experience including a position in sensor development. Sensor development is also an area in which she holds a patent. She currently has research focused on student learning in virtual laboratories and the diffusion of educational interventions and practices.Dr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering
motivation andinterest in course content and improve retention.5-6 Through computing, instructors can bringtogether concepts and ideas from mathematics, science, and engineering and allow students tointeract with them, helping to form the cross-disciplinary mental connections necessary for moreexpert-like understanding.7-8In the fall of 2012, the University of Cincinnati converted from a quarter system to a semestersystem. This conversion provided an ideal opportunity to review the first-year curriculum for theengineering and engineering technology students and make changes to help improve retentionand performance of students in the College of Engineering and Applied Science (CEAS). Thecollege faculty agreed on an almost common first year (Table 1
. Magana, A. J., Brophy, S. P., & Bryan, L. A. (2012). An Integrated Knowledge Framework to Characterize and Scaffold Size and Scale Cognition (FS2C). International Journal of Science Education, 34, 2181-2203.15. Gagne, R. (1987). Instructional technology: Foundations. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations.16. Moore, T. J., & Hjalmarson, M. A. (2010). Developing measures of roughness: Problem solving as a method to document student thinking in engineering. Journal of Engineeirng Education, 26(4), 820-830.17. Klimeck, G., McLennan, M., Brophy, S. P., Adams, G. B., & Lundstrom, M. S. (2008). nanohub. org: Advancing education and research in nanotechnology. Computing in Science & Engineering, 10, 17-23.18
students. Although persistence is valuable,being blindly persistent can be counterproductive. In ART, if the candidate traceability linksgenerated by the automated tool do not look promising, the students should learn to revisit theproblem definition or to re-prioritize the requirements (clusters) to be traced. Essentially, thisstrategy is analogous to engineering design, in which constructing and reasoning about a de-sign model, rather than building the full-fledged system, can help assure quality and minimizere-work. Despite the teaching of the shorten-the-feedback-loop principle in most curriculums,students should learn to apply the idea in a more flexible and dynamic way.3. Developing an enriched vocabulary. Using an enriched vocabulary to
and system integration and risk management. He is the director of the Dynamics Environment Simulation (DES) Laboratory and the Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) Laboratory. He is the supervisor of the capstone senior design project team on the Autonomous Surface Vehicle (ASV) which has competed in the international competition in the last three years. During his tenure, he has the privilege of developing 3 new undergraduate and 6 new graduate courses in the areas related to computational methods and design.Xiaoxiao Hu, Old Dominion University Xiaoxiao Hu is an Assistant Professor in the Psychology Department at Old Dominion University. She received her PhD in Industrial/Organizational psychology from George Mason
Paper ID #10605Exploring How Design Critique Processes Shape Fifth Graders’ Peer Inter-action in Collaborative Engineering ProjectsDr. Michelle E. Jordan , Arizona State University Michelle Jordan earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Texas at Austin, focusing her studies on learning, cognition, and motivation with an emphasis on classroom discourse. She joined the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University in 2010. Her interdisciplinary research draws on traditions in qualitative inquiry, sociolinguistics, complexity theories, and the learning sciences. Partnering with teachers
review of the research. Journal of engineeringeducation, 93(3), 223-231.Redmon, R. J., & Burger, M. (2004). WEB CT discussion forums: Asynchronous groupreflection of the student teaching experience. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 6(2), 157-166. Page 24.1341.14Riffell, S., & Sibley, D. (2005). Using web-based instruction to improve large undergraduatebiology courses: An evaluation of a hybrid course format. Computers & Education, 44(3), 217-235.Romero, C., Ventura, S., & García, E. (2008). Data mining in course management systems:Moodle case study and tutorial. Computers & Education, 51(1), 368-384.Rourke, L., & Kanuka
division’s newslet- ter editor. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum, and professional ethics. Page 24.1236.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The Paperless Lab – Streamlining a Modern Unit Operations Laboratory Course to Reduce Faculty Time Commitment1. IntroductionUnit Operations (UO) laboratory courses are important, required offerings in chemicalengineering curricula due to the similarities of required laboratory tasks to those relevant inindustry
