Paper ID #7951Stimulating Interest in Technological and Engineering Literacy Using a Mul-tidimensional Desktop Virtual Reality FrameworkDr. Magesh Chandramouli, Purdue University, Calumet (Tech) Magesh Chandramouli is currently an Asst. Professor in Computer Graphics Techology at Purdue Univer- sity, Calumet. Earlier, he was a Frederick Andrews Fellow at Purdue University, West Lafayette, where he completed his doctoral studies at the Department of Computer Graphics Technology. He completed his Master of Science from the University of Calgary and his Bachelor of Engineering from the College of Engineering, Guindy, India.Dr
Paper ID #7380First-Year Engineering Students’ Learning of Nanotechnology through anOpen-Ended ProjectKelsey Joy Rodgers, Purdue University, West Lafayette Kelsey Rodgers is currently a graduate student at Purdue University in the School of Engineering Educa- tion. She is part of the Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) research team. She conducts research within the First-Year Engineering Program to help understand what and how students are learning about nanotechnology.Prof. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering
Purdue University. NSF and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering learning, the measurement and support of change of ”habits of mind,” particularly in regards to sustain- ability and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning. Page 23.838.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 K-8 Teachers’ Responses to Their First Professional Development
Paper ID #7464An Innovative Two-Year Engineering Design Capstone Experience at JamesMadison UniversityDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University OLGA PIERRAKOS is an associate professor and founding faculty member of the James Madison Uni- versity Department of Engineering, which graduated its inaugural class in May 2012. At JMU, Dr. Pier- rakos is the Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering Education (CIEE) and Director of the Advanced Thermal Fluids Laboratory. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineer identity, engineering design instruction and
response to a general agreement by U.S. industry, engineering societies,and government that there had been a decline in the quality of undergraduate engineeringeducation over the previous two decades [14-15]. The result was a strong push towardsproviding both intellectual and physical activities (such as dissection) to anchor the knowledgeand practice of engineering in the minds of students [16-17]. Product dissection was successfulin achieving this for several reasons. First, it helps couple engineering principles with significantvisual feedback [18] and increase awareness of the design process [19]. Dissection also givesstudents early exposure to functional products and processes, and introducing such experiencesearly in the students’ academic
Paper ID #7658Using projects in mathematics and engineering mathematics courses designedto stimulate learningDr. Hassan Moore, University of Alabama, Birmingham Years with the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB): 5 Current Position(s): • Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering • Director of Outreach, School of Engineering Current Job Responsibilities: Dr. Moore’s primary interest is in the area of engineering education, par- ticularly in developing project-based learning tools in Differential Equations and Multivariable Calculus. Dr. Moore has created and developed a new course in the School of Engineering
others.”Excerpt 5: “Finally, the issue of whose responsibility is this recycling mess. There is only so far that engineers can carry the burden of e-recycling. They can design recycling-friendly products, use environmentally conscious components, and propose recycling programs, but their companies have to support them in these endeavors. All of these steps cut into an electronic companies bottom line. Competition is tight, and many companies worry that they might lose their edge if they ‘waste’ money on electronic waste. We cannot continue exporting our waste and keeping an ‘out of sight, out of mind’ attitude. I believe that responsible engineers, responsible companies, and effective, enforced
Paper ID #6451Innovations in Software Engineering Education: An Experimental Study ofIntegrating Active Learning and Design-based LearningMr. Liu Junhua, Singapore University of Technology and Design Junhua is an undergraduate research technician of the International Design Centre (IDC) and pursuing a BE (Engineering Systems and Design) at Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD). He received a Diploma in IT from Singapore Polytechnic. Junhua was awarded the IT Youth of 2013 by the Singapore Computer Society.Dr. Yue Zhang, Singapore University and Technology and Design Yue Zhang is currently an assistant
Paper ID #6667Am I a Boss or a Coach? Graduate Students Mentoring Undergraduates inResearchMs. Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado at Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a doctoral student at the University of Colorado, Boulder, whose work examines and develops initiatives to encourage more students, especially women, into the eld of engineering. Currently, Tsai’s research focuses on understanding the dynamics of how status and prestige are constructed among novice engineers.Dr. Daria A Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Daria Kotys-Schwartz is the Design Center Colorado Co-Director and an Instructor in the
Paper ID #6555Faculty Reflections on a STEAM-Inspired Interdisciplinary Studio CourseDr. Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia Dr. Nicola Sochacka received her doctorate in Engineering Epistemologies from the University of Queens- land (Brisbane, Australia). She currently holds a research and teaching position at the University of Geor- gia where she transfers her expertise in qualitative research methodologies to a variety of research contexts at the intersection of social and technological issues. This includes engineering education projects con- cerned with transdisciplinary education, student reflection, and
