University. His research in- terests include low-power, reliable, and high-performance circuit design for nano-scale technologies. He has many publications in journals and conferences and 5 U.S. patents. He was a recipient of the 2008 SRC Inventor Recognition Award, the 2006 IEEE Circuits and Systems Society VLSI Transactions Best Paper Award, 2005 SRC Technical Excellence Award, and the Best Paper Award of the 2004 International Con- ference on Computer Design. He is a technical program committee member of International Symposium on Low Power Electronics Design and International Symposium on Quality Electronics Design.Dr. Hao Jiang, San Francisco State University Hao Jiang received the B.S. degree in materials sciences
adiscussion of best practices for NTT faculty career development and promotion in Fall2011. Promotional policies that have already been adopted at the University level will bediscussed, including those related to letters of support, expectations for national and internationalvisibility, and department voting. Future work at NCSU will focus on NTT faculty careerenrichment in addition to the development of more standard procedures for recognizing andevaluating the external impact of research, teaching, and outreach efforts of NTT faculty.Experiences of Women Faculty in STEMThere has been a renewed focus on exploring gender differences in academia. While increases infemale graduate students have occurred at the doctorate level, this has not translated
466 individualstudents attending the clubs at least once over the course of the grant period.Club structureRRRC clubs meet once per week for approximately one hour. During this time, the followingformat and structure is implemented: 1) Club meetings begin with an introduction to the main concept underlying the day’s lesson and activity. This introduction includes probing questions designed to gauge student comprehension and promote lesson engagement. 2) A multimedia presentation follows, delivered by engineering graduate and undergraduate student mentors. The presentation further elaborates on concepts from the STEM lesson and the relationship of these
Paper ID #9927Developing and Teaching a Multidisciplinary Course in Systems Thinking forSustainability: Lessons Learned through Two IterationsDr. Fazleena Badurdeen, University of Kentucky Fazleena Badurdeen is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and also affiliated to the In- stitute for Sustainable Manufacturing at University of Kentucky where she leads the Sustainable Manu- facturing Systems and Supply Chains Research Group. She is also the Director for Graduate Studies in Manufacturing Systems Engineering, a multidisciplinary program in the College of Engineering. With backgrounds in Engineering and
improvement efforts. The SEET’s multifaceted initiatives for improvingretention include several best-practice components, namely: 1) exposure to engineering practice through two new courses employing multidisciplinary projects8, presentations by practicing engineers, presentations by students involved in co- op education, and presentations by senior capstone design project students; 2) the development of the faculty mentoring program for first-year students; 3) the development of a peer mentoring program for first-year students; 4) the development of an industrial mentoring program for first-year students.We are implementing all four initiatives, and this paper focuses on initiative #3, peer mentoring
unstructuredintegrated projects in the core and elective courses of the ECE curriculum. Page 24.503.12Comprehensive curriculum integration will create and strengthen undergraduate engineeringeducation as follows: (a) Establish the laboratory facilities to deliver integrated skills (b) Adopt integrated projects across the ECE curriculum to enhance student learningAlthough research has shown the advantages of incorporating integrated projects into an ECEcurriculum, it is not yet widely accepted or practiced. The implementation of this curriculummodel and the careful assessment of its effectiveness will serve to guide others in best practicesthrough the
empirically tested in classrooms andwith practicing engineers [17, 19-21, 39-41]. These studies confirmed that the Design Heuristicswere useful in guiding engineering and design students and experts to develop less obvious andmore creative solutions, identify new design opportunities, and transform ideas into moreoriginal ones. Additionally, the studies provide support that this approach to helping studentssystematically approach idea generation is successful with students from introductory coursesthrough capstone course and graduate design courses [17, 39-40]. Based on the existing research,this tool was chosen to incorporate into a full-year capstone course, where students wereconstrained by industry-sponsored project descriptions and deliverables
Associate Dean of the Graduate College of Education. She teaches social science research courses and serves on the Executive Committee for the in the Ed.D. in Educational Leadership Program. She has researched the social functions of vernacular literacies and languages in a variety of multicultural contexts, such as the Eastern Caribbean, Navajo Nation, and the Southwest United States. Page 24.247.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Building technical capital in community college technology educationAbstract In spite of targeted efforts
all children, including those who are not minorities or children of poverty. Theimplementation of sound, research-based strategies that recognize the benefits ofdiversity can build a better future for all of us. Engineering curriculum and instruction inthe kindergarten to the twelfth grade classroom (K-12 engineering education) can serveas a vehicle to teach other content areas in a cross-curricular fashion.8 Additionally,certain engineering curricula have been found to impact learning in the specific contentareas of mathematics and science. 23 The Next Generation Science Standards 9 calls for a Page 24.36.4learning environment that is student
programs, andoutlines the current research on how design thinking processes could be taught and learned. Itexplores also the currently most-favored pedagogical model for teaching design, namely:Project-Based Learning (PBL). The paper identifies several contexts for PBL along with someavailable data on it success. Finally, the paper raises some of the questions that should beanswered to identify the most effective pedagogical practices of improving design learning.IntroductionDesign is widely considered to be the most distinguishing activity of engineering. It has also longbeen understood that engineering institutions should graduate engineers who could designeffectively to meet societal needs. Historically, engineering curricula have been based
