-lessons.html#storylink=misearch.3. Ingle, Jemima, Leonard Uitenham, and Geoff Bothun. “Professional Development Programs as Key Components of an Undergraduate Research and Development Program.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Chicago, Ill. (June 16-21 2006).4. Scott, Elaine P., Denise Wilson, and Rebecca A. Bates. “Integrating Professional Development Modules in the Engineering Curriculum.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas, (June 10-13, 2012).5. Sharp, Julie E., “Interview Skills Training in the Chemical Engineering Laboratory: Transporting a Pilot Project,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering
-gramming language that lets interactive and quick design and effective integration with mod-ern systems. Python usage leads to immediate gains in productivity and lower maintenancecosts. Python is becoming the work-horse in all new computer science activity in the modernindustry. It supports multi programming paradigms, including object-oriented and structuredprogramming. Python elegantly combines the number crunching capability like that ofMATLAB with the programming ease of C based languages with a difference of better rea-dability and interactivity .The Python Programming is a 400-level, 3-credit course that contains all five components:a) the basic elements like the statements, comments, data types, data manipulation in-put/output and control
Paper ID #8136”The Bottom 3” – A New Revolution in Leadership DevelopmentMr. Eric Paul Pearson, Northrop Grumman, Electronic Systems Eric Pearson is the Director of Cross-Sector Program Initiatives for Northrop Grumman Corporation. His has responsibilities for relationship building and cross culture leadership development. Eric has a BS in Education from Bowie State University and an MS In Technical Management form the Johns Hopkins, Whiting School of Engineering. Eric is best known for his development and leadership of the Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems New Graduate Engineering Rotation Program and the Recent
statistically significant differences: Project work had stronger positive impacts onengineering majors when compared to non-engineering majors and on alumni who completedoff-campus projects when compared those who completed on-campus projects. Kruskal-Wallistests identified areas where impact either changed or remained stable over time. Findings providea unique perspective on the long-term impacts of project-based learning.IntroductionThis paper provides an overview of an evaluation study of the impact of formal project work forstudents who graduated from Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) in science and engineeringmajors between 1974 and 2011. WPI has featured a project-based curriculum since the early1970’s. While there have been many studies of
this is typically done through grading after they submit their lab reports. • Students are not given an opportunity to fail. If we want them to be creative and try out Page 23.198.3 different solutions then failure should be allowed and not be disproportionately penalized. • In general, we felt that over the years we have erected artificial barriers between lecture and lab, while in reality we should strive to integrate the labs and lectures. • Many of our past labs were hands-on in the name only. We should strive to make lab experience as authentic as is practicable.II. Active learning in classroom and
engineering program and the computerscience program have been working on developing two software packages to aid studentsin developing their skills in the material and energy balance course in the chemicalengineering curriculum. The first of these (Chemical Process Visualizer – ChemProV) isa software package developed to assist students in converting written descriptions into agraphical format and then into a mathematical representation. It also provides a singleformat for the communication of the solutions to material/energy balance problemsbetween students . The second software package (On-Line Studio-Based LearningEnvironment – OSBLE) provides a means whereby the ChemProV solutions can beshared between students in an asynchronous online
STEM. His research interests include diffusion of research innovations, information visualization, data mining, Bibliometrics, social network analysis, and user study.Dr. Krishna Madhavan, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Krishna P.C. Madhavan is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He is also the Education Director and co-PI of the NSF-funded Network for Computational Nanotechnology (nanoHUB.org). He specializes in the development and deployment of large-scale data and visualization based platforms for enabling learning analytics. His work also focuses on understanding the impact and diffusion of learning innovations. Dr. Madhavan was the Chair of the IEEE/ACM
, introductory materials science, electronic materials, kinetics, and microelectronics processing. She has been involved in a number of innovative curriculum development programs and educational research projects on improving student learning in engineering through the use of active learning and service learning. In 2010, she was awarded the College of Engineering Award for Excellence in Service. In 2007-2008, she was an SJSU Teacher Scholar. In 2002, she was awarded the College of Engineering Excellence in Teaching award.Katherine Casey, SJSU College of Engineering Katherine graduated with a B.A. in Psychology and an M.A. in Experimental Psychology from SJSU. She now works in the College of Engineering as Engineering
