, and social issues surrounding the use of information, and accessand use information ethically and legally.”1With the intention of helping to satisfy the University’s goal regarding core competencies andmeeting the ACRL definition, an online module based around an assignment developed for afreshman electrical engineering and computer science course was developed. The assignmentwas modified to be generic enough to be customized by faculty in any engineering department.Literature ReviewComputer-based tutorials for information literacy instruction have been in use since the 1980s.Librarians at the University of Delaware launched PLATO (Programmed Logic for Automatic
entrepreneurial education across the curriculum. Thenetwork is limited to private institutions with ABET accredited engineering programs and is byinvitation only.The goal of KEEN is to make entrepreneurship education opportunities widely available atinstitutions of higher learning, and to instill an action-oriented entrepreneurial mindset inengineering, science, and technical undergraduates. The skills associated with theentrepreneurial mindset are communication, teamwork, leadership, ethics and ethical decision-making, opportunity recognition, persistence, creativity, innovation, tolerance for ambiguity, riskanalysis, creative problem solving, critical thinking, and business skills (including marketing,financial analysis, and strategic planning).1, 2, 3
our students to be ethical practicing engineers, and is the chair of the External Advisory Committee for the IDEA cen- ter, which promotes inclusion, diversity, excellence and advancement in engineering. She has conducted research in performance-based earthquake engineering and large-scale experimentation of reinforced con- crete, FRP composite, and hybrid bridges. Page 23.358.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Curriculum Exchange: “Make Your Own Earthquake”IntroductionThe George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) is an
reference in the body of thepaper. However, two articles in IJEE were Foucauldian-inspired discourse analyses33, 65. Twoconference papers from Donna Riley also dealt with Foucault in more depth. One reviewed herclass on thermodynamics that uses Foucauldian notions of power and knowledge66, and anotherdiscussed Foucauldian notions of identity creation through power and knowledge as it related tothe ethical views of engineering students67. Riley’s work differs from ours as her work hasfocused on bringing Foucauldian notions into the classroom, whereas we are interested in usinghis concepts to understand ongoing issues of underrepresentation with STEM faculty. Werecognize that these searches are limited in that they can only tell us who is explicitly
function effectively as a member or leader on a technical team h. an understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development i. an understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity j. a knowledge of the impact of engineering technology solutions in a societal and global context k. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvementThrough community service programs, engineering students will play a more effective part in thedevelopment and improvement of the American way of life.community service in construction
literaturereview, formulating researchquestions and putting together aresearch proposal, writingabstracts and lay-man articles,presentation and report writing, Figure 1 REU cohorts and their faculty advisors in 2008,professional ethics, and 2009, and 2010 from top to bottom Page 23.184.3 Figure 2 REU-Site program activities. Clockwise from top left: orientation, safety around campus, group meeting, and field trip to Houston Energy Hall.intellectual property protection. Several field-trips were also organized to broaden their perspectives and make connectionsbetween E&T and society. Fellows
; emphasis on social relevance, service learning, volunteerleadership, and collaboration. These skills can be taught without significant investment.Introduction and emphasis on more soft skills in engineering classes can help students develop Page 23.256.3these skills.In the engineering senior design courses for example, ethics and law (patent and trademark) canbe incorporated in the teachings. These could be in the form of assigned reading, case studies,videos, external lecturers, and webinars from professional organizations like ASME, IEEE, andAIAA. Moreover writing should also be much emphasized, assigned and graded. Further oraland technical
delivery method affected thestudents’ opinion of the instructor. Means and standard deviations for both lecture deliverymethods are presented in Table 1. T-tests were performed to determine if the differences in themeans was statistically significant.The quizzes assessed student learning of class materials. Quiz one covered the policies, risks,and motivations behind environmental compliance audits. Quiz one displayed a 2.99 percentagepoint difference between the mean grades of the two sections. The higher grades were achievedby students with the Power Point/audio lectures. The difference was statistically significant,dictating that for the first quiz, lecture delivery method mattered. Quiz two assessed students’knowledge of procedures and ethics
processes.Nelson6 analyzed inputs from directors of ABET accredited programs to identify key technicalcompetencies for manufacturing graduates. Among 264 competencies, the highest rankedcompetencies related to quality, communication, and personal ethics. Baird7 proposed alaboratory exercise to simulate mass production environment. Although is more difficult todevelop this type of exercise compared to the traditional teaching practice, the benefit of thelatter approach is numerous since: a) It simulates industry practice, b) It develops specific hard-skill and soft-skill of students, c) It provides opportunity for lab instructor to be creative and organized, and
• Analysis • Critical thinking • Information process • Assessment and evaluation (self & • Teamwork group) • Ethics and professionalism POGIL ABET Criteria Approaches Page 23.1268.2 Figure 2: The POGIL approaches adopted for the needsWhat is the GPMT
