College’s Engineering StudentSuccess Center during the academic year and had rigorous training in advising and mentoring.The peer mentors formally interacted with the EXCEED students through active participation inthe projects and activities and leading nightly small discussion groups and informally duringmeals and break times.Campus Resource Hunt: Teams of students went on a photo “scavenger” hunt to discover theresources across campus, including the library, counseling, registrar, bursar’s office, writingcenter, and tutoring and advising centers.College of Engineering Tour: Students went on a comprehensive tour of the buildinghighlighting classrooms, student club space, laboratories, and department offices.Student Panels: Groups of current
these individuals we examined the NSF award Page 23.594.10database, particularly the Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) andTransforming Undergraduate Education in STEM (TUES) award base, as well as the engineeringeducation literature. The leaders of the first round of VCPs are: Dr. Ken Connor and Dr. LisaHuettel in the circuits VCP, Dr. Edward Berger and Dr. Brian Self in the mechanics VCP, Dr.John Chen and Dr. Milo Koretsky in the thermodynamics VCP, Dr. Lisa Bullard and Dr. RichardZollars in the mass and energy balance VCP, and Dr. Mary Besterfield-Sacre and Dr. JenniferTurns in the FOEE VCP.In the first year, each Faculty
partnership programs. His expertise includes assessment in teaching and learning outcomes in k-12 and in higher education, diversity, leadership, community outreach, and curriculum development.Prof. David O Kazmer, University of Massachusetts, LowellDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Dr. Olga Pierrakos is an associate professor and founding faculty member of the James Madison Univer- sity Department of Engineering, which graduated its inaugural class in May 2012. At JMU, Dr. Pierrakos is the director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering Education (CIEE) and director of the Advanced Thermal Fluids Laboratory. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineer
Agricultural Engineering and his doctorate in Engineering Science with minors in Civil Engineering and Applied Statistics from Louisiana State University. Dr. Moriassi is a research hydrologist at the USDA- ARS Grazing Lands Research Laboratory. His research focuses on the development of watershed-scale models of hydrological processes, the development of model evaluation guidelines, and the application of these models on water quality and quantity issues.Dr. Ann L. Kenimer, Texas A&M University Dr. Ann Kenimer is a professor and associate provost for undergraduate studies at Texas A&M University. She earned her bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Agricultural Engineering from Virginia Polytechnic In- stitute and
Technology programs has been to educate engineers-practitioners. Thus, curriculum of ET students is more oriented towards hands-on experience in laboratory settings and has less commitments to pure theoretical knowledge. Also, it should be said that some students, which officially belonged
well as in real-world applications to societally relevant energy andenvironmental issues.Participating teachers received this content in multiple modes. They were exposed to differentconcepts while working in the research laboratories as well as during their design activities. Inaddition, they attended a number of lectures both in the US and in the UK. All of these differentvenues allowed participants to gain both theoretical and practical knowledge about a number ofconcepts relative to all three areas: mathematics, science, and engineering. One teacher sharedhis perceptions of the greatest benefit of the program when he said, “as a teacher
LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, chair of the First Year Engineering experience, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter P.E., Lawrence Technological University Page 23.266.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Campus-wide Course Modification Program to Implement Active & Collaborative Learning and Problem-based Learning to Address the Entrepreneurial MindsetAbstractWhile active and
Paper ID #7355Defining Engineering in K-12 in North CarolinaDr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Laura Bottomley received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering in 1984 and an M.S. in Electrical Engineering in 1985 from Virginia Tech. She received her Ph D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from North Carolina State University in 1992. Dr. Bottomley worked at AT&T Bell Laboratories as a member of technical staff in Transmission Systems from 1985 to 1987, during which time she worked in ISDN standards, including representing Bell Labs on an ANSI standards committee for physical layer ISDN standards
Paper ID #7189Engaging Early Engineering Students (EEES): A Fourth Year Report froman NSF STEP ProjectDr. Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University Jon Sticklen is the Director of the Center for Engineering Education Research at Michigan State Univer- sity. Dr. Sticklen is also Director of Applied Engineering Sciences, an undergraduate bachelor of science degree program in the MSU College of Engineering that focuses both on engineering and business. He also is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Dr. Sticklen formerly led a laboratory in knowledge-based systems focused on task
activities and laboratory projects. Thelearning objective of the course reflects criteria recommended by the National Academy ofEngineering (NAE)1 and ABET14. In our offering of this course, four weeks of general lecture Page 23.42.4provided an overview of the engineering profession, with a focus on topics of failure analysis,design methodology, human-centered design, engineering in society, leadership and ethics.Students then partook in two sets of five-week modules.In the Fall of 2010, a 5-week leadership module was incorporated into the freshman engineeringdesign course; it was offered as the mechanical engineering module alongside
Education (CIEE) and Director of the Advanced Thermal Fluids Laboratory. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineer identity, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service, problem based learning methodologies, assessment of student learning, as well as com- plex problem solving. Her other research interests lie in cardiovascular fluid mechanics, sustainability, and K-12 engineering outreach. Dr. Pierrakos is a 2009 NSF CAREER Awardee. Dr. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in Engineering Science and Mechanics, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Virginia Tech.Dr. Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University
through selected quotations how the proposedresearch mentoring models exist and apply to each of the mentoring relationships, regardless ofgender composition, research area, type of laboratory or experimental work, etc. The coachingmodel is explained first from the perspective of 3 mentoring pairs: Mia and Annie (both female),Nate and Scott (both male), and Russell and Rachel (male mentor and female mentee). Thesupervisory model follows, as demonstrated by Dwayne and Amelia (male mentor and femalementee), Keeley and Veronica (both female), and Drake and Shannon (male mentor and femalementee). These gender pairings are summarized in Table 2Error! Reference source not found