theirpre-existing curriculums in their thermodynamics classes. Adopters were offered $1000compensation for their role as consultant-collaborators in the study. In return, adopters agreed to1.) Incorporate one or more modules into a thermodynamics course, as appropriate for theirparticular course setting and student population; 2.) Elicit student feedback on the module,adapting assessment materials as needed to the instructional context (materials include studentself-assessments integrated in the reflective portion of the modules and instructor-administeredminute-papers or short surveys to identify aspects that worked well and aspects that requirechange); and 3.) Evaluate their own extent of adoption, and suggest changes to the module basedon
coordination, curriculum devel- opment, assessment and instruction in the Pavlis Global Leadership program. She received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and an MBA from Wayne State University and is currently working on her PhD at Michigan Technological University. Before joining MTU she held various engineering and management positions during a 15 year career in the automotive industry.Mrs. Abby Lammons Thompson, Mississippi State University Abby Thompson is the Entrepreneurship Program Coordinator in the Office of Entrepreneurship and Tech- nology Transfer at Mississippi State University. Through her current role at the University, Thompson works to cultivate a culture of entrepreneurship
Page 23.1213.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 The Impacts of Real Clients in Project-Based Service-Learning CoursesIntroductionClient-based service-learning is increasingly prevalent in engineering education and is shown toimprove valuable technical and professional skills when properly executed. True service-learningpartners students and community clients to provide services that meet an authentic need in orderto achieve desired student learning outcomes. Using this definition, the mutually beneficial anddirect interaction between the students and the client to solve a real problem is indispensable fora service-learning experience. Conversely
-centered learning methods that are the cornerstone ofmodern engineering education practice.References1. Felder, R.M. and Brent, R., 2009, “Active Learning: An Introduction,” ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4).2. Goldberg, J.R. and Nagurka, M.L., 2012, “Enhancing the Engineering Curriculum: Defining Discovery Learn- ing at Marquette University,” 42nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Seattle, WA, October 3-6, pp. 405-410.3. Prince, M., 2004, “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of Engineering Educa- tion, 93(3), pp. 223-231.4. Cleverly, D., 2003, Implementing Inquiry Based Learning in Nursing, Taylor & Francis, London, p.124.5. Prince, M.J. and Felder, R.M., 2006, “Inductive Teaching and
Engineering at Nazarbayev University accepted its first cohort of students.The core building-blocks of the School of Engineering at Nazarbayev University are: problem-centered learning, the ‘upside-down’ curriculum, mathematics in context, design orientation, andcombining simulation with laboratory and workshop practices. These core building-blocks are allconnected through the central themes of safety and sustainability, transferable skillsdevelopment, and management and entrepreneurship.The School of Engineering’s teaching program has been developed in partnership withUniversity College London, considered one of the world’s best universities. Students are taughtin an “engineering systems” fashion, with all first year modules common with the
levels of instruction and addressed to a broad spectrum of students, from freshmen to seniors, from high school graduates to adult learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development. Page 23.101.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A Senior Student Design Project in Marine and Costal Environment MonitoringAbstractThe projects are a valuable component of the science and engineering education. The designexperience develops the students’ lifelong learning skills, self-evaluations, self-discovery, andpeer instruction in the
shot through with the idea that right-thinkingAmericans can apply their innate intellectual abilities in STEM fields reliably to attain bothindividual economic security and contribute to national well-being.17-18 But this promissorylanguage disguises a stratified economic and social system, pervaded with inequities.19-21 Thispaper is an attempt to integrate the theoretical tools and activist concerns of Disability orMinority Studies and those of Engineering Studies to shed light on this troubling neoliberalclimate. The former--scholarship on identity and equity--suggests means of understanding theconstructed nature of human differences; Disability Studies (henceforth, DS) has also addressedissues of intersectionality and authorial voice with
