AC 2012-5405: INCORPORATING ENGINEERING DESIGN INTO HIGHSCHOOL STEM INITIATIVESDr. Taryn Melkus Bayles, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Taryn Bayles, Ph.D., is a Professor of the Practice of chemical engineering in the Chemical, Biochemi- cal, and Environmental Engineering Department at UMBC, where she incorporates her industrial expe- rience by bringing practical examples and interactive learning to help students understand fundamental engineering principles. Her current research focuses on engineering education, outreach and curriculum development.Dr. Joshua A. Enszer, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Joshua Enszer is a full-time lecturer in chemical engineering at the University of Maryland
Derby, the fifth grade students were challenged topredict how the weight of a vehicle would influence how far it would roll down a straightaway,starting from an inclined ramp. The very nature of this project makes it unique in that it wasdesigned to have mutual benefit for both the engineering students and the fifth grade students. AYouTube video from the initial program administration in the fall of 2010 depicts the energylevel at the I2D2 event when so many creative minds of diverse backgrounds and ages arebrought together (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bvrjr7Qd1Rk).The “serious play” activities during I2D2 were designed to elicit meaningful customer inputfrom the fifth grade students; the college students then designed and built pets using
Management and Systems Engineering EducationAbstractAs engineering system complexity has increased over the years, numerous complex systems pro-jects have failed due to the lack of an appropriate systemic perspective. Since the solution to thischallenge is itself a complex system, educating and training our current and future technicalleaders on these challenges, and providing suggested changes in their mind sets, is imperative.As an educational tool, case studies can be a platform through which the analysis, knowledgeapplication, and drawing of conclusions can occur to facilitate coping with the most complexsystems. Case study learning has proven successful in the training of business leaders with reallife examples of the
toappreciate engineering design that is mindful of the resources and energy used to developproducts and systems.While we cannot be certain of the exact content presented to students throughout the semester,the heavy emphasis on traditional environmental engineering goals could be the result of directinstruction in this area, both in the engineering courses and perhaps in their required chemistryand physics classes. Or, it could simply be that students do not think about sustainability beyondresources, energy, and the environment at a basic level, as opposed to a systems level.Sophomore students might lack the intellectual maturity to think about sustainability andsustainable design from a systems approach. Regardless, the very fact that students have
provide innovations that contributecommercial value. For the development of entrepreneurial minded graduates, the educationalcontributions provided by general education are essential for career success.Introducing an entrepreneurial mindset in an engineering curriculum will not be accomplished byadding courses. This challenge must be addressed by making the liberal arts, social science, andbusiness topics relevant to engineering students in a practical sense that allows engineeringgraduates to commit to engaging in a world driven by more than technical facts. Professionalcompetencies and engineering skills/knowledge must be integrated, together in the same course,because that is how the graduates will engage their careers and
engineers who are environmentallysensitive, the “caring” aspect of environmental learning is increasing in importance [25]. Tochange engineering students’ mindsets from technologically-oriented to contextually approaches,Kastenberg et al. suggest that engineering students need to possess the goals of embodying thevalues of a new integrated culture of engineering, as well as enhancing self-awareness ofcontemporary issues [20]. Manion also suggested that engineering faculty members need notonly to increase students’ contextual awareness but also to complement this awareness byassisting them to transform their attitudes, values, and philosophies to match the engineer of the21st century [26]. Developing the students’ attitude of having an open mind to
Press.Hargreaves, D.J. (1997). Student learning and assessment are inextricably linked. European Journal of Engineering Education. 22 (4), 401-409.Gardiner, L.F. (1997) Redesigning higher education: producing dramatic gains in student learning, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, 23 (7), Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.Gardner, H. (1983) Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences, New York: Basic Books.Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Beng Lee, C. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95 (2), 139-151.McKenna, A. F., & Agogino, A.M. (2004). Supporting mechanical reasoning with a representational-rich learning
