Paper ID #6969Feedback in Complex, Authentic, Industrially Situated Engineering Projectsusing Episodes as a Discourse Analysis Framework – Year 1Dr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Dr. Milo Koretsky is a professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel faculty fellow and has won awards for
Paper ID #7150Research-Informed Practices for Inclusive Science, Technology, Engineering,and Math (STEM) Classrooms: Strategies for Educators to Close the GenderGapMiss Helena Isabel Scutt, Stanford University Helena Scutt is a rising senior studying biomechanical engineering at Stanford University. Her interests are human movement, optogenetics, realization of girls’ and women’s potential in STEM fields, and high performance sailing. She has been Captain of the Stanford Varsity Sailing Team for two years and is on the US Sailing Team Sperry Top-Sider.Dr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford UniversityDr. Sheri Sheppard
with like-minded students.PBL* team members often spend considerable time and energy towards this pursuit – at times to Page 23.625.3the detriment of their other academic or social commitments.. This sacrifice is only made possible due to the intrinsic personal connection the student has to the project, and the socialbonds and sense of belonging that results from working with similarly engaged students. Non-participants may look upon such commitment as extraordinary, odd, or perhaps both. There areclearly easier ways to muddle through an engineering degree. But the transformative nature ofsuch commitment arguably makes a far greater imprint and
Paper ID #6593Hands-on Learning of Commercial Electrical Wiring Practices for ElectricalEngineering Students Through Two-University Cooperative EffortDr. Herbert L. Hess, University of Idaho, Moscow Herb Hess received his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin in 1993. He then joined the Univer- sity of Idaho where he is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering. His interests are in power electronics, broadly construed, to benefit the people of the Inland Pacific Northwest.Dr. Brian Peterson, U.S. Air Force Academy Brian S. Peterson is a Principal Systems Engineer at the LinQuest Corporation providing technical
component allowsstudents the opportunity to start developing certain aspects of engineering “habits of mind”,based on the grade and developmental level of the specific unit. Engineering “habits of mind”refers to the values, attitudes, and thinking skills associated with engineering and includessystems thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, communication, and an attention to ethical Page 23.1226.4considerations3.Using Literacy to Support STEM LearningThe literacy component builds upon the idea of integrating across disciplines by using high-quality science and mathematics trade books to enhance and extend instruction, which helpsstudents to
, many of the students would have been taught relatively little of theCalculus material covered in Math 231. As students in Math 231 are learning much ofthe material for the first time, they may approach the PLTL groups in a more open-minded fashion, and may be more receptive to the learning tools and additional work thatthey are gaining in the groups. Whereas, if students in Math 116 believe that they alreadyknow much of the material, they may be less interested in devoting effort to incorporatingPLTL group activities into their studies and achieve less benefit from the groups. Asmentioned previously, facilitators in Math 105 PLTL groups have frequently encounteredthis attitude. Engineering freshmen in Math 105 often believe that they fully
of learning styles,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 103–112, 2005.[8] T. P. O’Brien, L. E. Bernold, and D. Akroyd, “Myers-Briggs type indicator and academic achievement in engineering education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 311–315, 1998.[9] P. Rosati, “The Learning Preferences of Engineering Students From Two Perspectives,” in FIE ’98 Proceedings, 1998, pp. 29–32.[10] B. M. Knoll, Teaching Hearts and Minds: College Students Reflect on the Vietnam War in Literature. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1992.[11] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “The intellectual development of science and engineering students. Part 1
and Communication Systems 5. Fiber Optics 6. Electronics 7. Power Systems 8. National Electrical Code 9. Data Analysis 10. Computer Engineering 11. Ethical Issues in EngineeringA main consideration while preparing these topics was that the focus of the course was not tomake the students understand all the details from each topic. Instead, the objective was to exposethem to these topics by keeping in mind that most of them do not possess the necessaryknowledge on calculus and differential equations. Based on the amount of exposure that thestudent will receive on each of the topics, either two or three weeks were allocated for eachtopic. In addition to the two hours of lectures per week a three-hour laboratory was preformedonce a
small physical models helps undergraduate studentsunderstand classic theories of soil mechanics. Similarly, this activity demonstrates that physicalmodels are helpful in elementary schools and that elementary school students can understandfundamental geotechnical engineering concepts through the use of physical models. The studentsdeveloped a meta-cognitive approach to learning by being both hands-on and minds-on.5Moreover, physical models allowed engaging the students in small teams to conduct learningactivities according to their different learning styles.3.3. Erosion Table Activity An erosion table (Figure 7) was designed and built for a second grade classroom insupport of the water cycle unit of New York City learning standards. The
Paper ID #8052Designing STEM Curriculum for K12 StudentsDr. MD B. Sarder, University of Southern Mississippi Dr. Sarder is an associate professor and program coordinator of the industrial engineering technology program at the University of Southern Mississippi (USM). He is also an assistant director of the center for logistics, trade and transportation. At the USM, he revamped his program by developing as many as fourteen new courses, implementing hands on experience in courses, and delivering online courses for distant students. Dr. Sarder is very active in engineering and technology education research. He has