Engineering Courses and Teaching Methods. Engineering design also seems to play a role inthis period. Both LDA and LSA extracted Design Courses but LSA also extracted Design Field studiesand Computer Design. Student work and teaching also seem to play a role in this period. LDA extractedProject Work while LSA extracted Student Work. LDA extracted teaching with Models while LSAextracted Teaching Methods. Computers were also an integral part of this period. LDA extractedComputer Networks while LSA extracted Computer Design. The concept of systems may have alsoplayed a part in this period. LSA extracted system processes, university systems and LDA extractedenvironmental systems. The differences of extraction in the two methods are as follows: Process
architecture students in an Integrated Project Delivery Studio at Cal Poly. Prof. McDonald is a former Chair of the American Solar Energy Society (ASES) and of the USGBC Formal Education Committee, as well as a member of the California State University Chancellor’s Office Sustainability Advisory Committee for Education and Research. She is the principal author of SEDE – the Sustainable Environmental Design Education Program, a curriculum project for Page 23.800.1 landscape and architecture undergraduate professional education funded through the California Integrated Waste Management Board. Her work has
learning experience – which usually requires an interaction rather than a one-way transmissionof information. In 2006 the National Academic Advising Association (NACADA) presented theConcept of Academic Advising 29 as comprising curriculum, pedagogy and learning outcomes.This Concept includes a basis in developmental advising as well as advising as teaching, and ispart of an overall effort in the advising profession to view and practice advising as part of theacademic mission of the institution. In particular, the Concept states: Academic advising is integral to fulfilling the teaching and learning mission of higher education. Through academic advising, students learn to become members of their higher education community, to
growth. A sample list ofdirected projects is presented in Table 7. Table 6: Employment of graduates in different sectors Healthcare, System Integration, Manufacturing, Medical Equipment, Wireless Industry 21 Communication, Automotive, Transportation Business 19 E-commerce, Business services, Financial Services, IT Consulting, Graphics Business Government 3 County, City, State Governments Education 7 K-12, 2-year College, 4-year College PhD Program 3 Doctoral program in Technology In the fall semester of 2012, for the first time, the program hired two limited-term-lecturers. Due to an increase in enrollment, the
; Zlotkowski, 1998) andis now generally recognized as an important part of higher education as evidenced by CampusCompact, the major society for service-learning in higher education, which boasts more than1,200 university members.Leah Jamieson pioneered service-learning in engineering through the Engineering Projects inCommunity Service (EPICS) program at Purdue (Coyle et al., 1997). This model featuresvertically integrated teams consisting of an equal number of freshman, sophomore, junior, andsenior engineering students who take a course repeating times for semester credit and who worktogether on solving a significant community problem. The EPICS model has been expanded toinclude approximately 20 colleges of engineering nationally and internationally
Page 23.918.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Multi-Institutional Physical Modeling Learning Environment for Geotechnical Engineering EducationAbstractThis paper discusses the preparation and pre-evaluation for the development and implementationof an educational module that integrates major remote research facilities into undergraduateclasses. The developed educational module incorporates state-of-the-art experimental tools(geotechnical centrifuge) into the undergraduate education curriculum via web-basedtechnologies that enable real-time video monitoring, tele-control, and shared execution ofexperiments. The students' activities within the developed module are
. This is notsurprising given the potential rewards of a successful entrepreneurial career both with respect toallowing entrepreneurs the freedom to pursue their own ideas and visions as well as with respect tothe potential for large material rewards. But how do we nurture students to become successful en-trepreneurs? In this paper, we report on an innovative program at the authors’ institution, designedto nurture students to become IT entrepreneurs. While the program builds on the experiences ofother programs, it includes a number of novel components that are integrated together in an un-usual manner to interlock and complement each other.1. IntroductionIt is widely accepted that entrepreneurship is the engine that drives the American economy
by enhancing students’logical and critical thinking through the use of visual programming tools such as RAPTOR inintroductory computing courses. RAPTOR is a visual programming development environment based onflowcharts. Students can build simple procedural programs without learning the details of a language.These features of RAPTOR has helped us in providing an Interdisciplinary Integrated Teaching andLearning experiences that integrates team-oriented, hands-on learning experiences throughout theengineering technology and sciences curriculum and engages students in the design and analysis processbeginning with their first year. The objective of this paper is to discuss our experiences with the use ofRAPTOR in various science and technology