possible in class) and external (e.g. theworld is getting better). It is not yet clear if LTS is an influencing agent, or simply a benefactorof attracting such-minded people28. Interestingly, like knowledge, there are no differences in mindset between LTS and NoLTS. Mindset is thought to be central to learning outcomes. Growth mindset people tend to relishchallenges, fixed mindset people get easily discouraged by challenges. It appears engineeringbenefits from having a healthy majority of growth mindset students, this maybe a prerequisite innavigating the academic obstacles to becoming an engineering student in the first place. Futureevaluation will begin to map this mindset with dialogue about engineering experiences from theinterviews
AC 2012-3876: THE ”RAISE THE BAR” INITIATIVE: CHARTING THEFUTURE BY UNDERSTANDING THE PATH TO THE PRESENT - MOD-IFYING THE MODEL LAWS AND RULES FOR ENGINEERING LICEN-SUREMr. Jon D. Nelson P.E., Tetra Tech, Inc Jon D. Nelson, P.E. is Senior Vice President of the central region of the Engineering and Architectural Services group of Tetra Tech, Inc. in Tulsa, Okla. He has been a consulting engineer for 34 years, focusing on municipal water and wastewater projects. He has been with Tetra Tech for 27 years. He holds a B.S. degree in civil engineering from Kansas State University and a M.S. degree in environmental engineering from Oklahoma State University. Nelson is licensed as a professional engineer in four states and
AC 2012-3512: STUDENT PERSPECTIVES OF ENGINEERING DESIGNEDUCATIONRichard J. Aleong, Queen’s University Richard Aleong is a master’s of applied science candidate in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. His research interests are in engineering design, qualitative research methodology, and teaching and learning in higher education.Prof. David S. Strong, Queen’s University David Strong joined Queen’s as the NSERC Chair in Design Engineering in March 2003 and is currently in his second term as Chair. In this faculty-wide appointment, his goal is to enhance student’s engineering design and professional skills by working collaboratively on educational
, additional person resource semi-qualified for the company/company has the opportunity to instruct and in turn gain fresh ideas forcing us to look at processes differently.• Help provide valuable experience and exposure to the student; was a symbiotic relationship for the student and company.• Having the opportunity to bring fresh ideas and young minds into our organization, along with their level of enthusiasm. Page 25.1219.11What aspect of the sustainable engineering internship needs the most improvement, if it wereto be offered again?• Involve company rep in student selection process• Increase time frame
AC 2012-5132: IEEE REAL WORLD ENGINEERING PROJECTS (RWEP)Dr. Seyed Hossein Mousavinezhad, Idaho State University Seyed Hossein Mousavinezhad is professor and Chair, Electrical Engineering Department, Idaho State University. He is active with ASEEECE Division, is IEEE Education Society’s Membership Development Chair, and is Van Valkenburg Awards Committee Chair. Mousavinezhad is founding General Chair of International IEEE Electro Information Technology Conferences, http://www.eit-conference.org/.Dr. Paul J. Benkeser, Georgia Institute of Technology Paul J. Benkeser is a professor and Senior Associate Chair in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University. He is past
entry into the culture andaesthetic of a new discipline [16] such as engineering. Interest benefits all students, but canparticularly boost the participation of girls and other underrepresented minorities who may beless predisposed to identify with or apply themselves to more technical studies or the physicalsciences. A narrative can help to raise questions in students’ minds, and arouse their curiosityand imagination [17]. The “so what” question is a perennial one in schools, particularly whenscience instruction is divorced from direct experience [18]. Helping students to connect schoollearning to the real world can motivate students by providing relevance for what they arelearning, whether that is science or technological problems and problem
AC 2012-3321: ADULT UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTEXPERIENCEDr. Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley Shannon Ciston is a lecturer of chemical and biomolecular engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. She has experience teaching chemical, environmental, and multidisciplinary engineering funda- mentals as well as technical communications. Ciston’s research interests include affective and experiential aspects of student learning, and impacts of nanomaterials on aquatic biofilms.Dr. Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven Maria-Isabel Carnasciali is Assistant Professor of mechanical engineering at the Tagliatela School of Engineering, University of New Haven, Conn. She obtained
intended manner.It is highly advantageous that the proposed structure aligns and is compatible with the ABETEngineering Criteria, which is well-established and well-understood by engineering programs.This would simplify interpretation of language and could serve to minimize any additionalassessment work.IntroductionThe Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) educational initiative in engineering hasthe goal to increase the number of entrepreneurially minded engineering graduates in the US.[1][2]To achieve that requires the establishment of curricula content and extracurricular activitieswithin existing engineering programs. Such a process is naturally related to key aspects of theABET accreditation process, as defined by the Engineering
