is an effort to link theknowledge and skills taught in upstream courses to the objectives in downstream courses. Thehorizontal integration of curriculum, on the other hand, focuses on the repeated exposure and useof certain knowledge, skills, or processes across courses in an educational program. Naumov etal. provided a straightforward diagram for vertical and horizontal curriculum integration, asillustrated in Fig. 124: Page 22.894.3 Figure 1. An example of vertical/horizontal curriculum integration24Mahajan et al.18 use curriculum integration by allowing students to use the same experimentalset-ups in multiple courses
to use unlimited availability of renewable energies in an economic way in contrast tofossil fuels which are finite and ultimately expensive.It is anticipated that the improving economy and alternative energy sources arecombining to create unique opportunities to obtain energy independence as well askeeping the environment green. Overall, this second course will motivate some of thestudents to pursue carrier in this lucrative and emerging field which will be beneficial to Page 22.379.11the society.References1. Felix A. Farret, M. Godoy Simoes, Integration of Alternative Sources of Energy, John Wiley and Sons,Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 20062. Kenneth
many of theengineering questions facing the next generation?While optics and optical engineering studies and research are often housed in physics andelectrical engineering departments, our web study has found eleven degree granting programs inoptics and photonics or optical engineering. Understanding these programs’ development, goals, Page 22.200.3and curriculum provides insight on this group of scientists and engineers who have becomeincreasingly valuable in the modern world. In addition to offering an uncommon degree option,the faculty who make up these departments are uncommonly interdisciplinary in their ownbackgrounds. Through
AC 2011-2077: THE IMPACT OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ONTEACHERS INTEGRATING ENGINEERING INTO SCIENCE AND MATH-EMATICS CLASSROOMHui-Hui Wang, University of Minnesota Hui-Hui Wang is a graduate student in Science Education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Minnesota. Her research interests are across both non-formal and formal setting. Her research primary relates to inquiry-based instruction and STEM integration in science education. She is also interested in developing STEM curriculum for K-12 science teachers.Tamara J Moore, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Tamara J. Moore is the co-director of the University of Minnesota’s STEM Education Center and an assistant professor of
: Practical Solutions to Issues of ConsistencyAbstractHistorically, the disciplines of fluid mechanics and thermodynamics have been taught as separatecourses using separately developed textbooks. Most undergraduate students form an early beliefthat these two aspects of thermal-fluid science and engineering are as far removed from eachother as cats are from dogs. It is not until the senior year or even into their graduate schoolexperience that the student begins to understand and appreciate the underlying physicalconservation laws upon which both of these disciplines are based. As a result of mechanicalengineering curriculum revision at the United States Military Academy at West Point, NewYork, separate courses in thermodynamics and fluid mechanics
information about this topic. (This information could be technical or could address the career or other aspects of the topic. Cite your sources.)The second part of each assignment varies widely from week to week in addressing the goal ofintroducing students to the breadth of career possibilities resulting from an ECE education. Forexample, following is the first week’s assignment: This assignment is designed to start you thinking about technology, society, applications and being an entrepreneur. The Global Positioning System (GPS) has become ubiquitous and integral to daily life. This would not have been dreamed of by its original developers. You may own several GPS devices for use in hiking, finding directions while
college. To this end, the course provides an overview of collegesuccess strategies and university resources available to students. Topics in the course includeself-assessment, motivation, goal-setting, study skills, learning styles, time management,organizational skills, stress management, decision making, and discovery of campus resources.Teaching methods and interventions from On Course: Strategies for Success in College and inLife (5th ed.) by Skip Downing17 were used to develop some of the curriculum, as well assuccessful strategies from faculty members who have taught similar courses, including modelsfrom the Academic Support Programs for Student Athletes.During the development of the course, multiple retention and advising experts from
The instruction of systems engineering is a difficult task, as this new yet prevalent area ofengineering requires knowledge within a practitioner that encompasses breadth and depth acrossvarious fields of engineering1. It is a requirement that any systems engineer have both breadthand depth in various niches of engineering poses an interesting problem in the development ofany pedagogy relative to the instruction of key systems engineering fundamentals. Thesefundamentals include design alternative identification, cost assessments, interface integration,risk identification, and many others2. It is through the instruction of systems engineering that keyskill sets necessary for completing the complex engineering tasks of today can be attained
#: H98230-08-D- 0171.3. Bryzik, Walter, Kim, Kyoung-Yun, and Ellis, Richard D. Systems Engineering Curriculum for Integrated Material Design and Reliazation for HA / DR Kits. Detroit : Wayne State University, 2010.4. Tennyson, Robert D. and Cocchiarella, Martin J. An Empirically Based Instructional Design Theory for Teaching Concepts. Twin Cities : Review of Educational Research, 1986, Vols. Vol. 56, No. 1, Pp. 40-71. DOI: 10.3102/00346543056001040. Page 22.932.7
effectiveness of an engineering curriculum is measured by how well studentscan apply and integrate their technical knowledge to solve real life problems. The currentengineering curriculum has been designed to only to provide the theory, however, it doesn’tprovide the integration of how this knowledge can be applied. The courses that are taken aspreparation for system engineering students include standard mechanical studies such asstatics, dynamics, and structural analysis, but also, computer software and hardwarecourses that study C programming, circuit analysis and electronics. These types ofcollegiate engineering classes that are taken on a general level in all system engineeringdisciplines, are supposed to provide the theory that is needed to build
