must beovercome.References1. Morris, William T. 1977. Decision Analysis. Grid Publishing. Columbus, OH. 290 p. Page 22.164.122. Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J.,and Greco, S. 2010. Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer, Inc. New York,NY3. Giron, F. J., and Martinez, M. 1998. Applied Decision Analysis.Kluwer Academic. Boston, MA. Page 22.164.13
University. 1991; 66: 201-208.2. Alkhasawneh R, Hobson R. Summer transition program: A model for impacting first-year retention rates forunderrepresented groups. American Society for Engineering Education. 2009; AC 2009-926.3. Bernold LE, Spurlin JE, Anson CM. Understanding our students: A longitudinal-study of success and failure inengineering with implications for increased retention. Journal of Engineering Education. 2007; 96(3): 263-274.4. Conley DT. Rethinking college readiness. New Directions for Higher Education. 2008; 2008(144): 3-13.5. Evenback S, Hansen MJ, Williams GA. The influence of a summer bridge program on college transition. StudentLearning Outcomes, Academic Performance, and Retention. 48th Annual Forum of the Association for
, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006, pp. 101,97, 111.12. S. K. Foong, D Kiang, P Lee, R H March and B E Paton, How long does it take a bouncing ball to bounce aninfinite number of times? Physics Education, January 2004, 40- 43.13. Audacity(http://audacity.sourceforge.net/ ). Retrieved on January 4, 2011.14. Goldwave (http://www.goldwave.com/ ). Retrieved on January 4, 2011.15. Holly M. Matusovich, Ruth A. Streveler and Ronald M. Miller, Why do Students choose Engineering? AQualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Students’ Motivational Values, Journal of Engineering Education, October2010, October 2010. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3886/is_201010/ai_n56442207/?tag=content;col1Retrieved on January 4, 2011.16. Holly M
Page 22.1629.10 The curriculum requires a proficient if not advanced knowledge of certain buildingsimulation strategies to execute the analysis approaches central to the proposed course’sconcepts. There are many software packages and pathways and each have certain strengths andweaknesses when it comes to building performance modeling. This section focuses on thecriteria upon which to select the appropriate tools for the curriculum. The students will need some previous knowledge of a few different performancemodeling software applications. Primarily, they will need proficiency with software(s) capable ofreliable yearly thermodynamic modeling for multiple zone buildings. It is critical that thesoftware be able to compute the load
present study, the students in universities of technology hold somealternative conceptions in Electricity. Therefore, the physics teacher should think how to teachthe topics of electricity in an effective way. Furthermore, more research is need on developingmore effective teaching strategy to enhance UT students’ conception about electricity. Finally, itis found that the UT students did lack of the ability/intention in reasoning and explanation. It issuggested that physics teacher should encourage students and provide them more opportunities toengage in reasoning activities in physics course.AcknowledgementThe funding of this research work is provided by the National Science Council, Taiwan, ROC,under grant NSC 97-2511-S-259-008-MY3
constructive, effective study groups to maximizeeach person’s learning within the study group environment.References Cited:1 Brower, A. M. & Inkelas, K. K. (2010). Living Learning Programs: One High-Impact Educational PracticeWe Now Know a Lot About. Liberal Education, 96 (2).2 Inkelas, K. K., Zeller, W. J., Murphy, R. K., Hummel M. L. (2006) Learning Moves Home. About Campus,10 (6), 10-16.3 Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1994). The impact of residential life on students. InC. L. Schroeder & P. Mable (Eds.), Realizing the Educational Potential of Residence Halls (pp. 22-52). SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.4 Pike, G. R. (1990). The Effects of Residential Learning Communities and Traditional
Education, 94(1), pp. 41-56, 2005.8. Besterfield-Sacre, M. and LJ Shuman, “The Future of Assessment” (Chapter 12) in Spurlin, J., Rajala, S., & Lavelle, J. (2008) (eds.) Designing Better Engineering Education Through Assessment: A Practical Resource Page 22.836.12 for Faculty and Department Chairs on Using Assessment and ABET Criteria to Improve Student Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing; pp. 307-327.9. Diefes-Dux, H.A., Moore, T., Zawojewski, J., Imbrie, P.K., & Follman, D. (2004). A framework for posing open-ended engineering problems: Model-eliciting activities. Proceedings of the 30th ASEE
. ―Learning to Navigate.‖ In Chaiklin, S. and J. Lave (Eds.) Understanding Practice: perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. p. 35-63, 1996.15. Kusterer, Ken. Know-how on the Job: The Important Working Knowledge of “Unskilled” Workers. Westview Press, 1978.16. Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, 1991.17. National Academy of Engineering. (NAE) The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academies Press, 2004.18. Orr, Julian. Thinking about machines. Cornell University Press, 1996.19. Robbins, Philip and Murat Aydede. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge