pressure, velocity, orelevation at one of the points, provided that the correct unit conversions are applied.Bernoulli Example. Given cold water flowing through an arbitrary shape where z1 = 100 ft, z2 =50 ft, p1 = 30 lbf/in2, V1 = 25 ft/s, V2 = 1ft/s, and = 62.4 lbf/ft3. Since water is essentiallyincompressible in this range, then the unknown pressure p2 can be determined by rewritingBernoulli’s equation using algebra as follows: V 2 V22 p2 p1 ( z1 z2 ) 1 2g Note that each term has basic dimensions of force per area (length2) and the rules
and evidence to arrive at a conclusion. Any special circumstances encountered during the lab experiment should be discussed as relevant to the lab topic. V. Synthesis (20 pts): Demonstrate Synthesis of the lab topic by describing how the results of the lab experiment can be used to design a safe and productive workplace.VI. Lab Specific (10 pts): Provide raw data sheet(s) and specific analysis as required by lab experiment discussion.VII. Spelling, Grammar, Neatness (10 pts)3. Method: Using Feedback for ImprovementThere is no doubt that feedback is required for continuous improvement. Three different methodsof feedback are utilized for the enhancement of the course. Formative assessment through amidterm student
buildclarity; and the assumptions that can transfer through multiple stages in project management,amounting to a potentially very serious problem if only detected at the end of the projectmanagement cycle. In some cases, students have recognized this uncertainty and ill definition inthe design and execution stages, which has made an excellent opportunity to ask the student tostate the question/concern in front of the class, applaud her/his insight, and role modelnegotiation of the measure(s) of success with the class. Page 24.1015.6Phase 3: Check and Act (Evaluate)After the activity, students are typically buzzing about what they would have done
Students in Problem and Project Based Education (2008): n. pag. Web. 5. R. M. Felder, “Reaching the Second Tier: Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education,” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 286-290, 1993. 6. R. M. Felder and L. K. Silverman, “ Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,” Engineering Education, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 74-681, 1988. 7. S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPetro, M. C. Lovett, and M K. Norman, How Learning Works 7 Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching, San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. 8. T. A. Litzinger, L. R. Lattuca, R. G. Hadgraft, and W. C. Newstetter, “Engineering and the Development of Expertise
inventory management; material requirements planning; just intime practices; and maintenance and reliability. This course is designed to provide students witha brief introduction to these topics so that they can better choose which areas they wish to pursuein more depth later in the program.At program inception in the 1970’s, all courses were taught in traditional classroom settings. Inthe l990’s the program experimented with distance delivery through the use of VHS tapedlectures, and the Introduction to Operations Management course was the first to be delivered inthis format. Driven by improving educational technology, course content delivery moved fromVHS tapes to CDs, and eventually to fully online courses. As the distance component of the
/DrSalimian: http://www.youtube.com/user/DrSalimian5. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn. Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington DC: National Academy Press.6. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pentice Hall.7. Goodlad, S. (1998) , Mentoring and Tutoring by Students, Psychology Press8. Falchikov, N. (2002) Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education, Routledge9. Salimian, M., & Mahmud, Y. (2012.).10. Bransford et al., 200011. Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 1.12. Bransford et al., 2000Appendix ASome Guidelines
Industrial and Operations Engineering from The University of Michigan, and the A.B. degree in Engineering Science from Dartmouth College.Dr. Laura Stanley, Montana State University - BozemanProf. Nicholas Ward, Montana State University Professor Nicholas Ward (F. Erg. S) obtained his Ph.D. in Human Factors psychology from Queen’s University (Canada). He is currently a Professor of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Montana State University and a Senior Research Scientist in the Center for Health and Safety Culture at the Western Transportation Institute. Professor Ward has led interdisciplinary and international research consortia to study traffic safety research including intelligent transportation systems, driver
Research,” in 120th ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, 2013.3. Kellog, S., “Developing Online Materials to Facilitate an Inverted Classroom Approach”, 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009.4. Toto, R. and H. Nguyen, “Flipping the Work Design in an Industrial Engineering Course”, 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009. Page 24.616.135. R. M. Felder, R. Brent, and M. Prince, National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI), Charlotte, NC, June 2012.6. Kahn Academy website: https://www.khanacademy.org/ accessed 12/20/13.7. R Core Team R: A language