Paper ID #6493New project-based instructional modules improve climate change literacy (re-search to practice)Dr. Susan E. Powers, Clarkson University Susan E. Powers is the Spence Professor of Sustainable Environmental Systems and the Associate Director of Sustainability in the Institute for a Sustainable Environment at Clarkson University. Her education and scholarly work are integrated through research on sustainability in engineering and broader STEM fields. She has had several education oriented research grants, including the NSF Director’s Award as a Distinguished Teaching Scholar. Among these efforts, she has promoted
Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Regional Autonomous Robotics Circuit: Providing Informal Approaches to STEM EducationIntroductionThe National Science Board, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology,the National Governors Association, and numerous scholarly journals have all reached the sameconclusion: the United States is not developing enough science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) scholars to maintain its role as a world leader in science and innovation.In fact, the National Science Board reports that over “half (51 percent) of the world’s share ofSTEM researchers now live outside the United States and the 27 EU-membered countries.”1Asian countries, specifically China
studentswill have to keep economics in mind when choosing the materials for their vessel. Therefore, thismodule and subsequent modules allow for a multi-dimensional approach to projects that aregenerally seen as one-dimensional.After completing the build of their vessels for the second time, students will test their newdesign. Because the students will have spent more time understanding the problem, researching,brainstorming, and building the prototype, the vessels should perform better than their firstattempt at the egg drop. This process will build an appreciation for the engineering designprocess, instill a culture of teamwork, communication, and problem-solving in the students earlyin the course as well as develop their understanding of STEM
Paper ID #5922Teachers in Industry: Measuring the Impact of a K-12 Teacher InternshipProgramBradley Bowen Ed.D, North Dakota State University Bradley Bowen is an assistant professor at North Dakota State University. He has a duel appointment with the Teacher Education Department and the Department of Construction Management and Engineering. He has a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech and received a Master’s of Civil Engineering and an Ed.D. in Technology Education from N.C. State University. With five years of corporate engineering experience and six years of high school teaching, he specializes in developing and
Paper ID #7933A Female-Only Camp for STEM DisciplinesDr. Muhittin Yilmaz, Texas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK) Dr. Muhittin Yilmaz received a B.S. in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from Gazi University at Ankara, Turkey, and the M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Pennsylvania State University at University Park. He has been an assistant professor with the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, Texas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK) since 2007. His research interests include robust and control system optimization, model identification and validation, robotics
.356instruction from a global perspective is important.Science and mathematics instruction is necessary for economic 4.75 .441 4.71 .460development.I believe that teaching science and engineering is of central 4.82 .390 4.82 .476importance in order to cope with future global challenges.The new connections that participants developed and the increased awareness of the presence ofthose relationships were more strongly evident in participants’ open ended survey responses andreflections during the one-on-one interview. One mathematics teacher may serve as an exampleof change that took place for many RET participants. At the beginning of the program her open-ended survey response was, “there is not a clear cut relationship in my mind
Paper ID #6376Introducing 6-12 Grade Teachers and Students to Computational ThinkingDr. A. Dean Fontenot, Texas Tech University Dr. Fontenot is the Sr. Director of the Texas Tech T-STEM which provides professional development for K-12 teachers as part of the Texas STEM (T-STEM) initiative. The Texas Tech T-STEM Center focuses on project-based learning with the integration of the engineering design process. The Center provides professional development training for T-STEM Academies, T-STEM Early College High Schools, and all Texas school districts, public and private. She collaborates with Whitacre College of Engineering
helped clarifycareer goals. Fellows noted improvements in “patience and flexibility,” and appreciated theexperience of working “with individuals of different skill sets and levels of drive and academicability.” One Fellow mentioned that classroom teaching “helped my personal skills in dealingwith a large number of children and teenagers,” and another developed tools and skills “toeffectively teach and grasp attention of today’s young minds.”There were other occasional difficulties working with students. One Fellow stated “I believe Iwould have been more effective working with older students” due to difficulties expressing somescience and engineering concepts without a certain level of mathematical background (geometry,angles, and area). Another
in learning is beneficial for student engagement, retention of knowledge,and improving student comprehension. As evidenced through the existing literature,5,6 use ofrobotics in K-12 classrooms to teach science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)disciplines is well documented. However, the effectiveness of the use of robotics to addressstudents’ cognitive domains of Bloom’s taxonomy remains to be explored. Mindful design of alearning environment centered on Bloom’s taxonomy can guide students through the entire cycle Page 23.329.3of cognitive domains to ensure that all levels of learning are captured. Specifically, throughhands-on
Paper ID #6188STEM inSight: Developing a Research Skills Course for First- and Second-Year StudentsDr. Dirk Colbry, Michigan State UniversityDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Recruiting at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she received her Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published nearly two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational
