-eligible at time of admission to the universitydue to their mid-level ACT/SAT scores, INNOV scholars lived in the honors residence hall. Thisliving among high achieving students fostered an environment of collaborative academicachievement as well as a quality social environment with access to enrichment programs. LessonLearned: Although the enrichment activities added tremendous value, it was also important tobalance group activities with opportunities for individual reflection to accommodate differentneeds and preferences within the community.Peer Mentoring: INNOV scholars are mentored by upper-level Path students during their first twoyears, then they can serve as peer mentors their junior and senior years. Lesson Learned: Peermentors needed
, Tufts University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 CAREER: An Integrated Framework for Examining Contextual Influences on Faculty Pedagogical Decision Making and Student Learning in Design EducationIntroductionRecently, the ways that emerging technologies, such as generative AI, social media algorithms,and predictive analytics, reflect, propagate, and exacerbate systems of inequality has made theimpact of engineering decisions on people and society an issue of national importance [1-2]. As aresult, scholars have called on engineering educators to facilitate learning experiences thatchallenge engineering as a technocentric discipline towards pedagogical practices that fosterstudents
directly to designing solutions, emphasizing the need for moreextensive investigation into the nuances of inequity. This was not a denial of inequity itself butrather a reflection of an intense focus on comprehensively mapping its complexities beforeacting. While these committees successfully drove slight but notable progress, they also revealedpersistent resistance to institutional change, highlighting the need for continued efforts to addresshesitations and build consensus around actionable solutions.Insights from the Factorial ExperimentThe factorial experiment revealed significant preferences in tenure and promotion evaluations,emphasizing the need for systemic interventions. Research excellence, scored on a 1–5 scale,reflects how a surveyed
initial portfolio will include written reflections on areas of leadership theywould like to pursue or develop throughout the fellowship. The course instructors and co-PIs willmeet monthly through the spring with the Fellows with master’s to provide opportunity forface-to-face reflection and collaboration.ConclusionThe Noyce project, “Partnering to Prepare STEM Master Teachers for Michigan's MiddleSchools” at MTU and NMU will directly address the shortage of middle school STEM teachersin Michigan by developing and retaining teacher leaders within the state. By integrating PARprojects into their classrooms, the project will have the secondary effect of inspiring the nextgeneration of STEM scholars in Michigan.Funding AcknowledgementThe work
tothese problems. Furthermore, this pedagogy is predicated on moving beyond traditional ethicstraining which often adopts some form of procedural ethics, that which refers to bad behavior inresearch or the workplace, and incorporates extrinsic ethics and intrinsic ethical thought [3]. Insummary, traditional case-based pedagogy in engineering ethics often presents students withpredefined scenarios and solutions, encouraging them to identify ethical issues but frequentlylimiting deeper exploration of how ethical and technical considerations interact. In contrast,ethical-epistemic analysis engages students in actively examining how knowledge productionand ethical concerns are intertwined, fostering a more integrated and reflective approach toproblem
the program's significant role in preparing studentsfor the demands of a data-driven, interdisciplinary workforce.Interns’ responses to surveys reveal three core areas of growth that illustrate DIFUSE’stransformative impact: development of professional and interpersonal skills, strengthening oftechnical knowledge, and achievement of personal and professional goals. These interconnectedoutcomes demonstrate how the program holistically supports interns’ professional development.Development of Professional and Interpersonal Skills: Collaborative projects help interns buildessential workplace skills such as teamwork, leadership, and communication. Student A reflects,“The program improved my teamwork skills and gave me useful insight into working
(ENG) through the Engineering Diversity Activities(EDA) program. During Year 0 and Year 1, the team planned and piloted an innovative, project-based learning program. The student feedback and short-term outcomes from the initial pilotwere positive. However, as the team reflected on what is needed to educate today’s engineeringstudents to address the engineering problems of tomorrow it became clear that there was morework to be done. The goal of the overarching project was to reimagine engineering education through ahands-on, project-based curriculum. Specifically, the team set out to design its programscentering four evidence-based practices: (1) A sense of mission explicitly centered onsustainability and equity, (2) hands-on teamwork
