specific instructional/intellectual objectives of the proposednano/microengineering course are:(1) Students will be able to link meso-scale engineering to micro/nano-scale engineering;(2) Students will compare/contrast/evaluate nano/micro-scale engineering applications;(3) Students will use the computational/design tools available for nano/micro-scale engineering and will know their limitations;(4) Students will use fabrication facilities to implement micro-scale structures.PARTICLE TRANSPORT COURSE MODULES These combined research and curriculum development (CRCD) courses arecomposed of four modules. The models are: • Fundamental of particle transport, dispersion, deposition and removal. • Computational modeling of particle
to Practice (E2R2P): NSF Program: EEC Division of Engineering Education and Centers Grant 1037808 Our effort addresses the question: How can successes in engineering education researchtranslate into widespread instructional practice? Published research has provided a robust set ofdocumented tools and techniques for transforming individual engineering courses fromtraditional lecture-based formats to those that emphasize project- and problem-based learning[1].These new formats support transfer of learned skills to subsequent courses and the workplace.Unfortunately, the mere availability of such research has not resulted in its widespread adoptionacross engineering programs. The pace of adoption has
Classification (IPC) and incorporate the best classification practices from theUSPTO. Starting in 2013 the EPO and USPTO will classify all EP and US documents using theCPC. This development has significant implications for academic engineering librarians. Patentsare one of the core literatures of engineering and have been taught in engineering schools formore than a century. As early as 1913, engineering students at Cornell University attendedlectures on patent topics.1 Today, academic engineering librarians often provide formal andinformal instruction to students on how to search the patent literature, including how to usepatent classification codes to retrieve patents related to specific technologies. In an informalsurvey of academic engineering
exemplar of an inductiveapproach to teaching and learning”10 and contains a directed sequence of steps that immerses thelearner in the four dimensions of the How People Learn (HPL) effective learning environmentand provides a framework for CBI and the design of associated learning activities11. Thesuggested cycle is illustrated in figure 1 and it is described below from the perspective of thefaculty development program. As described in the literature, the legacy cycle contains steps or Page 25.1030.3activities that appeal to different learning styles10. Furthermore, most engineers relate to thiscycle since most of the activities align
, concise summary of theassumptions, analyses, design decisions, and justifications is in itself a challenging task for mostteams as it requires that they identify and present only the most important assumptions, analyses, Page 25.1031.4and results from their work.What follows is a brief description of each of the four different in-class activities and theassociated peer-to-peer assessment approaches.In-Class Activity 1: Poster Gallery WalkFor the Poster Gallery Walk, each team creates an 11"×17" poster that is prepared with drawings,sketches, and text (minimum18 point font) and summarizes their solution to the design problem.The posters are placed
satisfaction with one’s position at the university.This paper is the second in a series that examines data from this study. Paper 1 [1] reported onthe distribution of RIT STEM faculty, outcomes of institutional processes of recruitment andadvancement, distribution of STEM faculty in leadership positions, allocation of resources forSTEM faculty, barriers to the recruitment and advancement of women, success of existingstructures at addressing these barriers, accomplishments over the grant period, and plans forinstitutionalizing various initiatives. This paper focuses on distillation of climate survey data toobtain useful and meaningful measures related to work/life balance, climate, value and influence.The paper also explores answers to the following
discussed, along with suggestions for educators on how tointegrate the contributions of women in STEM into the classroom.IntroductionFor at least forty years, women’s historians have delved into the historical record to deconstructfamiliar narratives around who is responsible for advances in science and technology. Thesehistorians have worked to dismantle the assumptions and practices that have typically excludedwomen’s scientific contributions throughout history. For example, the extensive scholarship onthe history of women in science and technology in Margaret Rossiter’s two-volume WomenScientists in America,1 demonstrates that tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, ofwomen have worked as scientists in fields as diverse as zoology and
asked to rate the extent that they were interested in various components of typical and non-typical Ph.D. degree programs. Results indicated that participants felt that doctoral programswould be prepared to do almost everything on the survey, including things not typically taught.In response to a question about challenges to pursuing a Ph.D., potential Ph.D. candidatesfrequently mentioned financial concerns, and often stated that they “did not want to teach”reflecting a lack of understanding that the doctoral degree is relevant to industrial jobs. Resultsfrom this study can be used to inform doctoral programs and enhance the recruitment efforts ofengineering doctoral students in the United States.1. BackgroundThe traditional expectation of
. Vincent Joseph Amuso Sr., Rochester Institute of Technology Vincent Joseph Amuso, Sr., has been with the Rochester Institute of Technology since June 1, 1999. He is a faculty member in the Kate Gleason College of Engineering. He came to RIT with nearly 10 years of de- fense industry-related engineering design and development experience. He has worked as a government contractor with Lockheed Martin and the Sensis Corporation. He has also worked with the Air Force Research Lab (AFRL) and the U.S. Army Missile Defense Agency as a consultant and researcher. He continues to be involved with the AFRL in the areas of radar systems analysis, deep ground penetrating Synthetic Aperture Radar used for three dimensional