.[8] D. E. Graff, et al. (ed.), Research and Practice of Active Learning in Engineering Education, Pallas Publication in Leiden University Press, Amsterdam, Nederland, 2005.[9] D. Paulson and J. Faust, “Active Learning for the College Classroom,” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 3-24, 1998.[10] P. Pheeney, “Hands on, minds on: Activities to engage our students,” Science Scope, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 30-33, 1997. Page 23.264.14[11] S. Burd, et al. (ed.), “Virtual Computing Laboratories: A Case Study with Comparisons to Physical Computing Laboratories,” Journal of Information Technology
projects.There are a variety of approaches to outreach, but those that involve undergraduate engineeringstudents accomplish two goals: 1) encouraging more K12 students to consider engineering bybreaking stereotypes, and 2) involving the undergraduate engineering students in meaningfulcommunity engagement, which they will hopefully continue throughout their careers. There are several reasons that involving undergraduates in outreach is particularlyeffective, primarily because they can break the stereotypes of engineers that most K12 studentshave in their minds. Obama administration officials have met with business executives andschool deans in order to better understand the barriers to creating more engineers, which wereidentified as scientists
generators, melting plastics, using electrical appliances,or “playing” detective in a crime scene accident, applying scientific topics to concrete technology andactivities solidifies the concepts in students’ minds. Students can strengthen their knowledge of thescientific concepts and the relevance to their lives by being introduced to engineering concepts at an earlyage, especially through hands-on activities9,10.Several students have expressed in class that they would be more interested in pursuing a career inscience after their 8th grade experience because they can see how applicable science class can be on adaily basis. Most were not aware of how prevalent scientific technology is around them and theopportunities for careers in science. Often
that is useful fordeveloping courses that smoothly integrate the major facets of course design. The results of thisstudy also demonstrate a process for validating the contents of the instrument and a process forimproving the rating consistency among coders.References Page 23.1032.61 Felder, R.M., Brent, R., & Prince, M (2011). Engineering Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations, Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 89 –122.2 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
; Operations Management in the College of Engineering at South Dakota State University. Page 23.1129.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Systems Learning Within the Context of Subject LearningIntroductionConnecting curriculum to practice is one of the more difficult things to do in education andtraining. In manufacturing practice we must consider many aspects to a problem; whereas ineducation we often explore one topic at a time. Interdependence of the topics, however, is oftenmore important than the topics themselves. Engineering practice requires a systems orientation.1In a recent
throughantiquated methods such as: multiple choice, true/false, essay or thesis presentations. Thebest measure of a growing leader occurs when the challenge is fairly well defined, yet theanswer is unknown. The best solutions are developed when a group of like-minded peopleembrace a challenge together and through their diversity of thought and backgrounddiscover several plausible choices and embrace the "best” answer, not just the first correctanswer.A second example of how "The Bottom 3" attitude in The School of Engineering is makinga difference is at California Polytechnic San Luis Obispo; better known as Cal Poly, SLO.Key to Cal Poly, SLO’s success is that the School of Engineering bases its curriculum on
source, fewer purchasing transactions, less inventory to manage and handle, etc. However, the design engineering community had been isolated from Lean initiatives (on the manufacturing shop floor,) and therefore, part count reduction efforts have not been (a) part of the lean equation (Shipulski, 2009)Suggestions for Including DFV in the Curricula:We believe DFV is a top management initiative and hence although its parts can betaught in various courses, the overarching holistic concept should be introduced and wellseeded into students’ minds in the capstone experience. DFV’s ideas on providingnothing but true value to the customer can be introduced to students in product designand manufacturing systems courses. Courses
also be able to serve as an incubator for best teaching practices. Previous attempts to recruitSTEM faculty to hold regular office hours in the Center have met with limited success, but anexpanded space may encourage more participation.ConclusionsWhat a large, urban commuter college like ours lacks for its students, especially its minority,low-income students, are nurturing spaces where like-minded students can work and interactwith their peers and faculty. Several researchers have found that minority students performbetter in college when they are integrated into a community where they feel as though theybelong (10), (11), (12). By creating a science and engineering “home” in the MESA Center, studentsare brought into a learning community with
a great tool to use for increasing the interest of those students who are engineering oriented. Trey truly enjoys your classes and looks forward to learning more about the options available to him in the field of engineering (especially with Robots).”(b)“I would like to thank you for everything that you all did to make this camp a success! As I watched the kids, I noticed they really were enjoying themselves. They didn’t mind sharing what they had done. Please consider more opportunities for learning with the middle school students (to urge them to consider this major and as a possible career path). If possible, I would like to see more of this during the school year and possibly culminate with a visit to Georgia
Paper ID #7458Raising Students’ Cultural Awareness through Design ScenariosAndrea Mazzurco, Purdue University Andrea Mazzurco is a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests focus around global engineering education with an emphasis on cross-cultural education and assessment for engineers, and critical/liberatory/emancipatory pedagogies in engineering projects for sustainable com- munity development in ”less-developed” countries.James Huff, James L. Huff is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University and the assistant edu- cation administrator for EPICS. He earned