, offering valuable insights into the design and implementation ofprograms that aim to diversify the clean energy workforce and address equity gaps in education.Keywords: Clean Energy, STEM Education, Career Trajectories, Hands-On, Summer CampIntroductionThe escalating impacts of climate change and the need for sustainable practices underscore theurgent global push towards a low-carbon economy. Clean energy and decarbonization are pivotalin mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and ensuring long-term environmental stability. Derivedfrom renewable, zero-emission sources such as solar and wind, clean energy minimizes harm tothe environment while ensuring resource sustainability. Decarbonization complements this effortby employing strategies and
consumerproduct applications focused on wellness, which may overlap with similar, but highly regulated medicaldevices. Offered since 2017, the course has impacted approximately 120 students. The course takes placeduring a 3-hour studio block which consists of lectures, individual skill-building activities, and groupproject work. Assessment of learning outcomes for accreditation, student feedback, and instructors'reflections are presented. The course's iterative history, curricular benefits, and best practices forimplementation are discussed. Commentary on syllabi, outcomes, logistics, COVID-19 adaptations, andonline resources provides insights for programs interested in replicating this innovative approach tobiomedical engineering education. 1
three courses—CEGR 324(Software for StructuralAnalysis and Design), TRSS 301(Transportation Systems), and CEGR 628(Bridge Engineering)—revealed significant changes in teaching practices before and after instructors participated in theCommunity of Practice training during the summer of 2024.Research Question 1: What impact does the fusion of COPUS and COI tools have,quantitatively and qualitatively, on addressing inequities in classroom participation?The integration of the COPUS and COI tools provided a comprehensive evaluation of classroomdynamics in TRSS 301 and additional insights from CEGR 324 and CEGR 628, showcasingpatterns in both positive and negative practices.Before Training: The results of the COPUS observation shown in Figure 2
National Space Research and Development Agency (NASRDA), Favour has contributed to significant advancements in spacecraft design, optimizing fuel consumption and increasing payload capacity. Favour’s professional journey also includes roles such as Aircraft Maintenance Engineer with the Nigerian Airforce, where he enhanced aircraft performance and safety through advanced maintenance techniques. Additionally, he has worked as a Graduate Assistant for the Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship (SURF) at Purdue, mentoring young researchers and coordinating program logistics. His interdisciplinary skills span across engineering, project management, and data analysis, making him well-suited for the evolving needs of
experiences in K-16 settings. His primary interests in research are class environments in teaching and performance improvements based on the team work and team alignment in cons ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Strengthening Ethics Education for Construction Engineering and Management StudentsBACKGROUNDThe construction industry stands a cornerstone of the U.S. economy, employing millions andshaping the built environment [1]. Its significance extends beyond economic impact, influencingcommunities and ecosystems [2]. This dynamic sector has witnessed a diversification ofoperations, encompassing design, renovation, maintenance, supply chain management, anddemolition
included the low use of key student support offices, low rates of remedial coursework,and low rates of veteran/SSM students in adverse academic standing.Areas for future research would include a deeper investigation into why these support offices areunderutilized and what can be done to enhance their accessibility. Particularly, exploring thebarriers to veteran/SSM engagement in key services is crucial to enhancing their impact andeffectiveness for continued student success [5]. For example, is lack of engagement due to aperceived lack of value, perceptions that these services lack awareness of the needs ofveteran/SSM students, or perhaps they already have established services through otherorganizations, such as the VA. Additionally, results from
, user research, and problem framing, helping them refine their work. Peer assessmentsencouraged reflection and accountability, fostering collaboration and teamwork. Summativeassessments evaluated final deliverables such as prototypes and design reports for technicalquality, creativity, and user-centeredness, with rubrics aligned to ABET criteria ensuringconsistent grading standards.Faculty support was essential for successful course integration. Professional developmentopportunities, including workshops on iterative prototyping and incorporating user feedback,helped instructors build their capacity to teach HCD principles. A shared repository of casestudies, teaching materials, and best practices enabled faculty to incorporate these
