Paper ID #7302How Land Use Change, Changed CultureMs. Aimee S Navickis-Brasch P.E., University of Idaho, Moscow Aimee Navickis-Brasch is a registered professional engineer with over nineteen years of experience in Hydraulic and Stormwater Engineering including positions with: Bovay Northwest Consulting Engineers (Dames and Moore), Boeing, and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). The ma- jority of her career was spent working for WSDOT as a headquarters hydraulic and stormwater engineer where she was responsible for providing statewide support including; design, research, training, men- toring, and
Paper ID #5808Social Constraints: A Critical Component of Global Humanitarian-basedProjectsAmy Wood, Brigham Young UniversityMr. Parry Fader Garff, Brigham Young UniversityProf. Carol J Ward, Brigham Young University Carol J. Ward is associate professor in the Sociology Department.Prof. Eric C. Dahlin, Brigham Young UniversityDr. Randy S. Lewis, Brigham Young University Dr. Randy S. Lewis is professor and chair of Chemical Engineering at Brigham Young University (BYU). He received his B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from BYU and Massachusetts Institute of Tech- nology, respectively. He currently serves as vice-chair of
Paper ID #7666The Impacts of Real Clients in Project-Based Service-Learning CoursesDr. Malinda S Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Malinda S. Zarske is the director of K-12 Engineering Education at the University of Colorado Boul- der’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. A former high school and middle school science and math teacher, she has advanced degrees in teaching secondary science from the Johns Hopkins University and in civil engineering from CU-Boulder. She is also a first-year Engineering Projects instructor, Faculty advisor for SWE, and on the development team for the TeachEngineering
. Page 23.1098.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Student Experiences in Service-Learning: Engineering vs. SciencesAbstractThe cognitive and affective benefits of service-learning (S-L) for students have been welldocumented, and S-L has become more common in many disciplines, including engineering, thehealth sciences, and education. Opportunities in the core sciences, however, seem sparse. Thispaper compares the attitudes of science majors and engineering majors toward S-L throughquantitative analysis of survey responses. The goal is to examine student experience andlearning in the context of other factors that might influence participation in S
in Engineering Service-LearningAbstractAttracting and retaining women in engineering is critical in the USA today. While women arecoming to college in overrepresented numbers, they are not represented equally to men inengineering majors. Though a university can only have limited impact on the attrition of womenin the engineering workforce, we can (and must!) work to improve recruitment and retention andto graduate women with adequate preparation for an engineering career. An increasing numberof engineering programs are integrating service-learning (S-L) into their curricula.For the past eight years of one S-L program, students in a college of engineering have beenwidely surveyed at the beginning of their studies and at the end of each
globally competent engineer as one who “work[s] effectively with people whodefine problems differently than they do” (p. 110).8 Moreover, we understand navigating acrosscultures to be a salient characteristic of working effectively with those “who define problemsdifferently.” We understand culture to be “dominant images” (p. 5),9 a framework also proposedby Downey and Lucena.10 Lucena nicely articulates this understanding of culture: “[I]ndividualsliving and working in a particular spatial and temporal location are challenged by dominantimages. Dominant images create expectations about how individuals in that location aresupposed to act or behave. In this … concept of culture, the image remains the same over aperiod of time, while individual or
with anintensive 4-day summer workshop (including a community college faculty member), whichresulted in action items including plans to alter specific courses. We also describe theDepartment of Education funded grant that is supporting this work to incorporate sustainability,service learning, and advances in educational technology in all STEM programs at ouruniversity.Unique features of these community and university efforts include the involvement of all facultymembers in our department in the project and as authors on this paper and the increasinginvolvement of engineering faculty and students in our community‟s sustainability efforts.IntroductionIn the Department of Engineering at Colorado State University-Pueblo, we are increasing
U.S. Merchant Marine Academy. Her pri- mary teaching responsibilities are in the solid mechanics and materials areas. She was awarded the 2012 ASEE NCS Outstanding Teacher Award. Vernaza consults for GE Transportation and does research in the area of alternative fuels (biodiesel), engineering education (project based learning and service learning), and high strain deformation of materials. She is one of the PIs of two NSF S-STEM grants and one NSF ADVANCE-PAID grant.Dr. Barry J Brinkman, Gannon UniversityDr. Scott E Steinbrink, Gannon University Dr. Scott Steinbrink is an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering
in Odense, Demark in the mid-1970’s, and it is now a program of the U.S.Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) through the currentfederal transportation law, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21). Thedesignated funding available to SRTS projects was eliminated in MAP-21, but those activitiesremain eligible for funding through the Transportation Alternatives program.SRTS accomplishes its goal by improving safety and physical infrastructure and by removingbarriers that currently prevent students from walking or biking to school. Schools form an SRTSaction team consisting of members with expertise in transportation, engineering, education,public health, and public safety. The SRTS planning process