, students in this course have been offeredthe option of attending a hands-on library workshop and receiving extra credit on a relatedproject report. Since several hundred students enroll in over 25 sections of this course each fall,the workshop format was developed as an alternative to traditional one-shot library instruction,which is not practicable on this scale. To better assess how the workshops were serving thestudents in these large classes, a group of instructors from the class and the engineering librarianworked together to evaluate student success with research projects and overall informationliteracy within the freshman engineering curriculum. The first initiative was to design a citationstudy assessing submitted projects for quality and
alternatives to prevalent educationalpractices. For example, a variety of educational approaches were presented in the plenarysession of the 2011 ASEE annual conference. Examples of some of the approaches presentedincluded active learning, formative assessment as a strategy to support learning, and problem-based learning. Each description of an approach included a summary of research-based evidenceon specific educational impacts. The National Science Foundation, which funds projects forimproving STEM education through its Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement(CCLI) and Transforming Undergraduate Education in STEM (TUES) programs, has sponsoredforums in which panels of practitioners and scholars were commissioned to investigate the issueof
engineeringcurricula, despite a strong dependence between professional attributes and engineeringeducational experiences.1 Studies have demonstrated how courses that incorporate servicelearning as a novel pedagogical approach nurture professional skills while integrating designmethodologies.2-6 Furthermore, such teaching models have an enhanced positive impact onwomen in particular.7,8 We developed, taught and evaluated the impact of a design module onfirst-year engineering students that utilized a service learning project in the context of developingboth professional and leadership skills.9,10 Our analysis revealed an increase in students’confidence in both their technical and professional abilities immediately following the leadershipmodule, especially for
recently web-based discussionforums have been added allowing students to more easily communicate with other students in thecourse.On-site lab offeringsLaboratories play a major role in our electrical engineering curriculum. All but one of our EEcourses (Electric and Magnetic Fields) have an integrated laboratory component. Faculty teachboth the lecture and the laboratory portions of the class (no teaching assistants). We feel thathands-on application of theory is a strong component of good learning. Most of our courseshave significant design projects. In our entry level courses, laboratory experiments are used toverify theoretical concepts and to teach the students how to use basic lab equipment. Facultytake an active role in the lab and are
Engineer of 2020 by the National Academy of Engineering7. Theincorporation of professional skills into the undergraduate engineering curriculum is madeformalized by the ABET. Criterion 3, Student Outcomes, requires engineering programs todemonstrate their graduates achieve competency in teamwork, communication, andunderstanding the impact of technology on society and the environment2.An underpinning of LTS is service-learning, which is “a form of experiential learning in whichstudents engage in activities that address human and community needs together with structuredopportunities intentionally designed to promote student learning and development”8. ProjectsThat Matter: Concepts and Models for Service-Learning in Engineering9 is part of a
functionality (an engineeringfocus) with aesthetics, user-friendliness, relevance and empathy. It was our objective to developproject oriented courses that integrated these aspects at the university level.Our long journey towards this was inspired by ABET’s3 accreditation criteria 3(a-k) that mapwell to team-oriented semester long projects, as envisioned and implemented in the capstoneprojects of an engineering curriculum. However, not all the criteria can be met in the capstoneprojects. The capstone projects also tend to vary much in quality and focus, leading to demandson faculty and student members alike. This led us to utilize the lessons learned from a six- yearlong industry funded project on significantly increasing engineering design
through hotlinks embeddedin the report templates that are posted on Scholar, the local course management program. Theseare brief lectures that highlight the theories that form the foundation of the experiments anddiscuss deviations from the ideal, flash and video tutorials on simulation and measurementtechniques and links to component datasheets. Hands-on activities using the electronic platformhave also been incorporated into courses on electromagnetic fields, signals and systems and fiberoptics.Three major initiatives have supported the lab activities: the refinement of an automated lab report grading program the development of an online laboratory course the integration of MATLAB more completely in our experiments.The last