feedbackwould greatly shorten the feedback cycle, and supplement more detailed summative feedbackprovided when a student work is graded.If the system is woven throughout the lecture it may be helpful to have a teaching assistant inclass to help with the system, as it is challenging to simultaneously look for questions coming in,look for good student responses to post and discuss, answer questions, and lecture.ReferencesBunce, D. M., VandenPlas, J. R., & Havanki, K. L. (2006). Comparing the effectiveness on student achievement of a student response system versus online WebCT quizzes. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(3), 488.Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sciences
over the last decade3.Industry, government, and education leaders continue to increase accountability in institutions ofhigher education4-7. Sustained reductions in the number of students interested in STEM forcesinstitutions of higher education to devise cost effective and outcome-rich strategies to recruit,retain, and graduate more students in the STEM disciplines8-9. Researchers continue to look forbest practices, or a combination of best practices, leading to greater student persistence. Leaderssupport faculty and student service staff in the creation of appropriate campus programming,such as learning communities and mentoring programs, to promote student success, increaseretention, and deepen student learning10-15.Learning communities
developing a hypothesis that can be tested through data collection and interpretation. Theydesign and conduct environmental research, and apply the results of their research toward arecommendation for an engineered design or specification. The following four steps provide adescription of how the term project is presented to students and implemented.Step 1: Introducing the Scientific MethodPrior to the introduction of the term project, faculty dedicate two class lessons at the beginningof the semester toward discussion of the steps of the scientific method (as described in Botkin-Keller, 2011)7, developing testable hypotheses (Fig. 1) and experimental design, developingviable research methods, and introducing the course term project
Paper ID #7230The Inverted Classroom in a First-Year Engineering CourseMrs. Brooke Morin, Ohio State University Brooke Morin is a Lecturer in the College of Engineering at Ohio State University, teaching First-Year Engineering for Honors classes in the Engineering Education Innovation Center. She also worked with the program as an Undergraduate Teaching Assistant and a Graduate Teaching Associate. Brooke earned her bachelor’s degree and master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering at Ohio State.Dr. Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety received her B.S. in aerospace engineering at The Ohio State
providing a value-added component for technology-oriented universities toextend the curriculum experience by providing both undergraduate and graduate students aresearch experience3 with real-world problems, opportunities and applications. The authors of this paper present a comparative analysis of technology and innovation-oriented centers. To gain an understanding of such centers, the authors focused on recognizedcenters to examine their mission, goals and objectives, research focus, business model,competitive perspectives, growth anomalies, principles of specialization, and innovationcapabilities. Based on this comparative analysis, the authors developed a set of relevantconclusions and recommendations for technology innovation centers
InnovationIn addition to our discussion of these four factors’ impact on corporate innovation, the secondmajor element of each corporate visit was each industrial partner’s recommendations ofcompetencies, mindsets and knowledge for future engineering innovators, especially those notprovided by today’s engineering education. Both corporate innovation leaders and recentengineering graduates provided over 160 recommendations. The second part of the paperpresents a summary of their answers and reflections of the authors in the section title “The Voiceof Corporate Innovation Leaders.” Page 23.17.4 The Culture of
Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of engineering education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by more than $12.4 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received the William Elgin Wickenden Award for the Best Paper in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011. Ohland is Past Chair of ASEE’s Educational Research and Methods division and a member of the Board of Governors of the IEEE Education Society. He was the 2002
. Thepurpose of this research initiative is to harness ideas US wide, develop effective, innovative toolsthat will provide students with an interactive, visual learning experience in class, implementthese tools while identifying the challenges, and conduct an extensive evaluation of the impact ofthis effort so that a formalized model can be developed and presented to the engineeringcommunity for use in their programs.Course Design As part of the curriculum enhancement effort of this project, the existing GeotechnicalEngineering course is organized into four main content modules: 1) Soil Structure, 2) Seepageand Effective Stress 3) Consolidation, and 4) Shear Strength. These modules and theirsupporting lectures were designed so that they could be
