, 128, 1. 6. Jenkins, S. et al. (2002) “Capstone Course in an Integrated Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 128, 2. 7. Butkus, M., and Kelley, M. (2004) “Approach for Integrating Professional Practice Issues into Undergraduate Environmental Engineering Design Projects,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130, 3. 8. Hanna, A., and Sullivan, K. (2005) “Bridging the Gap Between Academics and Practice: A Capstone Design Experience,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 131, 1. 9. Jones, J., and Mezo, M. (2007) “Team Teaching the Capstone Management Course: How and Why
- Page 25.461.13 505.6. Anwar S. Work in progress-measures and evaluation in engineering technology (MEET): A TC2K outcomes- based assessment framework. 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2005; Session S1C: 9-10.7. Petrova R., Tibrewal A., and Sobh T.M. An electronic web-based assessment system. Journal of STEM Education. 2006; 7: 44-57.8. Bloom, B S (ed.) (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, and the classification of educational goals— Handbook I: Cognitive Domain New York: McKay.9. Hamilton, J.G., and Klebba, J.M. Experimental learning: A course design process for critical thinking. American Journal of Business Education. 2010; 4: 1-12.10. Dickie, L.O. Approach to learning, the cognitive demands
. (1980). “AIQS survey of building contract time performance,” Building Economist, 19(2), 79-82.2. Choudhury, I. and Rajan, S. S. (2008). “Time-cost relationship for residential construction in Texas,” The American Professional Constructor, 32(2), 28-32.3. Ireland, V. B. E. (1985). “The role of managerial actions in the cost, time, and quality performance of high-rise commercial building projects,” Construction Management and Economics, 3 (1), 59-87.4. Kaka, A. & Price, A. D. F. (1991). “Relationship between value and duration of construction projects,” Construction Management and Economics, 9(4), 383-400.5. Chan, A. P. C. (1999). “Modeling building durations in Hong Kong. Construction Management and Economics,” 17
Engagement – Institution specific dataDavis, S., Connolly, A. and Linfield, E. "Lecture Capture: making the most of face-to-face learning", EngineeringEducation, vol. 4 issue 2, 2009.Toppin, I. “Video lecture capture (VLC) system: A comparison of student versus faculty perceptions”, Educationand Information Technology, vol. 16, 2010.Von Konsky, B., Ivins, J., Gribble, S. “Lecture attendance and web based lecture technologies:A comparison of student perceptions and usage patterns”, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol 25issue 4, 2009 Page 25.507.12
of the project was viewed very favorably by the students.References1. Somerton, C.W. and Bénard, A., “Developing a Design Based Alternative Energy Course”, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Chicago, June 2006.2. http://www.geothermal.marin.org/GEOpresentation3. Somerton, C.W., Genik, L.G., Thelen, W., Lewis, D., and Strawn, S., "TEEHOUSE: Thermal Environmental Engineering Design and Cost Software for a Building", 2002 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Montreal, June 2002 Page 25.31.11 Appendix A Cold Geothermal Project Assignment ME 417
. Figu ure 2: Frameework for tecchnical comm munication ddevelopmenttWherre:STPS S 201 - First course in en ngineering designSTPS S 251 - Second course in n engineering g designSD – Senior desig gn / Capstonne design cou urse seriesThe two t freshmen n communiccation coursees that are buuilt into the curriculum hhave avarietty of strategies to develoop and impro ove professioonal and tecchnical comm municationskillss. In the first course (COM 101) stud dents investiggate and dessign their owwn researchstudyy on topics reelevant to th
25.74.9 85 Desired Temperature Actual Temperature 80 75Temperature (°C) 70 65 60 55 50 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time (s) Fig. 8: Transient response before control modification 85 80 Desired Temperature Actual Temperature
validuniversity ID numbers. We are planning to make this resource available to the public uponadministrative approval.Bibliography[1] W. Swart and Bengu, “A computer-aided, total quality approach to manufacturing education inengineering,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 415–422.[2] “nsf08204.pdf.” [Online]. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08204/nsf08204.pdf[3] C. A. Canesin, F. A. S. Goncalves, and L. P. Sampaio, “Simulation tools for power electronics coursesbased on java technologies,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 580–586, Nov. 2010.[4] Fraser, D.M., R. Pillay, R.L. Tjatindi, and J.M. Case. “Enhancing the learning of fluid mechanicsusing computer simulations”. Journal of Engineering Education 96 (4
