Projects in Community Service (EPICS) at Drexel, among others. In collaboration with other College of Engineering faculty and staff she co-teaches a sequence of classes for the Paul Peck Scholars Program. Alistar received her B.A. from Drew University and Master’s from Duke University.Dr. Alisa Morss Clyne, Drexel University (Eng.) Alisa Morss Clyne is currently an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering, with a courtesy ap- pointment in the School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, at Drexel University in Philadelphia, PA. Dr. Clyne is director of the Vascular Kinetics Laboratory, which investigates integrated mechanical and biochemical interactions among cells and proteins of the cardiovascular
2. Electro Optical Devices 3. Fiber Optics 4. Lasers Systems Robotics Specialty 5. Advanced Programmable Logic Controllers 6. Intro to Robotic Systems 7. Manufacturing Processes 8. Capstone Project Telecommunications Specialty 9. Computer Repair 10. Wireless Networks 11. Wireless Security 12. Telecommunication Systems TOTAL 60 Page 24.1151.6Replicating the Photonics Systems Technician Curriculum ModelIn 2014, 28 colleges across the U.S. have adopted the Photonics Systems Technician
researchers will independently score all of the pilot VCD responses. If their agreement is less than 80%, discrepancies will be discussed and the scoring rubric will be revised. The two researchers will then independently score all responses again. This process will be repeated until their scores agree more than 80% of the time. Test-retest reliability will be determined by administering both versions of the VCD to approximately 20 pre-service teachers who are not involved in the project. Reliability will be achieved when there is greater than 80% agreement, on average, in the performance of individual teachers across the two versions
fashion, solve for all of the unknownnode temperatures and provide the final file for grading. This is done on an individualbasis, although they are allowed to consult with each other during the lab period. Somestudents are able to finish all five cases within the two hour lab period, but many cannot.They are given one week to turn in the computer file. If they wish to leave early from labthey must demonstrate that they have correctly completed the first three cases. The fiveproblems and their solutions are shown in the appendix.This exercise provides the students with a hands on application of a numerical 2-dimensional analysis method (finite difference) for solving a variety of heat transferproblems. Another benefit of this project is its
have a pragmatic way of projecting to external stakeholders that accreditationactivities are somehow “independent.” Yet domestically, accreditation activities are organized bythe CEEAA, which was initiated by and located in the Ministry of Education. Figure 1. The Governing Bodies of EEA in ChinaFurther, both CAST and CEEAA are GONGOs (government organized non-governmentalorganizations). Through such a complicated but pragmatic design of the accreditation agency, theChinese government is able to reach two seemingly contradictory ends. In theory and forinternational purview, China has what looks like an “independent” and “non-governmental
goals. Adam is an active member of the American Society of Engineering Education, Biomedical Engineering Society, American Educational Research Association, and National Association of Research and Science Teaching.Courtney June Faber, Clemson UniversityDr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clem- son University, with a joint appointment in the Department of Bioengineering. Her research interests include assessment of motivation, how motivation affects student learning, and student-centered active learning. She is also involved in projects that utilize Tablet PCs to enhance and assess learning, and in- corporating
. Page 24.762.2IntroductionEducators are always seeking ways to encourage their students to grow and learn. Like anexperienced carpenter, most experienced teachers have more tools in their box than they are ableto use on any particular project, not because they don’t care about the quality of the finishedproduct, but because the time available for those critical enhancements and finishing touches isvery limited. The carpenter and the teacher both must make daily decisions that balance valueadded against time invested. With this in mind, the concept of Two-Minute Follies has beendeveloped at West Point and adopted by Mississippi State as a means to motivate and teachstudents in an effective and time-efficient manner.The basic concept of the Two
includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teach- ing practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering.Dr. Matthew Arnold Boynton PE P.E., Virginia Tech Matthew Boynton recently finished his Ph.D in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He also holds a B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineering from Tennessee Tech and an Ed.S in Instructional Leadership. Matthew has experience in industry as well as teaching. Previously, Matthew taught Project Lead the Way Engineering courses in two rural high schools in