Room (470 sq ft). This multi-purpose room will include an Energy Telemetry Laboratory for renewable energy resources and provide a testbed design area for energy and green technologies. Using telemetry systems, this lab will allow the remote (smart) monitoring and performance evaluation of, for example, small vertical wind turbines that may be used in residential, commercial and industrial applications, or solar power systems, in collaboration with the Sustainable South Bronx for example. Other equipment will include a micro-grid system, with generator protection and multifunction relays that will provide a basis for training in power engineering.F. Power Transmission & Control Graduate Research Room (920 sq ft). This room
Page 23.188.13development to determine best practices for these experiments. One factor that would beinteresting to study is the impact of the hands-on nature of the experiments relative to asimulation only based experiment. The advantage of doing simulations only is the reduced costand accessibility to the students, but what is lost is the connection to a physical system. It will beinteresting to see what impact the hands-on aspect has with regards to CTSS concepts inparticular.AcknowledgementsThis work is funded by NSF grant #1140995. Special thanks to Shannon Sexton in the IRPAoffice at Rose-Hulman for her help with the assessment section.References[1] J. Nelson, M. Hjalmarson, K. Wage, and J. Buck, “Students’ interpretation of the
methodstook more time to develop. In keeping with the focus of OU-ECE’s overall program, the mostkeenly-sought new retention program was a continuous mechanism to present advancedengineering technologies, innovative demonstrations, and hands-on activities to students in theirfirst year. A recent publication from the American College Testing Program provides the resultsof research that lists the top practices that make the greatest contribution to retention.7 A first-year seminar/university course that is taken for college credit is listed as the number one practiceby a large margin.7 Past work describes in detail how OU-ECE applied its new retention programinto first-year seminar/university courses.2 At OU, all engineering majors are required to take
how theory and practice are used in the design process.Suddenly, we have STEM graduates who know, and appreciate, the complexities of theirdiscipline and who are able go out into the workforce and immediately contribute to productdevelopment.This paper summarizes current models for delivering mobile hands-on education in engineering, Page 23.910.2including in-class labs, labs done at home, and mobile studio classes. The authors of this papercome from three different institutions, each having an NSF grant on mobile hands-on educationin engineering and each using a different model of delivery. The generic aspects of these modelsare discussed
-0836861). This project requires students to design, build, test, and analyze a lab-scalehorizontal axis wind turbine. The goals of this project were to create project modules that couldbe easily adaptable to various curriculums and applications, including K-12 programs.1In 2010 – 2012, three project modules were integrated into the first-year curriculum at MichiganTech: aquaculture, biomechanics, and wind energy. For the aquaculture module, students built,tested, and analyzed their own aerator or used 3D modeling to develop a new impeller for anexisting pump to use in water circulation. Students working on the biomechanics module createda prosthetic leg device and analyzed the motion and forces generated during the kickingmovement. Students
at multiple universities to conductcyberinfrastructure (CI) research in the water resources area. The impetus was a NSF-fundedproject (EPS-1135482 and EPS-1135483) to provide and use CI tools, especially high-performance computing, to enhance the capacity for water resource planning and management inthe two-state region of Utah and Wyoming. The project has as a goal to link technical experts,modelers, analysts, high-performance computing experts, stakeholders, and the public through CIimplementation (Figure 1). Approximately 25% of the graduate students in the course also areworking on the research project as funded research assistants. However, the course is notexclusively designed to train graduate students working on the project. The more
development in order to protect the environment for future generations.” NSPE givesthe following definition: “„Sustainable development‟ is the challenge of meeting human needsfor natural resources, industrial products, energy, food, transportation, shelter, and effectivewaste management while conserving and protecting environmental quality and the naturalresource base essential for future development.” 17 The ABET criteria now include therequirement that programs demonstrate that graduates are able “to design a system, component,or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, Page 23.304.2social
