national or PEER’s home institution.state-level tables and reports, many researchers require more The data wing of Engineering PLUS (Continuous Improve-granular data at the institutional and/or discipline level in ment through Data, Evaluation, and Research, or CIDER)order to fully contextualize their work. This can introduce a was established to support project leadership, researchersprohibitive amount of labor into the act of retrieving data, such as PEERs, and Hub member stakeholders. The CIDERand complicates the process of joining datasets that exist at team brings together a multidisciplinary effort to supportdifferent levels of granularity
[9][10]. Strong connections, fostered throughacademic, social, and extracurricular experiences, have been shown to improve both retentionand graduation rates. These activities offer students opportunities to build networks of faculty,peers, and advisors, which are essential to students' persistence and academic success [11][12].For women in STEM, proactive initiatives, programs, seminars, and workshops have been shownto integrate women into their academic departments more effectively [13] and help themnavigate the challenges of higher education. By fostering a sense of belonging and a strong socialnetwork, these experiences not only provide academic benefits but also boost students'confidence and motivation [14][15]. In addition, high-impact
infrastructure projects; primarily those in support of educational content delivery and K-12 education. The past twenty-one summers Professor Winzer has conducted a STEM outreach effort titled ’Adventures in Robotics’ which has had over 1,000 local K-12 participants. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Introduction to Scratch Programming and Motor Control with LEGO Spike Prime Revision Date:4/29/2025Lesson Length: _30-45______min Audience:__4th – 7th Grade_Description: Students will learn the fundamentals of programming using Scratch with the LEGO Spike Primekit. By the end of the lesson, students will be able to write a program to control
notbe clear to the public, or even to a professional outside of the narrowly focused field of theparticular engineer. After graduation, engineers’ writing becomes exponentially more important.Often approval of projects relies on residents’ or clients’ understanding of engineers’ work. Forexample, an engineering firm might design several alternatives for a new road or bridge, but thecommunity may not approve the best design because the engineers were not clear in theirpresentation of the data.The plain language movement arose from the legal field and the need to provide moreunderstandable documents free of legal jargon. It has since been adopted by many other fields,especially public health and other healthcare professions, where understanding
, and M. E. Cardella,“Students’ Perceptions of and Responses to Teaching Assistant and Peer Feedback,”Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, vol. 9, no. 2, 2014. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1479.[14] C.-P. Dai, F. Ke, Z. Dai, and M. Pachman, “Improving Teaching Practices via VirtualReality‐supported Simulation‐based Learning: Scenario Design and the Duration ofImplementation,” British Journal of Educational Technology: Journal of the Council forEducational Technology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 836–56, 2023.[15] Ely, S. J., & Chen, J. E. (2021, July), Educational Opportunities for Technical Writing inEngineering Education Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference ContentAccess, Virtual
concerns.” He writes that he managed to emerge from this period and started to find “away back into hope and action” by engaging with solarpunk literature and art, which “provides apositive vision for a better future”. With this newfound purpose and energy, Matthew involvedhimself more with causes and groups that he cares about; however, he had not yet talked openlyabout his emergent authentic self with his peers or fellow organizers before the Pilot Course. Heworried that other folks at Caltech wouldn’t share his concerns, might find solarpunk unappealingor unrealizable, or would judge him for being too na¨ıve, impractical, or radical. Overall, he fearedthat this more authentic version of himself would not fit who a Caltech biology grad
overlooked. This imbalancein STEM education can impact graduate students’ preparedness for various career paths in bothacademia and industry. GAPS course design combines active learning and inductive teachingmethods, enabling students to apply professional skills directly to their thesis research throughcommunity-based experiential learning. In-class discussions, online forums, and peer feedbackalso facilitate collaborative problem-solving and reflective engagement.In this study, GAPS was used to evaluate the effectiveness of these pedagogical approaches. Thestudy aimed to understand how these strategies lead to the development of essential professionalskills among STEM graduate students by examining the incorporation of active learning andinductive
. altering any causes. parameters. I explain how I I adjust detector I listen to the I analyze lab data andapproached solving a settings in the virtual instructor’s write my ownproblem to my peers environment to explanations during conclusions about the in real-time measure and collect the demonstration