, plasticsengineering, mechanical engineering, and/or civil engineering.13,14 Examples of SL projects inthese core courses are provided in Table 1. More commonly, SL projects are integrated intoprojects-based or design courses at levels ranging from first-year to capstone design to graduate.New elective courses specific to service projects focused around sustainability, global issues,and/or appropriate technology have also been developed.Table 1. Examples of LTS CoursesCourse SL Component Reference(s)Statics and Dynamics, Lewis-Clark Wheelchair ramp design/build 23State CollegeHeat Transfer, Mechanical installed heat saving devices at windows 15
teams.The program is structured with student-led divisions, each with 8-20 students, a faculty orindustry mentor, and a graduate teaching assistant (TA). Each division has one or more not-for-profit agency/ies (such as a museum, government service, charity, etc.) as a communitypartner(s). The students work with their community partner(s) to identify, develop, and deliverprojects that meet the community partner’s needs. Examples of such community needs includedesigning assistive technology for people with disabilities, developing database software forhuman services agencies, and developing engaging science-educational technology forelementary students. Additional projects can be seen athttps://engineering.purdue.edu/EPICS/Projects/Teams.Assessment
of listening to community members, and for instructionalpurposes offers numerous case studies and poses many reflection and discussion questions.Mihelcic et al.’s Field Guide to Environmental Engineering for Development Workers: Water,Sanitation, and Indoor Air similarly emphasizes community participation.9 Yet it is somewhatmore specifically scoped as an environmental engineering field guide, with extensive technicaldiscussion of appropriate technologies for water supply and treatment, latrine building,sanitation, etc. The design firm IDEO, on the other hand, has developed a Human CenteredDesign Toolkit, which is organized around processes, methods, and tools that can be used toidentify problems and design solutions for communities in need
onlydemonstrate engineering skills, but also enabled museum visitors to engage with the engineeringdesign process and “real engineers.” In essence, students worked with their client, the localscience museum, to provide an optimal design for their stakeholders, the museum visitors, whichfurther transferred knowledge of the engineering design process from the student to the public inan interactive exhibit.Lecture topics covered in the leadership module provided a framework for developing the corecompetencies of successful leaders14. One central theme was the three “C”s of leadership:competence, compassion and chronos (time management). The module offered methods fordeveloping personal and team leadership styles; addressed differences in learning and
transform to a program. LTS Assessment Of Stakeholders Explored the value of assessment and the assessment ‘space’ – what are the impacts of effort on people Of Program Explore impacts of program on/to others LTS Community Community of Learners Explored ways to build a community of LTS practitioners and scholars Page 23.1401.7Workshop close3. Relationships – Description of the type(s) of relationship you have each of your stakeholders and what the expectations are to maintain this relationship are the focus
students from ages 7 through 13. Table 2 is a breakdown ofparticipants’ ages, grades, and gender. There were a total of ten student volunteers, two instructorvolunteers and assistance from two part-time employees from the Section 8 housing complex. Table 2 Participant Demographics Grade Age Male(s) Female(s) Total Level Group participant per grade level 1st 6 to 7 1 2 3 2nd 7 to 8 1 2 3
’ mastery of course content as a result of LTS is as evident as withservice-learning. Further analysis and investigation is required to extract and validate theprimary themes as a function of respondent demographics towards the development ofappropriate recommendations and policies.Bibliography1 National Science Foundation (NSF) 2007 Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education(No NSB-07-122) Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.2 Lathem, S. A., NEUMANN, M. D., & Hayden, N. (2011). The Socially Responsible Engineer:Assessing Student Attitudes of Roles and Responsibilities. Journal of Engineering Education,100(3), 444-474.3 Vanasupa, L., et al. (2006) Global Challenges as Inspiration: A Classroom strategy to fostersocial responsibility
withcommunity organizations. Page 23.884.9 References1. Zlotkowski E. The Case for Service Learning. In: McIlrath L, MLabhrainn IM, eds. Higher Education and Civic Engagement: International Perspectives. Aldershot, England: Ashgate; 2007:37-54.2. Coyle EJ, Jamieson LH, Oakes WC. EPICS: Engineering projects in community service. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2005;21(1):139-150.3. Dorado S, Giles DE. Service-learning partnerships: Paths of engagement. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 2004;11(1
Paper ID #6720Implementing a service learning class for undergraduate engineers with littlerequired budgetDr. Joan B Schuman, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Joan Schuman is an assistant teaching professor in the Engineering Management at Missouri S&T. She has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Arkansas and completed her Ph.D. in Polymer Science and Engineering. Schuman teaches a variety of courses including several in Project Management. She has several years of industrial experience in the aerospace industry but is now focusing on engineering education with a special interest in
