AC 2012-4832: ASME’S VISION 2030’S IMPORT FOR MECHANICALENGINEERING TECHNOLOGYDr. Scott Danielson P.E., Arizona State University, Polytechnic Scott Danielson is the Associate Dean for Academic Programs in the College of Technology and In- novation at Arizona State University. Before assuming that role, he had been the Interim Chair of the Engineering Department and the Chair of the Engineering Technology Department. He has been active in ASEE in the Mechanics Division and the Engineering Technology Division. He has also been active in ASME, being awarded the 2009 Ben C. Sparks Medal for excellence in mechanical engineering technol- ogy education, serving as a member of the Vision 2030 Task Force, serving as chair of
AC 2012-3815: IMPLEMENTATION OF LOW-RESIDENCY DELIVERYOF A BSEET ARTICULATION PROGRAMProf. Pamela S. Frinzi, Southern Polytechnic State UniversityMr. Scott Larisch, Southern Polytechnic State University Page 25.731.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Implementation of Low-Residency Delivery of a BSEET Articulation Program Page 25.731.2AbstractSouthern Polytechnic State University (SPSU) has implemented a system-widearticulation with the Technical College System of Georgia (TCSG). Thisarticulation will provide the opportunity for SPSU to offer a
AC 2012-4042: DEVELOPING EXPERIMENTS FOR THE VIBRATIONCOURSE WITH MINIMAL EXPENDITUREDr. B. S. Sridhara, Middle Tennessee State University B. S. Sridhara is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Middle Tennessee State University. He received his B.S.M.E. and M.S.M.E. degrees from Bangalore University and Indian In- stitute of Science, Bangalore, India. He received his M.S.M.E. and Ph.D. degrees from Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, and Auburn University, Alabama. Sridhara has published sev- eral peer-reviewed articles in the areas of acoustics, vibration, finite element methods, and engineering education.Mr. Daryl Hunter White, Middle Tennessee State University Daryl
student.First Class Meeting - Anxiety ReductionAt the very first class meeting, the instructor tries to remove the anxieties of first year Circuits(affectionately called “Snircuits” by the instructor) students. Many of these students, especiallythe non-majors, are quite intimidated by Electrical Circuits even at the most fundamental levelbecause they can‟t “see” what‟s happening before them. A significant portion of the non-majorsare taking the course for the second time and / or have avoided taking it until they are upperclassmen increasing their anxiety ever further. In the first session, the instructor does not review the syllabus, etc. To some of the students thesyllabus is the only subject at the university that is more boring than the subject of
stages.Fortunately, both ABET and ATMAE accreditation procedures are amenable tonew/innovative programs, although the former’s requirement for the existence ofprogram graduates defers its accreditation decision until this requirement can bedemonstrated. Given that the ATMAE’s process does not have this requirement, theadvantage to the department is that there will not be a period during which any newprogram(s) might not be accredited.Based on the experience of the past years, it seems appropriate to recommend thatcolleagues considering multiple accreditations do pursue that path despite the resourcedemands in terms of faculty time, technology and money for professional development.However, the advantages of increased purposeful and collective reflection
inthe course. Course-embedded direct and indirect student assessment data confirm that the mainobjectives of the course presented herein are met.Bibliography 1. J. Choi, W. Grebski, and K. Dudeck, “The Development of Teaching Materials for an Introductory Course in Electrical and Mechanical Engineering Technology,” Proc. ASEE Annual Conf., 2009. 2. G. Ma, “Innovation Teaching Technique in Introduction to Engineering Technology Course,” Proc. World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, Vol. 1, 2010. 3. S. Ahuja and A. Ross, “Introduction to Engineering Technology: VSU’s New Approach,” Proc. ASEE Southeast Section Conf., 2005. 4. S. Ahuja, “Math Remediation in a First Semester Engineering
educating future professionals with engineering principles integrated with practical experience. Twelve programs in the United States offer four-year bachelor degrees in general Engineering Technology (1). General Engineering Technology degree programs offer an interdisciplinary platform. In addition, many discipline specific engineering technology degrees are offered at the bachelor‟s level. For example, ninety-four ABET accredited programs offer bachelor degrees in Electrical Engineering Technology in the U.S.A. Similarly, sixty-six and six ABET accredited bachelor degree programs are offered in Mechanical Engineering Technology and Industrial Engineering Technology in the United States, respectively (1). A graduate program in
