Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University and Central Queensland University; Richard A. Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

Education. 6. An extension of the FIE 2013 article comparing the engineering fields with the largest enrollments but smallest percentage of women, namely Electrical and Mechanical Engineering is also being considered. This was not originally planned in the proposal but has been a useful analysis.Finally, a consideration of the exchange between Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering is thefocus of an ASEE 2014 conference paper.7Publications Related to this GrantM. K. Orr, S. M. Lord, R. A. Layton, and M. W. Ohland, (in press). Student Demographics andOutcomes in Mechanical Engineering in the U.S.. International Journal of MechanicalEngineering Education.M. Madsen Camacho and S. M. Lord (2013). Latinos and the Exclusionary Space of

Conference Session

Best of DEED

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julia Kramer, University of Michigan, College of Engineering; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Seda Yilmaz, Iowa State University; Colleen M. Seifert, Univ. of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Page 24.23.15References [1] Brophy, D.R. (2001). Comparing the attributes, activities, and performance of divergent, convergent, and combination thinkers. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3&4): p. 439-455. [2] Liu, Y.C., Bligh, T., & Chakrabarti, A. (2003). Towards an 'ideal' approach for concept generation. Design Studies, 24(4): p. 341-355. 1323251 [3] Cross, N. (2001). Design cognition: Results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education, 7, 9-103. [4] Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. T. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in

Conference Session

WIED: Faculty and Gender Issues

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sharon Patricia Mason, Rochester Institute of Technology; Carol Elizabeth Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Stefi Alison Baum, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Capstone and Online Courses in Construction Education

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James W. Jones, Ball State University; Mike Mezo, Ball State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction

described by McIntyre, students in problem-basedlearning environments “are challenged to „learn to learn‟ so that they can achieve their highestpotential in their chosen professions.”1 Just as a capstone completes a building or archway, thecapstone course finishes off the students‟ learning as they prepare to graduate and enter theworkforce.This paper describes the process used by the construction management program in Ball StateUniversity‟s capstone in construction course. This course, jointly created and refined by theprogram‟s faculty, utilizes three major distinctive features: team teaching, team learning, andsignificant industry involvement. By describing how these features have evolved over the years,the authors provide their course as a case

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zenaida Otero Gephardt, Rowan University; Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Mariano Javier Savelski, Rowan University; C. Stewart Slater, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

Equation 1. volume of swollen gel Q= (1) volume of dry polymerThe tensile modulus is related to the tensile stress and the equilibrium polymer volume fractionas given by Equation 2 = G v2,s-1/3 (2)where G is the tensile modulus, α is the elongation, τ is the tensile stress, and v2,s is the Page 24.797.16equilibrium polymer volume fraction in the gel (1/Q). G can be found from the slope of a plot

Conference Session

Evaluation of Ethical Development

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edwin R. Schmeckpeper P.E., Ph.D, Norwich University; Ashley Ater-Kranov, Washington State University; Steven W. Beyerlein, University of Idaho, Moscow; Jay Patrick McCormack, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Patrick D. Pedrow P.E., Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

focuses on a group of five to six students discussing a complex, real-world scenario that includes current, multi-faceted, multidisciplinary engineering issues. Beforethe 30-45 minute long discussion begins, student participants all read a short scenario thatpresents some technical and non-technical details of the topic.Table 1 presents a summary of sample scenarios. As part of the EPSA, students are asked todetermine the most important problem/s and to discuss stakeholders, impacts, unknowns, andpossible solutions. Examples of the scenarios used in the EPSA are presented in Appendix A. Page 24.1349.2  Table 1. Summary of Sample ScenariosEnergy

Conference Session

Laboratory Experiences with Mechanical, Materials and Fluid Systems

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bijan Sepahpour, The College of New Jersey

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

materials under dynamic/fatigue loading is the “S-N”diagram. Here, “S” corresponds to the stress level and “N” to the number of cycles. Due to theuncertainties involved in materials’ behavior and characteristics, a large number of specimensare tested at different stress levels for generating the “S - log N” diagram. Ideally, the mainobjective in such tests is two-fold. First, to establish (for a given material), up to what stresslevels the material will enjoy an infinite life (Endurance Limit); and second, to correlate thenumber of cycles at different stress levels that a material will be able to go through beforecoming to failure. The range of cost for a typical educational fatigue testing apparatus is from$10,500 to $32,500. These units are

