Cleveland State University’s General Education requirements, it wasnot approved for Gen Ed listing by the University Curriculum Committee. As a result, few, ifany, non-engineering students take the course.A complete description of the course is provided in another paper 4. The earlier paper alsodiscusses similar courses at other universities, as well as the assessment of the course atCleveland State University and some preliminary results. The course syllabus is provided as anAppendix.Student Learning OutcomesThe requirements that civil engineering programs have to meet now, and will have to meet in thefuture, are contained in a number of documents. The requirements are written in terms ofoutcomes, which include technical knowledge as well as the
into a contract agreement promising that they had read the syllabus and understood thatthey had to:1) complete a pre assessment (ARE) and post assessment (IPT), 2) submit a signedand dated program agreement, 3) attend 80% of onsite classes or make four contacts (emails,calls or texts) with the facilitator for online classes, 4) complete a program evaluation, and 5)complete the homework assignments and tests with an 80% on both.Engineering Analysis I This lecture based course covered the development and use of differentiation andintegration to solve engineering problems, including those involving motion, related rates,optimization, moments and centers of mass and it also includes an introduction to vectormethods. In the approximately 15
tosystems engineering in this paper. Planning for this new academic track took place in Fall, 2011;the pilot of the Introduction to Systems Engineering course occurred in Spring, 2012 and Fall,2012. The course is consciously structured after the introductory course at the University ofVirginia (UVa), the transfer target for a majority of PVCC students, to ensure that the transfercredit is accepted and students are prepared for success. Based on our experiences in the pilots,the syllabus became slightly modified to prepare students for study in other undergraduateprograms in systems engineering. Course goals, objectives, and content are described. Finally,we offer student reflections on their experiences and course utility as they prepare to
) management in a very large class, (2)syllabus content and (3) balancing teaching and research responsibilities. In addition, Prof.Spearot worked with the Department of Mechanical Engineering staff to develop a formalevaluation survey for Mr. John Lee.In preparation for the fall 2012 semester, Prof. Spearot involved Mr. Lee in every decisionrelated to the management of the large course, including writing of the course syllabus, decisionsrelated to the weight provided to each assignment and exams in the course, week-by-weekplanning of course topics and homework problems, and determination of homework and examdates. Prof. Spearot and Mr. Lee developed a strategy to manage homework submission,homework distribution to the graders, and drill session
will try to schedule several relevant field trips.Ideally, these will happen during class time, but may run over.Catch-all final statement:This is a new class, and both the content and format will evolve as we work together. If youhave ideas or requests, tell Dr. Vigeant. We can shift things around to create the optimallearning environment for the entire group. Appendix A – Course Syllabus Page 23.929.14 13
(angle, vel, h0) #instantiation of the object cball in the class Projectile while cball.getY() >= 0: cball.update(time) print "\nDistance traveled: %0.1f meters." % (cball.getX())Now run the Python script in the Interpreter.>>> import cball2>>> main()Enter the launch angle (in degrees): 30Enter the initial velocity (in meters/sec): 50Enter the initial height (in meters): 2Enter the time interval between position calculations: .1The python returns the result in the interpreter window.Distance traveled: 225.2 meters. Page 23.22.6III. Course Syllabus and DescriptionECET 49900 - Dynamic Programming with Pythonclass 3, lab 0
assignments. The information was provided in the course syllabus also.To be effective, the assignments required some weight (providing some external motivationto improve) but not too much weight (limiting internal grade anxiety or evaluationapprehension in the creative writing process). The average low stakes writing score wasweighed only 10% of the course grade, as shown in Table 1. Students reported that 10% wasa fair and preferred weight (see student survey responses below).Table 1. Course Grade Components and Weights Component Weight (%) Laboratory Preparation or Data Gathering Role 30 Formal and Informal Lab Reports 50
studies of aircraft design,” in AIAA Aircraft Systems & Technology Meeting, Seattle, WA, 1977.18. A. Pritchett, “AE 4803/8803 Humans and Autonomy Syllabus,” Georgia Tech School of Aerospace Engineering, January 2011.19. L. Young and M. Yeh. (2001) 16.400/2.181j/16.453j Human Factors Engineering. MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics. [Online]. Available: http://stuff.mit.edu/afs/athena/course/16/16.400/www/- syllabus.pdf20. D. Peet and K. Mulder, “Integrading SD into engineering courses at the Delft University of Technology,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 278–288, 2004.21. L. A. Guerra, W. Fowler, and M. Brennan, “Systems engineering and spacecraft