in surveys, interviews, classroom observations, courseconsultations, and focus groups. Results highlighted commonly used student-centered strategies,including connecting content to real-life applications, encouraging peer interaction, using visualaids, and providing timely feedback. Innovative practices such as debates, “quiet” problem-solving, and intentional errors were also observed. Course consultations led to actionablerecommendations, including diversifying teaching strategies, aligning materials withaccreditation standards, and supporting team dynamics. A summer workshop further enabledfaculty to reflect on and adopt these strategies. Future efforts will focus on scaling impactthrough cross-departmental workshops at an R1 land-grant
teachers (PETs) followed a structured process to model four phenomena: 1. Observations and Hypothesis: PETs observed a phenomenon, created drawings of their observations and initial hypotheses, reflected on questions, and developed a driving question for the unit. 2. Collaborative Sensemaking: In groups, PETs used whiteboards to represent their understanding, refine their ideas, and discuss scientific concepts
, which “affirms,rearticulates, and provides a vehicle for expressing in public a consciousness that quite oftenalready exists” [3]. The experiences that Black women have in STEM higher education aresimilar to those of Black women who enter other traditionally white spaces. With this in mind,our research questions are: 1) In what ways and to what extent is the interruption of undergraduate Black women in STEM reflective of the structural and systemic oppression of Black women in the United States? 2) How do undergraduate Black women in STEM process the phenomenon of interruption in STEM education?Data CollectionThe mixed methods approach that we use to uncover the experiences of interruption by Blackwomen in STEM is
in the retention of engineering doctoral students: diversity, perceived culturaldiversity, authenticity, psychological safety, psychosocial safety, mastery, performance,organizational support, and sexual harassment climates. We explored how power and inequalityare embedded in or emphasized by those nine climates and provided guidance for futureempirical work on organizational climate in engineering doctoral education to inform leadershipefforts in promoting the retention of students from historically excluded groups. This paperpresents a framework of nine focused climates and the perceptions captured or reflected in 23sources representing 19 studies.We collected initial pilot study data and reported the development procedures [8] for a multi
theirstudents and the everyday and cultural resources they bring that can serve as a foundation forlearning [20], and perhaps most importantly, to engage with peers in reflective and curiousinquiry about the ways their teaching could support learning and development.Together, these theories explain how collective engagement and shared practices can becultivated to foster cultural shifts and policy changes within organizations that directly addresspower dynamics and avoid perpetuating inequities.InstantiationWe instantiated these theories into our change efforts by initiating a call for proposals thatprovided examples of research-based teaching approaches. For instance, the call encouragedfaculty to propose “classroom transformations that foster student
[1], [2], [3]. Over time, researchers have gained a nuancedunderstanding of how international student status affects various dimensions of academic life,including mental health, psychosocial well-being, cultural adaptation, and feelings of belonging[4], [5]. Qualitative studies have added depth to this picture, highlighting how students undergopersonal and identity shifts through their interactions with new social systems, unfamiliarenvironments, and internal reflections on their past and aspirations for the future. These changesdon’t happen in isolation but emerge through a complex web of experiences that unfold acrossdifferent stages and destinations.Much of the existing scholarship has concentrated on individuals pursuing long
names de-identifiedfor publication purposes.Each participant was given a definition of mentorship to help guide their reflection on themeaning of mentorship during the interview. As defined by the National Academies of Sciences,Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), “mentorship is a professional, working alliance in whichindividuals work together over time to support the personal and professional growth,development, and success of the relational partners through the provision of career andpsychosocial support.” [10, p. 2] Next, participants were asked to draw a sociogram that reflectedtheir social networks of people whom they work closely with and feel comfortable talking to.Once they drew the sociogram, the interviewer asked questions about their
theconcepts, music was used as a thread for the program. Contextualized courses have been foundto improve student confidence and learning (Govindasamy et al., 2018) and tackling engineeringdesign problems has been shown to increase engineering identity and persistence (Gray et al.,2021; Morelock, 2017). Through the STEM course students: 1. Used mathematics to solve engineering and physics related problems; 2. Built and tuned a thumb piano; 2. Used breadboards to create an electric circuit and an electronic piano; 3. Reflected on their own learning.Some of the materials for the FYSEP program were adapted from a highly successfulMathematical Concepts in Engineering course that was created and taught by one of the authors.ALL students who