Conference Session

DEED Melange

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ang Liu, University of Southern California; Stephen Y. Lu, University of Southern California

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

technologies are likely different than what were available before, and the purpose(s)to be achieved may be different. Furthermore, even an expressed need that may have the samename as a previous problem always involves different people and very often has differentpurposes.The second foundation question of “purposeful information” means “what purposeful Page 24.299.3information is needed to create new solutions?” EBT argues that, since information is arepresentation of some reality, any information is somehow inaccurate, but some is more usefulthan others. The theoretical amount of information needed to describe any reality (and solve anyproblem) is

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-college Engineering: Research on Teachers' Perceptions, Attitudes and Impacts of Teacher PD

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Purdue University; Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

, No. 3, 2012, pp. 1- 26.[2] Committee on Standards for K-12 Engineering Education, Standards for K-12 engineering education?: National Academy Press, 2010.[3] Katehi, L., Pearson, G., and Feder, M. A., Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects: National Academy Press, 2009.[4] Engineering is Elementary, "Engineering for children?!", n.d.[5] Iverson, E., Kalyandurg, C., and de Lapeyrouse, S., "Why K-12 engineering?": ASEE EngineeringK12 Center, n.d.[6] de Romero, N. Y., Slater, P., and DeCristofano, C., "Design challenges are "ELL-elementary"", Science and Children Vol. 43, No. 4, 2006, pp. 34-37.[7] National Research Council, A framework for K-12 science

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Daney, Downingtown Area School District & Villanova University; Aaron P. Wemhoff, Villanova University; Gerard F. Jones, Villanova University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

a number of projects in areas of solid waste re-use, renewable energy systems, and waterquality for 8th-grade students.9 Arkansas Tech has hosted a two-week workshop for K-12teachers with a focus on comparing various energy sources and provided in-class demonstrationsfeaturing water turbines, fuel cells, and photovoltaics.10 Finally, the Villanova Department ofMechanical Engineering has hosted approximately 60-80 girl scouts on the annual Girl ScoutDay, where the middle school-aged girls learn sustainability concepts through activities such asconcentrated solar energy and photovoltaics.11One aspect of energy literacy that has not yet been explored on the K-12 level lies in green datacenters. Data centers consumed 1.5% of U. S. energy in

Conference Session

WIED: Medley

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith J. Bowman, Illinois Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

., & Kuh, C. V. (Eds.) (2009), Doctoral education and the faculty of the future.Cornell University Press.Erickson, S. K. (2012), Women Ph. D. students in engineering and a nuanced terrain: Avoidingand revealing gender. The Review of Higher Education, 35(3), 355-374.Ferreira, M. M. (2009). Trends in women's representation in science and engineering. Journal ofWomen and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 15(3).Fox, M. F. (2000),Organizational environments and doctoral degrees awarded to women inscience and engineering departments. Women's Studies Quarterly,28(1/2), 47-61.Gardner, S. K. (2009), Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty inseven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education,32(3), 383-406.Goldsmith

Conference Session

Focus on African-American and Hispanic Engineering Students’ Professional and Academic Development

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noemi V. Mendoza Diaz, University Corporation for the Development of Internet-Mexico

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

). The latter resource provided disaggregated information regardingparental education, occupation, GRE and College GPA of doctoral engineering students and acomparison with science and math students. Zavala (2003) pointed out the diversity of the Hispanics/Latinos, for example “PuertoRicans are about 10 percent of all Latinos but make up 29 percent of the Latino Ph.D.’s” (p.189). Furthermore, based on a Pew Hispanic Center report, Friedrich and Cabrera (2012) andCrisp and Nora (2006) state that “Cuban students are the only Hispanic group who areperforming on par with white students, while Mexicans, the largest Latino group in the nation,tend to have lower achievement than other Hispanics” (p. 8). In consequence, thismisrepresentation is a