-instruction. Theinstructors were generally positive about the experience and were happy with the papersproduced. One consistent complaint from instructors was they had to give up three classsessions. The librarians were concerned that more students did not take assessments connectedwith class sessions. During the course assessment and revision process for fall 2012, librariansworked with instructors to devise ways to deliver the same amount of information without usingthree class sessions. The librarians taught one session during week three, offered an out of classexperience (OCE) in the library instruction room during weeks five, six, eight and nine (multiplesessions were offered to accommodate student schedules) and provided one online module
as an important measure of a student’s projectwork, other significant components of the student’s activity will likely be included in theoverall course grade to be complete, as laid out in the syllabus for a project course. Atour institution, for the Engineering Project sequence, besides the Portfolio componentworth 20%, we include Progress against the semester plan (20%), Reporting andDocumentation (40%), On Time completion of assigned tasks (15%), Logbook (5%) andan Adjustment Factor (+/-5%). The Progress against the semester plan component isbased on measurable goals set by the project team with approval by the faculty advisornear the beginning, and evaluated by the team at the end of the semester, as reported in a
Paper ID #7596Making Mathematics Relevant to Engineering StudentsDr. Michael R. Allen, Department of Mathematics Dr. Allen earned his PhD in Statistics from the University of Georgia in 1997 and currently holds a full time Associate Professor position in the Department of Mathematics at Tennessee Technological Univer- sity. His research interests include edgeworth expansions, time series, bootstrapping, online pedagogy and fractional calculus and has published papers on four of these five subjects. He minored in education and physics as an undergrad and obtained a Master in mathematics. Recently, he earned a Bachelors in
localstudents and are posted within 20 minutes of the completion of lecture allowing distance studentsto watch the lecture at their convenience. All course content (syllabus, links to recorded lectures,reading assignments, homework, homework solutions, laboratory projects, examples, web-basedresources, etc.) is posted on the course webpage (Desire to Learn (D2L)). All assignments andlaboratory reports, for both local and distance students taking the course, are submitted andreturned via an electronic dropbox. Grades are uploaded to the course webpage so that studentscan track their progress.One of the major issues in the education of distance engineering students is office hours. Mostyounger engineering students have a difficult time expressing in
related to the discussion from the previous stage.This material can be taught using any pedagogical approach (e.g., lectures, in-class activities,computer simulations, discussion). It may be necessary to modify the course syllabus and/ormethod of presentation to ensure coherence between the course material and the theme.However, it is expected that these modifications, at least initially, could be minor. Although themethods used in this stage are similar to those typically used to incorporate real-world problemsinto a course, it is critical that they be well-integrated with the Grand Challenge theme.Stage 5: Application of Course Content to the ChallengeNext, students apply the course-specific content, tools, and techniques to a real-world
and civil.Liberal Learning at Our CollegeLiterature refers to liberal learning, liberal education, and general education as courses in non-professional areasthat are required to develop complete professionals. The courses, it is assumed, are taught like any other coursesand therefore do not really help build life-long learning skills. We have attempted a different approach. Wehave defined Liberal Learning as ―self-learning in self-chosen liberal areas with self-defined scope‖. Unlike astandard course, the course does not have a defined syllabus, identified text or reference books, classroomlectures, and standard examinations. Students define their own syllabus, hunt or harvest for learning resources
discussion on a breadth of topics relating to graduate education,acquiring a job, and the transition therein. The course component of PPIT aims to improve theteaching qualities of each student by providing theoretical and practical instruction on teachingin the classroom. In class, students are introduced to learning theories, literature in the field,learning styles, syllabus development, and others. The emphasis in this environment is on thedelivery and not particularly the technical content of an engineering professor’s instruction. Thiscomponent scaffolds the development of personal teaching philosophies and learning objectives,and gives each student a video-recorded microteaching sample for feedback purposes. Thesuccessful completion of both