Paper ID #8917Student Demographics and Outcomes in Mechanical and Aerospace Engi-neering Including Migration between the DisciplinesDr. Marisa Kikendall Orr, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. She completed her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, as well as a Certificate of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity and diversity, and academic policy.Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S
regardless of how much of the reading you did.” “The flipped classroom was a great idea that allows college students to be college students. They have the responsibility to be prepared for class which allows the teacher to then build on what they should have already learned or have an idea about, which removes lecturing, something students tend to ignore anyway.” “It was great! The video lectures were a great resource. Wish I had this in every class!” “I felt that the flipped classroom was very helpful and a lot better than taking the class online.”Students also provided some feedback toward improving the flipped classroom and its place inthe curriculum: “I really liked the flipped classroom
in China” .“Red andExpert” as an educational objective was put forward by Mao Zedong. Being redmeans obeying the leadership of the Communist Party, unconditionally subscribing tothe communist ideology, and being loyal to all levels of party members and cadres.Under the party rule, the party’s wills were equivalent to the nation’s benefit; hence“red engineers” were considered as patriots. The cultivation of “experts” focused ontraining specialized senior personnel. The excessive emphasis on specializationseparated science education from engineering education; humanities education wasseen even less relevant and largely eliminated from engineering curriculum, exceptfor a few courses in political education. This idea was imported from
shared anothercommon characteristic 44,45. These commonalities included: foreign students who are sponsoredfinancially by their national governments; students who are sponsored financially by a company;students who work in a research position as part of an integrated university/industrial researchpark community; and students who have previously participated in a professional developmentcourse or workshop offered through the university.Research Design and Data Collection ProceduresEach of the four focus groups consisted of roughly 8-10 participants who were asked toindividually fill out a consent form and a 20 question survey upon arrival at the focus group site.The survey consisted of questions designed gather general demographic information, as
Paper ID #8505People Matter: The Role of Peers and Faculty in Students’ Academic En-gagementDr. Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific UniversityDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Stanford University, Stanford, CA, in 1988 and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Tech- nology, Atlanta, in 1989 and 1995, respectively. She received the M.Ed. from the University of Wash- ington in 2008. She is currently an Associate Professor with the Electrical Engineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, and she
designer to integrate the sick building syndrome in the building design: A number of rules should be developed to integrate expertise from different professional concerned with indoor air quality and sick building syndrome, using a questionnaire and face-to-face interviews. The sick building syndrome is a multidisciplinary problem since the causes of sick building syndrome are multiple, such as, contamination (inside and outside), material used to construct the building (formaldehyde, fiberglass), inadequate ventilation, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, cigarette smoking, humidity, noise and illumination, scabies, and other unknown syndrome. An interprofessional experience in different fields such as
, particularly on low-achievement students, who are led to believe that they lack ability and so are not able to learn.Therefore, it is urgent and important to find practical ways to improve assessment methods andutilize them to better serve students’ needs. The integration of instruction, learning andassessment should be emphasized.Fortunately there has been some active research regarding how formative assessments cansupport learning, improve outcomes and actualize the drive for lifelong learning. (Clark, 2012)These research are mainly carried out in disciplines such as English (Wei, 2010), Criminology(Gijbels, 2006), Medical curriculum (Weurlander 2012) or conducted with Primary andSecondary learners (McLaren 2012). Some inside classroom formative