learning – A systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Centre, 2004.3. Felder, Richard M., Woods, Donald R., Stice, James E., and Rugarcia, Armando. The Future of EngineeringEducation II. Teaching Methods That Work. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 26-39, 2000.4. Kipper, Hants, and Ruutmann, Tiia. Teaching Strategies for Direct and Indirect Instruction in TeachingEngineering. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy – Volume 1, Issue 3, October 2011. Available athttp://www.i-jep.org.5. Peercy, Paul S. and Cramer, Steven M. Redefining Quality in Engineering Education through HybridInstruction. Guest Editorial. Journal of Engineering Education. October 2011, Vol. 100, No. 4, pp. 625-629.American Society for Engineering
evidenceof certain FE and PE topics in the capstone course. We will also explore the connection betweencapstone course design and student career efficacy to help develop a common guideline for anyIndustrial Engineering capstone course.Bibliography1. Beyerlein, S., Davis, D., Trevisan, M., Thompson, P., & Harrison, K. (2006). Assessment framework for capstone design courses. Proceedings of the 2006 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.2. Dunlap, J.C. (2005). Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53(1), 65-85.3. Farr, J.V., Lee, M.A., Metro, R.A., & Sutton, J.P. (2001). Using a
25.109.8References 1. Hensel, R., Sigler, J.R., Lowery, A. (2008). “Breaking the cycle of calculus failure: models of early math intervention to enhance engineering retention.” Proceedings, ASEE Annual Convention, Paper AC 2008-2079. 2. Koch, D., and Herrin, G.D. (2006). “Intervention strategy for improving success rates in calculus.” Proceedings, ASEE Annual Convention, Paper 2006-775. 3. Lavelle, J.P., and Keltie, R.F. (2005). “Calculus intervention for first-semester engineering students.” Proceedings, ASEE Annual Convention. 4. Sachs, L. Applied Statistics: A Handbook of Techniques. 2nd edition, Springer, New York, New York, 1984. 5. Jaeger, B, Freeman, S., Whalen, R., and Payne, R. (2010). “Successful students: smart or tough
developed 29 A formal faculty assessor (advisor) is assigned 71 Project carried out in a robust organization 86 An appointed representative from the client organization participates 14 Frequent, regular meetings with the supervising instructor 57 Weekly progress reports and evaluations 71 Formal presentation(s) of progress 29 A final session with the client 57 A final closing presentation to faculty 57 Faculty in earlier courses evaluate 43 Student self-evaluation
data for both agencies each semester; therefore, offset agencyreview periods do not influence the data collection and evaluation process.The student assessment methodology IUPUI uses for accreditation purposes is a multi-method/multi-source approach. Using this approach, according to Elaine Cooney, Chairpersonfor the Department of Engineering Technology, “maximize[s] validity and reduce[s] bias of anyone approach” (Cooney & Reid, 2004) 6. Cooney and Reid continue, “even though allassessment options have advantages and disadvantages, the ‘ideal’ method… [shoulddemonstrate] a balance between the program needs, validity, and affordability ‘in time, effort andmoney’”. The multi-method/multi-source approach uses guidelines from both the
Industry: Identifying and Addressing Workforce Challenges. Report of Findings and Recommendations, May 01, 2005.[6] Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2010-11 Edition, Engineering Technicians. Retrieved December 21, 2011 from http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos112.htm.[7] Anderson, J., Dubikovsky, S., Way, R., Harriger, B., Pringle, B. F., & Schaffer, S., Modular approach in development of curriculum for aerospace schools provides flexibility and uniformity, Proceedings of the Page 25.140.8 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, June
Production Technician (MSSC-CPT) credential was developed bythe same named council and grew out of the US Department of Labor efforts in the1990’s to develop a credential for manufacturing front line or entry level employees. Theskill sets for a CPT are built on the industrial engineering principles and practices forproduction which are common to all manufacturing and production enterprises. Thus, thecredential is portable and applicable to all manufacturing sectors. These foundationalskills and knowledge are bundled into four broad areas common to the manufacturingsector: Manufacturing Processes & Production, Quality Practices and Measurement,Maintenance Awareness, and Safety. The skill sets are also aligned with the USDepartment of Labor
