assessment and preliminary creek restoration design that relied on structural solutions (such as riprap). The tribe decided against this quick-fix approach, instead choosing to rely on the beaver as a resident ecological engineer. For STEM education researchers working with tribal communities, it is essential that the curriculum be grounded in tribal culture and values. The community's desire is that their youth be prepared to stand in two worlds: one in one in which tribal values are fully honored and on in which they apply the best practices of western STEM knowledge.ConclusionEngaging tribal communities in education is critical to validate theoretical research, whichrecommends culturally relevant STEM experiences to inspire student
hadgraduated and did not provide post-graduation contact information. Finally, the paper providesrecommendations for future longitudinal studies. Page 24.501.32.0 MotivationFor the purposes of this work, community engagement (CE) is taken as an amalgamation ofvarious pedagogical methods, including service learning, community-service, and project-basedlearning, among others. The distinguishing aspect of CE in engineering education is theintentional design of the effort to incorporate service as a means to meet academic learningobjectives. Previous work has shown that CE has the potential for student development on thecognitive 16, 17, 43, 49, social
acknowledgingthe value of journaling, there exists an opportunity to examine what can be done to increasethe effectiveness of this reflective practice as a tool for student development and assessment.Construction of Reflective Prompts Using Boud’s stages of experiential learning, the researcher intended to construct thereflective prompts to target those three stages. Journals can be given a structure to reflect howthey are progressing. A collection of reflective prompts for a GDT student would at first get atideas that are concerned about what expectations they have about their involvement, then thebulk of the journal would be concerned about the progress and obstacles being faced as thestudents delve into their design and finally the journal would
Paper ID #10351What is Design for Social Justice?Dr. Jon A. Leydens, Colorado School of Mines Jon A. Leydens is an associate professor in the Division of Liberal Arts and International Studies at the Colorado School of Mines, USA, where he has been since 1997. Research and teaching interests include communication, social justice, and engineering education. Dr. Leydens is a co-author of Engineering and Sustainable Community Development (2010). He recently served as guest editor for an engineering communication special issue in Engineering Studies and won the James F. Lufkin Award for the best con- ference paper—on the
and related concepts are essential guidelines in engineering practice that will enable the achievement of the ultimate goal of any engineering project, which is to enhance social welfare. I believe that professionals must: first, be aware of the high impact role they play in society and second, learn to derive professional satisfaction from practicing Appropriate Technology. During the development of my thesis, the assimilation of these concepts was not easy because I had not been exposed to this in my previous experience with as an engineer with a more “traditional” role. But now, my experience with the project helped me to choose a research area for my upcoming Ph.D. studies and it is definitely influencing my
team proposal project was offered again in2013.There are multiple considerations for this type of project in terms of logistics and sustainability,especially for yearly participation of 220 students in this project. This paper will discuss thestrategies involved in adapting a community service learning project originally designed for 60students to a larger scale project for 220 students while maintaining the academic robustness ofthe proposal assignment and the good will of the partnering community organizations.1.0 IntroductionEngineering is a profession that holds high respect within the community. The design,communication, research, audience analysis, and business skills that engineers build and developthroughout their careers are
framework for this study, as well as backgroundinformation about the EPICS program and data collection and analysis procedures.Theoretical FrameworkThe guiding principle of the present research is based on a truth- and reality-oriented theory ofempirical research. Patton (2002, p.91) describes this theory as “there [being] a real world withverifiable patterns that can be observed and predicted – that reality exists and truth is worthstriving for.”14 This framework impacts the research questions, design and analysis. Given thenotion that the “truth” is worth striving for, the question implies that there are truths out there,and through systematic research they can be uncovered. The research question for this studyassumes that by asking the
and social development,and deeper engagement5-6. The ambassador program at the University of Utah has been built upon best practices andthe success of similar programs at other large research universities. Various schools have alreadyfound success in recruiting students through K-12 mentor programs run by engineering studentsand faculty7-15. Furthermore, the program builds a community of engineering students. It hasbeen shown that when students feel that they are part of a community they are more likely to beretained16-21.The Ambassador Program Created by the College of Engineering The Ambassador Program was designed to give engineering students an opportunity toget involved with the College of Engineering. It was originally
contribute substantively to their value of the need for life-longlearning, and using their engineering education for making adifference in the lives of others. By approaching K-12 students withopportunities to creatively understand and apply engineering design, we believe their potential Page 24.769.8for preparing, preservering and performing as future engineers is greatly enhanced.Assessment rubrics are being designed to quantitatively assess the impact on students in a pre-and post- assessment approach. These instruments will be used in our spring and summer 2014outreach activities with planned
(CoE), Engineering Education Innovation Center (EEIC)at The Ohio State University has conducted an engineering service-learning program inHonduras. The program consists of three components: preparation, implementation, andevaluation. These components are aimed to introduce and teach students the concepts ofhumanitarian engineering through a practical, real-world, hands-on experience. During the firststage, the students assess needs in collaboration with in-country partners, and then research,design, develop, prototype, test and document their chosen projects. In the second stage, thestudents implement and execute these projects. Finally, the students evaluate their designs anddocument their results as well as make recommendations for future
materials science and engineering from Stanford University (1991 and 1987) and her B.S. degree in metallurgical engineering from the Michigan Technological University (1985).Dr. Lizabeth T Schlemer P.E., California Polytechnic State University Page 24.1037.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Relational versus transactional community engagement: An experience of the benefits and costsAbstractLearning through community engagement (CE) is widely considered a high-impact practice withthe potential benefit of accelerated cognitive development, deeper
number of community engagement efforts increase, it is important to understand theimpact of these experiences to inform best practices and to ensure that the efforts are positivelybenefitting all of the stakeholders. Although our program, EPICS, is well-established and hasintentionally focused on long-term partnerships, research suggests that immersive experiencescan help develop more comprehensive ways of understanding of the community partners. Thispast summer, our service-learning design program offered a local immersive design experienceto a group of 13 students from a variety of majors in a camp for children with disabilities. Thispaper describes the immersive experience and examines its impact on student learning throughanalyses of the