Technology (ETEC), with at least 50 sustainingenrollments of 200+ students in fall 2010 according to ASEE data. On the other hand, since the1980’s only about 14 institutions have created master’s degrees in ETEC. Some M.S. programshave evolved from Master of Science in Technology (M.S.T.) or Master of Technology (M.T.)versions. One fundamental question posed in the debate is whether ETEC curricula rise to thenecessary scientific rigor of traditional M.S. degrees. This paper asserts that the M.S. in ETECshould stand on equal footing with M.S. programs in any other field and particularly inengineering when viewed from the perspective of (i) the scientific level of graduate ETECcourses; (ii) the roles that ETEC graduates perform in the engineering
classroom engagement and its effect on student performance.The emergence of Web 2.0 and SNT as a dominant force for communication and interactionamong various groups of people has led to discussion among the academic community regardingwhether or not these technologies are actually effective within the classroom setting. Whileeffectiveness in regards to classroom performance has not been successfully determined and stillexists as a gap in the academic community’s knowledge of Web 2.0’s effect on higher education,there are parallels that exist between using online courses and Web 2.0. Several studies7, 8, 10have been conducted to determine if there are any significant differences between students whohave chosen an online course of study versus a
25.65.3development context, communication could be related to faculty that should be discussing skillsthat studeents need to have for folllow-on courrses, while riisk identificaation is relatted to studenntsnot propeerly acquirin ng those skillls. This work k will use a combinationn of customeer needselicitation n and DSM’’s to assess the t existing curriculum c ffor a combinned Manufaccturing andMechanical Engineerring Technology program m.MethodssThis projject began ass part of a strrategic plann ning exercis e in the Mannufacturing aand MechannicalEngineerring Technollogy Program m at
wed. ologyMethodoTo test th he hypothesiis, two groupps of prescho oolers were uused with peermission froom parents aandapproval of the Instittutional Reviiew Board att XXXX Unniversity. Thhe first groupp was read thhestory aboout Tinker Bell and how she invents devices, buiilds them, annd uses themm to help herfriends. The second group was not n read the story. s Each group of stuudents come from differeentclasses th hat do not meet m at the sam me times. Each E group w was then expposed to the gguided
) is “characterized by relationships with manygroups and individuals (‘stakeholders’), each with (a) the power to affect the firm’s performanceand/or (b) a stake in the firm’s performance.” The stakeholders in the scholarly publishingenterprise are the academic community and institutions, the editor, the publisher, the readershipof the journal(s), the authors, the reviewers, the journal(s), the company’s staff and officers, andany share- or stockholders in the firm, who stand to gain or lose as the value of the firmfluctuates.51A social contract is established between the stakeholders and the firm. Embedded within it arethe duties referred to in deontology. Jones summarized the third assumption of the theory bystating, “Firms exist in markets
, Stylus Publishing, LLC,2004. Page 25.1005.75. Toohey S., "Designing courses in Higher Education", Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press,1999.6. F.P. Deek, F.P., Kimmel, H., & McHugh, J., “Pedagogical changes in the delivery of the first course in computer science: Problem solving then programming”, Journal of Engineering Education, 87, 3, pp. 313-320, July 1998.7. Meier, R.L., Williams, M.R., and Humphreys, M.A., “Refocusing our efforts: assessing non-technical competency gaps”, Journal of Engineering Education, 89, 3, pp. 377-385. 2000.8. Massa N.M., Masciadrelli G.J, Mullett G.J., " Re-Engineering Technician
AC 2012-5131: IMPORTANCE OF UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH INENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMSDr. Sidi Berri, New York City College of Technology Sidi Berri is a professor and the Chairman of the Mechanical Engineering Technology Department of New York City College of Technology.Dr. Andy Zhang, New York City College of Technology Andy S. Zhang earned his master’s in mechanical engineering from the City College of New York in 1987 and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the Graduate Center of the City University of New York in 1995. Zhang’s research areas include materials testing, composite materials, CAD/CAE, engineering animation, and mechatronics design.Dr. Gaffar Barakat Gailani, New York City College of Technology
the root of an equation f x 0 are 1. Evaluate f x symbolically 2. Use an initial guess of the root, xi , to estimate the new value of the root, xi 1 , as f xi xi 1 = xi f xi 3. Find the absolute relative approximate error a as xi 1 xi a = 100 xi 1Compare the absolute relative approximate error with the pre-specified relative error tolerance,s . If a > s , then go to Step 2, else stop the algorithm. Also, check if the number ofiterations has exceeded the maximum number of iterations allowed. If so, one needs to terminatethe algorithm and notify