[2].While the seminar is open to all students, its focus is to be supportive of military students inparticular. As such, this intervention has an added focus on military student inclusion throughintegrated peer awareness training, peer mentorship, and allyship.Using design-based research (DBR), a multi-disciplinary design and development researchmethodology advanced by the learning sciences and modeled after engineering design principles[3], [4], we are developing the seminar series over multiple iterations with volunteer post-traditional and military student participants. During successive iterations, we are collaborativelydeveloping the seminar curriculum, gathering student and partner/stakeholder feedback, andupdating the curriculum based
, information literacy, community resilience, and student peer mentorship. The interdisciplinary focus blends engineering and community-based learning to foster a holistic understanding of sustainability and inclusion. Active learning emphasized communication, teamwork, active reading, and participation to enhance student engagement and critical thinking. Information literacy promoted effective research and information evaluation skills. Community resilience addressed local and global challenges through project-based learning and the student peer mentorship was provided by a student who successfully completed the first-year community course. The paper delves into the course development
], and proposes an alternative way to think about the role of self-efficacy in careerchoice development. The motivation of this paper was a quantitative study that produced resultsmisaligned with SCCT and a follow-up qualitative study of the same population that usedPVEST to explore underlying reasons. While empirical studies generally support the SCCTmodel (i.e., mathematics self-efficacy is correlated positively with mathematics performance[2]), research with minoritized youth is much less consistent [3], [4], [5], [6]. For example, Blackstudents had higher mathematics self-efficacy compared to White, Hispanic, or Asian peers, butthat did not translate to performance [7], [8]. Using PISA 2003 data, researchers even found asignificant negative
graduate students' feelings of belonging in the library by using signatureevents as the cornerstone to create a stable framework for additional outreach opportunities. Thisstrategy allows for a dynamic and responsive approach to outreach, ensuring that the libraryremains a welcoming and supportive space for STEM and health graduate students throughouttheir academic journey. The creation of graduate-specific events and targeted efforts to shareimportant support information is key to helping students balance their personal and academicwellbeing. Allowing students the opportunity to engage with their peers beyond the classroomwhile offering low-stress resources can increase their own academic belonging and identity.Graduate students arrive on campus
as opposed to the writing and oralpresentations students would do in a short amount of time in DT, although it is once againinfeasible to demonstrate such an improvement definitively. Multiple students expressed that they benefited from the increased amount of time anddetailed feedback from the teaching team and peer and external review of their designs. DPrequired students to turn in low-fidelity prototypes, conduct one round of user testing and iterateto submit a high-fidelity prototype over a week and a half, which left no room for peer review ofthe prototypes. Spreading out the prototyping phase over an entire quarter in three stages allowedfor the integration of a few rounds of peer review after designing the low-fidelity
’ communication skills, both oraland written. By engaging in presentations, report writing, and peer reviews, students will developthe ability to convey technical information in a clear and concise manner to technical as well asnon-technical audiences.Furthermore, the course introduces students to the engineering design process, a systematicapproach to problem-solving by eliminating uncertainties/unknowns, is fundamental and crucialto all engineering disciplines. Students are provided multiple opportunities to brainstormsolutions, create prototypes, and test their designs, iterating as necessary to achieve results.Self-efficacy, motivation, and agency are essential components for effective student learning andacademic success. Self-efficacy, described as
empower students to tackle real-world healthcarechallenges by designing and innovating medical devices. Throughout the ten-week summerprogram, participants are exposed to both laboratory research and professional developmentworkshops, equipping them with technical expertise and communication skills. Key researchprojects include mobile phone-based imaging for diagnostics, biomaterial development for tissueengineering, and computational modeling of respiratory devices. Key professional developmentevents include research a jump start seminars, technical writing workshops, communicationworkshops, microagression training, and a final poster presentation event.Preliminary findings indicate significant growth in students’ research self-efficacy, with a