engineeringpractice. These courses emphasize the application of engineering knowledge in complex, open-ended problem-solving scenarios. Students often work collaboratively in teams, reflecting thecollaborative nature of modern engineering, and produce tangible deliverables such as prototypesor detailed project reports. Capstone courses also require students to consider real-world factorssuch as economic constraints, environmental impacts, and societal needs [7]. Industry orcommunity engagement is a common feature, with external clients providing practical challengesand broadening the scope of learning [2], [8]. Furthermore, these courses demand iterative designprocesses, critical reflection, and comprehensive assessments that evaluate both the final
., textbooks, internet, computationalplatforms such as MATLAB, …), except for interaction with non-team members. At the timethese interviews were administered, generative AI was neither as mature nor as easily accessibleas it is presently.The situation for developing a team response as described above sought to emulate, to first order,an authenticity found more widely in engineering as practiced outside of the traditionalclassroom environment, including, but not limited to a) small team dynamics in addressing problems of moderate complexity, moderate ambiguity, and moderate solution duration, b) a comparatively long (relative to a timed exam) time for response to the prompt, reflecting lower time-pressure in formulation of a response to
, which is negative three minus eight should equal -17. So negative nine minus eight equals -17. Yeah, that's correct because this is 17.”The participant’s consistent monitoring, evaluation, and adjustment of problem-solving strategieshighlight their expertise in self-regulation. This active engagement in monitoring, regulating, andevaluating strategies significantly contributes to successful problem-solving outcomes.V. Conclusions Quadrant 1, referred to as “Impeccable Learning” where both the problem-solving process characterized by high levels of metacognitive knowledge about tasks (MKT) and effective monitoring and evaluation (ME) and the resulting solution, reflected in outstanding task performance, are highly successful. In
draft plan content. Remarkably, roughly 80% of the School’s faculty and staff participated inthe in-person retreat, which effectively served as a final editing session of the strategic plancontent. Combined with the previous continual engagement with the School’s key constituents,this final retreat served as an important reflection and buy-in session that effectively codified theplan content as well as the inclusion of the RED and KEEN-related initiatives. Afterincorporating this final set of feedback, the School’s strategic plan was formally launched in Fall2022 via printed and digital collateral and a launch event for faculty, staff, and students.RED and KEEN content in the strategic planFigure 1 presents a brief summary of the themes
-basedapproaches may establish a relatively didactic and passive learning environment for students. Onthe contrary, students are immersed in a practical and active learning environment throughexperiential learning, which can potentially reinforce their understanding of knowledge. Themost prestigious experiential learning theory was proposed by Kolb, who defined experientiallearning as “the process whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience”[15]. Kolb’s experiential learning theory depicts a cyclic model of learning, including (i)concrete experience, (ii) reflective observation, (iii) abstract conceptualization, and (iv) activeexperimentation [15]. Specifically, the cycle initializes with concrete experiences, meaninglearners
trends of its integration into industrytools seeking to enhance productivity. In doing so, it also contributes meaningfully to theirprofessional development.Keywords: AI in Education, In-class Coding Assistance, Student Engagement, Real-timeFeedback, Enhanced Learning,IntroductionThe rapid advancement of technology has reshaped how education is delivered, with artificialintelligence playing an increasingly pivotal role. One such AI-driven innovation is ChatGPT 4.0,a sophisticated language model developed by OpenAI. Since its debut in November 2022 [1], thistool has been widely utilized in academic settings, significantly impacting various fields of study.Its evolution reflects a broader trend in AI, where intelligent systems are
open-ended feedback to identify team leaders or pinpoint students inneed of additional support. Meanwhile, robust prompt design allows instructors or researchers totailor LLMs for specific instructional goals, though the field continues to refine best practices inprompt-engineering [9].Within higher education, peer evaluation and feedback play critical roles in developing students’teamwork abilities and self-reflection skills. Tools such as CATME (Comprehensive Assessmentof Team Member Effectiveness) facilitate structured peer rating and feedback, ensuring that eachteam member’s contributions are accounted for [11][12]. However, while numeric ratings givebroad insight into performance, the sheer volume of qualitative comments can
