industry, consists of all the necessary steps tobring a new or redesigned product to the market. Although the process is practiced in manydifferent ways, depending on, for instance, company size and customer requirements, there aremany common elements. These need to be covered by University teaching to prepare studentsfor jobs in industry. This paper considers how students can be supported to make open, creativeand well informed decisions in several stages of the product development process.A teaching approach suitable for the product development process is described and investigated.The pedagogic context of the approach is project based learning in small student groups withshort regular meetings with an instructor for consultation and supervision
combinations of certain strengths succeed and others don't. Teamsfor a final project (design, construction, and race of solar powered cars) were formed based uponan understanding of conative strengths and team synergy gained from the interim project. Resultsfrom peer evaluations of teamwork and teammate satisfaction on the solar car project show thatstudents were highly satisfied with the conative approach.IntroductionABET outcome Criterion 3 (d) requires that universities teach students to function productivelyas part of a multidisciplinary team. This study analyzes the effectiveness of teaching students tounderstand their instinctive behavioral strengths in regards to teamwork activities with the hopethat this understanding leads to increased team
of Teaching and Teacher Education. His focus is engineering and science education. Beau currently teaches the science methods course for pre-service teachers and works on several research projects related to STEM education. Beau has worked to develop K-12 engineering curriculum, co-taught master’s level STEM education courses, and developed/directed an after school engineering and robotics program. He is a member of the National Science Teachers Association, American Society of Engineering Education, National Association for Research in Science Teaching, and American Society for Mechanical Engineers. Beau is certified teacher with five years of experience title one school in Phoenix, Arizona. He holds a Master’s
year of the undergraduate curriculum to teach thefundamentals of design (from needs identification and brainstorming to manufacturing andcommercialization). In spring 2013 we introduced significant changes to our required secondyear level semester-long design course aimed at teaching the ambit of BME research as well asdeveloping design principles and practices.BackgroundHistorically, this course has two main objectives: introducing new engineering students to thevast field of biomedical engineering and to developing designs with faculty andengineering/medical professionals. While looking for projects to assign our students in the springof 2013, we took a tour of our hospital’s Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with aneonatologist who had
Paper ID #10929BUILDING TRANSATLANTIC COLLABORATION FOR EXCELENCE INDOCTORAL EDUCATIONDr. Javier Orozco P.E., UPV Ph. D. Javier Orozco-Messana lectures on materials science, ceramics and several scientific topics since 1986 at the Universidad Polit´ecnica de Valencia. He has also lectured at Florida State University. He has been Reserach & Development manager in several private companies (AIMME, Lladro, Autocares Luz) since 1990 to 2004. He has been responsible for more than 5 research projects at European, national and regional level with an overall budget of over 3 million euros. For 6 years he was secretary
Paper ID #8676First-Year Engineering Students’ Communication of Nanotechnology Size &Scale in a Design ChallengeKelsey Joy Rodgers, Purdue University, West Lafayette Kelsey Rodgers is currently pursuing her PhD in engineering education at Purdue University. She is a member of the Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) education research team. She con- ducts research within the First-Year Engineering Program to help understand what and how students are learning about nanotechnology. Her current projects involve investigating students’ understanding of size and scale concepts, the cross-disciplinary nature of
Introduction to Systems Engineering course isstructured around three group projects, which collectively provide an overview of thefundamental lessons of the field. The projects are an egg drop challenge which teaches the valueof upfront Systems Engineering and rapid prototyping, a LEGO Mindstorms™ competitionwhich teaches the importance of problem decomposition, testing and validation, in addition todesign under operational uncertainty, and a Lean Simulation game which teaches user needs, theimportance of balanced work and enterprise value.While it has been well established in the general pedagogical literature that group projects andactive learning are effective teaching tools, they are not widely used in Systems Engineering fora variety of reasons