engineering attrition among female students [20].Beyond course difficulties, internalized societal stereotypes contribute to lower self-efficacyand higher fear of failure, which negatively impact persistence [21]. Many female studentshesitate to ask for help, fearing it will reinforce gendered perceptions of competence gaps.Without visible academic support systems, these challenges can lead to disengagement andeventual withdrawal from the program. Structured academic interventions are essential tomitigate these challenges and improve retention. Research has shown that female studentswho receive mentorship from female role models report increased confidence, a strongersense of belonging, and higher persistence rates in engineering programs [22
Paper ID #46314Programming as an Engineering Tool in K-12: e4usa+Programming. Introducingthe Purple ThreadDr. Kenneth Reid, University of Indianapolis Kenneth Reid is the Associate Dean and Director of Engineering at the R. B. Annis School of Engineering at the University of Indianapolis. He and his coauthors were awarded the Wickenden award (Journal of Engineering Education, 2014) and Best Paper award, Educational Research and Methods Division (ASEE, 2014). He was awarded an IEEE-USA Professional Achievement Award (2013) for designing the B.S. degree in Engineering Education. He is a co-PI on the ”Engineering for Us All
-Champaign. He creates and researches new opportunities for accessible and inclusive equitable education.Prof. Yuting W. Chen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Yuting W. Chen received the B.S. degree from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in 2007, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 2009 and 2011, all in Electrical Engineering. She is currently a Teaching Associate Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering and the Director of Women in Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her current interests include recruitment and retention of under-served students in STEM, leadership development for undergraduate and graduate students, and curriculum
hinder or support success. The research aims to identify patterns in enrollment, retention, and graduation rates, whilealso uncovering the cultural, financial, and structural factors that impact student persistence. Earlyevidence points to the importance of mentorship, community-based support systems, and targetedoutreach efforts that raise awareness of construction management as a viable and rewarding career.HBCUs—despite challenges with funding and accreditation—have a proven track record ofproducing Black STEM graduates and are well positioned to lead the charge in diversifying theconstruction management workforce. Findings from this study will inform a framework of best practices for enhancing HBCUCEPs and increasing African
Paper ID #45886Automated Analysis of Knowledge Types in Computer Science Textbooks: ANatural Language Processing Approach to Understanding Epistemic ClimateMitchell Gerhardt, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Mitchell Gerhardt is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education and a M.S. student in Computer Science at Virginia Tech. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and worked as a software engineer for General Motors in Detroit, Michigan, before returning to graduate school. Mitchell’s research focuses on learning in STEM graduate education; in particular, how graduate students recognize and learn the
comfortable offering detailed feedback [3].2 MethodThis paper presents a continued study (Part II) on how design review can be used in practice formechanical engineering, instructor observations of lessons learned, and graduate teachingassistant (TA) observations from lab sessions. An earlier cohort of students in ME 347 haveused the same design review process, but students had a new design challenge in Project 1:create a custom design for a manufacturing company who wants an action character or fidget toythat has moving parts which are marketed toward college students.The method used in the study is an anonymous Qualtrics survey. The main constructsinvestigated in the survey include student mindset, benefits of design review, impact on
interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering.Dr. Ivan E. Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University Ivan E. Esparragoza is a Professor of Engineering at Penn State. His interests are in engineering design education, innovative design, global design, and global engineering education, professional skills in engineering, curricular innovation, and program assessment.Dr. Jennifer X Wu Jennifer Wu is the Director of Engineering Institutional Research and Associate Research Professor in the College of Engineering at Penn State. She has a PhD in Educational Administration from the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. Prior to her current ©American Society for
Paper ID #48827BOARD #150: WIP More than its parts: Insights from cultivating a multidisciplinarynetwork for entrepreneurship and communicationProf. Mark Blaine, University of Oregon Mark Blaine is a professor of practice who works at the intersection of storytelling and science, producing stories, developing experiential courses, and training scientists with audience analysis, strategic communication, and storytelling tools. He also works with media researchers to translate their work to best practices in science communication for journalists and strategic communications teams. At the Knight Campus, he has designed a