, robotics, and human motion analysis. Additionally he has extensively studied creativity in engineering education. His professional service in ASME includes Chair of the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee, DED Exec- utive Committee, and several ASME conferences including the general conference chair for IDETC/CIE 2002. Currently he is also a member of the ASME Strategic Planning Committee.Prof. Janet Katherine Allen, University of Oklahoma Janet Allen came to the University of Oklahoma in August 2009 where she and Professor Farrokh Mistree are establishing the Systems Realization Laboratory at the University of Oklahoma with a focus on engi- neering design. She holds the John and Mary Moore chair of Engineering and is a
latest technology with new knowledge and design.7 Technology is chosenand mediated by those in social power and domination, which has traditionally been anexclusively male domain.8 This domination has led to a monopoly of male engineers in controlof the technological knowledge and its power upon society. Male dominance in technology andengineering has rendered gender invisible in the science of design and technology. There is adanger in this rendering as it assumes gender as being non-relevant within the social creation oftechnology. Yet, “universities still tend to reproduce this professional engineering culture and thecorresponding social habit in favor of men” 9 resulting in research and design laboratories asprimarily male dominated spaces
, Germany (VDE) Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Page 23.1233.2 European Commission of the European Union (CE) Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Underwriters Laboratories (UL) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)At the national level, the ABET Criteria for Engineering programs also require students toincorporate engineering standards in their design experience1. The National Standards Strategyfor the United States (NSS) demands increasing the
at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, co-authoring the textbook used in the course. As a National Director with the Mathematics Division of ASEE, he works tirelessly to grow and develop the STEM workforce in the Cen- tral Alabama area. Dr. Moore teaches (1) Engineering Mathematics and (2) Engineering Computation using MATLAB at UAB. Work Background / Experience: He interned at UNC/Chapel Hill, Argonne National Laboratory (Atomic Physics Division), and Entergy Corporation in Transmission and Distribution, and then Standards. He then began serving as a high school physics teacher for three (3) years where his students would inspire him to continue his education. Upon completing his doctoral studies, Dr
took participants to the Melvin Price Locks and Dam in EastAlton, IL. There the teachers were exposed to working systems and were able to discuss with theArmy Corps of Engineers the real-world complex problems that they had to solve on a day-to-day basis. A tour of the School of Engineering labs was also provided to expose participants toother problems being solved in laboratory environments.Overall, the summer workshop presented engineering and engineering design principles to theteacher-participants and then allowed them to experience hands-on application of thoseprinciples. The Ask, Imagine, Plan, Create, Improve and Reflect engineering design stepswere presented and applied during projects. While concepts built upon one another and
) An issue related to the rhetorical literacy skill of clearly stating the purpose and providing an explicit justification for the writing (16% of evaluations) 3) An issue related to the ethical literacy skill of using citations for others’ ideas, including both textual and non-textual materials (36% of evaluations)In 2006, Drury, O’Carroll, and Langrish[8] reported on an interactive online program for teachingreport writing at the University of Sydney. They included in their results the assessment of acohort of third year chemical engineering students’ laboratory reports. This cohort wascomprised of 46 students, 42% of whom were non-native English speakers. Assessment criteriaincluded “academic literacy” based on a
PROBLEMS THROUGH DESIGN PROCESSES 16the base or “bottom part” more detachable to improve transportability, the group did not addressmaking the frame or “top part” more transportable as well. Because the students had devoted solittle of their conversation to re-stating the problem and clarifying what the client wanted, oneaspect of the problem did not emerge until after the design had already been produced.Research a need or problem. Many previous studies of novices’ design processes have been ina laboratory study where the only available source of information was the experimenter. In thesestudies, the researchers defined the ‘information gathering’ stage as asking for information fromthe experimenter, reading
Tech School of Civil and Environmental Engineering and a principal research scientist and distinguished technical fellow with the Georgia Tech Research Institute. Over the last thirty plus years, Dr. Rodgers has held various academic, research and administrative positions including serving as director of the Georgia Tech Air Quality laboratory from 1988 to 2008. He currently serves as deputy director for Research and Technology Transfer for National Center for Transportation Productivity and Management at Georgia Tech. Page 23.408.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
weak correlation between the studentgroup and the professionals, 0.5 was moderate correlation between the student group and theprofessionals, and 0.7 or larger was considered to be a strong correlation between the studentgroup and the professionals. In addition, 95% error bands for the correlations were estimatedusing the bootstrap re-sampling method. This bootstrap analysis with Kendall’s Tau wasconducted by Jonathan Stallings of the Laboratory for Interdisciplinary Statistical Analysis(LISA) at Virginia Tech using code that was written in the R programming language. The results of Part 2 of the survey were checked for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and the Shapiro-Wilk tests. Based upon the results of these tests, it was
alternatives to prevalent educationalpractices. For example, a variety of educational approaches were presented in the plenarysession of the 2011 ASEE annual conference. Examples of some of the approaches presentedincluded active learning, formative assessment as a strategy to support learning, and problem-based learning. Each description of an approach included a summary of research-based evidenceon specific educational impacts. The National Science Foundation, which funds projects forimproving STEM education through its Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement(CCLI) and Transforming Undergraduate Education in STEM (TUES) programs, has sponsoredforums in which panels of practitioners and scholars were commissioned to investigate the issueof