Appendix B of theGuidelines.The mentor should: Be familiar with the expectation of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge, in particular with regard to the experiential outcomes. Provide guidance, insight, and tutelage to the EI through face-to-face meetings and review of the EI’s work products, with specific reference to one or more experiential outcomes and their associated guidelines, and be mindful of the expectation of progression in professional responsibilities. Be cognizant of jurisdictional licensing requirements and the EI’s requirement to demonstrate attainment of the experiential outcomes, and enable the EI to tailor their work assignment to this end. Monitor the EI’s progression in
AC 2012-5438: ETHICAL ISSUES AWARENESS FOR ENGINEERS INPRACTICEDr. A. Dean Fontenot, Texas Tech University A. Dean Fontenot directs a professional development center for K-12 teachers as part of the Texas STEM (T-STEM) initiative in order to bring about educational reform in secondary schools. The Texas Tech T-STEM Center focuses on project-based learning with the integration of the engineering design process. As Senior Director, she has brought together three Texas Tech professional development centers that have a history of training teachers, and built partnerships with five Educational Service centers as well as other organizational and industry partners who help implement the professional development training
AC 2012-3661: PREPARING STUDENTS FOR WRITING IN CIVIL EN-GINEERING PRACTICEProf. Susan Conrad, Portland State University Susan Conrad is a professor of applied linguistics at Portland State University, where she teaches discourse analysis courses and collaborates with civil engineering faculty and local practitioners to study writing in civil engineering.Mr. Timothy James Pfeiffer P.E., Foundation Engineering, Inc.Mr. Tom Szymoniak, Portland State University Tom Szymoniak is a Civil Engineer with 28 years of professional experience. He is currently a full-time instructor at Portland State University in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. His main area of focus is teaching the underclass students
Professional Practice (CAP^3), wasformed to study and implement the actions that would be necessary to achieve this vision forcivil engineering. The last fourteen years since Policy 465 was first approved have producedsignificant progress in ASCE’S “Raise the Bar” initiative.Purpose and ScopeTo maintain the initiative’s momentum, the successful processes of the past and the associated“lessons learned” must be clearly communicated to future leaders and proponents of the “Raisethe Bar” initiative. Much has been learned from the experiences of the past – and these hard-learned experiences should guide the future direction of the initiative. A relevant quotation(from Adlai E. Stevenson) comes to mind: “We can chart our future clearly and wisely onlywhen
AC 2012-3349: TEAM DECISION SKILLS DEVELOPMENT WITH MBTISTEP IIDr. Lawrence E. Whitman, Wichita State University Lawrence E. Whitman is the Director of Engineering Education for the College of Engineering and Pro- fessor of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering at Wichita State University. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees from Oklahoma State University. His Ph.D. from the University of Texas, Arlington, is in indus- trial engineering. He also has 10 years’ experience in the aerospace industry. His research interests are in enterprise engineering, engineering education, and lean manufacturing.Dr. Don E. Malzahn, Wichita State University Don E. Malzahn is professor of industrial and manufacturing engineering at
research in the learning sciences, couched in thecontext of a rigorous engineering design process, and scaffolded to build engineering skills andhabits of mind. This paper describes the creation and piloting of such a course: Engineer YourWorld, a product of the UTeachEngineering project at The University of Texas at Austin.The UTeachEngineering project was launched in 2008 with a Math and Science Partnership(MSP) grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Originally focused on preparing in-service and pre-service high school teachers to teach engineering, the project was agnostic onwhich course materials those teachers should use with their students. However, an NSF site visit
AC 2012-4337: ANALYSIS OF THE SUSTAINABILITY CULTURE IN CIVILAND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL ENGI-NEERING PROGRAMSMs. Maria Dawn Blevins, University of Utah Maria Blevins is a Ph.D. student in the Communication Studies program at the University of Utah.Dr. Steven J. Burian, University of Utah Page 25.189.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Analysis of the Sustainability Culture in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering ProgramsAbstractThis paper describes a study of the sustainability culture of 390 students in civil