23.450.2studio classroom with a reasonable expectation that each student has access to a computer.Instructors have some flexibility in how information is presented during a class or shuffledbetween class sessions, provided the content is covered in a timely fashion to meet preparationexpectations for in class activities, homework, and exams that are common to all sections of thecourse.Quizzes are given at the discretion of the section instructor and are used in a couple of ways, toensure the online modules have been viewed prior to class, and to gather summative informationabout how well students have learned the content covered in class.In the fall semester 2012, for one section of the course, a librarian had the opportunity to be theinstructor of
complemented the video presentation with application activities that werecompleted at the end of each segment. A 12-week online follow-up was used to enforce theemployment of the key concepts. These were monitored by the peer mentor.Each of the FIG groups were also clustered into the Intro to Engineering Practice I courses.5 TheFIGs were also clustered into the engineering version of the University’s introductory freshmancourse (Cornerstones).1.2.3 New First-Year CoursesThe FIRE project developed two new first-year courses which are required for all incomingSEET freshmen, namely Introduction to Engineering Practice I & II (ENGR 1513 and ENGR1523). These courses comprise a fall-spring sequence totaling six credit hours, the primary aimof which is
thisquestion.What are the Implications for Practice /Recommendation?Based on the survey results and participants’ feedback, the following recommendations are madefor enhancing the teaching and learning of standards into the curricula and senior design projects. 1. The standards development organizations can help academia to better incorporate standards education in the curricula by: a. Making standards available online to students and faculty at no cost. b. Conducting standards education training programs for faculty. c. Developing and disseminating standards education materials that can be incorporated into existing courses. Materials may include tutorials, case studies, webinar lectures by industry professionals on
discretization approach is to use free body diagrams; the derivation approach for the free body diagrams is the method of sections; the learning outcomes targeted are ABET (a) and course learning outcome 1.c as stated on the syllabus; and so forth...where all the bold-faced words represent classes in the knowledge domain, and the underlinedwords represent traits and attributes of this individual. The Engineering Genome ontologycaptures and stores this information in a systematic, highly-structured way, enabling powerfulsearch as described later in this paper. A very readable introduction to ontologies is presented byNoy and McGuinness 8 .To be sure, the Genome contains specific taxonomies to help organize information (example
focusareas. These may be focused on specific courses or on more overarching ideas. Page 23.594.11Technology Aspects: All VCP meeting are being conducted using the Internet conferencingsoftware Adobe Connect. In addition to the weekly meeting, the VCPs interact through a web-portal that will host assigned or recommended readings, organizational information, and theparticipants’ products. It also will provide a highly interactive component where participants canpost questions or ideas and have the group engage in an asynchronous discussion about them. AnASEE technical support is managing this site, which uses the online collaborative toolkit
Page 23.250.4other course. Dr. Westphal is also presenting the pilot module at the January midyear meeting tofaculty from the other BEST colleges, who will engage in the module’s engineering activities aslearners, ask questions about her development process and the efficacy of implementation, andprovide feedback. Depending on the topics covered in each professor’s syllabus, this newmodule may be implemented in multiple colleges in future semesters.Dr. Westphal’s modules may be her students’ first exposure to technology and engineering at thecollege-level. If her students then move on to NSCC’s 4-year transfer partner, Salem StateUniversity (SSU) they will have more chances to experience engineering content in their courses.Patricia Bade, a
Certificate in BiofuelCertificate Program Continuing Education Production OperationsAlternative Energy Programs Crowder College / Environmental Sciences Associate of Arts DegreeBiodiesel Fuel Education University of Idaho / Biological & Online short course for generalProgram Agricultural Engineering publicNew York Center for Liquid Morrisville State College / School of Create jobs in the agriculture sectorBiofuel Agriculture and Natural ResourcesAs illustrated in Table 1, although many biofuel education programs have emerged recently,most of them target general non-engineering audience (such as agricultural or