level engineering capstone design courses that were cross-listed as a single course, which was open to MBA students24, 25. The purpose of this cross-listed course was to produce business minded future engineers who through the experience of producing marketable products would develop better teamwork skills, adaptable communication skills, be comfortable with business plan development, and be knowledgeable of patents and intellectual property. Student team projects were either assigned or self-generated. The final product of the project was a functional product prototype supported by a written report describing its business and engineering aspects. The project evaluation was based on the intended business and engineering
thinking. The purpose of this joint-inquiry course was to providean opportunity for the students and the professor to explore these questions, to identify and learnsome common “habits of the mind” of engineers, to enhance their sensitivity to when thesehabits of the mind can be used as effective tools to think critically about the world, and topractice applying these concepts to the analysis of systems that are not normally encountered ordiscussed in the context of the engineering classroom. This paper describes several highlights ofthe course’s design and implementation, including the readings, discussions, activities, and thefinal term project. Also included are students’ perceptions of the course elements as told by thestudent co-authors of
Paper ID #9550A collaborative, multinational cyberinfrastructure for big data analyticsProf. Raymond A Hansen, Purdue UniversityDr. Tomasz Wiktor Wlodarczyk, University of Stavanger Dr Tomasz Wiktor Wlodarczyk, is an Associate Professor at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Stavanger, Norway. His work focuses on analysis, storage and communica- tion in data intensive computing. His particular interest is time series storage and analysis. He is currently working on these areas in several research projects including: SEEDS (EU FP7), Safer@Home (RCN), A4Cloud (EU FP7), BigDataCom-PU
engineering(CEE) works is important to many civil and environmental engineers. Geotechnical and geo-environmental engineers in particular must be able to understand and apply various aspects of thegeological sciences in their practice, but many other types of engineers also need to be confidentin understanding and applying findings of geologists with respect to their projects. This includesmanaging civil or environmental aspects of foundation systems, tunneling, mining, constructionmaterials, excavation, ground water, contaminant transport, seismicity, and mass movement,among many other applications.Because of the importance of geological science to civil and environmental engineers, it is notunusual for some engineering programs to require a course
fourteenth weekof the course 64% of students utilized either interdisciplinary terminology or terminology from adiscipline outside of their own to propose extensions of course projects. Overall, we have shownthat a graduate course designed to improve interdisciplinary learning is capable of making smallincreases in the interdisciplinary learning of students.BackgroundThe need to create graduate students with interdisciplinary skillsets is regarded as increasinglyimportant as research challenges become more complex and fall outside the disciplinaryconstructs of currently established fields. Interdisciplinary skills are desired within academia,government and industry. As a result, interdisciplinary graduate programs and interdisciplinaryresearch
particularly relevant to the following themes of: Global awareness Financial, economic, business and entrepreneurial literacy Civic literacy Health literacy Environmental literacy. Page 24.912.3 Figure 1 Summary synthesis of multiple 21st Century Learning frameworks5Integrative Product Development Course The main feature of the discussed course is a semester-long project in which students workin teams. Every team consists of up to 4-5 students, and it is preferred when - whenever possible- each student brings to the team a different background and experience. The team assignment isto create a start-up company
prior year are contacted to reaffirm theircommitment for the next year. Two page proposals are created as both a justification of theexpenditures and a guide for students to decide which projects to pursue. While some projectsare earmarked for specific students as they tie into ongoing research either before or after theexternship, others are assigned based on student interest and faculty selection. Students entertheir preferences and faculty place students in an externship based on GPA, prerequisites, andfield of study, with GPA often being the primary factor. The exception would be the morepractical externships that do not challenge students in the field of engineering but provide apractical sense of possible future jobs. Often these are in
for assessing ethical decision-making in individuals and teams in engineering-centered project teams. These instruments are being developed as part of a larger grant seekingto understand the relationship between individual and team ethical climate in multidisciplinaryproject teams. This paper describes the development of the qualitative methods being used inthis project, a discussion of the analysis we have conducted, and presents preliminary results.Finally, we discuss limitations of this method and offer future directions for this line of researchin enriching our understanding of team ethical climate on multidisciplinary project teams in anengineering education context.Team Climate and Small Group CommunicationHow individuals relate to one