AC 2011-1407: THE RESEARCH STUDIO: INTEGRATING INFORMA-TION LITERACY INTO A FIRST YEAR ENGINEERING SCIENCE COURSEMichelle Baratta, University of Toronto Michelle Baratta has held positions in academic and public libraries, as well as a corporate setting. Her education includes a Master’s degree in Information Studies (2007) and an Honours Bachelor of Science degree (2004), both from the University of Toronto. She is currently a Reference and Instruction Librarian at the University of Toronto’s Engineering & Computer Science Library.Alan Chong, University of Toronto Alan Chong is a Senior Lecturer in the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Toronto. His pedagogical research is primarily in the
AC 2011-711: INTEGRATION OF THE CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LAB-ORATORY WITH A FOCUS ON BIO-FUEL PRODUCTIONDanilo Pozzo, University of Washington Prof. Pozzo’s research interests are in the area of soft materials and nanotechnology. His group focuses on developing structure-function relationships for a variety of nano-structured materials having applica- tions in materials, alternative energy and separations. Prof. Pozzo obtained his B.S. from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagez and his PhD in Chemical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh PA. He also worked in the NIST Center for Neutron Research and is currently an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Washington where
, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He cur- rently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels. Page 22.431.1 c American Society for
objectswith occlusions in high-resolution video sequences. Rather than focus on a specific type ofobject,6 this research covers general moving objects. Furthermore, most of current algorithmsalso assume a stationary camera in which the background can be learned over a long period oftime and usually consists of tracking objects in a very low-resolution video sequence.7 Thisresearch does not require learning the background and focuses in tracking multiple movingobjects in high-resolution video. The proposed object tracking will be integrated during thedecoding stage of the H.264 compression,8 the current state-of-the-art compression standard, inorder to take advantage of its robust motion estimation, a really useful feature which provides uswith an
visualizationtool which could have supplemented traditional course material throughout their undergraduatecareers. The Ohio State University has created a “cornerstone” design course, available tofreshmen, in which basic micro-fluid dynamics concepts are presented, using CFD software as avisualization and verification tool (5). This allows freshmen to identify and develop an interest influid dynamics at the start of their undergraduate career, perhaps shaping their progressionthroughout the curriculum. Overall, this course is still somewhat a work-in-progress, but also aunique proof of concept for teaching computational modeling early in an undergraduatecurriculum. Results were seen in the high quality of the work produced by students, as well asthe
. Page 22.1609.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Using Arduino as a Platform for Programming, Design and Measurement in a Freshman Engineering CourseAbstract Arduino is a compact, inexpensive, open-source electronics prototyping platform builtaround an Atmel AVR microcontroller. The features, cost, and small size makes Arduino apotent tool teaching as well as practical device use in engineering projects. This paper reports onadapting the Living with the Lab (LWTL) curriculum to the Arduino platform. LWTL wasdeveloped with the Boe-Bot mobile robotics platform and the Basic Stamp microcontroller. TheArduino is more modern and has better technical capabilities, but
online instruction for preparing technology education teachers and engineers. Along with teaching courses in introductory engineering graphics, computer-aided design, descriptive geometry, and instructional design, he has conducted CAD and geometric dimensioning & tolerancing workshops for both high school teachers and local industry.Eric N. Wiebe, North Carolina State University ERIC N. WIEBE, Ph.D. Dr. Wiebe is an Associate Professor in the Graphic Communications Program at NC State University. He has authored or co-authored four texts on technical graphics and has been involved in Computer-Aided Design (CAD)/3-D modeling development and use since 1986. He has also worked on the integration of scientific
asking their own questions and designing experimentsto solve problems. They also call for students to make physical system models that demonstratetheir learning and understanding.33 K-12 engineering education may facilitate meeting theseobjectives and efforts have already resulted in novel curricular approaches that have formallystructured activities and learning objectives around state curricular standards in mathematicsand/or science.5,7,14Nevertheless, the inclusion of an engineering education curricular program in U.S. schools hasraised questions among researchers and teachers regarding the specific content to be taught aswell as the process for integrating this additional subject area into an already ambitious K-12school curriculum. In the
core to ensure thatassessment is an integral and sustainable part of the core design and implementation. It is alsoimportant that the processes yield information that is useful for satisfying accreditation criteria Page 22.1725.2from different agencies, including ABET.A Core Curriculum Task Force (CCTF) was charged in 2005 to undertake a major revision of theexisting core. The faculty driven process concluded that the design of the core should be based onstudent learning outcomes, and that the outcomes would use Bloom’s taxonomy 3 as a frameworkfor constructing these outcomes. It comes as no surprise that one of the most significantchallenges
formats for the first year experience than do the grads. The table showsthat the new format results in faster engagement with a PhD research topic, advisorconversations, integration into lab groups, and conversations with the PhD committees.We conclude that the new format fruitfully addresses the prior concerns of both ourfaculty and graduate students.Spring proposition: An original or an echo ? Graduate students are uniformly supported by outside grants. According, foreach advisor topic offered to new students in our late fall student-advisor selectionprocess, a funded proposal already exists. Whether the spring proposition courseproduces a novel proposal is suspect, but the defining purpose of spring is for the studentto take ownership