by LLM suggestionsThe Halstead Measure, evaluated after implementing LLM-suggested changes to Expertiza, demonstratedreductions in difficulty, effort, and time. All approved changes adhered to proper code design principlesand caused no errors in Expertiza. The Halstead difficulty, which indicates how challenging the code is toread or write, decreased by 9.66. The Halstead time, estimating the time required to implement and fullyunderstand the software, decreased by 2047.5 minutes. This reduction highlights the substantial additionaltime previously required to implement and comprehend Expertiza. Adhering to principles like methodinheritance and minimizing unnecessary operators and operands, the code now reflects improved designand therefore
space for all and uses writing, speaking, and research to address each of these important aspects of her academic career.Dr. Emmabeth Parrish Vaughn, Austin Peay State University Dr. Emmabeth Vaughn is an Assistant Professor in the Physics, Engineering, and Astronomy Department at Austin Peay State University. Before join faculty at Austin Peay, she worked in industry as a Product Development Engineer for a commercial roofing manufacturer. She holds a bachelors degree from the University of Tennessee in Materials Science and Engineering. She earned her PhD from the University of Pennsylvania, where her thesis topic was Nanoparticle Diffusion in Polymer Networks. Her research interests include polymer physics
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Trisha Patnaik, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Experiential Activities Demonstrating Mass Transfer in Porous Materials in an Introductory Bioengineering CourseAbstractThis Complete Evidence Based Practice paper describes how hands-on experiential learning canbe utilized in an introductory bioengineering course to teach complex topics and help studentsfeel a sense of identity and belonging to the field. Bioengineering encompasses manymultidisciplinary concepts, techniques, and applications from other disciplines; as such, studentscan feel underqualified or ‘othered’ compared to their peers. This is
0.5 Engineering faculty connections I had an engineering faculty member who I consider a role model. 4 4.8 1.3 I was mentored by an engineering faculty member. 4 4.0 1.0 I had the opportunity to network with engineering faculty members. 4 4.5 1.3 I knew faculty members in my major who I would feel comfortable asking to write 4 4.5 1.3 a recommendation letter. I had engineering faculty members with whom I could relate. 4 4.8 1.3 Engineering peer connections I regularly socialized with engineering students outside of class
, course expectations, and selecting a major. They alsoreceive tutoring for two core STEM courses in both fall and spring semesters. These sessionsreinforce classroom learning, offer a space for questions, and foster a collaborative learningenvironment among peers. Tutoring helps students understand lecture material, preventprocrastination, and prepare for exams (Louie, Knight, & Sullivan, 2011). Academic coaching ismandatory for first-year scholars and available to upperclassmen on an as-needed basis.Academic coaching covers topics such as time management, note-taking strategies, andacademic goal setting.Each first-year BEST scholar is paired with an upperclassman peer mentor based on theirintended major and interests. Mentors and mentees
American Association of Colleges and Universities to develop effective pedagogy in undergraduate computer science (CS) education. She is the winner of the NCWIT Extension Services (NCWIT ES-UP) award, ABI Systers PIO (Pass-It-On) award, Google ExploreCSR Award, and NCWIT educator award. She published numerous peer-reviewed articles in venues, including the Special Interest Group of the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM SIGCSE), IEEE RESPECT, and IEEE Frontiers in Engineering Education, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) conference. She has received funding from different funding agencies research and mentoring initiatives directed toward developing effective pedagogy in undergraduate computer
have developed an intensive month-longNew Faculty Orientation (NFO) program based on a variety of published research. The uniquecomponent of this program is the amount of time spent practicing teaching in front ofexperienced instructors and peers. The structure, content and research basis of the NFO programis described in this paper. In this study, post-NFO measures of instructor self-efficacy werecollected using the College Teaching Self-Efficacy (CTSE) Scale and results are presented.CTSE survey results showed that the new faculty rated themselves confident in instructionalplanning (3.69/5.0), instructional delivery (4.22/5.0), classroom management (4.38/5.0) andassessment (3.93/5.0). Practice teaching lessons in front of peers and
Paper ID #47485Enhancing Engineering Learning through MathCADDr. Xiuhua Si, California Baptist University Dr. Xiuhua (April) Si is a Professor of aerospace and mechanical engineering at California Baptist University. Her broad research interests include engineering education, thermal fluid science, and composite materials application. She has published over fifty peer-reviewed journal and conference papers and had multiple presentations at engineering conferences and meetings.Dr. Keith Hekman, California Baptist University Dr. Keith Hekman is a full professor in Mechanical Engineering. He has been at California Baptist