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Marisa Exter, Purdue University; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Todd P. Shuba, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ji Hyun Yu, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mindy Hart, EPICS; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

help us to better understand all of the factors surroundingstudents’ perceptions of themselves and decisions about going into engineering, which can in Page 24.826.6turn help inform us about better ways to assist these students.References 1. National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2. Matyas, M. L. & Malcolm, S. (1991). Investing in human potential: Science and engineering at the crossroads. Washington, DC: AAAS. 3. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. N. (1992). Curriculum differentiation

Conference Session

Research in Biomedical Pedagogy

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margo Cousins, The University of Texas at Austin; Mia K. Markey, The University of Texas at Austin; Henry Grady Rylander III P.E.

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

Response % Trainee 0 0% Trainee's primary advisor(s) 0 0% Host institution 4 57% Graduate program 0 0% T32 grant 4 57% Other: 1 14% Figure 6. Question #21 results for stipend source during experience. Page 24.650.7 Most commonly, programs do not assign an off-campus training experience, but ratherallow trainees to self

Conference Session

Mentoring Minorities: Effective Programs, Practices, and Perspectives

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joi-Lynn Mondisa, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

. Page 24.899.10Bibliography1 National Science Foundation, N. S. B. Science and Engineering Indicators: Digest 2012. NSB 12-02. (National Science Foundation, 2012).2 Olson, S. & Riordan, D. G. Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. Executive Office of the President (2012).3 National Science Foundation, N. C. f. S. a. E. S. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013. Special Report NSF 13-304. Arlington, VA. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/. (2013).4 Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. M. Talking about leaving : why undergraduates leave

Conference Session

Student Learning, Problem Solving, & Critical Thinking 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan M. Hicks, University of Florida; Amy Elizabeth Bumbaco, University of Florida; Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

century. (National Academies Press, 2005).11. Arum, R. & Roksa, J. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. (University of Chicago Press, 2011).12. Crabbe, N. Study: College students fail to think critically. The Chalkboard. (2011). at .13. Jaschik, S. “Academically Adrift” | Inside Higher Ed. High. Ed. (2011). at .14. Leef, G. No Work, All Play, Equals a Job? – Room for Debate. New York. (2011). at .15. Paul, R. The State of Critical Thinking Today. (2004). at .16. Mason, M. Critical thinking and learning. Educ. Philos. Theory 39, 339–349 (2007).17. Ennis, R. H. A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. (1987). at 18. French, J. N. & Rhoder, C. Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory

Conference Session

Engineering Faculty: Interactions, Influences and Issues

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Massi, University of Central Florida; Caitlyn R. McKinzie, University of Central Florida; Andre J Gesquiere, University of Central Florida; Sudipta Seal, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #8899The Influence of Student-Faculty Interactions on Post-Graduation Intentionsin a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) Program: A Case StudyDr. Lisa Massi, University of Central Florida Dr. Lisa Massi is the Director of Operations Analysis for Accreditation, Assessment, & Data Adminis- tration in the College of Engineering & Computer Science at the University of Central Florida. She is Co-PI of a NSF-funded S-STEM program and program evaluator for an NSF-funded REU program. Her research interests include factors that impact student persistence and career development in the STEM fields.Caitlyn R

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brianna L. Dorie, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Gina Navoa Svarovsky, Science Museum of Minnesota

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

experiences in both school and out-of-school settings as we consider howto teach and facilitate engineering design thinking.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. (HRD-1136253). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We would alsolike to acknowledge the contributions of GRADIENT research team members Zdanna Tranby and ScottVan Cleave, as well as the Science Museum of Minnesota and INSPIRE at Purdue University.References 1. Brophy, S., & Evangelou, D., (2007). Precursors to engineering thinking. In Proceedings of the 2007

Conference Session

A Focus on Non-Traditional Students and Non-Traditional Course Delivery Methods

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline Bushey-McNeil, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University and Central Queensland University; Russell Andrew Long, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

could be a huge, potential resource for the U.S.’s growing need forengineers. The number of nontraditional students is increasing in higher education but is still asmall population in engineering.3 Private, for profit institutions have been very popular and haveattracted many nontraditional students, with their enrollment of nontraditional students reaching89%.3 Nontraditional students have been studied in community colleges and urban universities,but have been rarely studied at public 4-year universities in engineering due to a lack oflongitudinal data on individual students.The research of nontraditional students used the Multiple-Institution Database for InvestigatingEngineering Longitudinal Development (MIDFIELD). MIDFIELD was large enough

