Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying all 10 results

Validating the Diagnostic Capability of the Concept Assessment Tool for Statics (CATS) with Student Think-Alouds

Conference Session
Misconceptions
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dana Denick, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Aidsa I. Santiago-Román, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; James W Pellegrino, University of Illinois, Chicago; Ruth A. Streveler, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Louis V DiBello, Universtify of Illinois at Chicago
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Confirmation CE1: Failure to clarify body in equilibrium Q-1,3,17,18,19 Moderate CE2: Failure to treat parts as single system Q-1,3,4,5,14,15, 17,18,19 Weak CE3: Leaving force off FBD Q-1,3,14,15,17,18,19 No Evidence CE4: Including internal force in FBD Q-1,3 Strong CE5: Including non-acting force in FBD Q-1,3 Strong CE6: Failure to account for force pair between separated bodies Q-4,5,7,8 Moderate CE7: Couple between bodies Q-7,8,27 No
Relevance Score: 0.06114879

“Learning from small numbers” of underrepresented students’ stories: Discussing a method to learn about institutional structure through narrative

Conference Session
Culture, Race, and Gender Issues
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Relevance Score: 0.017831348

Taking Different Paths: A Comparative Study of Mentoring Models Among Robotics Competition Teams

Conference Session
Issues in Advising and Mentoring
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nathan Dolenc, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
develop an engineering mindset. Mentors tookan approach of teaching students by first having them watch or closely assist them before settingthem free to continue the task on their own. Mentors’ goal was to have students doing most ofthe decision making and work. Mentors realized the FRC activity was complex and wanted theirstudents to push their limits but still work within their means in order to produce the bestproduct. “If you take somebody and you try to teach them how to do something, about the fourth iteration they start unlearning it. This is occasionally called “drill and kill.” If you teach somebody how to do something by doing it with them and then you back off and let them do it and then go through a Q/A
Relevance Score: 0.017652135

The Dynamics of Attracting Switchers: A Cross-Disciplinary Comparison

Conference Session
Retention and Persistence in Engineering
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Corey T Schimpf, Purdue University, West Lafayette; George D Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
, R.A., “Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol 97, 2008.2 Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence , First edition. NY, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.3 Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. "Modeling the Days of our Lives: Using Survival Analysis When Designing and Analyzing Longitudinal Studies of Duration and the Timing of Events," Psychological Bulletin, vol. Page 23.1187.12 110, pp. 268–290, 1991.4 Li, Q., Swaminathan, H. & Tang, J., “Development of a
Relevance Score: 0.017652135

Learning Strategies and Learning Traits Critical to Practicing Engineers after College

Conference Session
Preparing for Practice
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; James Edwin Cawthorne Jr., Purdue University, West Lafayette; Corey T Schimpf, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Page 23.857.20 speaking techniques. presentation.Table 6.2: Criteria for Idea Pitch and Final Exam Presentation Delivery SkillsCriteria Very poor = 1 Good = 3 Excellent = 53. How well did the Speaker did not Speaker understood the Speaker’s answers tospeaker answer the answer questions or questions and helped judge's questionsquestions from the provided answers clarify points in the strengthened the casejudges? which were not presentation to which for the idea andDid the Q/A period relevant to the the judge referred. speaker repeated
Relevance Score: 0.017471083

Examining the Experiences and Perceptions of First-Year Engineering Students

Conference Session
First Year Engineering
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Irene B Mena, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
. Paper presented at theASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. San Diego, CA, October 28-31.7.Mena, I., Zappe, S., & Litzinger, T. (2012). Preparing the Engineer of 2020: Analysis of Alumni Data. Paperpresented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition. San Antonio, TX, June10-13.8.Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.9.Benson, J. & Clark, F. (1983). A Guide for Instrument Development and Validation. The American Journal ofOccupational Therapy. 36(12): 789-800.10.Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.11.Kilgore, D., Chachra, D., Loshbaugh, H., McCain, J., Jones, M
Relevance Score: 0.015130401

Comparing First-year Student Attitudes towards Engineering across a Liberal Arts University

Conference Session
First Year Engineering
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rick Olson, University of San Diego; Truc T. Ngo, University of San Diego; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
? Journal of Engineering Education 97, 467–479 (2008).12. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H. & Tang, J. Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Page 23.310.12 Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention. Journal of Engineering Education 98, 361–376 (2009).13. Hilpert, J. C., Stump, G. & Husman, J. A Brief Manual for the use of the Pittsburgh Engineering Attitudes Scale – Revised. 1–6 (Arizona State University, 2010).14. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (2012). at 15. Fox, J. An R companion to
Relevance Score: 0.015130401

Developing an Instrument to Measure Motivation, Learning Strategies and Conceptual Change

Conference Session
Motivation and Self-Efficacy
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rachel McCord, Virginia Tech; Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Relevance Score: 0.015130401

Unlocking Student Motivation: Development of an Engineering Motivation Survey

Conference Session
Motivation and Self-Efficacy
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Philip Reid Brown, Virginia Tech; Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Relevance Score: 0.015130401

The Influence of Feedback on Teamwork and Professional Skills in an Authentic Process Development Project

Conference Session
Assessment of Student Learning 2
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Debra Gilbuena, Oregon State University; Audrey Briggs Champagne, University at Albany, SUNY; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Relevance Score: 0.010086934