traditional counterparts as possible. Page 25.146.8Planned next steps to this research include the continuation of this study and this cohort groupinto their senior year as well as launching a new study with a new group of freshman cohorts inorder to compare results. In addition, it would be advantageous to expand this work to otherinstitutions, such as one in a traditional campus environment, for comparable results.Bibliography1. Carliner, S. (2004.) An overview of online learning (2nd Ed.) Amherst, MA: HRD Press.2. Horn, L., & Nevill, S. (2006). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 2003–04: With a
(and perhaps more expensive) radio laboratories are available – see [3]-[7].Bibliography1. S. Makarov, R. Ludwig, and S. Bitar, Electric Circuits and Circuit Components, Wiley Custom, Hoboken, NJ, 2011, ISBN 978-1-118-23356-8.2. Laboratory #6, ECE2010-Intro to ECE, ECE Dept., WPI 2011-2012.3. Online: http://courses.cit.cornell.edu/ee476/FinalProjects/s2010/pel29_slp56/pel29_slp56/index.html4. Online: www.engr.uconn.edu/ece/.../projects/ecesd21/final-report-291.pdf5. Online: http://web.eecs.utk.edu/~snaciri/courses/ece342/project2/Project%20%232%20Report%20ECE%20342.pdf6. Online: http://www.ece.vt.edu/ugrad/viewcourse.php?number=4676-1497. Online: http://www.ik4hdq.net/doc/testi/HRL.pdf
clearly describe the changes to be made to the system? Table 3: Rubric used for submissions of technical articles or papers. 1 Do the pages stick to the topic? 2 Are there an appropriate number of links to outside sources? 3 Does the analysis clearly identify the ethical issues? 4 Do the pages treat differing viewpoints fairly? 5 Is the organization of page(s) logical? 6 Do the pages identify several issues that are important in learning about the topic?For the analysis in this paper we collected project review data from two software projects.Students were asked to evaluate the entire project based on rubrics in Tables 1 and 2, one rubricfor each software project. We follow an informal, blind review process, where
continuing to overlook a population of technically-capableresources that stands ready to contribute to an organization’s and on a larger scale or nation’ssuccess.References1. Lombardi, M. (2011). Hiring to Win: Secrets to Sourcing and Selecting Top Talent, Retrieved August 24, 2011, from http://talentmgt.com/events/view/hiring-to-win-secrets-to-sourcing-and-selecting-top-talent.2. Bell, R. (2011). Survey Shows Talent Shortage Grows Despite High Unemployment, Retrieved September 22, 2011, from http://www.workforce.com/article/20110519/NEWS01/305199997.3. High, M. S. & Nowakowski, J. M. (2011). What do markets tell us about demand for engineers in the workplace?, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual
Lecturers, Assessment Series, LTSN Generic Centre, York.Brown, S. and Dove, P. (eds) (1991) Self and Peer Assessment, Standing Conference on EducationalDevelopment, Birmingham.Brown, S. and Glasner, A. (eds) (1999) Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and UsingDiverse Approaches, Open University Press, Buckingham.Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Barr, R., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education.Change, 27(6): 12-25.Bedwell, L.E., Hunt, G.H., Touzel, T.J., & Wiseman, D.G. (1991). Effective teaching: Preparation andimplementation. 2nd Edition. Springfield, Illinois: Charles Thomas Publishers.Chickering A.W., & Reisser, L. (1993
typically have highunderlying ink density and students frequently cross-out strokes with a single straight line.Strokes are first processed by the cross-out recognizer. Strokes not positively identified as across-out are then classified using our extension of Peterson et al.’s method.3.3 Stroke GroupingWe have found that there are two types of errors that can be made in classifying strokes: actualerrors and contextual errors. Actual errors are straightforward, incorrect classifications, such aspart of a beam in a free body diagram that was mislabeled as an equation stroke. Contextualerrors are more subtle and depend on the situation in which a stroke appears. Consider the letter“F”, which appears frequently in both free body diagrams and equations
2366, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2001 ASEE Annual Conference 8. S. Hsieh,”Design Of Web Based Ladder Logic Tool Kit For Programmable Logic Controller Education”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2001 ASEE Annual Conference 9. R. Pecen and L. Guo, “Student Design Projects In A Programmable Logic Controller (Plc) Course”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2008 ASEE Annual Conference 10. Festo Company, http://www.festo.com/cms/en-us_us/index.htm 11. F.D. Pertruzella, “Programmable Logic Controllers”, Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, 4th Edition, 2011 12. “Festo Didactic”, http://www.festo-didactic.com