be trained appropriately with the requisite nuclear knowledge andskills at the university level to meet future workforce demands (Baradaran et. al., 2024).While formal education at UNSW provides foundational knowledge, ANSTO is whereindispensable practical experience is gained. The workplace plays a fundamental role inproviding experience for engineering graduates (Baradaran et. al, 2024). Therefore, there is aneed to understand what learning takes place in the workplace and the specific tasks andactivities that nuclear engineers undertake within their roles at ANSTO, to uncover the corecompetencies and create educational programs that align with workforce needs.Competency, in terms of Knowledge, Skill and Ability refers to the integrated
as a transformative force in higher education, fundamentallychanging how students engage with knowledge. While often simply defined as "learning bydoing," experiential learning encompasses a rich variety of approaches including project-basedwork, community engagement, design challenges, laboratory investigations, and problem-basedlearning. What distinguishes these educational experiences is their open-ended, authenticnature—they provide structured scaffolding but lack predetermined solutions or pathways,mirroring the complexity students will encounter in professional practice.The impact of experiential learning in engineering education is particularly significant, as itbridges the persistent gap between theory and practice. Research
Paper ID #46649Strategies for Risk Management and Mitigation in Faculty-led CoursesDr. Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University Yanjun Yan is a Professor in Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University. Her research interests include engineering education, artificial intelligence, swarm robotics, and statistical signal processing. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Strategies for Risk Management and Mitigation in Faculty-led CoursesAbstractInternational exchanges are exciting opportunities for students and faculty, while risk management andrisk mitigation are critical
broader understandings of student success in engineering. Justin completed their Ph.D. in Engineering Education (’22) and M.S. in Aeronautics and Astronautics (’21) at Purdue University, and two B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and Secondary Mathematics Education at the University of Nevada, Reno (’17). Atop their education, Justin is a previous NSF Graduate Research Fellow and has won over a dozen awards for research, service, and activism related to marginalized communities, including the 2020 ASEE ERM Division Best Diversity Paper for their work on test anxiety. As a previous homeless and food-insecure student, Justin is eager to challenge and change engineering engineering education to be a pathway for socioeconomic
2023 and is currently an undergraduate student in Materials Science at the University of Oxford. His research interests lie in nanofabrication and characterization. Previously, he contributed to research on artificial synapses utilizing electrolyte-gated transistors. He is currently focused on the surface passivation of solar cells to improve their efficiency and durability.Gyuseok L. Kim, University of Pennsylvania Gyuseok Kim is a Lecturer in the Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering and the Director of Workforce Development at the Singh Center for Nanotechnology at the University of Pennsylvania. He manages the graduate student fellow (GSF) program that is designed to give Penn Master’s students
., works for Communication across the Curriculum (CxC) at Louisiana State University (LSU). She is a Ph.D. candidate in LSUˆa C™s cultural geography and anthropology program, and has over 10 years of qualitative research and teaching ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Celebrating 20 Years of the Engineering Communication Studio at Louisiana State UniversityAbstractThis practice paper reviews the 20-year history of the Engineering Communication Studio(Studio) at Louisiana State University (LSU), highlighting its role in improving communicationskills among engineering students to promote leadership, teamwork, and understanding ethicaland professional
] O. Noroozi, S. Soleimani, M. Farrokhnia, and S. K. Banihashem, “Generative ai in education: Pedagogical, theoretical, and methodological perspectives.” International Journal of Technology in Education, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 373–385, 2024.[12] M. Nyaaba, “Transforming teacher education in developing countries: The role of generative ai in bridging theory and practice,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10718, 2024.[13] Y. Wu, “Integrating generative ai in education: how chatgpt brings challenges for future learning and teaching,” Journal of Advanced Research in Education, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 6–10, 2023.[14] S. Shetye, “An evaluation of khanmigo, a generative ai tool, as a computer-assisted language learning app,” Studies in
Paper ID #45807Examining the Effects of Gender on Capstone Team CohesionMadeline JoAnna Szoo, Northeastern University Madeline Szoo is a 5th year undergraduate Chemical Engineering and Biochemistry major at Northeastern University (graduation May 2025). She is the current President of the Northeastern University Chapter of Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Honor Society, and outside of engineering education research, she studies the development of predictive vascularized tumor models for preclinical assays. She plans to pursue her PhD in Biomedical Engineering starting Fall 2025.Dr. Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern
presented would be beneficial to other programsenvisioning introducing environmental data science into their curriculum. It is anticipated that athorough examination of the course's features, and course synergy-enhancing factors would helpto develop a guideline for environmental data science curriculum development, implementation,and evaluation in environmental engineering. Future research on the impact of data science onstudents’ performance in subsequent courses, ABET student outcomes, graduation rates, andemployability is warranted.Funding statementThis work is funded by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Award Number AWD-03D09024.References[1] S. Scher, “Toward data-driven weather and climate forecasting: Approximating a simple
encountered, and howwe can build on existing efforts to create a more inclusive and socially responsible engineeringeducation. Hess et al. and Lafferty et al. suggest that incorporating the principle of justice is crucial,as it serves as a foundation for upholding DEI and is closely tied to the ethical responsibilities ofengineers [2], [4].At a time when DEI initiatives face increasing scrutiny and resistance in public higher education,particularly in the current sociopolitical climate, this research serves as an essential tool to informeducators, policymakers, and accreditation bodies on best practices for embedding JEDI principlesin engineering curricula. Ensuring that future engineers are equipped to serve and advocate fordiverse communities is
successful role models? 3. How is the PDM measured? 4. What are the environmental success factors for a PDM? 5. What are the best practices of a PDM? 6. What are the challenges and risks? 7. How PDMs are selected and what are the typical career paths? 8. How do companies train PDMs and grow their skills and competences? 9. Which external standards related to product management are used? 10. Are external certifications used for product management?These researchers then described challenges the PDM needs to address. They are: 1. Dysfunctional organization with unclear responsibilities and silo work which results in continuously changing focus and schedules. 2. No standardized processes across the company with a slow and
(PMP). Paul is currently completing a M.Sc. in Engineering Education at the University of Saskatchewan, studying the career pathways of engineering graduates.Dr. Jason Grove P.E., University of Waterloo Jason Grove is the Graduate Attributes Lecturer in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Waterloo. He is responsible for leading the continuous program assessment improvement process for the chemical and nanotechnology engineering prDr. Carolyn G. MacGregor P.Eng., University of Waterloo Carolyn MacGregor is the Associate Dean, Teaching for the Faculty of Engineering and an Associate Professor in the Department of Systems Design Engineering at the University of Waterloo. Prof. MacGregor has been
programsoptimize curricula to prepare students for a data-driven profession.Engineering identity is a dynamic construct evolving throughout students' academic experiences,encompassing technical competence and a sense of belonging in the engineering community [4],[5]. Key factors include performance/competence beliefs, interest, and recognition from peers andmentors [6]. Meanwhile, data skills have become crucial for engineering graduates [2], thoughintegrating data science into engineering curricula varies across institutions [9]. Recent studies [1],[7], [8] have begun exploring the link between data proficiency and engineering identity, butfurther research is needed to clarify how specific data skills influence identity formation.Understanding how
naturalistic driving and older driver fitness assessment.Dr. Kate Mercer, University of Waterloo Dr. Kate Mercer graduated with a Master of Information from the University of Toronto, and a PhD in Pharmacy from the University of Waterloo, focusing on communicating health information. Kate is the liaison librarian for Systems Design Engineering and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Waterloo where her job includes collaborating with faculty, staff, and students to effectively provide instruction and support and conduct research. By providing support around subject-specific and interdisciplinary research Kate both supports and collaborates in driving research forward. At the University of Waterloo, Kate works on
MedicalProfessionalism Best Practices: Addressing Burnout and Resilience in Our Profession, R. L.Byyny, R. Byyny, S. Christensen & J. D. Fish, Ed. Aurora, Colorado, Alpha Omega AlphaHonor Medical Society, 2020.[15] D. M. Mertens, Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 4th ed.. SagePublications Inc., 2015.[16] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing AmongFive Approaches, 4th ed., Sage Publications Inc., 2018.[17] D. Bobbett, K. Jensen, J. Sanders, L. Martini, and M. V. Huerta, “Work in Progress: Designand Preliminary Results of a Survey to Explore Relationships Between Faculty Mentoring,Engineering Doctoral Student Psychological Safety, and Work Outcomes,” presented at the 2024ASEE Annual Conference