Engineering Education.Jacob R Matti, Arizona State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Inspiring Early Engagement and Community Building Among First Year Students in a Multiyear Co-Curricular Program through A Summer Program: Successes Based on Ten Years of ImplementationAbstractThis Complete Evidence-based Practice paper describes the design and implementation of aweek-long summer program that aims to engage incoming first year students in the GrandChallenges Scholars Program (GCSP) in building a peer community on campus and learningabout opportunities to engage in work addressing global challenges at Arizona State University(ASU). The GCSP Summer Institute (SI) is a program that
,including a hypothesis to test, equipment to use, and data that they propose to collect. GraduateTeaching Assistants (TAs) and the laboratory manager review the proposals and either approve themor require further development. Once their proposal is approved, students use the remaining weeksto complete their study and write a full technical report, which they submit using an assignedpseudonym. The project finishes with each student conducting a single-blind Peer Review of astudent’s work from another lab section. Grading is based on the TA’s assessment of the report andthe Peer Evaluation.Pre- and post-surveys of the students measure their self-efficacy, among other aspects of theirexperience with the course, to evaluate the effectiveness of this
Educational Platform for Student and Professional EngineersAbstractThis Work in Progress Evidence-Based Practice paper aims to present the electronic Resources forEngineering Formation (e-REF).Engineering is grounded in the principles of science and mathematics, yet the ability to communicateeffectively through writing remains equally vital for its advancement. In today's engineering practice,professionals must be proficient not only in technical skills but also in retrieving and evaluating reliablesources of information such as journal articles, patents, books, and industry standards. Thesecompetencies are critical in addressing engineering problems and ensure solutions are built upon accurate,peer-reviewed, and reliable information. Additionally
previous year. Some authors had also taken part in other formal training in educa-tional research, including through professional societies such as ASEE or through grants focusedon faculty development from organizations such as the NSF.The funding was not intended to be an ongoing expense, and some of the authors have discussedcreating a condensed version of ProQual to be offered internally. Similar shorter workshops basedon ProQual have also been offered at education conferences in the past, such as at FIE 2023 [9].2.3 Peer Mentoring GroupsOur peer mentoring groups, which we nicknamed brain trusts, initially started as a grant proposalaccountability group among several faculty members learning to newly write proposals in engineer-ing education
will beshared in the study) also expose students to another aspect of the pedagogical framework: Amindful awareness of the AI Usability Spectrum. For instance, while Bloom’s revised taxonomyis instrumental in the creation of Human-AI learning outcomes and course content, theframework also encourages faculty to reflect upon the AI Usability Spectrum. To maintainacademic integrity and embrace the full use of Human-AI learning, faculty can engage studentsin the learning process, determining the ‘right’ amount of AI usage for every task. This practiceincludes breaking down tasks into categories pertaining to writing, critical thinking, and researchwhile classifying AI use into low, medium, and high intensity. This interactive processintroduces
technical skills anddecision-making: Talking to these people, getting input from them—if I write a test plan or report, what’s their feedback? What’s their criticism? Where did I make mistakes? Even at 14 years in, I’d say my knowledge is still relatively limited compared to someone who’s been doing this for 40 years. Mentoring under people with more experience is invaluable.This mentorship experience highlights how direct mentoring bridges generational knowledgegaps, fosters professional confidence, and preserves institutional expertise, ultimately enablingengineers to address complex technical challenges more effectively.Jordan’s experience with peer mentoring further illustrated how structured mentoring programsfoster
or writing on aboard, while active-learning classes were characterized by student-peer interactions and student-instructor interactions through group work or collaborative problem solving. Across both classtypes, participants discussed exam formats, attendance policies, and homework flexibility.Instructor responsiveness and ability to create engagement were key factors discussed in bothclass types as well.Four subcategories emerged in the theme of student responses: students’ attitudes and feelings,student engagement, classroom interactions (with the professor and with their peers), andstudents’ understanding of instructors’ expectations. Students felt lecture-based classes, whichrelied on slideshows, were unhelpful, and favored classes