a sample scenarioabout modern challenges in managing electronic waste. Feedback from project advisory boardmembers are integrated in this discussion.BackgroundEngineering programs have an explicit need to define, teach and measure professional skillssince their introduction by ABET evaluation criteria for engineering programs in 2000. Theseskills include ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (3d), understanding of professionaland ethical responsibility (3f), ability to communicate effectively (3g), understanding of theimpact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and cultural/societalcontexts (3h), recognition of and ability to engage in life-long learning (3i), and knowledge ofcontemporary issues (3j). A well
engineeringproject for implementation in their high school classroom.Although the E3 program is not a research project, the E3 program’s goal and core objectives canbe linked to anticipated outcomes. As part of the program’s formative and summativeevaluation, anonymous online surveys were administered to participants in two E3 summerprograms using the pre- and post-program survey format, and participants were asked to respondto survey statements using a Likert-type scale of responses. The E3 leadership team notedinconsistencies in some of the survey results with the teachers’ written (and verbal) comments;therefore the team investigated the apparent contradictions. Possible explanations included (a)pre-program survey response overestimation and concomitant
runs the Feminist Research in Engineering Education (FREE, formerly RIFE) group, whose diverse projects and group members are described at the website http://feministengineering.org/. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu.Dr. Adam R Carberry, Arizona State University Adam R. Carberry, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor at Arizona State University in the Fulton Schools of Engineering. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. Dr. Carberry has been a member of PEER since the first workshop held in 2011.Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West LafayetteMaria
studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She runs the erstwhile Research in Feminist Engineer- ing (RIFE) group, now renamed the Feminist Research in Engineering Education (FREE) group, whose diverse projects and group members are described at the website http://feministengineering.org/. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu.Canek Moises Luna Phillips, Purdue University, West Lafayette Canek Phillips is a graduate student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University-West Lafayette and works as a graduate assistant in Dr. Alice Pawley’s Feminist Research in Engineering Ed- ucation lab. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rice University and an M.S. in Mechanical
the Christian interpretation of life. And so, the practical by which isalso meant the technical (technological) was given less status than the academic by which isalso meant the pure.4 The Percy Report and its manpower projection.4.1. The committee began by categorizing the types of technologist that industry required, atask that would inevitably mean that it would have to consider the roles of the universitiesand technical colleges in meeting the needs when defined. The five categories were:1. Senior administrators.2. Engineer scientists and development engineers.3. Engineer managers (design, manufacture, operation and sales)4, Technical assistants and designer draughtsmen5. Draughtsmen, foremen and craftsmen.4.2. The committee felt that
Paper ID #9215How Students’ Informal Experiences Shape their Views of Engineering andAffect their Plans for Professional PersistenceDr. Kerry Meyers, Youngstown State University Dr. Kerry Meyers is in her second year as the Director of the STEM College’s First-Year Engineering Program at Youngstown State University. Her career is focused on the development of common, project based First-Year Engineering experiences, beginning at the University of Notre Dame where she was also the Director of the First-Year Engineering Program from 2005-2012. Further, her research interests relate to Engineering Educational issues in the
performance incourse exams. They report that student performance in the course projects in the FC version of thecourse was better than student performance in the traditional version by an average of 12 percent. Page 24.1395.3They also report that this improvement was not seen in one section of the FC version of the course;and they attribute this to the fact that the instructor in that section “neglected to utilize modelingand demonstration techniques . . . ”. This, of course, raises the question, which the authors do notconsider, of whether the performance of the students in the projects in the traditional version ofthe course would have matched
