provide real world examples that can be used to motivate and educate undergraduates and other students in the master’s program.In order to improve the practicum experience, the faculty are working on the following changes: ― Update the language of the assignments that students needed to resubmit in order to reduce ambiguity. ― Create a forum for students to share their practicum experiences once they arrive on campus for the fall term.Acknowledgements:The authors would like to thank the following firms for hosting practicum interns and forproviding feedback for the program and this paper: Barr Engineering Co., Minneapolis, Minnesota Walter P. Moore, Dallas, TexasReferences:Flood, L. S. and Powers, M. E., “Lessons
, fatigue testing, S-N curve and the simplified S-N curve, with fatigue theory under single level of cyclic stress or loading. We assigned the homework to students through implementing failure theories in specific close-end problems. Students were required to extend these concepts in their open- ended design projects.The Part III: The design of mechanical elements included the following topics: Typical machine elements including: bolts, shaft and key systems, gearing theories, spur gear, and bearings. It was well known that the design of typical machine elements were not the simple application of the stress/ strain theory discussed in the mechanics of materials but rather the application of design procedures. The design procedures
–232, June 2002[3]. Hanfmann, E. (1941). A Study of Personal Patterns in an Intellectual Performance. Character and Personality, 9, 315 – 325. Page 24.1215.15[4]. Klein, G. S. (1951). A Personal World through Perception. In R. R. Blake & G. V. Ramsey (Eds.), Perception: An Approach to Personality. New York: The Ronald Press Company.[5]. Witkin, H. A., Karp, S. A. and Goodenough, D.R. (1959). Dependence in Alcoholics. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Vol. 20,493-504.[6]. Kagan, J. (1958). The Concept of Identification. Psychological Review, 65, 296 – 305.[7]. Kagan, J. (1966). The Generality and
their perceptions onthe roles returners can and do play.References1. Peters, D. L. & Daly, S.R. (2011). The challenges of returning: Transitioning from an engineering career to graduate school. American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC.2. Peters, D. L. & Daly, S. R. (2012). Why do professionals return to school for graduate degrees? Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX.3. Peters & Daly, (2013). Returning to graduate school: Expectations of success, values of the degree, and managing the costs. Journal of Engineering Education.4. Strutz, M. L., Cawthorne Jr., J.E., Ferguson, D. M
assignment consisted oftwo to three posted homework problems, each having a set of multiple-choice questions withfeedback spaced at different substages of the problem to determine if the student had understoodthe key concepts presented. At the completion of each quiz, the student was provided immediatefeedback on their selection(s). Based on this feedback, students were allowed to retake the quizan unlimited number of times prior to the mid-week discussion session, during which we wouldgo over the pre-assignment problems and address any questions students had in regard to the Page 24.1262.14other homework to be submitted later that week. The only
National Science Foundation (NSF)under awards 722221 and 0939065. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe NSF.References[1] Bernold, L. E., Spurlin, J. E., & Anson, C. M. (2007). Understanding our students: A longitudinal study ofsuccess and failure in engineering with implications for increased retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 263-274.[2] Denning, P. J. (1992). Educating a new engineer. Communications of the ACM, 35 (12), 82-97.[3] Froyd, J. E., & Ohland, M. W. (2005). Integrated engineering curricula. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 147-164.[4] National Research Council (Ed.). (2002
increase the level of design complexity without risking overwhelming some otherstudents. The final recommendation is to use the newly designed 3.3V compatible trainersthroughout the course of the labs, which means replacing the traditional TTL 74LS family withthe newer 3.3V compatible 74HC family.References:1. J. Hill, Y. Yu, “The CPLD Provides a Third Option in Introductory Logic Circuits Course,” AC2012-5302, ASEE National Convention, 2012, session W5162. K. Hill, “Schematic Capture – ISE 13.x”, http://uhaweb.hartford.edu/kmhill/suppnotes/isetut/ise13x1/schem.htm3. K. Hill, Y. Yu, “Use of a CPLD in an Introductory Logic Circuits Course,” AC2013-7987, ASEE National Convention, 2013, session M4164. M. Radu, C. Cole, M. Dabacan, and S