survey,instructors viewed themselves as a guide or facilitator, bringing students through the textbookmaterial in a “rational way” and providing alternate explanations to the text. Others attempt togive a “big picture” view, tying various elements of the course (and the curriculum) together into Page 22.788.13a cohesive whole. For some, the role shifts as needed, from mentor to partner to coach dependingon the student and the situation. Some express the need for them to make the topic interestingand accessible, and to develop new examples and homework problems. The role as an evaluatorwas
these existing assessment tools is that they have been developed basedon different frameworks, and hence, the integration of non-consistent assessment tools into anoverall program assessment is challenging. Beard et al.7 suggest that an assessment plan toevaluate curricular efforts to integrate professional skills into programs should includestandardized rubrics.Beyond the studies that focused on assessment of individual skills (e.g., teamwork), a few recentstudies proposed more comprehensive assessment tools targeting a larger set of professionalskills. For example, Huyk et al.23 studied engineering students enrolled in multi-disciplinaryproject team courses to investigate the impact of reflections on the service learning and otherproject
. Page 22.1159.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Planting the seeds of computational thinking: An introduction to programming suitable for inclusion in STEM curriculaAbstractInadequate math preparation discourages many capable students – especially those from traditionallyunderrepresented groups – from pursuing or succeeding in STEM academic programs. iMPaCT is afamily of ―Media Propelled‖ courses and course enrichment activities that introduce students to―Computational Thinking.‖ iMPaCT integrates exploration of math and programmed computation byengaging students in the design and modification of tiny programs that render raster graphics
process at Oregon State University where he is pursuing a MS in Mechanical Engineering. His secondary research interest is engineering education.Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He cur- rently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels. Acknowledgements - The
information directly into a text field, which goes through an approval process beforegetting published. This task thus involves the readers actively and collectively in generatingknowledge on a common topic. Readers engage in research and writing activities that can beeasily integrated into their school curriculum making it a useful resource for teachers andstudents alike. Figure 2. Homepage of the new Go! web siteThe web site is also continually monitored for visitor traffic and steps are taken to optimize it forsearch engines and promote it on partner sites. It is expected that these changes will help Go!heighten its impact within its target audience and effectively increase teen and young adult’sinterest in transportation
currently consults with faculty and teaching assistants. She earned her Ph.D. in educational administration at UW-Madison. She is PI for the ”Aligning Educational Experiences with Ways of Knowing Engineering (AWAKEN): How People Learn” project. As a member of the man- agement team for the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), she is collaboratively responsible for a course about teaching science and engineering.Ms. Moira Lafayette, University of Wisconsin, Madison Page 22.817.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Implementing an Effective
AC 2011-2160: A HANDS-ON APPROACH TO DEMONSTRATING HARD-WARE/SOFTWARE TRADEOFFS IN AN EMBEDDED SYSTEM DESIGNJeanne Christman, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Jeanne Christman is an Assistant Professor in the Computer Engineering Technology Department at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her expertise is in the area of Embedded Systems Desgin and System on a Chip. She is also actively involved in recruitment and retention of females in engineering technology.Eric J Alley, Rochester Institute of Technology Eric Alley is a 2011 graduate of the Rochester Institute of Technology with a degree in Computer Engi- neering Technology. His RIT career includes working as a teaching assistant for many core curriculum
physical model, with the latter understanding being referred to herewith the label used in the literature of a mental model [26]. It is important to note in these data that lacking prior knowledge R and T for Problem 1results in failure to solve the problem (S8 and S15), consistent with the emphasis placed on priorknowledge in the Integrated Problem Solving Model.19 Failure to make the required assumptionsabout the reactions at C and D in Problem 2 in the context of a mental model will result in failureto solve the problem, as shown in Table 2 for S8, S11, S13, S14, S15, S16, S21, S22, and S26. Asserting prior knowledge late in the solution process, results in an extensive and inefficientsearch of equations as shown for S10 in Table 1. This
AC 2011-2720: AN INSTRUMENT TO ASSESS STUDENTS’ ENGINEER-ING PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY IN COOPERATIVE PROBLEM-BASEDLEARNING (CPBL)Syed Ahmad Helmi Syed Hassan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Syed Helmi is an academic staff in the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and is currently a Ph.D. in Engineering Education candidate in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Khairiyah is an associate professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. She is presently the Deputy Director at the Centre for Teaching and Learning in UTM. Her main research areas are Process Modeling, Simulation and Control, and Engineering Education. She has been implementing
Michigan State. McDonough’s areas of interest include educational theory, student development and engineering education.Daina Briedis, Michigan State University DAINA BRIEDIS is a faculty member in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University. Dr. Briedis has been involved in several areas of education research includ- ing student retention, curriculum redesign, and the use of technology in the classroom. She is a co-PI on two NSF grants in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a Fellow of