organize our discussion of the criteria that students apply to their decision making around the3 focal fields: engineering, science, and mathematics. We conclude by examining whether andhow participant decision-making exhibits ways of thinking that are common across these threedomains.Engineering CommitmentsBecause the lessons observed were a part of an engineering design curriculum, it is not surprisingthat engineering commitments were used the most often in the participants’ work. In particular,three of the common engineering commitments emerged as most relevant and useful for theseparticipants: attention to design requirements and constraints; attention to user needs; anddeveloping a practical solution. We saw little evidence of the remaining
. J. (2009). “The Integration of BIM in the Undergraduate Curriculum: an analysis of undergraduate courses”, International Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference. Associated Schools of Construction. 9. Miliband, D. (2006) “Choice and Voice in Personalized Learning”, Personalizing Education, OECD/CERI, pp. 21-30. 10. Wolf, M.A. (2010). Innovate to Educate: System [Re]Design for Personalized Learning, Software & Information Industry Association, p.7. Page 25.611.9
the NC TEACH OnLine Program, NC TEACH II, and program website.Dr. Eric N. Wiebe, North Carolina State University Eric Wiebe is an Associate Professor in the Department of STEM Education at NC State University and Senior Research Fellow at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. A focus of his research and outreach work has been the integration of multimedia and multimodal teaching and learning approaches in STEM instruction. He has also worked on research and evaluation of technology integration in instruc- tional settings in both secondary and post-secondary education. Wiebe has been a member of ASEE since 1989.Dr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Laura J. Bottomley, Director, Women in
walls, 1986-1987; and the United States Air Force Summer Faculty Research Award, Edwards Air Force Base, California, to work on experimental and theoretical analysis of the fracture behavior of a composite solid rocket propellant, Summer 1989. He holds current membership in professional organizations the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and the American Society for Engineering Education. He has been awarded travel grants to present a research paper at the Fourth International Congress of Biorheology, Jikei University, Tokyo, Japan; expenses covered in part by an invited lecture travel grant from the In- ternational Congress of Biorheology and in part by a Purdue XL International Travel Grant, 1981; the
duplication here isnot warranted. The work of Felder and Silverman5is one valuable reference.2. Articulate Clear Learning Objectives for the Course6Learning objectives are statements that clearly capture the intended outcome of the course,specifically detailing the skills or knowledge that students should matriculate towards during theprogression of the course. The course learning objectives serve a few purposes, but mostimportantly they can act as an important guide for course development. Curriculum design,including choosing which content to include and in which order, should follow the objectivesvery closely. Clearly articulated objectives allow for straightforward prioritization of topics andallotment of time in the course.Furthermore, the choice
, Bulgaria, China, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, and Thailand. He has numerous publications in engineering and technology education.Prof. Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nathan Mentzer is an Assistant Professor in the College of Technology with a joint appointment in the College of Education at Purdue University. Mentzer was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in curriculum and instruction. After graduation, he completed a one year appointment with the center as a postdoctoral researcher.Dr. Kyungsuk Park, Utah
positive trade balance of any U.S. manufacturing industry4. Page 25.140.2As new and improved processes and materials are being integrated into aerospace manufacturingthe industry is faced with an aging workforce. The average age of a production worker is 54years based on the 2005 President’s report of findings and recommendations for the USaerospace industry5. These workers have continued to retire over the last few years as a result ofcorporate downsizing and employee reductions. These production jobs, when replaced in thecoming years, will lack the skill brought about through years of stewardship and mentorship thathave historically been linked to
Engineering Physics from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in 2010. She is interested in Clean Energy Systems and has native fluency in English and Spanish. She is currently working at General Motors as a Development Engineer for the Chevrolet Volt and has worked for Mitsubishi Power Systems as a Mechanical Engineer.Dr. Jennifer C Adam, Washington State University Dr. Jennifer Adam is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineer- ing at Washington State University (WSU). She applies numerical hydrologic models to investigate the impacts of climate change on regional to continental scale hydrology. For example, she and collabo- rators are currently integrating a regional-scale hydrologic