necessitating a seachange in classroom practice in North Carolina. By engaging in engineering design-basedintegration early and often in their educational careers, students will have a broader exposure tothe important role all the subjects they learn have in moving society forward. This will enable Page 23.367.14them to use their experience to choose coursework that will best prepare them for the workforceand postsecondary education. The state of North Carolina has implemented a program to includeall of the elements of STEM into every classroom, K-12.Engineering is… • Use of knowledge and experience to solve problems • Accessible to all
working on her Masters in Library and Information Science at the University of Illinois. She received her bachelor’s degree in Environmental Engineering but is now pursuing a combination of interests related to education enrichment programs for international development, creativity, and commu- nity engagement.Dr. Russell Korte, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Russell Korte is an assistant professor in Human Resource Development and a fellow with the Illinois Foundry for Innovation in Engineering Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His research investigates how engineering students navigate their educational experiences and how engineer- ing graduates transition into the
Instructional Design Specialist in the Department of Global Learning at the Missouri University of Science and Technology. He received his Ph.D. degree in Information Science and Learning Technologies in 2007 from University of Missouri – Columbia. He also holds a BS and a Ph.D. from the University of Sibiu in Romania with a specialization in manufacturing technologies and respectively cutting-tools design. His research interests include design-based research in technology-enabled learn- ing contexts, technology-mediated problem solving, applications of dynamic modeling for learning of complex topics, and the impact of epistemic beliefs on learning with technology
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue Univer- sity. She is a member of Purdue’s Teaching Academy. Since 1999, she has been a faculty member within the First-Year Engineering Program at Purdue, the gateway for all first-year students entering the College of Engineering. She has coordinated and taught in a required first-year engineering course that engages students in open-ended problem solving and design. Her research focuses on the development, implemen- tation, and assessment of model-eliciting activities with realistic engineering contexts. She is currently the Director of Teacher Professional Development for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE
its curriculum to train productive and qualified power engineers. The academia needsto do further research to understand the industry trends and gather information as to what has Page 23.1069.2changed and what are currently common best practices in the industry. The challenge faced byacademia is to come up with an updated curriculum at both the undergraduate and graduate levelthat provides the knowledge base of fundamental concepts along with nurturing expertise incross functional disciplines[1].Currently in the industry there are quite a few visionary manufacturers who are contributing intosmart grid applications; some of the names include GE
thermodynamics.The videos were created at the request of SUTD’s senior administration to help supplement theeducational resources of a young university. The design parameters were largely left to the MITTeaching and Learning Lab to define. In order to best support learning, the goals of the videoswere three-fold: 1) to reinforce pivotal concepts and multidisciplinary themes, 2) to provideopportunities for students to actively engage with content, and 3) to provide real-world examplesfrom everyday life, or from research, of the utility of these concepts. The videos were designedfor a variety of usage scenarios: in class, in recitation sections, for students to review whenstudying, and during faculty training workshops (to provide faculty with ideas for ways
participation year(s), area of graduate study, and gender (all optional)The survey also included these open ended questions: What were the best parts of the program? What aspects of the programs could have been improved? What is your advice for future efforts to engage graduate students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics with K12 students and teachers? and Additional comments?The survey was created online using Survey Monkey and is included in the Appendix. Each ofthe 76 Fellows were sent an email that included an invitation to participate, a link to the survey,and a human subjects research statement. The survey remained open for two months before itwas closed and the results prepared for analysis. The
in the elds of engineering mechanics, robotics and control systems; precision agriculture and remote sensing; and biofuels and renewable energy. Dr.Nagchaudhuri received his bachelors degree from Jadavpur University in Calcutta, India with a honors in Mechanical Engineering in 1983, thereafter, he worked in a multinational industry for four years before joining Tulane University as a graduate student in the fall of 1987. He received his M.S. degree from Tulane University in 1989 and Ph.D. degree from Duke University in 1992.Dr. Corinne Johnson Rutzke, Corinne Rutzke Dr. Corinne Johnson Rutzke is a Senior Research Associate in the Department of Biological and Envi- ronmental Engineering at Cornell University