for Public Service from the University System of Maryland Board of Regents, and currently serves as the Chair-Elect of the K-12 and Pre-College Division of ASEE.Elizabeth A Parry, North Carolina State University Elizabeth A. Parry is the secondary contributor to this paper. She is an engineer and consultant in K-12 STEM Curriculum, Coaching and Professional Development and the coordinator of K-20 STEM Partner- ship Development at the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. For the past fifteen years, she has worked extensively with students from kindergarten to graduate school, parents and pre- service and in service teachers to both educate and excite them about engineering. As the Co-PI and
Engineering Technology at The University of Texas at Brownsville (UTB). Prior to join- ing the faculty at UTB he was a visiting professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY. Also, an Associate Professor of Production Engineering Technology at PSG College of Technology Bharathiar University, India, where he served as the Director of Computer Vision Laboratory and National Cadet Corps – Engineering Division Director. With over 26 years of teaching and research experience in manufacturing/mechanical engineering and engineering technology, he currently teaches in the areas of CAD/CAM/CIM, Robotics & Automation, Product and Process Design, Materials and Manufacturing processes, Machine Design, Renewable
1995, the ECE Department Distinguished Teacher Award in 2000. He held ECE’s Gardner Zemke Professorship from 2005-08. He was the recipient of ECE’s Lawton-Ellis Award for combined excellence in teaching, research, and student/community involvement in 2001 and again 2009. In 2009 he was also awarded the IEEE Albuquerque Section Outstanding Educator Award. From 2005- 2011 he served as Associate Chair (Director of Undergraduate Programs), and led the department through two ABET accreditation visits. In 2011 he became an ABET program evaluator. Since 2011 he has served as the Associate Provost for Curriculum at the University of New Mexico. During 1998 he held a research fellowship at the Universidad Carlos III de
Latino adolescents use engineering design processes to solve community-based projects, and how their household bodies of knowledge and social practices with their peers may connect to these design processes. Alex is particularly interested in the use of comprehension strategy instruction in linguistically and culturally diverse classrooms, physical and digital manipulatives and their application in engineering courses, and education and outreach for minorities in STEM.Dr. Amy Alexandra Wilson, Utah State University - College of Education Amy Alexandra Wilson is an assistant professor in the School of Teacher Education and Leadership at Utah State University. She studies disciplinary literacy instruction for adolescents in
conducting studies were with Attilio Poto; Dr. Matthew Mailman; Dr. Scott Nelson. ”Taking weekly lessons at Symphony Hall in Boston, where the greatest of musicians throughout time have stood, was awe-inspiring and magical.”Dr. Margaret Loraine Lowder, Southern Polytechnic State UniversityDr. Mir M. Atiqullah, Southern Polytechnic State UniversityDr. Rajnish Singh, Southern Polytechnic State UniversityDr. Craig A Chin, Southern Polytechnic State University Craig A. Chin received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Florida International University in 2006. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the electrical and computer engineering technology at Southern Polytechnic State University. His research
Paper ID #10681Scaffolding Cyber-Enabled Collaborative Learning in Engineering Coursesand Its Impacts of on Students’ LearningProf. Wei Zheng, Jackson State University Dr. Wei Zheng is an associate professor of Civil Engineering at Jackson State University. He received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2001 and has over ten years of industrial experience. Since becoming a faculty member at JSU in 2005, he has made continuous efforts to integrate emerging technologies and cognitive skill development into engineering curriculum.Mr. Yanhua Cao, Jackson State University Yanhua Cao is a
Paper ID #10360Public vs. Private, Large vs. Small: Significant Differences in Student Affec-tive ExperienceDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Stanford University, Stanford, CA, in 1988 and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Tech- nology, Atlanta, in 1989 and 1995, respectively. She received the M.Ed. from the University of Wash- ington in 2008. She is currently an Associate Professor with the Electrical Engineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, and she was previously with the
looming deadlines draw near. In 1989 while at the Software EngineeringInstitute of Carnegie Mellon University, Watts Humphrey introduced the notion of the CapabilityMaturity Model to describe the state that existed in software development organizations. Itincludes the concepts of “levels” of maturity and “key process areas.” Many organizations haveadopted this model now referred to as CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integration) and usedit to guide their maturation process. It is a framework that allows an appropriate, matureapproach to software development to become part of the organization’s culture. Marchewka9introduced the concept of “Assurance of Learning” coupled with CMM, a focus similar to thatproposed by the authors. In that work, the