idea of possible selvesand identity play to examine this process.Interactive Response and InteractionsFrom our early observations of the students’ use of the portfolios, we could see that identitywork and play occur in a variety of contexts, mediated by individual reflections as well as theresponses and interactions of other individuals. These observations informed our categorizationof “Interactive Response” (IR) as a site of learning mediated by diverse interactions with bothpeople (instructors, peers, friends/family, clients) and symbolic artifacts (e.g., professional codesof ethics). In this conception of IR, we pick up on Hattie and Timperley’s broader notion offeedback as provided by multiple “agent[s]”[8] in response to a particular
what anyone of the institutions could accomplish individually. The sharing of resources and opening thegateway that it creates makes this a project perfect for collaboration. More time and efforts arestill needed to justify the effectiveness of this project beyond joint collaboration to improvedstudent learning.References1. Marken, S., Gray, L., and Lewis, L. (2013). Dual Enrollment Programs and Courses for High School Students at Postsecondary Institutions: 2010–11 (NCES 2013-002). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved 15 February 2014 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
). “Key Competencies for US Construction Graduates: Industry Perspective.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 138(2), 123-130. 2. Chan, E. H. W., Chan, M. W., Scott, D., Chan, A. T. S. (2002). Educating the 21st Century Construction Professionals. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 128(1), 44-51. 3. Pries, F., Doree, A., van der Veen, B., and Vrijhoef, R. (2004). “The Role of Leaders’ Paradigm in Construction Industry Change.” Construction Management and Economics, 22(1), 7-10. 4. Skipper, C. O., & Bell, L. C. (2006). “Assessment with 360° Evaluations of Leadership Behavior in Construction Project Managers.” Journal of
means that all due dates in a chapter are past. Aright pointing triangle indicates that there is at least one assignment left, but it is more than aweek away. A red “.10 Silverstein, S. (2006). Why go to class? Just go online: even friends’ notes no longer needed.The Los Angeles Times, January 25.11 Sheppard D. (2013). Blended Learning: Traditional lecture learning to be replaced with onlinelectures and group work sessions, how will you adjust? Wisconsin Engineer. Retrieved fromhttp://wisconsinengineer.com/magazine/272/263/.12 Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy R., Bakia, M., Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies
MOOC, the colleges gained significantinsight into the challenges and opportunities associated with the technology and pedagogyassociated with MOOCs. In particular: There are a variety of reasons to offer MOOCs including: marketing / organizational awareness, outreach, providing professional development, support enrollment in “traditional” programs, etc. It is imperative that the goal(s) be clearly established early so that appropriate decisions regarding design and development can be made which support the goals. Very careful attention to content management minimizes issues when the course is offered. Video accessibility issues need to be carefully planned and managed. The visibility and positive attention generated for
Engineering”. Chemical Engineering Progress, March 2013. 2. Saltzman W. Drug Delivery. Oxford University Press, 2001. 3. Truskey G. et al. Transport Phenomena in Biological Systems. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006. 4. Farrell S. et al. “Drug Delivery Education Using Microsphere Technology,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2011. 5. Gu F. et al. “Sustained Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor with Alginate Beads,” Journal of Controlled Release, 2004, 96(3): 463-472. 6. Gombotz W. et al. “Protein Release from Alginate Matrices,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1998, 31 (3): 267-285
normally experienced inthe classroom. Quality control is also needed to assure that the content of the online course issimilar to what is taught in the classroom.References 1. Haugen, Susan; LaBarre, James; Melrose, John, “Online Course Delivery: Issues and Challenges” International Association Computer Information System (2001). 2. Song, Liyan; Singleton, Ernise S.; Hill, Janette R.; Hwa Koh, Myung, “Improving Online Learning: Student Perceptions of Useful and Challenging Characteristics” Internet and Higher Education 7 (2004): 59–70. 3. Kearsley, Greg, "A Guide to Online Education" (1998) Web 1 Jan. 2013. 4. Kearsley, Greg, “Online Education: Learning and Teaching in Cyberspace”, Belmont, CA, Wadsworth