local 100Mb/s Ethernet switch to a cable that provides an Internet connection through a WAN to threeremote servers. OPNET provides accurate models of real commercial devices—note in the figurethat the model for a real, commercially available Linksys cable modem is being used. They alsohave models for all popular protocols and you can define your own devices or protocols in ahigh-level language such as C. The link speeds can be chosen as well.A variety of traffic patterns may be specified. For example, traffic may be generated with arandom number generator using several statistical distributions such as normal or Poissonian forpacket length and inter-packet time. The simulator can produce useful information such asaverage and instantaneous
.”) Page 25.1080.3Building RelationshipsBefore starting the PLTW conferences, Professor Harding spent a few years buildingrelationships with teachers from local high schools. Of the 20-30 high schools in the region,there were four PLTW schools, so he started there. His first contact at each school was generallywith the principal, then with the PLTW teacher(s).He built a recruiting presentation, and started visiting the schools. At one school, the largest inthe region, the PLTW instructors set up large assemblies of students (PLTW classes, physicsclasses, etc.) so he could speak to hundreds of students in a single visit. At the other schools henormally spoke to one or two PLTW classes.Although it has a recruiting component, the presentation itself
economical.” Grand Challenges for Engineering. 2 May 2011. .3. Foroudastan, S, Klapper, R, & Hyde, S. “Intercollegiate Design Competitions and Middle Tennessee State University’s Machine Shop: Kindling Engineering Technology-Student Creativity & Confidence.”4. “Welcome to Solar Splash.” 2 May 2011. .5. Foroudastan, S. “Undergraduate Research and Creative Activity at MTSU.”6. “The Case for a Name Change.” A UMR White Paper. 10 Nov. 2006. .7. Foroudastan, S. “Enhancing Undergraduate Performance through Peer-Led, Team- Learning (PL-TL).”8. Hockings, SC, DeAngelis, KJ, & Frey, RF. “Peer-led team learning in general chemistry: implementation and
Economics. Education Economics. June 2006;14(2):211-233.6. Crede M., Roch S. G., Kieszczynka U. M., Class Attendance in College: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship of Class Attendance with Grades and Student Characteristics. Review of Educational Research 2010; 80(2): 272-295.7. Davidovitch N, & Soen D. Class Attendance and Students' Evaluation of their College Instructors. College Student Journal. September 2006;40(3):691-703.8. Dollinger S, Matyja A, & Huber J. Which factors best account for academic success: Those which college students can control or those they cannot?. Journal of Research in Personality. August 2008;42(4):872-885.9. Gump S. The Cost of Cutting Class. College Teaching
. Students were also expected to reviewthe best practice literature associated with their group assigned area of study and any relevant(animal health distribution related) industry specific information to support their analysis. Duringthe residency week, they follow the schedule of activities shown above in Exhibit 1.On day 1 (Monday), students along with the instructor(s), will travel to visit the companyfacility. The objective of this visit is to understand the current business process and refine theirproblem statement. The typical sequence of events on Monday is as follows: a) students arrive atthe company premises and are guided to the conference room by company associates; b) the topexecutive(s) of the company will give a brief presentation on
., & Chapman, D. (2007). Upgrading or Replacing Your Learning Management System: Implications for Student Support. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, X(I).2. Watson, W.R., & Watson, S.L. (2007). An Argument for clarity: What are Learning Management Systems, what are they not, and what should they become. TechTrends, 51(2).3. Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of Learning Management Systems. Computers and Education 53(3), 686–694.4. Little-Wiles, J., & Naimi, L. (2011). A Study of Traditional Undergraduate Student Engagement in Blackboard Learning Management System. Proceedings from 118th ASEE 2011 Conference. Vancouver
survey provided. Page 25.765.5Figure 1: Green Robotics with Lego Mindstorms Figure 2: Students Utilizing Lego Mindsorms Page 25.765.6S-STEMCurrently, the author of this effort is a co-principal investigator (or co-PI) on a NSF Scholarshipsin Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) funded grant. This grant hasa primary focus of supporting scholarships for academically talented students demonstratingfinancial need, enabling them to enter the STEM workforce or attending a STEM graduateprogram4. As a co-PI, the author of this effort is responsible for aiding in the selection