simulators for labs and healthcare providers together with integrated Logistics support systems for Advanced Cardiac Life Support. One of his current interests is in the area of manufacturing systems for rapid product design and development in international production. An extension of this work is the current effort that established the UTPA Rapid Response Manufactur- ing Center in a consortium of academic institutions, economic development corporations, industry, local, state, and federal governments. This initiative is an integral component of the North American Advanced Manufacturing and Research Initiative (NAAMREI). In addition, he has served and continues to serve in leadership positions in technology based economic
of a High School Science, Engineering, and Design Course: Observing Documentation and Communication Patterns to Inform Pedagogy and AssessmentIntroductionThere are multiple challenges to introducing engineering into high school classrooms. Theseinclude, but are not limited to, curriculum placement, class time, content expertise of teachers,and assessment1. Often time limitations force simultaneous teaching or integration of design,engineering, and technology in science courses. When this happens measurement of learningand conceptual development has to be navigated in lessons that have layers of content or skills,and assessment of working
AC 2012-4254: DUAL MODEL SUMMER BRIDGE PROGRAMS: A NEWCONSIDERATION FOR INCREASING RETENTION RATESDr. Jeff M. Citty , University of Florida Jeff Citty, Ed.D., is an Assistant Director of Engineering Student Services at the University of Florida. His scholarly interests include first year student success and student leadership development.Dr. Angela S. Lindner, University of Florida Angela Lindner received a B.S. degree in chemistry from the College of Charleston in South Carolina in 1983 and an M.S. degree in chemical engineering from Texas A&M University in 1987. Her master’s thesis work, funded by the Texas Transportation Institute, involved use of phosphogypsum, a byproduct of phosphoric acid production
. Page 25.233.2Supto1 taught for many years as an adjunct and humorously describes how adjuncts can betreated as a “pet rock” which is a near-perfect low-maintenance pet. Adjuncts typically are “offthe radar screen” of the Dean and Chair, hence receive minimal feedback except from students intheir classes. Adjuncts often have little authority to improve the laboratory/class they teach andmay not be included in curriculum decisions. Supto recommends that “every adjunct shouldhave a full-time faculty member assigned as an advocate and resource” but this often isn’t thecase1. Adjuncts are often left to fend for themselves.Departments and faculty may want to do an excellent job of teaching undergraduates, yet it isoften the lack of resources and not
program/discipline specific criteria. For decades, technical programsleading to an electrical/electronics technology (ET) or engineering technology (EET) associate’sdegree have tended to follow a cook-book type approach to new curriculum development and/oradoption by focusing on a “parts-centric” approach to the introduction of new technology and the Page 25.1254.2electronic devices that enable it. In fact, the vast majority of these programs, even now, follow afairly standard collection of technical courses1, whose content is oftentimes dictated by the bestselling textbooks on the particular subject matter. To be sure, faculty with industry
implementationcosts and multiple advantages for both students and faculty. Along with the obvious benefit ofdeveloping team problem solving and discussion skills, students receive fast feedback on theirperformance, the instructor spends less time reviewing the exam (in class and with individuals),and the classroom environment benefits from the added value placed on collaboration andreciprocal learning. This paper describes a number of variations on the team testing idea anddiscusses how factors in the course affect the type of team test to develop.In a team test, the students complete an individual test paper as well as a group test paper. Theindividual component enforces individual accountability and allows the instructor to askquestions in formats that do
called Kilo Volt Ampere (KVA) capacity.Electric motors are rated as either Integral Horsepower or Fractional Horsepower. IntegralHorsepower motors are rated at one horsepower or more, while Fractional Horsepower motorsare rated at less than one horsepower. Electric motors according to their operational tasks arerated as Continuous or Intermittent Duty motors. Devices requiring continuous operation, suchas electric fans, use continuous duty motors, while items such as electric compressors, thatrequire a cyclical and short period of usage, utilize Intermittent Duty motors.The author of this paper has taught electric machine classes in both semester and quarter systemsin electrical engineering (EE) and electrical engineering technology (EET