. Poetry writing for those interested individuals has provided an avenue forcommunication.When an earlier paper began with the following quotation, “Variety's the spice of life, that givesit its flavor,” it echoed a feeling that stifling the creativity of any group of individuals is notproductive. Allowing these individuals to range across various types of communication is notonly good for engineers expressing themselves but for the production they produce in theirengineering activities. These lines in "The Task, I" by William Cowper (English poet 1731-1800) still reflect an attitude over two hundred later that must he fostered in the minds ofengineers. No man is an island, and no field of study can divorce itself from the activities,interests
AC 2012-3943: RECRUITMENT AND ENGAGEMENT OF UNDERGRAD-UATE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY STUDENTS IN INTERDIS-CIPLINARY RESEARCH PROJECTSDr. Tolga Kaya, Central Michigan University Tolga Kaya currently holds a joint Assistant Professor position in the School of Engineering and Tech- nology and the Science of Advanced Materials program at Central Michigan University (CMU). Prior to joining CMU, Kaya was a Postdoctoral Associate at Yale University (2007-2010), a Research and Teach- ing Assistant at Istanbul Technical University (1999-2007), a consultant at Brightwell Corp., Istanbul (2007), a senior VLSI analog Design Engineer and Project Coordinator at Microelectronics R&D Com- pany, Istanbul (2000-2006), and a
competitive advantage that any organization has is in the unique, unduplicated[diverse] intellectual capital of its people10. Diverse engineering teams harness differingperspectives and ideas that individuals bring to the workplace in a complementary fashion forinnovation and problem-solving success—two critical elements needed to survive in today’sglobal marketplace. Keep in mind that résumés only partially reflect potential and degree titlesshould not be the primary proxy for skill and competency. Hiring must be based on eachcandidate’s display of competence and ability to fulfill an organization’s current and futuretechnical needs.The differences in academic preparation and professional contributions of Engineers andEngineering Technologists are
experience in the simulated design projects that prepare them for realchallenge when graduate. The hands-on project allows student to learn from his failure.The hands-on engaging design project should be provided every semester to allow students toreinforce their mind on the practice of current engineering approach in product design and slowly Page 25.1453.10and steadily build problem solving and synthesizing skills [Mil01]. This type of project should beintroduced at freshman years, so they can benefit from the experience early. This will provideopportunities for the students to make early connection of STEM to the future work that they willbe
several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering learning, the measurement and support of change of ”habits of mind,” particularly in regards to sustainability and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning of complexity. Page 25.1379.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Troubleshooting Skills for Non-Engineers In Technological JobsAbstractAlthough there is an
-ready Software Engineers” Software Engineering: Effective Teaching and Learning Approaches, Ellis, H., Demurjian, S., and Naveda, J.F., (eds.), Idea Group Publishing. October 2008.7. Novak, J.D. and Cañas, A.J., "The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them" Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, 2006.8. Eppler, M.J., “A Comparison between Concept Maps, Mind Maps, Conceptual Diagrams, and Visual Metaphors as Complementary Tools for Knowledge Construction and Sharing “ Information Visualization 5(3):202-210, 2006.9. Cañas, A.J. and Novak, J.D. (eds.), “Assessing concept maps: First impressions count”. Proceedings of the Second
students arequizzed on the topics of the day’s lesson.This technique has been successfully adapted to cooperative learning activities in the distanceeducation environment via computer-supported groups16, and using handhelds17. Specificallypertinent to this report, engineering educators have found Jigsaw activities to be positive andeffective in online learning.Soh’s et al “research has designed and developed an infrastructure called the IntelligentMultiagent Infrastructure for Distributed Systems in Education (I-MINDS)”18 [p. 1556]. Page 25.128.6Intelligent agents actively support two types of interactions: student-student and teacher
”; applying heuristics developed from experience, “It’s a series of thin strands and thinstrands to me means small…1 mm is a good starting point I would think”; and incorporatingreal-world constraints, “In my mind I see that big, see a steel cable that big, it’s not going to beexceptionally large”.For both conceptualizing and solving the problem, Michael emphasized the importance ofviewing the problem within a real-world engineering context,Generally you have probably an expected value of what would compare it to and what I’velearned is to be reasonable…if you look at a bridge and it says its’ going to be 9 feet by 9 feet noone’s going to believe that. If you don’t compare your answers you’re probably going to get itwrong to what you know in real