knowledge (knowledge about when and why to usestrategies).32 Knowledge of cognition has been shown to play a key role in decision making andperformance.33–35 Regulation of cognition refers to an individual’s ongoing cognitive processesand includes five skills: planning, information management strategies, comprehensionmonitoring, debugging strategies, and evaluation. These skills have been suggested to play acritical role in problem solving as they allow learners to organize and monitor their thinking.35Metacognition was operationalized in this work to assess students’ perceptions of their ability touse metacognitive strategies when solving an engineering problem. Items were adapted from Leeet al.’s (2009) work originally used to assess elementary
numerical or graphical representations.Practice 6: Constructing Explanations (science) and Designing Solutions (engineering)6.1 Explanation/Evidence: the teacher questions and discourse guides students to generate their own explanations for observed or hypothetical phenomena; or teacher asks student to support statement with empirical evidence, prior knowledge, or logical reasoning.6.2 New Situation: the teacher helps students relate previously-learned concepts to new content/situation.6.3 Evaluate Understanding: the teacher initiates a discussion in which student/s may judge or articulate their success or failure with the science activity; or teacher gets students to assess their own level of understanding of a concept or to
retention, and how to best teach work skills throughout the engineering curriculum.Dr. Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville and also has an associate appointment in Chemical Engineering. Dr. Ralston teaches under- graduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved in educational research on the effective use of Tablet PCs in engineering education, the incorporation of critical thinking in undergraduate engineer- ing education, and retention of engineering students. Her fields of technical expertise include process modeling, simulation, and process control.Dr. Kate E. Snyder, University of
whichresources students used to improve their writing, according to the post-course survey. Studentswere allowed to select all the help method(s) they used. Of the 101 students answering thissurvey question, 13 indicated they used multiple resources. Perhaps even more notably, 81indicated that they did not seek writing help from any source, despite the majority of studentsexpressing frustration about not knowing how to improve their writing scores. Table 2. Types of help sought by students for paragraph writing exercise Type of Help No. of Students* No Help 81 Professor 7 Teaching
. Miller, Inquiry-based activities to address criticalconcepts in chemical engineering, in 118th Annual Conference & Exposition. 2011: Vancouver, BC.4. M. J. Prince, M. A. Vigeant and K. E. K. Nottis, Assessment and repair of critical misconceptions inengineering heat transfer and thermodynamics, in 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2013: Atlanta,Georgia.5. K. C. Midkiff, T. A. Litzinger and D. L. Evans. Development of engineering thermodynamic conceptinventory instruments. in 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2001. Reno, NV.6. S. Yeo and M. Zadnik, Introductory thermal concept evaluation: assessing students' understanding. ThePhysics Teacher, 2001. 39(November): p. 496 - 504.7. D. L
,Gregerman S.R., Jonides,J., von Hippel,W., Lerner,J.S., “Undergraduate Student-Faculty ResearchPartnerships Affect Student Retention”, The Review of Higher Education 22.1 (1998) 55-72 4. Dahlberg,.T, Barnes, T., Rorrer, A., Powell, E., Cairco, L., “ Improving retention and graduate recruitment throughimmersive research experiences for undergraduates. SIGCSE Bulletin,” 2008 Mar;40(1):466–70. 5. Board of Engineering Education-National Research Council, "Improving Retention in Undergraduate EngineeringEducation," Issues in Engineering Education: A Bulletin Addressing Culture Change in Engineering Education, vol.1, no. 1, 1992. 6. Short, S. R., “Investigation of Shear as aFailure Mode in Anisotropic Materials
(6), 12-21.3. National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE), Job Outlook: The Candidate Skills/QualitiesEmployers Want, 2011, Retrieved on July 2013 fromhttp://www.naceweb.org/s10262011/candidate_skills_employer_qualities4. Cleary, M.; Flynn, R.; Thomasson, S.; Alexander, R.; McDonald, B, Precision Consultancy, Graduateemployability skills, 2007. Retrieved on July 2013 fromhttp://aces.shu.ac.uk/employability/resources/GraduateEmployabilitySkillsFINALREPORT1.pdf5. Sugars, J.; Pearce, E., DOCNET: Doctors in Enterprise, Transferable skills and employability fordoctoral graduates: survey of the current landscape (Final report), 2010. Retrieved from (July 2013):http://www.docentproject.eu/doc/Report_DEF_EN.pdf6. Vitae, Researcher