, faculty members at theseinstitutions sought a grading system that would better reflect students’ comprehension andsupport their academic growth. Standards-based grading (SBG) was implemented to meet theseneeds by shifting the focus away from partial credit accumulation and toward a more meaningfulassessment of learning.SBG was adopted in College Algebra courses to encourage students to master specific learningobjectives through an iterative process of reassessment. Unlike traditional weighted averagegrading (WAG), SBG emphasizes mastery of content, giving students multiple opportunities todemonstrate their understanding. This paper will present a statistical analysis between studentoutcomes in SBG and WAG college algebra courses.Supported by
training, and partner development. These business achievements are reflected in his academic activities through the designing of lectures and mobility programs with practical implementation perspectives. Ishizaki has been actively presenting and publishing his academic achievements at international conferences in the Asia Pacific region and North America such as APAIE, WERA, and NAFSA. He earned a Master of Business Administration majoring in international business at the University of Southern California in the United States of America, and a Bachelor in Law at Hitotsubashi University in Japan.Rumi Okazaki, School of Architecture, Shibaura Institute of TechnologyProf. Ikuro SHIMIZU, Shibaura Institute of Technology Ikuo
thecountry that the participant is from. Once the weight of the marbles has reached a critical value,the tree will shake, making the leaves fall. The hope is by increasing the number of stories weleave; we will increase the hope that the tree of Hope survives.Using a collaborative collage shaped like a tree, this work invites collective reflection on the roleof engineers in perpetuating or challenging violence. Each leaf symbolizes a story orcommitment to peace, while the tree’s periodic "shaking" represents systemic disruptions. Byfostering community engagement, the project reimagines engineering as a force for justice,advocating for responsive pedagogy and transformative practices in engineering education.This paper explores how engineering
analyzed through a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches.Quantitative methods included the use of bar and pie charts to represent categorical data as wellas box plots to illustrate responses from Likert scale questions. Qualitative methods involvedgenerating word clouds using NVivo 14, with the size of each word reflecting its frequency inthe text. NVivo 14 is a specialized qualitative analysis software that enhances transparency andreliability of the findings by providing advanced tools for data syntheses [25].To validate the consistency, reliability, and adequacy of the data, the authors conducted three keystatistical tests. First, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test assessed the sample adequacy, with athreshold of 0.6 or higher
, including reflections on the usage ofGenerative AI, the overall well-being of students, as well as the future roadmap for student-centric,educator-focused, and institution-based implementation of E.D. 5.0. This course revamp is part ofa broader effort to align Chem Eng education with E.D. 5.0 goals. By preparing students for I.D.5.0 competencies, this approach cultivates a skilled workforce valued across interdisciplinarysectors. Ongoing research further maps I.D. 5.0 to E.D. 5.0, with findings from this study servingas a benchmark for optimizing university pedagogical strategies. Industry 5.0 (I.D. 5.0) envisionsan efficient, productive industry with a strong societal role. Education 5.0 (E.D. 5.0) fostershuman-centric, personalized, and
. Participants who had not completed the survey were reminded twiceby email before the survey closed two weeks after distribution.Participants were directed to the mentee (FYE) or mentor (sophomore, junior, senior) questionsbased on the academic classification they chose in the survey. Both the content and logic of thesequestion sets were identical except for the use of the terms “mentee” and ’“mentor” as appropriate.See Appendix A for the complete survey.Participants were asked to identify their “ideal” counterpart based on a personality descriptionindex originally provided in the paired mentoring program application. In the application, par-ticipants were asked to select the description that most reflected their personality (See AppendixA, question 6
Communies need MH knowledge for preparedness Yes 79 95 No 4 7 The DMW should have MH knowledge and skills Yes 80 96 No 36 Experts Students Figure 3. Perceptions and awareness of MH issues, strategies, and education in DRMThe third question aimed to understand the impact of disaster on MH. The results, reflected inFigure 4, highlight the significant psychological toll of disasters, with 86% of participants (159individuals) reporting increased stress and anxiety, 61% (113 participants) identifying challengesin community
design. 6. Understand the principles of excess sludge treatment and apply the knowledge in the process design. 7. Formulate a preliminary design of a wastewater treatment plant. 8. Reflect on the importance of practical wastewater design considerations as well as sustainability issues. 9. Use BioWin software to model wastewater treatment plants.Grading System: The grading system employed was specifications grading. Specificationsgrading is a complement to mastery learning because grades are structured on competenciesachieved rather than on points earned, meaning that mastery is the key to success. The goals forthe usage of specifications grading as identified by the course instructor included the following: • Uphold high