Conference Session

Global Perspective and Experiential Learning in Civil Engineering

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John E. Greenleaf P.E., Quinnipiac University; Emils Stires Schnore, Independent construction professional; Patrick M. Strenk P.E., Golder Associates, Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

. Participate in Participate in Indigenous Project Phase Travel Visits Domestic Activities Participants Initial investigation S, F S, F, PE, DCP, OP B, NGO Design S, F, PE, OP S, F, PE, DCP, OP B, ICP, NGO Pre-implementation S, F, PE, OP, S, F, PE, DCP OP B, ICP, NGO planning DCP Construction S, PE, DCP, F S, F, PE, DCP B, ICP, NGO Closeout S, PE, DCP S, F, PE, DCP B, NGO, ICP Key: “S”= student, “F

Conference Session

Computer-Based Learning Models

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wendi M. Kappers, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Stephanie Cutler, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

collaborative administration and industry mentorship planning used to increase enrollments of woman and minorities with declared majors in the areas of Computer Science (CS), Engineering (E), Mathematics (M), and Science (S). Currently, Dr. Kappers is the fulltime Di- rector of the Rothwell Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence Worldwide Campus (CTLE – W) for Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. In addition, she holds Adjunct Assistant Professor status in the College of Arts and Sciences, Worldwide Campus, teaching RSCH 202 – Introduction to Research Methods, and in the College of Engineering, Daytona Beach Campus, teaching CS120 – Introduction to Computing in Aviation. Both positions allow her to stay focused upon

Conference Session

Discipline Specific Topics and Techniques

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University; Korine Steinke Wawrzynski, Michigan State University; Megan A. Shannahan, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

individuals mostinvolved in mentoring undergraduate researchers, the invitation emails specifically requested thatthe survey be completed by the individual most involved in mentoring the undergraduate(s).We were surprised to find that, on both surveys, more than 70% of respondents indicated thatthey were faculty members and about 20% of respondents were post-docs or graduate students.The few respondents who selected “other” included a post-bachelor lab manager and otherresearch staff. Table 1 summarizes the respondents’ self-identified roles at the University. Table 1: Respondents by University Role Pre-Survey (n=47) Post-Survey (n=56) What is your role at the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Vernengo, Rowan University; Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan University; Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

Courses Focused on Tissue Engineering ApplicationsProceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition; 2002.8. Pittsburg Tissue Engineering Initiative I. An Education Outreach Manual in TissueEngineering. In: Pittsburg Uo, editor. 2010.9. Birol G, Liu S, Smith D, Hirsch P Educational Modules in Tissue Engineering Based on Page 24.528.10the “How People Learn” Framework. Bioscience Education E-journal. 2006;7.10. Bhatia S. A disease-centered approach to biomaterials education and medical devicedesign. 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Opening General Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janna Rodriguez, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Qu Jin, Stanford University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

contributions of Philipp Müller and Adam Probst of the TechnicalUniversity of Munich, Shanon Gilmartin, and the support of all of our colleagues in theDesigning Education Lab at Stanford University. This work was supported by the NationalScience Foundation as a collaborative research grant (NSF-DUE-1020678, 1021893, 1022024,1022090, and 1022644). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.Bibliography1. Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S., & Weilerstein, P. (2013). Entrepreneurship: Its Role in Engineering Education. Summer Issue of The Bridge on Undergraduate Engineering Education, 43(2), 35-40.2. Bonnett, C., &