throughout thisundergraduate research.Introduction Wind tunnels, beginning from the rude but arguably famous Wright Brothers device circa1903 to the great research facilities funded by NASA, have uncovered the dynamics existingbetween fluid and solid objects. The Wright Brothers recognized that by blowing air past a modelof their aircraft in a device that could mimic conditions favorable to flight, they could ultimatelydeliver the answer sought after by man for millennia, the ability to fly. The Wright Brothersprevailed, and the history of the wind tunnel as an integral component to aerodynamic researchwas documented.What the Wright Brothers failed to recognize, was that the complexity of flight and those tomimic the conditions in a device are
currently a professor of engineering technology at Middle Tennessee State University. He received a B.S. degree in E.E. from Damascus University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in E.E. from Tennessee Technological University. He is actively engaged in curriculum development for technology education. He has authored and co-authored several industry-based case studies. He is also conducting research in the area of mass spectrometry, power electronics, lasers, instrumentation, digital forensics, and microcontroller applications. He can be reached at sbenaty@mtsu.edu. Page 25.941.1 c American
scientific and technological understanding? • What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?Secondary • Integration of education and research • DiversityNIH review criteria28:Significance • Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? • If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? • How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?Innovation • Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical
AC 2012-4240: USING PUBLIC POLICY THEORY TO IMPROVE POWERENGINEERING EDUCATIONDr. Timothy R.B. Taylor P.E., University of KentuckyProf. Johne’ M. Parker, University of Kentucky Johne’ M. Parker is an Associate Professor of mechanical engineering. Page 25.1438.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Using Public Policy Theory to improve Power Engineering EducationIntroductionAs society continually increases its reliance on complex, highly integrated technological systemsto function, engineering education must evolve to include not only traditional engineeringsubjects
for us however toask how best to use this experience to enhance an adult engineering students’ experience indegree programs.Extensive work in the field of Adult Education has focused on areas where adults are wellrepresented, including workplace training, and community colleges, but less literature has takenadult engineering students as the focus. Furthermore, within engineering education, variousspecial groups have been studied at some length, including women and ethnic minorities, but lesshas centered on adult students.Two recent areas of research that may have connections to adult engineering students includework on United States military veterans in engineering and the integration of peer tutors and peerquality managers in the learning
AC 2012-4716: A THERMODYNAMICS SHORT COURSE FOR A SUM-MER OUTREACH PROGRAMMs. Natalie Barrett, Purdue University, West Lafayette Natalie Barrett is a mechanical engineering Ph.D. student at Purdue University and is interested in re- newable energy. Barrett received a B.S.M.E. from Florida State University, a M.S.M.E. from Georgia Institute of Technology, and a M.B.A. from Indiana University. She has taught at Wentworth Institute of Technology as an Adjunct Professor. She has also worked in industry at Pratt & Whitney for several years and served in roles such as Integrated Product Team Leader and Affordability and Risk Manager for the F135 Engine Program
. This will inspire students and help them comprehend and respond todiverse and fast changing knowledge and technologies in Aerospace domain. This initiative is in-line with the development of a new Aerospace engineering program at Southern PolytechnicState University. The research skills obtained by undergraduate students in their early educationcareers are an important learning experience. Special emphasis is put on design, practice,integration, and application of the scientific and technical knowledge learned from the classroomthrough various activities. The topic chosen for research is rather simple yet important tounderstand. It has real world applications. It provides analytical and experimental knowledge andskills to the students involved
industry ties to develop a deep understanding of intrapreneurship and develop collaborative intrapreneurship end-to-end education (IE3) curricula that will enrich the student learning experience Employs intercollegiate student projects (ISP) that are impactful and multi-disciplinary, with diverse student teams as a central element of an exciting new intrapreneurial cultureThe IE3 curriculum development will be led by two of the institutions (Baylor University andUniversity of Detroit Mercy) and will consist of: An in-depth study of intrapreneurship Development of three modules on innovation in a corporate context Creation and presentation of a seminar series, and An intrapreneurship-focused