documented in the two biographies of Skinner cited above. See especially Bjork(1993), chs. 4 & 6; and Wiener (1995), pp. 32-37.13 E Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 2nd edition. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980). The periodfrom Vargas, through Kubitschek, Quadros, and Goulart, is described in chapters 6-7.14 Fred. S. Keller, “An International Venture in Behavior Modification,” in Fred S. Keller and Emilio Ribes-Inesta,Behavior Modification: Applications to Education (New York: Academic Press, 1974), 143-155, 143-145; SérgioDias Cirino, Rodrigo Lopes Miranda, and Robson Nascimento de Cruz, “The beginnings of behavior analysislaboratories in Brazil: A pedagogical view,” History of Psychology 15/3(2012): 263-272. Available online
out supplemental instruction in a required generalchemistry course and what factors affected whether a student used a form of supplementalinstruction.1 However, data were unavailable to correlate with grades.In order to understand a student’s pre-disposition and ultimate choice to participate insupplemental instruction as well as to determine correlations with grade distribution, honors andnon-honors students in a required general chemistry course were given pre-surveys at thebeginning and post-surveys at the end of the semester. Analysis of pre-surveys allowedidentification of a student’s predisposed “trigger point” at which s/he decides to seek extra helpupon entering college. The availability of data for different types of course
”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2011 ASEE Session AC 2011-522 7. Kuyath, S., Owen, T., Sharer, D., Murphy, D., Kimble, J., and Englebert, M., “Development of an Electrical Engineering Technology Education”, ”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2003 ASEE 8. Crossman, G., “A CD-ROM Based Laboratory in Fluid Mechanics”, ”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2001 ASEE Session 2247 9. Connor, K., Berry, F., Chouikha, M., Newman, D., Deyoe, M., and Brubaker, W., “Using the Mobile Studio to Facilitate Nontraditional Approaches to Education and Outreach”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2011
. Project-based learning (PBL) is an instructionalapproach that engages students’ interest and motivation, relates the theoretical concepts studentsstudied inside the classroom and their applications explored during the activities outside of theclassroom and provides more opportunities for direct interactions among students. This paperpresents the implementations of PBL in Physics I and Statics courses at WKCTC. Sample teamprojects are described in details and the assessment on learning outcomes are discussed.IntroductionStudents at West Kentucky Community and Technical College (WKCTC) can pursue Universityof Kentucky (UK)’s Bachelor of Science degrees in either chemical or mechanical engineeringwithout leaving home. All four years of classes can
Paper ID #10955Improving the Affective Element in Introductory Programming Courseworkfor the ”Non Programmer” StudentDr. David M Whittinghill, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. David Whittinghill is an Assistant Professor of Computer Graphics Technology and Computer and Information Technology. Dr. Whittinghill’ s research focuses on simulation, gaming and computer pro- gramming and how these technologies can more effectively address outstanding issues in health, educa- tion, and society in general. Dr. Whittinghill leads projects in pediatric physical therapy, sustainable energy simulation, phobia treat- ment
electricalpower. Horsethief Reservoir is a local artificial lake that abuts the camp. The reservoir has boththe water volume flow (0.07m3/s) and elevation drop (20 meters) sufficient for continuous Page 24.766.3microhydroelectric power generation. Penstocks are already in place as part of overflowmanagement. Placing generators in tandem where maximum energy transfer occurs alsominimizes ecological impact in this case. A manifold design provides scalability and flexibility.Figure 2 shows the total present value costs, including manufacturer-recommended maintenance,and paybacks associated with different scalability. As shown in Figure 3, a positive payback
, J.R., Crittenden, J.C., Small, D.R., Hokanson, D.R., Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Sortby, S.A., James, V.U., Sutherland, J.W., and Schnoor, J.L. 2003. Sustainability Science and Engineering: The Emergence of a New Metadiscipline, Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 5314-5324.4. Young, T., Powers, S., Collins, A., and Ackerman, N. 1996. A Unified Elective Concentration in Environmental Engineering. Proceedings of the 1996 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition, Washington, D.C, June 23-26.5. Newberry, B. and Farison, J. 2003. A Look at the Past and Present of General Engineering and Engineering Science Programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(3), 217-224.6. Woolschlager, J