Paper ID #6619Toward more pragmatic engineering classes: Transformation from tradi-tional to Deweyan classes in technological literacy and competency approachesDr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Page 23.1254.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 TOWARD MORE PRAGMATIC ENGINEERING CLASSES: TRANSFORMATION FROM TRADITIONAL TO DEWEYAN CLASSES IN TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY AND COMPETENCY APPROACHES Mani Mina1and Iraj Omidvar2
., A. L. Brown, et al. (2006). "How People Learn Brain, Mind, Experience and School (Expanded Version)." Education Canada 46(3): 21-21.6. Shuman, L. J., M. Besterfield-Sacre, et al. (2005). "The ABET “Professional Skills” — Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?" Journal of Engineering Education 94(1): 41-55.7. Cantor, J. A. (1995). Experiential Learning in Higher Education: Linking Classroom and Community, Association for the Study of Higher Education.8. Itin, C. M. (1999). "Reasserting the Philosophy of Experiential Education as a Vehicle for Change in the 21st Century." The Journal of Experiential Education 22(2): 91-98.9. Savage, R. N., K. C. Chen, et al. (2007). "Integrating Project-based Learning throughout the
Paper ID #6174Gadget Avalanche: A Technology Literacy Course for Novice AdultsDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Recruiting at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she received her Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published nearly two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing undergraduate education through hands
drafting or graphic texts7. Visualization encompasses at least the relation betweentwo-dimensional representations and real 3-D objects16 and the capability to relate and formimages connecting these two worlds17. Everyone involved in the design process agrees that theability to visualize is a vital skill and a new and effective method of teaching visualization mustbe found. Keeping in mind the rapid change in technology, some people focus on the conceptualaspect of the engineering and drafting process, and perceive the current CAD tools as draftinginstead of design tools10. Instructors fear that sustaining Computer Aided Drafting in designeducation will lead to the loss of hand drawing skills20.Benefits of Computer Aided DraftingThe benefits of
Paper ID #6115Using Scale Models to Promote Technological LiteracyDr. William R Loendorf, Eastern Washington University William R. Loendorf is a Full Professor Emeritus of Engineering & Design at Eastern Washington Uni- versity. He obtained his B.Sc. in Engineering Science at the University of Wisconsin - Parkside, M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Colorado State University, M.B.A. at the Lake Forest Graduate School of Management, and Ph.D. in Engineering Management at Walden University. He holds a Professional En- gineer license and has 30 years of industrial experience as an Engineer or Engineering Manager at General
Paper ID #6204Using Mini Design Competitions in CapstoneCapt. Joseph Anders Wahlquist, US Air Force Academy Joseph Wahlquist is an instructor in the department of engineering mechanics at the United States Air Force Academy. He teaches courses in Mechanical Behavior of Material and leads a Capstone Design team focusing on Small Unmanned Aerial Systems. He received his MS in Aeronautical engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology in Dayton Ohio and a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University in Provo Utah. He has also worked as a structural engineer on the F-16 and a mechanical systems engineer
writing,communication, and teamwork through multidisciplinary collaboration.Multidisciplinary research can encompass many different disciplines (i.e., engineering, health,communication, English, etc.) and negotiating the mergers of colleges or it can also denote thecoming together of multidisciplinary education (e.g., electrical engineering, mechanicalengineering, civil engineering). The premise of this type of setting is unlike minds comingtogether for the possibility of a better-informed cause through the exercise of multidisciplinaryteams. It is important to explore the consequences and successes of multidisciplinarycollaboration because working together will be paramount for engineers working in a global(diverse) society.1 Much of their
Paper ID #6088Prototype Exemplars: The Path to Effective Design or to Design Fixation?Dr. Thomas F. Schubert Jr. P.E., University of San Diego Thomas F. Schubert, Jr. received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of California, Irvine. He is currently a Professor of electrical engineering at the University of San Diego, and came there as a founding member of the engineering faculty in 1987. He previously served on the electrical engineering faculty at the University of Portland, Portland OR and Portland State University, Portland OR and on the engineering staff at Hughes
Paper ID #6224Talkin’ Teams – Strategies for Elevating Student and Team Skill Developmentover Project CompletionDr. Greg Kremer, Ohio University Robe Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering, and the director of the ”Designing to Make A Difference” ME senior capstone design experience. Page 23.1131.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Talkin' Teams – Strategies for Elevating Student and Team Skill Development over Project CompletionAbstractThe purpose of this
.," A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty", ASME Journal of Mechanical Design Vol. 132, No. 4, 2010, pp. 041003.[14] Viswanathan, V.K., and Linsey, J.S., "Understanding Fixation: A Study on the Role of Expertise", International Conference on Engineering Design, Kobenhavn, Denmark, 2011.[15] Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., and Smith, S.M., Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications: MIT press Cambridge, MA, 1992.[16] Smith, S.M., and Blankenship, S.E.," Incubation effects", Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Vol. 27, No. 4, 1989, pp. 311-314.[17] Kohn, N., and Smith, S.M.," Partly versus completely out of your mind: Effects of incubation and