muscle damage classification by morph metric (shape analysis), biochemical, and Raman spectral analysis to provide objective criteria for diagnosis and treatment moni- toring.Dr. Jeyamkondan Subbiah P.E., University of Nebraska, Lincoln Jeyamkondan Subbiah is an Associate Professor of food engineering at the University of Nebraska, Lin- coln, with joint appointments in the Departments of Biological Systems Engineering and Food Science & Technology. His research focuses on spectral imaging for predicting food quality (beef tenderness) and early diagnosis of human diseases (peripheral arterial disease). He has active research in the area of food safety engineering through integration of heat transfer model and
AC 2012-3356: MOTIVATING LEARNERS: A PRIMER FOR ENGINEER-ING TEACHING ASSISTANTSMrs. Ana T. Torres-Ayala, University of South Florida Ana T. Torres-Ayala is a doctoral candidate in higher education at the University of South Florida. She holds a B.S. degree in computer engineering from the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez, and a M.Eng. degree in computer and systems engineering from Rensselear Polytechnic Institute. She has experience in the telecommunications industry where she worked for Lucent Technologies. Torres-Ayala was previously an information technology instructor. Her research interests include faculty development, scholarship of teaching and learning, graduate education, and broadening participation of
the following degrees of importance:‘Not Important’, ‘Important’, ‘Very Important’, ‘Extremely Important’, or ‘N/A’.As an example, the question “How important is knowledge of these Products Design subjects?”resulted in high ratings for ‘CAD/CAM/CAE’ and ‘Tolerance Analysis/GD&T’, and low ratingsfor ‘Marketing/Sales’ and ‘Intellectual Property Protection’.Survey ResultsA total of 106 individuals participated in the survey. The following pages provide the rankedorder of results for those deemed more important to ensure emphasis in our program, and also ofthose deemed of lesser importance as candidates for reduced emphasis in our curriculum. Thefull list of ranked topics and ratings can be found in Attachment D
, solar heatgain coefficient, visible light transmittance, and U-value.As part of a NSF International Research Experiences for Students (IRES) project a team ofgraduate and undergraduate students at a major U.S. university worked with L&T’s designengineers at the Center for Excellence and Futuristic Design (CEFD) in conducting all thenecessary calculations to determine the annual cooling loads for each of the glass-frame-shadingcombinations. The goal was to tabulate all the necessary values and calculations into an Excelspread sheet and then develop a simple interface –using Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) –for L&T’s architects. The program accesses a hidden database that allows the architects tosimply select their desired values for
thinking to reality depends on similar cognitive processes to rationalthought 9.Creativity comes in different forms. A number of thinkers suggest models of creative people. Forexample, one model indicates that there are kinds to produce growth, innovation, speed, etc. Thefour Creativity Profiles: incubate, imagine, improve, and invest can help achieve such goals 10:Mark Batey suggested that the creative profile can be explained by four primary creativity traits.These are: idea generation, personality, motivation, and confidence 11-12.Creative industries and servicesToday, creativity is the core activity of a growing section of the global economy known as the"creative industries." The creative professional workforce is merging as an integral part
photons to electrical output has been a topic of high interest. Opticalconcentrators have been researched to improve panel efficiency. However, undergraduatecourses that focus on the practical design and implementation of solar system starting with thepanel to end user are virtually absent in the literature. Many courses across the nation are MEcourses that focus more on solar radiation and the thermal aspect. A few EE courses devoteabout fifty percent of the course to semiconductors and the remaining to system hardware. Thefundamentals of the system components are covered in other courses in EE curriculum and nofocus on integration to solar conversion is presented. However this approach needs seriousrevision in view of the importance and
engineering.Jean S. DeClerck, Michigan Technological University Jean Straw DeClerck has supported two National Science Foundation (NSF) grants through the design, facilitation, and ongoing improvement of ethics education instruction to science and engineering students. She is an Engaged Learning and Integrated Technology Specialist at Michigan Technological University’s Van Pelt and Opie Library. Her undergraduate studies included technical communication and mechanical engineering coursework, and she will complete her master’s of science degree in rhetorical and tech- nical communications at Michigan Tech in early 2012. Her current interests include engaged learning environments, mentorship, and the rhetorical aspects of