´ Polytechnic School of Agueda, University of Aveiro, Portugal. He has been deeply involved with the coordination of the move towards Project-Based Learning at his institution, and his research interests focus on Engineering Education, conceptual understanding in Electronics and Problem/Project Based Learning. He is a member of the Board of the SEFI Working Group on Research in Engineering Education and of the Editorial Board of the European Journal of Engineering Education. He is also a referee for the Journal of Engineering Education. Jos´e Manuel Oliveira has also led several staff training workshops on Active Learning Strategies and Project-Based Learning.Mr. Gavin DuffyDr. Dermot Brabazon P.E., Dublin City
University. He earned his PhD from UC Berkeley in 2004, and he previously worked as a staff engineer at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.Dr. Gerard F. Jones, Villanova University Following a several year period as a project engineer for Mobil Oil Corporation in Paulsboro, New Jersey, Jerry Jones joined the University of Pennsylvania, receiving his MS in 1975 and PhD in 1981. Jones was a technical staff member with Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in New Mexico until 1987. His research activities included experiments, analysis, and simulations on thermal systems, including solar and geothermal energy conversion. He consulted with LANL on a wide array of technical topics from 1990 until 2006. Jones joined the
social sciences, and foreign languages.”8 Union College is experimentingwith pairing courses, one taught by an engineering faculty member and another taught by onefrom the humanities or social sciences.9 Pairings such as music and acoustical engineering haveproven to complement each other while generating both interest and benefit to both schools.O’Neill-Carrillo, et al.10 have utilized engineering projects at the university level to respond tofundamental needs of society and address social, environments, and socio-economic issues of thelocal community thorough creation of academic structures that enable direct interaction amongstudents, faculty and community members. Catalano11 described a new interdisciplinary coursefor both engineering and
colleges, andestablished industry partners. This paper will discuss the development of the digital systemscurriculum module that can easily be integrated into existing high school technology courseshaving electrical/electronic content. One goal of this project is to provide resources that willassist high school curriculum coordinators in linking this module to high school technologycurriculum. The course emphasizes on digital logic circuits. Number systems, codes, Booleanalgebra, logic gates, combinational logic, sequential logic circuits. Students will become familiarwith the basic digital systems and develop skills in digital design using VHDL and FPGA. I. IntroductionTechnologists trained on modern reconfigurable electronics will change the
- sign course, he has taught courses in mechatronics, controls, vibrations, dynamics and robotics as well as senior design. Page 24.150.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 An Analysis of First Year Students’ Changing Perceptions of Engineering Design and PracticeIntroductionA vast body of literature is available to guide freshman engineering introductory courses. Thispaper builds on three key pillars within the literature that focus on 1) project-oriented learning, 2)team-based learning, and 3) freshman design experiences. Design experiences at
Civil Engineering CurriculumLessons learned from case studies have had a significant impact on both education and practiceof engineering and related disciplines. The history of practice in civil engineering is, in largepart, the story of failures, both imminent and actual, and ensuing changes to designs, standardsand procedures made as the result of timely interventions or forensic analyses. In addition totechnical issues, professional and ethical responsibilities are highlighted by the relevant cases.Over the past five years the project extended the work of implementing and assessing casestudies from Cleveland State University to eleven other university partners, and broadened thescope to cover engineering
engineers involved specifically with Engineers Without Borders-USA.Dr. Amy Javernick-Will, University of Colorado, Boulder Amy Javernick-Will holds a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Stanford University and has been an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering Department at the University of Colorado-Boulder since 2010. Her research investigates managing infras- tructure projects and project-based organizations, with particular interests in global projects, knowledge mobilization in projects and project-based organizations, diversity and boundary-spanning, and disaster recovery.Cathy Leslie, Engineers Without Borders - USA