. Thomas and M. (National S. of B. E. Smith, “Technical Outreach Community Help : An Engineering Outreach-Mentoring Program For Minorities,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2010, vol. 7.[2] S. M. Brown and L. D. Thomas, “Technical Outreach Community Help : Initial Results,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2011, no. June.[3] “Building Effective Partnerships in Service-Learning | National Service-Learning Clearinghouse.” [Online]. Available: http://www.servicelearning.org/instant_info/fact_sheets/tribal_facts/partnerships. Page 23.1353.7 [Accessed: 07-Jan-2013].[4] R. G
-learning reflection for engineering. In E. Tsang & American Association for Higher Education (Eds.), Projects that matter (pp. 64-75). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.6. Reynaud, E., Duffy, J. J., Barrington, L., Kazmer, D. O., Tucker, B. G., & Rhoads, J. L. (2012, June). Engineering faculty attitudes towards service-learning. Paper presented at the 119th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX.7. Pierrakos, O., Bielefeldt, A. R., Duffy, J. J., Mcvay, S., Paterson, K., Swan, C. W., & Zilberberg, A. (2012, June). Faculty survey on learning through service: Development and initial findings. Paper presented at the
willingness of the student interviewees to participate and for theiropenness and honesty with the researchers about their views and beliefs.Bibliography1. NAE, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century, Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.2. ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluation During the 2009-2010 Accredidation Cycle," ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2008.3. ASCE, "Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, 2nd Edition," ASCE, 2008.4. AAEE, "Environmental Engineering Body of Knowledge," American Academy of Environmental Engineers, 2009.5. R. S. Weiss, Learning from Strangers
the community, and 3) enabling students to practice autonomy and personalresponsibility in directing their own learning.Servant-Leadership is a leadership paradigm established by Robert Greenleaf in the 1970’s thatemphasizes power sharing in decision making processes. It also encourages leaders to servethose they manage by gently guiding and propelling them toward high achievement andaccomplishment while promoting their growth and self-efficacy. Servant-Leadership advocates ahierarchical structure different from the classical top-down management pyramid often seen inindustry and academia. In industry, management rests at the top of the structure supported byworkers, and in academia, teachers are authority figures with control over content
, "Model of Integrating Humanitarian Development into Engineering Education," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, April 2010.7 M. J. Prince and R. M. Felder, "Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123-138, 2006.8 M. Borrego and J. Bernhard, "The emergence of engineering research as an internationally connected field of inquiry," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 14-47, 2011.9 J. S. Brown, A. Collins and P. Duguid, "Situated cognition and the culture of learning," Educational Researcher, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32-41, 1989
College. Chapter written by Kremer, G. Designing to Make A Difference: Authentic Integration of Professional Skills in an Engineering Capstone Design Course. Indiana University Press, May 23, 20138. Sandmann, L., Kiely, R., and Grenier, R. Program Planning: The Neglected Dimension of Service-Learning, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Spring 2009, pp.17-339. Mooney, L., and Edwards, B. Experiential Learning in Sociology: Service Learning and other Community- Based Learning Initiatives, Teaching Sociology, V. 29, No. 2 (April 2001), American Sociological Association, pp. 181-19410. Carter, M., Rivero, E., Cadge, W., and Curran, S. Designing Your Community-Based Learning Project: Five Questions to ask
societies in the 21st century. In New perspectives on service-learning: Research to advance the field (M. Welch & S. Billig, eds.) (pp. 3-22), Greenwich:Information Age Publishing.Lima, M. and W. Oakes. 2006. Service-Learning: Engineering in Your Community. Great LakesPress, Okemos, MI., ISBN 1-881018-94-6 (book was purchased by Oxford University Press in2011; 2nd edition will be published in June, 2013).E. Tsang, Editor. 2000. Projects That Matter: Concepts and Models for Service-Learning inEngineering, AAHE’s Series on Service-Learning in the Disciplines. AAHE Press,Zlotkowski, E., Ed. 1998. Service-Learning in the Disciplines. 20+ volume series on service-learning in various professions; entire series available athttp://styluspub.com/Books
Work, 22(1-2), pp. 213-225, 2002. 4.) W. Oakes, J. Duffy, T. Jacobius, P. Linos ,S. Lord, W.W. Schultz, and A. Smith, “Service Learning in Engineering,” Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November, 2002. 5.) E.J. Coyle, L.H. Jamieson, and W.C. Oakes, “EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), pp. 139-150, January 2005. 6.) Andrew T. Jeffers, Angela G. Safferman, and Steven I. Safferman, “Understanding K–12 Engineering Outreach Programs,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130(2), pp. 95- 108, April 1, 2004. 7.) G. Padmanabhan and D. Katti, “Using Community-Based Projects in
capabilities are rooted in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics… For a variety of reasons, concerns have arisen over the future of both the military and civilian contingents of the Air Force’s STEM workforce. Emerging mission areas, particularly in the space and cyber domains, are expanding the need for new technical skills and expertise… A growing percentage of science and engineering graduates in the United States are foreign citizens and thus ineligible for the security clearances that many jobs in the Air Force and in the aerospace industry require. The existing STEM workforce is aging, with many individuals nearing retirement. Women and minorities are underrepresented in most S&E