addition to the extracurricular activities, there are work-study and co-opprograms that provide students with real-world experiences. Inside the classroom, studentsacquire the knowledge necessary to ultimately graduate with a Bachelor’s degree in their chosenmajor. All these experiences help transform the student from a dualistic to a relativistic point ofview. According to Dr. William Perry, author of Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Developmentin the College Years, there are nine positions of intellectual development that can be divided into Page 23.571.2two broad categories with position 5 as the pivotal point (see Appendix for Dr
communities of practice coming together to solve a particular problem of commonconcern.24 Through defining, designing and making SmartSurfaces the academic communities ofpractice were able to come together as new communities of interest (the teams).As stated above, cross-disciplinarity in education is widely believed to provide valuableexperience. Newell indicates that products of cross-disciplinary courses are: a greaterappreciation of and ability to integrate other’s points of view; an increased ability to evaluate thestatements of experts - particularly in the detection of bias; an increased acceptance ofambiguity; an increased understanding of values and ethics; and an increase in the ability to thinkcreatively.25 It should be noted that these
outcomes1 (although individualprograms are free to define additional program-specific outcomes). The outcomes are typicallylisted using lower case letters. This paper concerns the two outcomes, c and k, utilizing themastery of solid modeling packages as an assessment tool. For these two outcomes, ABETrequires that students graduate with: (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and Page 23.285.2 safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and
instrument.(v) Demonstrate effective use of project and personnel management techniques.(vi) Identify and meet customer needs.(vii) Integrate engineering professionalism, ethics, and the environmental in their work and as it relates to the context of engineering in society.(viii) Demonstrate improved communication skills including written, oral, and multimedia. This may include both patent and literature searches as well as writing a patent disclosure for novel work.Common Grading Guidelines for Jr. /Sr. Engineering ClinicThe following (Table 1) are general guidelines that are used for establishing grades for theJunior/Senior Engineering Clinic. As mentioned earlier, these guidelines were developed by theclinic committee and
Support for Community-Based Architecture and Planning Outreach Scholarship at Auburn University. In Hardin, M.C, Eribes, C., Poster, C. (Volume Eds.), Zeisel, W.(Series Ed.). From the Studio to the Streets: Service-Learning in Planning and Archtiecture. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.[11] Hardin, M.C. (2006). Research as Ethical Practice: When Academic Goals Align with Community Needs. In Hardin, M.C, Eribes, C., Poster, C. (Volume Eds.), Zeisel, W.(Series Ed.). From the Studio to the Streets: Service-Learning in Planning and Archtiecture. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.[12] Wing, S. (2006). Sore Shoulders, Bruised Ethics: The Unintended Lessons of Design Build. In Hardin, M.C, Eribes, C., Poster, C
technical report is reviewedand graded by a different instructor (Outcome G). One of the deliverables of each project is acontextualization document which reports what significance the final design may have on theenvironment, global, health, safety, economics, ethics, etcetera (Outcome H). Anotherdeliverable is a report on project management. Students are required to manage all aspect of theirprojects and submit the project management document describing how they managed theirproject including project planning, budgeting, scheduling, execution, managing the availableresources, monitoring and controlling the project (Outcome L).Lastly, students are engaged in entrepreneurial projects for at least their first semester (OutcomeM). They are required to
, they receive their 2-page project summary and are contacted by their faculty and graduate student mentors to discuss their summer project, answer questions, and receive additional background material that will enhance their knowledge of the project prior to their first day in the laboratory. iii. Orientation - At the beginning of program, students participate in a rigorous 2-day orientation to bring the entire cohort to a shared understanding of: research, scientific ethics, laboratory safety, conducting literature reviews, data treatment and analysis, UC Berkeley’s campus and resources, and energy-themed research at the three hosting NSF- funded Centers. iv. Growth seminars - Growth is one
” experiment we could find,and the ELISA technique is directly applied in a common product: the home pregnancy test.Week Fifteen: “Nano-Ethics”Finally, the course concluded with an interactive discussion on the ethical issues surroundingnew technologies, specifically nanotechnologies. To this end, the class played a Democs “cardgame.” Democs is an acronym for a deliberative meeting of citizens.21 Developed in the UnitedKingdom,22 these are a means for non-experts “to work out, share, and express their views onpublic policy issues.” The “game” is made up of sets of cards (“Issues,” “Information,” and“Story”), and is not played to win, but sets up a semi-structured group discussion of complextechnical issues through the medium of the cards. It is
technology problems, Outcome g: Ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical and nontechnical environments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature, Outcome h: Understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development, Outcome i: Understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity, and Outcome k: Commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement. Table I: Mapping of Course Objectives to Student Outcomes Course Objectives Supported Student Outcomes