Region Distinguished Teacher Award. He teaches courses in both analog and digital electronic circuit design and instrumentation, with a focus on wireless communication. He has more than 15 years experience in the development and delivery of synchronous and asynchronous web-based course supplements for electrical engineering courses. He has published over 35 papers and presented his research work at regional, national and international conferences. He also runs several exciting summer camps geared towards middle school, high school, and community college students to expose and increase their interest in pursuing Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields. Dr. Astatke travels to Ethiopia every summer
engineering undergraduate students into the College’sscholarship – such as conducting research and presenting the findings. In this paper theprograms implemented for each strategy are presented followed by results documenting theimpact of the strategy on retention and student success. Finally, the conclusion sectionsummarizes the highlights of the accomplishments and the challenges faced. This paper willhelp serve as a resource for others planning similar programs for engineering undergraduatestudents. The University of Cincinnati (UC) is an urban, comprehensive, research-intensive, publicinstitution with over 42,000 students. The UC College of Engineering and Applied Science(CEAS) has over 3,000 undergraduate and 650 graduate students, and grants
-12 science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, particularly as it relates to increasing interest and participation by females. Dr. Klein-Gardner serves as the director of the Center for STEM Education for Girls at the Harpeth Hall School in Nashville, TN. Here she leads professional development opportunities in science, technology, engineering, and math- ematics (STEM) for K-12 teachers and works to Identify and disseminate best practices from successful K12, university and corporate STEM programs for females. This Center also leads a program for rising 9th and 10th grade girls that integrates community service and engineering design in a global context. Dr. Klein-Gardner continues to serve
SPSU. This historical datademonstrates a continuing confusion about engineering technology and the role of an1 SPSU is an unit of the University System of Georgia located in Marietta, Georgia. Its vision is to be acomprehensive university with a unique purpose. Through a fusion of technology with the liberal arts andsciences, we create a learning community that encourages thoughtful inquiry, diverse perspectives, andstrong preparation of our graduates to be leaders in an increasingly technological world. The university –faculty, staff, students, and graduates – aspires to be the best in the world at finding creative, practical,and sustainable solutions to real-world problems and improving the quality of life for people around theglobe.2
: Issues and Challenges. American Society for Engineering Education. Presentations, five most relevant: TeleRobotics: The Internet, a Physical Sensor 73rd Annual Confer- ence Program, ITEEA 2011. Dr. Kallis, J., Boyles, R. Implementation of Microgravity Experiments in the Classroom 73rd Annual Conference Program, ITEEA 2011 Teaching STEM Concepts with Agile Robotics. Dr. Kallis, J., Boyles, R. 73rd Annual Conference Program, ITEEA 2009. Tremaux’s Algo- rithm with Recursion 73rd Annual Conference Program, ITEEA 2009. ”Normalcy” 2008 Intercollegiate Art Show, Best of Show, California University of PA, April 3rd, 2008. ”Die Verfeinerung von Sustain- ability” Create the Future Design Contest, NASA Tech Briefs and SolidWorks
are designed, implemented, and assessed; evidence for the impact of such initiativeson various parameters of interest; and the research needed to further define and guide advancesin K-12 integrated STEM teaching and learning. This paper will summarize the researchconducted to inform the study’s findings and recommendations,* including a comprehensivereview of the literature related to integrated STEM education; an analysis of illustrativeintegrated STEM education programs and initiatives in both formal and informal settings; and in-depth interviews from a broad spectrum of STEM education stakeholders. Because manyintegrated STEM education initiatives include an engineering design component or attempt tomake mathematics and science more
education at NC State, ASEE Southeast Section Conference.3. Peercy, P. S. and Cramer, S. M. (2011). Redefining quality in engineering education through hybrid instruction, Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), pp. 625–629.4. National Academy of Engineering (2012). Infusing real world experiences into engineering education, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, www.nap.edu.5. ASEE (2012). Innovation with impact: creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education, http://www.asee.org/about-us/the-organization/advisory-committees/Innovation-with-Impact.6. ASEE (2012), Going the distance: best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineering technology and