design, facilitation and evaluation. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques in undergraduate classes (problem based learning, games and simulations, etc.) as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the Chemical and Petroleum Engineering as well as broader engineering curricu- lum. In addition, she is actively engaged in the development of a variety of informal science education approaches with the goal of exciting and teaching K-12 students about regenerative medicine and its potential.Dr. Renee M Clark, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Renee Clark serves as the Director of Assessment for the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of
solve engineering problems.f. Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.g. Ability to communicate effectively.h. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context.i. Recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning.j. Knowledge of contemporary issues.k. Ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Page 24.567.8Table 4. Student and Municipality Partner Survey Questions Student Survey1. What do you like best about this course?2. What do you like
Paper ID #9947The Innovation Competencies - Implications for Educating the Engineer ofthe FutureProf. William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Dean of Innovation and Engagement and Professor of Engineering Management at Rose- Hulman. He joined Rose-Hulman in 2001 and his teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, design, quality, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Prior to joining Rose-Hulman, his industry experience includes roles as cofounder and Chief Operating Officer at Montronix and development manager at Kennametal. Bill is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Illinois
, University of Limerick Diarmaid is a Lecturer in Technology Teacher Education at the University of Limerick. His research interests are in the areas of freehand sketching, cognition and spatial visualization. He is currently Director of Membership of the Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD).Dr. Aaron C. Clark, North Carolina State University Aaron C. Clark is a Professor of Technology, Design, and Engineering Education within the College of Education and is the Director of Graduate Programs and Associate Department Head for the Depart- ment of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education. He has worked in both industry and education. Dr. Clark’s teaching specialties are in visual theory, 3-D modeling
. The effects were observed in Page 24.468.5low earth orbit satellite constellations, automotive manufacturing plants, military equipment inIraq, and fashion and customer products.Despite the undergoing researches and their importance in industries, the concept of uncertaintyis not well known among engineering graduates. This is not because theories of uncertainty arenot numerically represented but because they are not usually included in a typical engineeringcurriculum7. For the special issue of the ASME Transaction: Journal of Mechanical Designdedicated to the topic of Design Under Uncertainty (DUU) 13, the editors indicated that no
technology graduate students to think morecreatively in a visual analytics system-design competition by collaborating with designers. In thesummer of 2013, two faculty members led a team organized by technology and design graduatestudents to work on a visual analytics system design and won the only two awards of“Outstanding Creative Design.” To investigate and learn from this interdisciplinary collaborationexperience, we purposely tracked and collected the design process information such as meetingminutes, white-board discussion photos, and development files at different stages from the verybeginning of the collaboration for analysis and review. The paper reviews this 7-week designprocess and specifically focuses on observing how the technology
decreasing rampup time. Proprietary research. Consulting services for universities providing information about the job readiness of their engineering graduates. Consulting services for industry providing assistance in improving their onboarding practices. Grant monies investigating new areas of interest.This business plan describes the initial set up and operation of the proposed coalition, whichwould occur over a time frame of 1 – 1.5 years.1 The authors are actively seeking other colleges of engineering who want to collaborate with Boise State University to set up the proposed coalition
engineering topics (ET) and 32 hours of math and basicscience (M&BS); a program that requires 120 credit hours for graduation must offer only 45hours of ET and 30 hours of M&BS; a program that required only 100 hours to graduate couldoffer only 37.5 hours of ET and 25 hours of M&BS without violating the EAC Criteria.The ASCE task committee opposed the continued use of this definition for three reasons: • Logically, the minimum required math, science, and engineering content of a baccalaureate-level engineering curriculum should be absolute, given that the graduates of all programs are being prepared to enter the same profession. It seems illogical that, to enter engineering practice, the graduate of a 100-hour program
for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University - Engineering Education Kurt Becker is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University and the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded project exploring
; new technology research and development; technology management; projectbidding and scheduling; process improvement; system conceptualization, design and re-design;engineering operations management; industrial training, representation and sales; and manymore! A degree in ET can also set graduates on the way to career choices in business, law ormedicine.The challenge for a prospective or current student is to rely on their experience, do some “soulsearching”, and seek advice to help them assess their own skills, abilities, and interests thatmatch the academic expectations of a particular degree plan.The challenge for industry recruiters is to carefully evaluate the competencies required toperform specific functional engineering tasks and match
identity construction. Her current projects include a cross-national collaboration focused on supporting productive disciplinary engagement in complex STEM contexts (including engineering and environmental science): the Science Across Virtual Institutes (SAVI) collaboration with OSU and UTU reported here, sponsored by NSF, the Academy of Finland, and TEKES. Dr. Nolen is a member of the Knowledge-in-Action research group in the UW LIFE Center. In collab- oration with teachers and districts, the KIA group is developing engaging, rigorous, project-based AP courses for high school students using a design-based implementation research framework.Dr. Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University Debra Gilbuena is a postdoctoral