, with the hope that students will model the physics of the problem situation, identify economic and ethical constraints, and find ways to base decisions on quantitative analysis. These types of problems have helped students understand the nature of engineering problems and decisions. However, by themselves, they do not show students the process of transferring basic theory to engineering practice and incorporating it into the “making-of-meaning” required for addressing engineering design problems2, 3.In this paper, it is proposed to augment these problems by asking the students (and instructor) toengage in problem posing and problem structuring. The goal is to suggest methods in concordancewith
Skills b 3 Creative Problem Solving d 1,2 System Thinking d,e 4 Ethics and Professionalism a,i 8 Self-Learning h 5 Technology Skills a,f 1,2 Respect for diversity j 8 Continuous improvement k 4Note: ABET Criterion 2 Program Outcomes – Students will have:a. an appropriate mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills and modern tools of their
supply thecomprehensive understanding swiftly transforming field demands. It is a full-time PhD programthat lasts two years, offering classes conducted on an undergraduate-type schedule.It has a curriculum that addresses the time-crunch problem by integrating professional practicesinto the technical curriculum — that is, professional practices are contextualized in engineeringin ways that reinforce and strengthen students’ understanding and their ability to apply thatunderstanding to address engineering problems. Throughout their graduate program, studentswork to master the engineering body of knowledge and simultaneously become skillfulcommunicators, ethical decision makers, team leaders, creative thinkers and problem solvers.Today, engineers
multidisciplinary manner) b. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability f. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility h. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context j. a knowledge of contemporary issuesThis paper has described a few of activities to develop student understanding of the opportunitiesand
Written Communication e,g 6 Project Management b,e 6,7 Visual Communication e,g 6 Math Skills b 3 Creative Problem Solving d 1,2 System Thinking d,e 4 Ethics and Professionalism a,i 8 Self-Learning h 5 Technology Skills a,f 1,2 Respect for diversity j 8
. Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. 2 (design an activity or demonstration to teach a concept using creativity and innovative ideas) 3 ABET f. Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. (need for outreach and science education to the public, professionalism) 4 ABET g. Ability to communicate effectively. (to a non-technical audience, with multimedia presentation and in written report) 5 ABET i. Recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning. (reflect on experience and continuing outreach after graduation) The groups chose an engineering concept from their coursework
thereview process. Applicants must also 1) demonstrate a work ethic, time management skills,communication skills and professionalism; and 2) agree to participate in all parts of the program.To better understand the number of students that can be affected by SIIRE, we analyzed Page 23.942.7engineering enrollments and financial aide eligibility. Table 1 reports first-time freshmenenrollment figures for 2006-2011 and retention figures (after freshmen year) for all but 2011.The data from Table 1 indicates significant enrollment growth since 2006. Table 1 - Undergraduate Engineering Students
excitinghands-on design challenges to analyze artificial organs. In more advanced core engineering courses andlaboratories, students will explore the function of artificial organs in the laboratory and investigate thevariables affecting their performance. The engineering goals of this project are: (1) to explore the function of human and artificial organs; (2)to apply current research methodology state-of-the-art medical devices for a hands-on investigation ofartificial organs; and (3) to introduce fundamental engineering principles through experiments with artifi-cial organs; (4) to investigate the factors affecting artificial organ performance and design criteria; and (5)to explore the complicated ethical issues regarding the technological
discuss artificial intelligence through computer science usingheuristics. Additionally, the students debate the ethics associated with artificial intelligence andwhen legal rights should apply to artificial beings.Teachers attend a week-long, immersive professional development workshop for Cyber Sciencethe summer prior to teaching the course6. Following the professional development workshopteachers gain access to all curriculum materials including lesson plans, master notes, andsupplemental documents which are found on NICERC’s website. Communication is maintainedthroughout the school year via the website allowing for any questions, concerns, or issues ateacher may experience when teaching the material.Narrative #1 – High School Teachers
Paper ID #6392Problem-Solving Learning Environments for an Introduction to Food Engi-neering CourseProf. Tammara Ram´ırez , Universidad de las Americas Puebla Tammara Ramrez is a Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. student at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. She teaches ethics and development complex thinking skills related courses. Her research interests include faculty development, outcomes assessment, and creating effective learning environments.Prof. Aurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las Americas PueblaDr. Enrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Professor Palou is director of
as Ethics, GRE preparation, Getting into Graduate School, and Abstract Writing. Additionally, tours of campus research facilities (e.g. cyclotron, immersive visualization center) were offered. Finally, students were required to participate in the campus-wide REU poster session held during the first week in August. Students kept their posters for presentation at national or regional conferences and to display in their home departments to facilitate recruiting. Social activities REU students were integrated into the larger Texas A&M research community—over 200 undergraduates were involved in a dozen REU and other formal summer research programs in 2011. Students were housed with students from these other summer research programs in a