Physics 100 is: Strong Moderate Minimal Not ApplicableGE-1 Critical reflections on the nature and history of beauty and MinimalAesthetic sensibilities artGE-2 Interchanging ideas and information through writing, ModerateCommunication skills speech, and visual and digital mediaGE-3 Systematic
indicate that the effect of PBL on skills is positive, whileits effect on knowledge is negative. Combined results indicate an overall negative effect for problem-based learning. Gijbels et al. [30] recommend careful consideration of assessment methods inmeasuring problem-based learning outcomes.4.5 Active LearningPrince [61] defines active learning broadly as, “any instructional method that engages students inthe learning process.” This definition is itself broad enough to include many traditional classroomactivities such as lectures (provided students are reflecting, taking notes, or asking questions).However, in an effort to maintain contrast with traditional teacher-centered3 approaches, thesemethods are systematically dismissed by explicit
in design orentrepreneurship fields. Specifically, it provides a means to help both novice and expertdesigners and entrepreneurs organize, communicate, refine, and reflect on their ideas. Thecanvas also provides a means of design-thinking documentation in which comparisons betweeninitial, mid, and final versions of the canvas could be used to assess student learning.The prototype version of the innovation canvas is shown in Figure 2 below and is availableonline for educators and practitioners to test, evaluate, and provide feedback36. In addition to thedetails presented in the remainder of this paper, a brief description of the canvas’s themes can befound in the appendix of this paper. The canvas is shared under a Creative Commons (CC
emphasis on increasing the proportion of engineering majors, theToys’n MORE project seeks to increase the number of students in STEM majors at thePennsylvania State University by as much as 10 percent. Please note that any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.This project is being conducted by the College of Engineering at Penn State through an NSF-sponsored Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Talent Expansion Program grant(STEP grant, DUE #0756992). The project involves the College of Engineering and 13 regionalcampuses in the Penn State system. These campuses offer 2-year degrees, 4-year
pedagogical changes made throughout the study and facilitatedsharing of feedback to make course improvements. Qualitative data were collected through aseries of open-ended surveys and focus groups to determine the effectiveness of the instructionalmethods. Data were collected after each semester, and results were disseminated to the team toguide course modifications for the next semester.Qualitative research, known for its flexibility in theoretical frameworks and methodologies,emphasizes the importance of context, researcher/participant engagement, perceptions ofparticipants, inductive data analysis, and reflection by researchers and participants.13 Quality ofresearch findings in qualitative research is established through the “high standards of
compare to topics in same sections Using puzzles to solve math problems; Self-explanatory or useless tipsActivity: Explain what is wrong with speed limit signs:From the user’s point of view: What’s wrong with speed limit sign/driving/enforcement (forexample, we don’t feel “guilty” by driving above it). Suggest ideas to solve the problem.Students’ responses:Right: Max speed limit required by law Higher speed limits in Highways Safe way not to get a speeding ticket People can agree that the octagonal shape of a stop sign is an unmistakable symbol Reflective properties of signs and reflectors make it easier to drive during the nightWrong: People do not follow the speed limit Speed limit signs are
activelyinvolved in the learning process (based on the results of each survey feedback), which is inagreement with its decision to register in the course. The students feel very comfortable learningat its own pace but not so much deciding in what order to learn. It is very plausible that, whilethe course materials and virtual lab are available at any time, the sequential presentation of someof the scientific content of the modules limit in what order the modules could be completed. Thetasks to complete each module are clearly stated and the perceived interactivity of the course andexperiments reflects that the choices that students make are meaningful and not just not for thesake of making choices. However, in general, the responses amongst the surveyed
amount of change (AE #3, AE #6) deal with the perceptions ofthe students own discipline as collaborative and their understanding of the integrateddesign process. The small percentage difference does not necessarily reflect a lowlevel of comprehension of that particular question, but that it started with a high overalllevel of understanding.The questions that showed medium to high levels of change more directly addressdesign issues and performance metrics about daylight and energy. These questionsreveal whether or not the students were beginning to understand the complexrelationship between design and performance. Figure 4 shows the results fromimportant individual questions that relate to this particular learning objective organizedfrom most
education research focused on young learners raises questions such as howengineering experiences can be integrated into existing school curricula, and which engineeringframeworks are significant, engaging, and inspiring to students 7,8. There are many differenttheories of how to engage students in what they are learning. One of these is ExperientialLearning Theory (ELT), which was developed by educational theorist David Kolb and hiscolleagues. In ELT, “knowledge is created through the transformation of experience” 9, andultimately provides students with the opportunity to directly involve themselves in a learningexperience, reflect on their experiences using analytic skills, and eventually gain a betterunderstanding of the new knowledge and retain
the fall of 2008, there was one section with 50students completing the course. Last fall, there were 69 students completing the course in onesection and 49 in the other. Even the spring section has grown to the initial fall 2008 levels asthere are currently 54 students in the course, up from the 29 students completing the course in thefirst spring offering of 2009. I would like to reiterate that these numbers reflect only thosestudents who have completed the course, since there are a handful of students who drop thecourse every semester.For direct student comments, all of the IDEA Survey comments have been gathered, beginningwith the initial offering of the course in fall 2008. Below are all of the comments with thekeyword project. When asked
remain. The theoretical lenses of social learning theory and communities of practice are fruitfulways to consider the experiences and suggestions of female STEM faculty at ECU. Each of theparticipants in this study has been engaged in one or more professional communities of practice,including STEM departments and interdisciplinary teams, at ECU. The domains of thesecommunities are shaped by the objectives of the participants’ respective disciplines, and theiracademic roles to attend to research, teaching, and service. The very fact of their hiring placed Page 23.1088.5the participants into these communities, reflecting their competence
” (GA, MN, WA, WI) or "__ College of Technology" (TCICollege of Technology in NYC, formerly Technical Careers Institute/ RCA Institute; DunwoodyCollege of Technology (MN), ex-Dunwoody Institute). Some tech institutes got absorbed bynearby Community Colleges. The name change reflected new transferable Associate’s Degreesvs. terminal Certificates (adding Math, English & General Ed.) – but a result was more word/name confusion, as hundreds of “Institutes” were now called “… College of Technology.” 11 12Beyond education, the National Institute for Certification in Engineering Technologies (NICET),formed in 1981 by merging two prior groups that certified individual technicians (70,000+ by12/31/84) or technologists (600- by 12/31/84). Yet, though