Methods, John Wiley & Sons, England, 2000 (third edition).[3] Clive L. Dym and Patrick Little, Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2004 (2nd Edition).[4] G. Pahl and W. Beitz, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer, New York, 1996.[5] Lumsdane et. al., Creative Problem Solving and Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill, College Custom Series, 1999.[6] L.S. Vygotsky (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.[7] D. Wood, J. Bruner, & G. Ross (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Child Psychiatry, 17, 89−100.[8] Paul A. Kirschner, John Sweller, Richard E. Clark. "Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not
Paper ID #7526Body? What Body? Considering Ability and Disability in STEM DisciplinesProf. Amy E. Slaton, Drexel University Amy E. Slaton is a professor of history at Drexel University. Her most recent book is Race, Rigor and Selectivity in US Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color Line. She is currently writing on issues of equity surrounding high-tech workforce preparation. Page 23.247.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Body? What Body? Considering
Paper ID #7053Educational outcomes and effects on cross-cultural communication skills ofan international experience for undergraduate STEM students through Michi-gan Technological University’s Pavlis Institute for Global Technological Lead-ershipMadelyn Espinosa, The Pavlis Institute - Michigan Technological UniverisityHelena Keller, Michigan Technological UniversityMs. Nicole Westphal, Michigan Technological University Page 23.456.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Educational outcomes and effects on
participate because they have a service learning/communityparticipation requirement for renewing their scholarship or because they too want to give back.MethodsWeek after week, elementary students explore basic principles of engineering through fun,hands-on projects that spark their imaginations and engage their minds. The young students workin teams to create engineering projects that integrate age and development-appropriate scienceand mathematics. These “design, build, test, and evaluate” experiences help them gain anunderstanding of the pervasiveness of engineering in their world as well as an awareness of howengineering benefits humanity and our planet.And, diversifying the engineering workforce is a priority for the TEAMS initiative; the
). Quantitative estimation: One, two, or three abilities? Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(4), 259–280.17 Reys, R. E., Rybolt, J. F., Bestgen, B. J., & Wyatt, J. W. (1982). Processes Used by Good Computational Estimators. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13(3), 183–201. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/74855518 Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.19 Hsi, S., Linn, M. C., & Bell, J. E. (1997). The Role of Spatial Reasoning in Engineering and the Design of Spatial Instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 82(2), 151–158.20 Sorby, S. A. (2009). Educational research in
learning in open-ended problem solving such as Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs).Dr. Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Johannes Strobel is the director of INSPIRE, the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learn- ing, and assistant professor of engineering education, learning design, and technology at Purdue Univer- sity. NSF and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focus on the policy of P-12 engineering, the support for teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering learning. Dr. Strobel also focuses on the measurement and support for changing ”habits of mind” par- ticularly in regards to sustainability and the use of cyber
,” Proceedings of the 1997 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Milwaukee, WI.[17] Elger, D., Beller, B., Beyerlein, S., and Williams, B., 2003, “Performance Criteria for Quality in Problem Solving,” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville, TN.[18] Smith, K., 1996, “Cooperative learning: Making “Groupwork” Work,” New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 67, pp. 71-82.[19] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R., 1999, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.[20] National Academy of Engineering, 2004, The Engineers of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
/draftsman. He works closely with civil, environmental, and structural engineers on a daily basis; so for him, becoming a civil engineer is his next logical career progression. He brings to the table a fresh mind and eagerness to succeed. It is his opinion that experience can overrule education. He has every intention to reach a point where his education will meet his experience, creating a complete and well-rounded professional engineer. Thompson plans to minor in Chemical Engineering. When coupled with his education in civil and environmental engineering, chemical engineering is a field of study that he believes will lead him to achieving his ultimate goal: earning a Ph.D. in nuclear engineering. Thompson believes his
while guidingstudents through hands-on design projects. These projects focus on an engineering designpedagogy that provides students an opportunity to engage with CAD and digital fabricationtechnologies in the classroom to create, build, and refine their designs. WISEngineering’sprojects immerse students in engineering habits of mind such as systems thinking, creativity,optimism, and collaboration, in conjunction with standards-based mathematics and scienceconcepts.The Community Center Challenge (CC) project, formerly referred to as the Community BuildingChallenge (CBC), is a two-week long WISEngineering instructional module that asks students todesign and construct a model for a new community center while facilitating instruction ofCommon Core
Paper ID #8010Using Programming to Strengthen Mathematics Learning in 9th Grade Al-gebra ClassesDr. Eric A Freudenthal, University of Texas, El Paso Eric Freudenthal is an Associate Professor of Computer Science.Dr. Kien H. Lim, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Lim’s research interests are on students’ problem-solving disposition and instructional strategies to advance their ways of thinking. Dr. Lim is particularly interested in impulsive disposition, students’ propensity to act out the first thing that comes to mind. Dr. Lim’s research goal centers on helping stu- dents advance from impulsive disposition to analytic