educators, and teacher education university faculty wrote the content for T2I2. Parallelingmany of the themes and requirements of National Board Certification in Career and TechnicalEducation, the T2I2 content uniquely addresses best practices in teaching within a technology andengineering context.The content is divided into 17 Learning Objects, which are research-based guides for readers tolearn about specific topics in teaching and their classroom applications. The Learning Objectsare situated within the context of learning through inquiry, centered on engineering design-basedproblem solving strategies, while maintaining alignment with the NBPTS. The Learning Objectsfall under one of four Units, whose titles directly align with the four National
the students graduate, andthey become employees or entrepreneurs.The Bottom Line:You may ask: “How were you able to form a team of volunteer professionals willing to commitsubstantial time and their expertise in a university’s educational undertaking?” Possibly it’saltruism; possibly it’s a faith-based reason; possibly it’s the excitement of new productdevelopment; possibly it’s the ability to interface with the best and brightest of a succeedinggeneration; or possibility it’s for the potential of a benefit that each individual personally holds.Probably; however, it’s the same reason each of the readers of this paper is involved inengineering education: “The assignment is for you to fill in your own answer
. Andthe new Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure (ISI) was formed in 2011 to bring a newprofessional sustainability credentialing and project certification framework to the civilinfrastructure engineering profession.Paralleling the development of sustainability in civil engineering practice, approaches to teachsustainability concepts in the civil engineering curriculum also have been created. Initial interestwas partly driven by sustainability being added as part of the ABET accreditation criteria for allbaccalaureate level programs, specifically Criterion 3 (Program Outcomes). Criterion 3(c) statesthat programs must demonstrate their students attain: “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
as a part of their ownengineering identity. The PIP uses a continuous improvement process similar to that used inengineering design, but now applied to the individual rather than to a product or process. Withthese attributes in mind, we believe the PIP is a best practice that could be adopted in anyengineering education. Whether it is at the department level, course level, or for special cohortssuch as honors programs, adaptation of the PIP can serve to benefit any engineering student inthe pursuit of her or his degree.6. References1. Jackson, Norman. "Personal development planning: what does it mean?" Higher Education Academy from http://www. heacademy. ac. uk/ourwork/teachingandlearning (2001).2. Clegg, Sue, and Sally Bradley
Paper ID #10640A Proposed Dynamic Model for Education in Construction Project PlanningMrs. Kristen Caroline Hurtado, Arizona State University Kristen is a current PhD candidate in Construction Management at Arizona State University in the School of Sustainable Engineering in the Built Environment. She is also pursuing a Graduate Certificate in In- structional Design and Performance Improvement in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College. Kristen has experience teaching applied statics and estimating at the undergraduate level. She also instructs profes- sionals in her work and research in value-based project delivery. The main
communicate effectively; (h) the broad educationnecessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic,environmental, and societal context; (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability toengage in life-long learning; and (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues. Often thesenontechnical skills do not receive as much emphasis in undergraduate engineeringeducation and instead must be learned on the job, learning "soft skills the hard way" 2.Opportunities do exist in current engineering curricula to better integrate the developmentof these nontechnical skills into students' experience. These include team projects incapstone design and freshman design courses, engineering study abroad courses, servicelearning projects in both
. Also, they indicated that researching online was a very good tool to use for theproject. Francisco mentioned that using search engines, forums, and warehouse websites wouldgive them the information they needed to work on the project, including specifications that mustbe taken into consideration.Selecting the Best SolutionThe next step in their design process was to decide whether the doors would opensimultaneously, or not. One of the reasons they determined this was important was the traffic ofstudents in the hallway. If the doors were not opened simultaneously, the amount of studentstrying to pass through the doors every class period would block the passage for the students withdisabilities. They reached a conclusion to have the doors open
developeda basic 6-step AHP-based creativity process, shown in Table 2, to teach design creativity toundergraduate engineering students. Table 2. The Proposed AHP-based Creativity ProcessStep 1. Knowledge CollectionThe mission requirements for the targeted design question will be introduced to the class. The reference materialsof the domain knowledge and technology should be made available to students.Step 2. Concept GenerationStudents are encouraged to discuss as a team and propose possible design concepts to fulfill the missionrequirements. Students are encouraged to record their discussions and make the sketches of the proposed designs.Step 3. Criteria GenerationPossible criteria used to weight and select the best design
Holes, excerpt (AISC, 2011)9. (Q2) Recalculate Anchor Bolt Diameters and Plate Thickness under Alternative Scenario. Students are asked to recalculate the bolt diameters and plate thickness under a new scenario in which the pole is assumed to undergo impact due to a collision with a truck. Using an equivalent static force V = 400 Kip as per AASHTO 201010 that represents an isolated special load of truck collision at the bottom of the post, students were required to design the number and diameter of anchor bolts based on a the equivalent direct lateral shear strength resisted by the bolt cross sections (Figure 2e), and the plate thickness using similar reasoning as above. For this case, Figure 2e. ASTM the maximum number of