Conference Session

Aerospace Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steve Gorrell, Brigham Young University; C. Greg Jensen, Brigham Young University; Brett Stone, Brigham Young University; Edward Red, Brigham Young University; Michael Richey, The Boeing Company; Fabian Zender, The Boeing Company; Michael Wright; David E. French, The Boeing Company; Shigeo Hayashibara, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott; Carl Johnson, Georgia Institute of Technology; John P. Sullivan, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

the conceptual design phase andabout 75% of the preliminary design phase. Teams had presented a Conceptual Design Reviewand Preliminary Design Review to the AerosPACE Advisory Board. The purpose of this sectionis to demonstrate what the multi-disciplinary, multi-university teams were able to accomplishafter one semester.Figure 4 shows Team 1’s interpretation of the UAV mission profile. Each team was asked torespond to the RFP and throughout the conceptual and preliminary design phases a clearunderstanding of the mission requirements was emphasized. Figure 4. Team 1 PDR RequirementsAn important outcome of the conceptual design phase is a constraint diagram to identify feasibledesign space based on takeoff, maximum

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University; John L. Falconer, University of Colorado Boulder; David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky; Bill Jay Brooks, Oregon State University; Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University; Christina Smith, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

the AIChE Concept Warehouse.References1. Halloun, I. and Hestenes, D. (1985). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics 53, 1043.2. Hestenes, David, Wells, Malcolm, and Swackhamer, Greg. (2002). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30,141.3. Mazur, E. (1997) Peer instruction, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.4. Evans, D. L., Gray, G. L., Krause, S., Martin, J., Midkiff, C., Notaros, B. M., et al. (2003). Progress on concept inventory assessment tools. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Engineering Conference, Boulder, CO.5. Rhoads, T. R., and Roedel, R. J. (1999). The wave concept inventory-a cognitive instrument based on Bloom's taxonomy. Proceedings

Conference Session

DEED Melange

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Libby Osgood P. Eng, Dalhousie University and University of Prince Edward Island; Clifton R Johnston P.Eng., Dalhousie University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. R., & Lee, H. S. (2010). Measuring engineering design self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 71-79.6 Zoltowski, C. B., Oakes, W. C., & Cardella, M. E. (2012). Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 28-59.7 Charyton, C. et al. (2011). Assessing creativity specific to engineering with the revised creative engineering design assessment. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 778-799.8 Schilling, W. W. (2012). Effective assessment of engineering design in an exam environment. Proceedings from the 2012 ASEE Conference.9 Sobek, D. K. (2002). Preliminary Findings from Coding Student Design Journals. Proceedings from the 2002 ASEE Conference.10 Nesbit, S

Conference Session

Sustainability

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James E. Wilcox , Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Multidisciplinary Engineering

learningoutcome into three components: reading comprehension [N/S LO2a], critical understanding [N/SLO2b], and informed judgment [N/S LO2c]. The blind evaluation used an aggregate figure [N/SLO2] for these three elements, which is compared against an average of the instructor’s threevalues at Times 1 and 3. This “critical understanding” learning outcome is the primary metric bywhich student performance was measured.In addition to course learning outcome evaluation, seven additional ASHE Education forSustainability (EfS) learning outcomes were assessed: 1) Each student will be able to define sustainability. [EfS LO1] 2) Each student will be able to explain how sustainability relates to their lives and their values, and how their actions impact

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University; Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington; Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University; Erno Lehtinen, University of Turku; Marja Vauras, Centre for Learning Research, University of Turku; Gavin Tierney, University of Washington; Simone E. Volet, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.We would also like to acknowledge all of the individuals who participated in the studiesassociated with this work. We would also like to acknowledge the people who supported thiswork with their time and help.References1. Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. M. 2008. Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355–368.2. Johri, A. and Olds, B. M. (2011), Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences. Journal of Engineering Education, 100: 151–185. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Giersch, Broad-based Knowledge; Flora P. McMartin, Broad-based Knowledge, LLC; Elizabeth Nilsen, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA); Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Phil Weilerstein, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA)

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Page 24.1144.3                                                                                                                1 Giersch, S., & McMartin, F. (2014). Promising Models and Practices to Support Change in Entrepreneurship Education. Epicenter TechnicalBrief 2. Stanford, CA and Hadley, MA: National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation. http://epicenter.stanford.edu/documents/1912.1 Selecting Resources through an Iterative Search and Review ProcessBbK team members employed an iterative search process using the web and reference databases(see Bibliography) from the library systems of New York University and the University ofCalifornia at Berkeley during June-July 2013.  During the first phase of assessing the searchresults