. Page 25.1015.12References 1. Azis, Y. and Osada, H., “Innovation in management system by Six Sigma: an empirical study of world-class companies.” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 2010, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 172-190. 2. Byrne, G., Lubowe, Dove., and Blitz, A., “Using a Lean Six Sigma approach to drive innovation.” Strategy and Leadership, 2007, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 5-10 3. Bisgaard, S., “Innovation and Six Sigma”, ASQ Six Sigma Forum Magazine, May 2008, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 33 4. Figueroa, E., and Conceicao, P., “Rethinking the innovation process in large organizations: a case study of 3M.” Journal of engineering and technology management. 17(2000) 93-109. 5. The theory
interactwith and provide feedback from the customer were substantially improved in the second semester.This implies the faculty’s efforts in emphasizing design innovation rather than design analysis inthe class. a bFigure 1. a) Total Organic Carbon Analyzer (TOC), Model 1030 S. b) Examples of student’s workfor developing of an automated system for inserting specimen cups in a carbon analyzer: fromrack and pinion traversing design, through belt and chain drives, drum assembly with a swing arm Page 25.5.6to using a robotic arm and four bar linkages.Table 1 shows the top and bottom three scored
. The results of this study bolster evidence to support theimportance of the first year experience for engineering technology students. Both academically Page 25.331.8strong and weak students drop out of the major equally. Educators hoping to improve thenumber of STEM graduates should explore first year interventions designed to support thesuccess of students. References 1. Beering, S. (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: Identifying and developing our nation’s human capital. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2010/nsb1033.pdf 2. Gibbs, R. (2009
tointroduce their students to highly complicated and expensive devices and systems in a cost-effective way. . VR is most suitable for replicating educational laboratories with highlyexpensive or potentially dangerous equipment. Although, the design and development of 3-Dvirtual reality systems cost relatively high, often not yet affordable by small educationalinstitutions, the use of VR can still be a suitable alternative to conventional expensive Page 25.1461.11educational laboratories. References[1]. Koh, S. H., Zhou, H., Tan, H.S., and Tan, K. C., 2002, Virtual Environments for manufacturing and training (VEMAT), Distance learning and the
than one out of every four Page 25.1206.2students departed during the first year from a 4-year college or university4. Braunstein, McGrath,and Percatrice found that academic performance was overwhelmingly the most significant factoraffecting a freshman‟s decision to continue in to the sophomore year5. It is common sense thatstudents who struggle academically during their first year of college are especially vulnerable todisqualification as well as to voluntary withdrawal due to feelings of discouragement or lack ofself-efficacy3.Cruise states that while there are at-risk students who find themselves on academic probation, itis important to
, and global issues pertaining to the electronictechnology field.k. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement.l. the application of circuit analysis and design, computer programming, associated software,analog and digital electronics, and microcomputers to the building, testing, operating, andmaintenance of electrical/electronic(s) systems.m. the application of physics to electrical/electronic(s) circuits in a rigorous mathematicalenvironment at or above the level of algebra and trigonometry.It must be noted that at the time of the initial accreditation of the AAS ET program nodifferentiation was made between the a. - k. Program Outcomes of two-year and four-yearengineering technology programs. At the present time the
technology program will greatly be beneficial not only to students but to theprofessors as well.Bibliography1. D'Onofrio, A. & Bowes, K. (2007). Hybrid Instruction 101: It’s in the Design. In T. Bastiaens & S. Carliner (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (pp. 1500-1506). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Page 25.541.42. Spilka, R., (2002, March). Approximately "Real World" Learning with the Hybrid Model. Teaching with Technology Today, 8 (6).3. Young, J.R. (2002, March 22). 'Hybrid' teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online
layout using EagleCad design tools.Schematics – One of the major design considerations was the testing and expansion capabilitiesof the E-Clock™ project. E-Clock™’s primary purpose, of course, is to keep and display timethrough the use of LEDs. As shown in Figure 3, the LEDs were arranged in a row and columnmatrix so that only 15 digital signals (12 X and 3 Y) are needed to control the state (ON/OFF) ofup to 36 different LEDs. To create the effect of up to three LEDs being on at the same time, thecontrol software strobes the Y signals for a short period of time. Each light is turned on for aduty cycle (that can be varied) at a frequency of approximately 250 Hz. By varying the dutycycle of the Y signals, the intensity of the LEDs can also be