the studentsdevelop designs to satisfy the sponsor needs. The semester concludes with student presentations tosponsors. The sponsor must accept the proposal. In the second spring/summer semester the studentsorder materials, build components, integrate components, test, and eventually deliver the result. Like the Page 24.741.2first semester, the sponsors must accept the final product for the course to conclude. The first semesterincludes lecture content, as listed2. The second semester of the course does not include lectures.Throughout both semesters, students hold weekly meetings with faculty and produce progress reports. ● An
Development, Stanford University. His research interests are educational research, market analysis and manufacturing of photovoltaics. Page 24.450.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014AbstractThis paper describes the development of educational modules which provide a multi-disciplinaryknowledge of solar energy and which can be incorporated in the curriculum of chemicalengineering, mechanical engineering and electrical engineering, among others. Through thesemodules, we have made an effort to provide basic information to students on the economic,technical, and policy based aspects of
from Tsinghua University, China, in 1994 and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of California, San Diego, in 2000. Page 24.390.1 Hao Jiang has been with San Francisco State University since August 2007 as an assistant professor in electrical engineering. Prior joining SFSU, he worked for Broadcom Corporation, Jazz Semiconductor and Conexant Systems Inc. His research interests are in the general area of analog integrated circuits, particularly in ultra-low-power circuits for biomedical applications. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014
teaching at too fast a pace. In addition, many students felt that theylacked suitable preparation through prior experience, particularly in programming skills anddatabase concepts. 2,3,5,6A few studies found that the students’ ability to integrate into the academic and socialenvironment of the university played an important role in retention.3 The most important factorin this integration was building a peer group support system through peer interaction in theclassroom.5,7,8 In addition, student-faculty relationships were also very important to academicintegration. Students had to feel comfortable interacting with faculty members.2,8 However,Weng et al. found that self-efficacy, or the ability to persist in the face of obstacles, was moreimportant
Engineering Education*." Journal of Engineering Education 90, no. 1 (2001): 33-41.8. Ambrose, Susan A., and Cristina H. Amon. "Systematic Design of a First‐Year Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie Mellon University." Journal of Engineering Education 86, no. 2 (1997): 173-181.9. Felder, Richard M., Robert J. Beichner, L. Bernold, E. Burniston, Philip Dail, and Hugh Fuller. "Update on IMPEC: An integrated first-year engineering curriculum at NC State University." In 1997 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. 1997.10. Kilgore, Deborah, Cynthia J. Atman, Ken Yasuhara, Theresa J. Barker, and Andrew Morozov. "Considering Context: A Study of First‐Year Engineering Students." Journal of Engineering Education 96, no
University of the West Indies in his native Barbados, W.I. A member of the FIU-SCIS faculty for more than 30 years, Mr. Pestaina has taught at all levels of the curriculum, receiving awards for excellence in teaching on five occasions. He served the School as an Undergraduate Advisor for 15 of those years, and has served continuously as a member of the School’s Curriculum/Undergraduate Committees. Mr. Pestaina was a principal architect of the School’s program assessment processes, and the SCIS undergraduate program Assessment Coordinator from 2006 through 2013, leading successful re-accreditation of the BS in Computer Science program in 2004, and 2010. Mr. Pestaina has been a Reader and Question Leader of the College
more upfront planning than does the average lecture-based course. If you are new toPBL design, consider finding someone in your department who has more experience to helporient you to the process. Otherwise, consider seeking assistance from the instructional supportteams offered at your institution or find researchers on your campus who may be involved inPBL research. Timing is important to the success of any PBL experience. It is important to startdeveloping early. Your environments may need at least a semester of planning before they areready to be implemented. Making an effort to streamline the design process can be beneficial asyou seek to add PBL opportunities throughout your course or across the curriculum. Templatescan be an