ofUBVRI5 (standard bandpasses for astronomical research) filters for photometry. Also availableare narrow band Hα, O III, and S II filters for imaging and photometry. The telescope ismounted on the GTO 3600 German equatorial mount from Astro-Physics6. Like many Germanequatorial mounts, the GTO 3600 employs worm gears on the two control axis. The rightascension axis, the one responsible for countering the Earth's rotation, contains a high resolutionencoder that reduces the tracking error to under one second of arc providing a very stableimaging platform. The software system is designed to provide maximum flexibility. At the lowest level, theASCOM platform7 provides a driver based programming interface to the observatory hardware.This driver
thesingle line diagram. While studying the single line diagram they learn what type of informationto acquire from it. The major differentiation from architectural drawings is that this diagram isnot to scale and it cannot be used for lineal, area, or volume calculations during the takeoffprocess. Students then informed about the schedules sheet(s) which provide information onequipment and fixtures. They are informed that this is critical information and it needs to becompared with the respective information provided in the specifications. Specifications mayinclude similar, additional or complementing information. Last step is to analyze the details. Notonly plumbing drawings but HVAC and electrical drawings will contain details. Students
Students’ Financial Support Patterns Affect Their Times toDegree and Completion Probabilities? Journal of Human Resources. 30: 581-610.9 Lovitts, B. 2001. Leaving the Ivory Tower The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. p.131.10 Nettles, M. & C. Millett. 2006. Three Magic Letters Getting to Ph.D. Baltimore, MD: The Johns HopkinsUniversity Press.11 Ehrenberg, R, Zuckerman, H., Groen, J. and S. Brucker. 2010. Educating Scholars Doctoral Education in theHumanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.12 Bandura, A. 1986. Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. AmericanPsychologist 1389-1391.13 Gibson, D.E. 2004. Role models
frequently than that in Prototype I (No cues) group. Page 25.1404.7 Table 2. Gaze percentage in each region for Prototype II S Subject 1 Subject 2 Subject 3 Subject 4 Subject 5 Cost 3.6 5 5.5 2.3 4 Equipment Selection 16.9 25.9 13 12.5 18.1 Process Selection 12.1 8.7 16.1 18.9 7 Time 6.3 12.4 12 16.7 6.8Table 3 shows gaze percentage in each region for Prototype III (Red dots). Gaze percentages
very easy todetermine which product terms are true, and for those that are false to determine exactly whythey are false (i.e. which literal(s) is(are) false). Performing this inspection for all combinationsof inputs for simple sets of equations, or an interesting subset of those combinations for complexsets, can lead to an in-depth understanding of any specific design and of HDL described designsin general. As stated earlier, both combinational and sequential logic are supported inVisiBoole. Combinational assignment equations have only a variable name to the left of anequal sign. Sequential logic assignments use a variable name with a “.d” sufix. When formattedfor the display, the variable name and the “.d” are separated by a space. The
AnnualASEE Conference and Exposition, Chicago, Il. June 20063. Alenskis, Brian, “Integrating Ethics into an Engineering TechnologyCourse: An Interspersed Component Approach,” Proceeding of the 1997 AnnualASEE Conference and Exposition, Milwaukee, WI. June 19974. Mindek, R. B., Keyser, T. K., Musiak, R. E., Schreiner, S., Vollaro, M.B.,“Integration of Engineering Ethics Into The Curriculum: Student Performance andFeedback,” Proceeding of the 2003 Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition,Nashville, TN. June 20035. Durfee, J., Loendorf, W., “Using the National Society of ProfessionalEngineer’ (NSPE) Ethics Examination as an Assessment Tool in the EngineeringTechnology Curriculum,” Proceeding of the 2008 Annual ASEE Conference andExposition
Greatly improved Yes Surfing/Skimming Not included in Site dependent. Yes phase ITable 1: Comparison between Phase I, Phase II and Phase III*(Artino and Stephens (2009) stated “ To succeed in autonomous online learningenvironments, it helps to be a highly motivated, self-regulated learner.”) Page 25.1502.43. Methodology3.1 The ProcessThis information was obtained using action research. Action Research is a specific variationof Evaluation Research. McMillan and Schumacher state (2001) ”Evaluation Researchfocuses on a particular practice at a given site(s). The practice may be a program, a product,or a
, aandtest in thee laboratory. An examp ple of one of the student lload cells is shown in Fiigure 4. Theestudents are told thatt the owner is not an engineer, and thherefore theyy must comm municate witth thebusiness owner in terrms that he oro she can un nderstand. Sttudents also write a simpple program m toacquire data d from thee transducer in the laboraatory, and thhen test the eentire systemm to verify ittsfunctionaality. Page 25.1041.7 Figu ure 4. Studen nt built forcee transducer..A short survey s was given