development included four courses the first year, sixcourses the second year, and up to nine courses the third year (all of which already existed intraditional course formats). The initial four courses—applied quantum mechanics, digitalsignal processing, digital image processing, and convex optimization—were chosen basedprimarily on the interest and availability of the regular instructors to develop online coursematerials. All were graduate courses, though at the introductory level, and therefore open toadvanced undergraduates.Funding for the program came from the University’s recently created Office of the ViceProvost for Online Learning (VPOL), which had requested proposals from departments thatwent beyond single-course projects. Each of the four
not beconfused with an instructor who accidentally creates an exam that is too hard.We became interested in left-of-center grading through an unrelated project on gender andcommunication in engineering. During the course of our interviews, we frequently heardcomplaints about tests with medians as low as 20. Curious, we began systematically asking ourinterview subjects about the pros and cons of this grading practice.Since adding this question to our protocol, we have interviewed a total of 83 engineeringundergraduates, professional engineers and faculty. Our study adds to research examiningcompetitive grading practices in engineering in that we focus our insight on a very specificgrading practice (e.g., left-of-center grading) and we include
. Wilczynski was named the 2001 Baccalaureate College Professor of the Year by the Carnegie Foundation, the only national award which recognizes outstanding college teaching.Ms. Isabella M Quagliato, Yale University: School of Engineering & Applied Science Isabella Quagliato joined Yale University in January 2013 as the Program Manager Analyst for the Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science (SEAS). After obtaining her B.S. with high honors in Civil Engineering & Structural Design from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, she worked for two years as a structural engineering designer at Dewberry Good-kind, then worked for three years as a structural de- signer and project manager at Spiegel Zamecnik & Shah
&T State University, an MBA in Management from Wake Forest University, and a Ph.D. in Leadership Studies from North Carolina A&T State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Paper ID #9234 As Co-Principal Investigator and Statewide Project Director for the North Carolina Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation program (NC-LSAMP), and Co-Principal Investigator and administrative man- ager for the NSF Innovation through Institutional Integration (I-3) project, she is a strong advocate for broadening the participation of underrepresented populations who major
participate in the REM program. Eachsemester, the REM program began with a Research Studio lasting approximately 8 hours beforestudents began the laboratory experience. The Research Studio included an introduction of tissuetest systems and overall EFRI project goals, completion of laboratory safety training, anintroduction to research ethics, technical writing, and basic laboratory practices, participation ina team building exercise, discussion of the projects to which each student would be exposed, anddiscussion of the expectations for and of RPs. Once RPs completed the Research Studio, each RPwas paired with a graduate student mentor and the mentor’s project. After completion of theResearch Studio, each student was required to spend 3 hours on lab
and Discovery Services team by utilizing relational database and data visualization skills. Currently, she is working with the Virginia Department of Transportation to support its project acquisition process with data analysis, systems integration, and risk management.Prof. Reid Bailey, University of Virginia Reid Bailey is an Associate Professor at the University of Virginia in the Department of Systems and Information Engineering.Dr. Michael C Smith, University of Virginia Mike Smith earned his B.S. and M.S. at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville and Ph.D. from the Uni- versity of Missouri - Columbia. He has worked across a variety of application domains including man- ufacturing, transportation, defense
predominantly from rural communities, and yet they have chosenSTEM in contradiction to the research.Table 1: Hispanic Enrollment by Gender at ##### Fall 2005 – Fall 2011 ##### Year Male Female Total Fall 2005 62 41 103 Fall 2006 85 61 146 Fall 2007 96 66 162 Fall 2008 109 72 181 Fall 2009 125 77 202 Fall 2010 141 89 232 Fall 2011 163 97 260By 2030, projections indicate the U.S. population to be 20.1% Hispanic. The percent ofHispanics in the 18-24 age group is expected to be even
in the domains of engineering technology. The survey also explores faculty inputregarding the importance of technical currency and its relationship to student learning andsuccess. Finally, the paper compares the current status of faculty scholarship vis-à-visfaculty technical currency to the results obtained through earlier studies (2003 & 2007). I. IntroductionThe purpose of project was to explore faculty perceptions of the importance and currentstatus of faculty technical currency for effective teaching. A survey was conducted viathe ASEE ETD listserv during December 2013; the listserv has a membership of morethan 4000 faculty members and professionals belonging to 1000 institutions. Engineeringtechnology faculty were asked to