of the course but served as supplementary instruments. The tools thatwere implemented for this course included online quizzes and exams, instructor led digitaldiscussion boards, and student led group sign-up and digital discussions. Blackboard platformwas used to establish the digital content which facilitated a self-paced study of the coursematerials while maintaining an interactive environment. The group projects were designed toaddress the implementation of the rating systems which was discussed in course lectures. A real-life project was used to analyze the design and construction alternatives including theachievement of rating system points. A simple survey was conducted at the end of the course tomeasure the effectiveness of the online
to excite these students about structures and integrate structure into their owndisciplines in a meaningful way. This paper reports on one means of accomplishing thisin ARCE 316 using K’nex toys to illustrate the entire design - construction sequence andrelate how structure fits into the process during this final large scale structures course.The project was made possible by a generous $10,000 donation of 48,400 K’nex piecesfrom the K’nex Corporation.Project DescriptionIn addition to the lectures, homework and examinations required to attain the ARCE 316course objectives, a course project was developed to illustrate the entiredesign/construction process. For the ten-week 2013 winter quarter, the course projectrequirements were to design and
in project-based courses.Dr. Merredith D Portsmore, Tufts University Dr. Merredith Portsmore is the Associate Director for Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Out- reach (www.ceeo.tufts.edu). Merredith received all four of her degrees from Tufts (B.A. English, B.S. Mechanical Engineering, M.A. Education, PhD in Engineering Education). Her research interests focus on how children engage in designing and constructing solutions to engineering design problems and eval- uating students’ design artifacts. Her outreach work focuses on creating resources for K-12 educators to support engineering education in the classroom. She is also the founder of STOMP (stompnetwork.org), and LEGOengineering.com
Technology and Guest Professor at UTM University Technology Malaysia 2011-2013. President of SEFI 2009–2011 (European Society for Engineering Education). Founding Chair of the SEFI-working group on Engineering Education Research. During the last 20 years, Dr. Kolmos has re- searched the following areas, primarily within Engineering Education: development and evaluation of project based and problem based curriculum, change from traditional to project organized and problem based curriculum, development of transferable skills in PBL and project work, and methods for staff development. She is Associate Editor for the European Journal of Engineering Education and was Asso- ciated Editor for Journal of Engineering Education
Associate Technical Fellow currently assigned to support technology and inno- vation research at The Boeing Company. Michael is responsible for leading a team conducting engineer- ing education research projects that focus on improving the learning experience for students, incumbent engineers and technicians. His research encompasses, Sociotechnical Systems, Learning Curves, and Engineering Education Research. Additional responsibilities include providing business leadership for engineering technical and professional educational programs. This includes development of engineering programs (Certificates and Masters) in advanced aircraft construction, composites structures and prod- uct lifecycle management and digital
Paper ID #8570An Integrated Approach to Developing Technical Communication Skills inEngineering StudentsProf. Ronald S Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is the Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering at the University of New Haven. He leads the Project to Integrate Technical Communication Habits and implemented a similar program in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Michigan State University when he was the chair there. Dr. Harichandran received his BE in Civil Engineering from the University of Canterbury, New Zealand, and his MS and PhD from MIT. He was a faculty member
substantial exposure to digital/tactile activities,upper level engineering students actively engaged in several project based courses during thecourse of their undergraduate engineering experiences that might have provided insights abouttheir learning preferences, as it relates to digital and tactile experiences. This research stemsfrom a multi-institutional collaboration between Penn State University and the University of Page 24.1215.2Maryland, where we aim to gain a deeper insight into the preferences of the next generationwork force prior to their graduation and highlight the professional work environment thatmay/may not align with students
, P.h.D., P.E., is the professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Mas- sachusetts Lowell and has previously lectured at University of Pennsylvania’s EXMSE Program and at the University of California Irvine. He is the coordinator of the Design and Manufacturing Certificate, the Quality Engineering Certificate, the ME senior Capstone Projects and COOP education at UML. He is a past chairman of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) Robotics/FMS and a founding mem- ber of the Massachusetts Quality Award. He is the founder of the New England Lead Free Consortium. He is the author of several best-selling books on Concurrent Engineering, Six Sigma, Green Design and Engineering Project Management. He