project for the semester and were part of an early preliminary version of themodule. The main advantage to this approach was that potential problems, both information andlogistics based, were addressed before the remote undergraduate class students were involved.Approximately two weeks prior to an actual task, the host students would be given theopportunity to run through an initial trial. There were six students involved in this operation,which ensured that several opinions and experiences would be documented. The group containedthree students that had already taken a class with a similar syllabus and three students that werecurrently enrolled in a comparable course. This created an environment where some of thestudents knew what to expect and
previous semesters). During the same semester, we designed and offered to thestudents many detailed online surveys that include multiple-choice and open-ended questions.Our teaching goals include: ü Focus on the key concepts and strategies transferable to many fields of engineering ü Provide extensive lab experience in building/testing/studying a variety of circuits, which have been discussed in lectures ü Engage students’ interest via hands-‐on work with circuits for practical applications from the very beginning of the course. Similar goals have been formulated and achieved by other instructors. For example, Sterian et al.(2008) included projects in their introductory circuits
writing for 7 years online at a university serving students from around the world, and she has published in and has presented on international education, engineering education, blended learning, and online learning. Wold’s primary interests focus on global education, methods of online education, and curriculum design. She has degrees in journalism and economics from the University of Minnesota as well as a master’s degree in international education from George Washington University.Mr. Roy Lee Hayes Jr, University of Virginia Roy Hayes is a PhD Candidate at the University of Virginia. He completed a Bachelors of Science in Aerospace and Systems Engineering at the University of Virginia in 2009. His research focuses on
ebrary have conducted their own studies to learn more about howstudents use e-books. These studies cannot be considered an analysis of their respectiveplatforms, but both provided information about students’ thoughts regarding e-books. Springerfound that users “value the ability to access eBooks anytime and anywhere and appreciate thataccess is fast and easy.” They also found that “Full-text searching was also named as a topeBook advantage.”16 ebrary’s survey asked students how important certain features are to e-books and they found that searching was the most important, followed by “anytime access” andoff-campus access.5Rojeski conducted a study to gather student perceptions and preference relating to e-books usedas textbooks in library course
course materialcoming alive in an episode of South Park, the course was having the intended impact.Team TeachingTeam Teaching can be a powerful way to create a T-shaped course, but it is not for thefaint of heart. Unlike single-instructor courses, decisions require discussion: studentrecruitment, course content and structure, syllabus and website, readings andassignments, grades, office hours, and in-class work. How should the workload bedistributed? How will all of the small decisions (e.g. extensions, in-class surprises) bemade? There are many models, ranging from everyone doing everything to completedivide and conquer. No matter the model, team-taught courses are more work.The weight of these decisions is amplified when two cultures collide
this case course redesign techniques, are the critical elements in the proposedredesign of Principles. Where they are available from the predecessor course to Principles, artifacts that explainthe content selections, give substance to actual and proposed assessment practices, or describe orillustrate actual or potential student learning activities are provided in appendices. The attachedappendices include: 1. The prior course syllabus revised for the new course design. Page 23.857.5 2. An example of a guest speaker biography ( used in the prior course for the Tuesday night 9:00 pm free pizza talk). 3
provided by thespeakers. A variety of other online resources are also provided. NCWIT and CSTA also provided awealth of printed materials that attendees could take with them to support their recruiting andteaching efforts.4 EvaluationAll of the attendees expressed an interest in learning new strategies and techniques for attractingand retaining a more diverse student population in the computer science courses. The second-mostcommon expectation (expressed by 15 of 27 participants) was to collaborate with other teachersand CS education professionals to develop ways of strengthening their CS curricula and informingschool administrators and parents about the importance of computing education for all students. At the end of the workshop
practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a National Science Foun- dation CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios for graduate students to promote professional identity and reflective practice. Her teaching emphasizes the roles of engineers as communicators and educators, the foundations and evolution of the engineering education discipline, assessment methods, and evaluating communication in engineering.Wende Garrison, Virginia Tech Wende Garrison got her bachelor’s and master’s from Portland State University in Film & Television and Rhetoric &