together via an ePub editor 73 .Finally, there is the displaying of math in the chapter. This is obviously an important feature.Originally we attempted to use MathML (which ePub 3 is supposed to support), but had greatdifficulty getting this to work. Having used LATEX and MathJax in a similar project 72 , we tried itwith great results. We used the Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 74 option in MathJax exclusivelywhich allowed us to trim MathJax down by deleting some unused resources that come bundledwith it.PerformanceThe primary concern in creating interactive eBooks for computationally intensive applications isobviously performance. A test case computed is that of an inviscid, uniform, incompressiblecross-flow over a circular cylinder with
, is the Introduction to Operations Management course. The Introduction toOperations Management course provides an overview of the functional activities necessary forthe creation and delivery of goods and services. The goal of the course is to give the students abasic understanding of operations management and an appreciation for the many roles anoperations manager can play in an organization. Specific attention is paid to how an operationsmanager impacts strategic and operational decisions across a variety of functional areas in anorganization. Topics covered include: productivity; strategy in a global business environment;project management; quality management; location and layout strategies; human resourcesmanagement; supply chain and
classroom [6].Course Details and Student DemographicsThe systems analysis and design course is a core requirement of students studying computertechnology and focuses primarily on the makeup of software systems. The subject matter buildson the concepts of logic, decomposition, and problem solving introduced in the first year. Thecourse was held during a typical 16-week semester and met on Monday and Wednesdaymornings for 75 minutes at a time.The course itself is made up of a number of learning modules, most of which are scheduled for asingle calendar week although there are a few longer topics. 10 distinct learning modules werescheduled over the first 12 weeks of the course. Students are engaged in two larger, multi-deliverable final projects during
Foundation (NSF) funded FORTE (Fostering Opportunities for Tomorrow’s Engineers) Program at UWM. Jablonski is focusing her dissertation on sustainable oxidation of textile wastewater and is working to create small-scale wastewater treatment units for cottage textile industries. She trained at the National Environmental Engineering Re- search Institute (NEERI) in Nagpur, India where she worked on biodegradation of azo dye intermediates. Jablonski served as Co-chair of UWM’s student chapter of Engineers Without Borders for 2 years begin- ning with its inception in 2007 and continues to help design and implement water distribution projects in Guatemala as a mentor. Jablonski was a 2012 recipient of NSF’s EAPSI fellowship in
View3. Siemens providestwo solutions for visually analyzing the product during its design process. The first one is NXthat uses HD3D Visual Reporting from metadata to help designers understand design issues.With different color-coded tags and “see-through” settings, users can see the inside componentsof 3D models and comprehend data quickly4. With the integration of product views and 2Dsnapshots, Teamcenter’s lifecycle visualization can send CAD data to the stand-alone applicationviewer or the Lifecycle Viewer to provide a complete view of the whole assembly5.Almost all these projects use spreadsheets, basic information diagrams, and tree widgets todisplay the product information. However, very few existing PLM systems adopt
bestatistically valid and resulting data provide a groundbreaking view of mechanical engineeringeducation.In a broad-brush summary of the Vision 2030 survey data, the industry supervisors’ four greatestperceptions of weakness are worth highlighting. These four were focused on engineeringpractice—how devices are made and how they work, communication within diverse engineeringteams and with stakeholders in the organization, engineering codes and standards, and a systemsperspective. Notably, early career engineers judged their greatest weaknesses as practicalexperience, project management, knowledge of business processes and engineering codes andstandards.2 Many of these perceptions of weakness point unmistakably to a lack of emphasis ontranslating
al [7]. The ADVANCE project spurred coordinated programming aimed towards recruitment, retention, and advancement of women faculty, improved campus climate, and expanded leadership opportunities. Overall indications are that intensive efforts on multiple fronts have shown positive results. There are more women in faculty ranks and academic administrative positions, and measures of institutional climate change continue to show progress. In addition to multiple interventions, the kind of transformation sought required engagement of men – not just as participants, but also as facilitators, planners, and leaders guiding the work of NSF ADVANCE at