research published on how to address the on-going UnitedStates (US) national challenge of increasing gender parity in undergraduate engineeringprograms is almost entirely US centric. The authors of this paper reached across borders andoutside the STEM education literature to gain a different perspective on the US problem ofpersistent gender segregation in undergraduate engineering education. As we compared the issueof gender parity between the US, Jordan and Malaysia, three previously unexplored areas beganto take shape: 1. The US has potentially inaccurately scoped the problem, 2. Different factors seem to contribute to greater gender equity in undergraduate engineering programs in Jordan and Malaysia than in the US, and 3. A
disciplines of engineering to their students, with the goalof preparing them for the practical, real-world experiences they will encounter in theirprofessional life. Though much of the field includes anecdotes and teaching strategiesthat educators have tried and “worked”, not as much has been done to examine specialpopulations, in particular Deaf engineering students. Most of the research in this areafocuses on the interface between the Deaf student and educator. One study examines theeffect of using sign language interpreting, real-time text, and both [1]. Here, the authorsconclude that providing real-time text produced significantly higher performance fromDeaf students, and that the combination did not produce any greater benefit. Anotherpaper
, engineering departments may need to create a way to foster this sense of community,which in turn may effectively enhance the learning environment, reduce attrition, increaseacademic performance and ultimately aid in the production of well needed, competent minorityengineers.IntroductionLearning environments, where students actively participate is one factor that has been found tohave a positive influence on learning. Three main factors comprise the learning environment:individuals, relationships among those individuals, and the culture within the environment1.More specifically, Johnson 1 specifies that the definition of the learning environment is asperceived by the individual. This implies that what truly gives meaning to the learningenvironment is
developments in the study of philosophy, engineering and engineering educationThe last decade has been marked by an increasing interest among engineers and engineeringeducators in the philosophy of engineering education. In 2003 there were two major publicationsconcerned with this matter. First, Billy Koen‟s “Discussion of the Method: Conducting theEngineer‟s Approach to Problem Solving” rooted in the use of heuristics that he claimed to beuniversal [1]. Second, Louis Bucciarelli explored the connections between philosophy andengineering especially engineering design, in a book with the formidable title of “EngineeringPhilosophy” [2]. A year later, Goldman argued the case for a philosophy of engineering asopposed to a philosophy of science [3]. A
25.1040.2PHOTON MASSThe Helium Neon Laser operation is dependent on Light Amplification by Stimulated Emissionof Radiation. The metastable helium atoms in the 3P2 state collide with the Neon atoms andtransfer the energy to the 3S state of Neon. When the excited neon atom in 3S releases a photonit drops to the 2P energy state. The quantum of energy is emitted as a photon. Professor Willis ELamb wrote a paper “Theory of the Optical Maser”1. My research on gaseous lasers “TimeDevelopment of a Laser Signal”2 demonstrated how this transfer of energy from heliummetastable atom produces an excited state in the neon atom.Conventional physics has established that a photon has momentum, but does not have mass. Icannot find a reference in the literature for a
students are very excited about the opportunity to makemeasurements of their own appliances. Inevitably, we hear students sharing their experiences ofsurprise at some of their measurements. Several students have even volunteered that the MEAencouraged them to modify their behavior regarding electricity usage. Their enthusiasm for themeasurements helped motivate effort during the calculation-intensive model developmentportion of the activity.Viscosity Measurement MEAHere, a petroleum company has hired the student teams to develop a small, robust device formeasuring fluid viscosity quickly in the field. The viscometer is supposed to work over a widerange of viscosities (1-1000 cP), although the device does not necessarily have to measuredynamic
understand the mapping relation of source domain and target domainwith the sentence “Thought As Food”. See table 1.Table 1. The mapping relationship of the conceptual metaphor “Thought As Food” (Su, 2000:419 Figure 6).Source domain (Food) Mapping (As) → Target domain (Thought)ingredient The content of thought as the ingredient content of food.taste Quality of thought as flavor of food. qualitypreparation Creation of thought as preparation of formation food.Digestion Compression of thought as digestion of comprehension food.The theory of conceptual blending addressed by Fauconnier
Page 25.1043.3the sample, 326 Caucasian students, 12 Foreign National students and 3 students who did notspecify either of these categories.To assess these students, the LAESE (Longitudinal Assessment of Engineering Self-efficacy)-aninstrument created, tested, and validated to measure self-efficacy, inclusion, and outcomeexpectations8-was administered. Figure 1 shows a summary of the subscales measured by theLAESE instrument. The questions relating to each subscale were designed to identify thesupports and barriers engineering students encounter while pursuing an engineering degree,which ultimately determines their engineering self-efficacy. The expected outcome would be tosee an increase in subscale averages as a student progresses through
knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors(methodological framework discussed in the methods section) regarding gender and STEM, andhow this may potentially influence how they counsel and engage with students. The purpose ofthis study is to examine counselor’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior related to gender andSTEM. Research Questions The specific questions guiding this study are the following: 1) Do PK-12 counselors believe that girls can achieve equally as well in math and science as boys? 2) Do PK-12 counselors encourage students to choose math and science coursework? 3) Do PK-12 counselors know that females are underrepresented in STEM occupations, and are negatively affected by stereotypes? 4) Do PK-12 counselors
speed internet connection.MethodologyThe goal of our project is to provide users with an interface that will work in any Internet-enabled web browser without the need to install any software. The project will include threesections: client side, web server, and experiment server (see Figure 1). The client side willcommunicate their commands to the experiment server through the web server, which acts as amedium for control and data-basing. When the clients log in their web browser on our websitewhere the web server is located, they will be asked to sign in using their givenusername/password. This username/password combination will be set to a default value for eachstudent, using their student id number as the username and password. Upon logging
research questions sought to assess the degree of variability between TAgrading within each course. A one-way ANOVA performed for each class and each semesterassessed whether TA was a significant predictor of student score in each of the measureddimensions (e.g., homework grade, exam grade, etc.). For section homework scores, there weresignificant differences between TAs in 4 of 6 classes. In only one class was there significantvariability between TAs in exam grades. In 3 classes, there was significant variability betweenTAs for final grades. Please see Table 1 for full results. Our third research question examined whether TA experience had a significant impact onstudent grades. We analyzed both classes separately, but did not separate by
(2), 329-345.18. Luegenbiehl, H. C. (2004). Ethical autonomy and engineering in a cross-cultural context. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 8(1), 57-78.19. Robinson, S., Dixon, R., Preece, C., and Moodley, K. (2007). Engineering, business, and professional ethics. New York: Elsevier. Page 25.1047.820. Callahan, J. C. (1988). Ethical issues in professional life. New York: Oxford.21. Lawson, W . D. (2004, January). Professionalism: The golden years. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130(1), 26-36
and the theoretical motivation that serves as a foundation for our activities. This section also includes a description of the settings for implementing the ePortfolio curriculum. Next, we describe the curriculum we have developed and the processes used for its pilot implementation. Then, we outline the assessment methods to be used in the project, including a summary of survey development. Finally, we conclude with a prospectus of areas we hope to describe in the future with analyzed results. II. Overview of Project Activities and Rationale The overall project involves goals of 1) creating curriculum and assessment methods for
. The setup described canbe incorporated into an undergraduate thermodynamics laboratory, or also used as ademonstration in a thermodynamics lecture course. Page 25.1049.2Experimental SetupA commercial thermoelectric device was used for the experimental testing and is a model TEC1-12706 Bismuth Telluride device with a physical size of 40mm x 40mm x 3.5 mm. The devicehas 127 couples and a photo of the device is shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1: Photo of thermoelectric device used for testing (model TEC1-12706).A testing assembly was constructed such that a known heat could be added to “hot” side of thedevice. By measuring the
betrained on the equipment and a buddy system applies requiring at least 2 persons to be presentfor after hours work to take place.Robotics LaboratoriesEven with the low enrollment in the manufacturing engineering program, the class has had agood size about 10 students in lowest points and up to 25 in other semesters recently. Thissection of the paper details each laboratory exercise and relates the exercise to practicalrequirements for practicing manufacturing engineers. Laboratory 1: It is about getting familiar with the Fanuc robots, their teach pendants and Page 25.1050.2 controllers as well as the major frames associated with the
implement a technical prototype in one semester.Student work from a class with this needs-based, human-centered design pedagogical approachis described.1. Introduction Engineering students benefit from working on authentic design challenges that areconnected to real users and real context over “toy problems”. However, finding subject-matterappropriate engineering projects in addition to securing access to real users for design projectscan be immensely challenging and time-consuming for instructors, especially at scale. Thisinnovation relies on students to bring context into the classroom, where the instructor canconnect it to the curriculum. In addition, the learning objectives of the Engineering 301mezzanine Electrical Engineering course
AC 2012-5021: PRECISION MEASUREMENT METHOD OF MISALIGN-MENT, CRACKS, CONTOURS, AND GAPS IN AEROSPACE INDUSTRYDr. Devdas Shetty, University of Hartford Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Dean of Research at the University of Hartford. Has published more than 200 papers and conference presentations and three text books. The field of expertise of Dr. Shetty involves (1) Mechatronics System Desgn, (2) Innovative Product Design, (3) Laser Instrumentation, (4) Laser material processing, (5) Unmanned Aerial Systems, (6) Guided Projectiles, (7) Rehab System for Gait and Walking without fall, (8) Engineering education and (9) ABET accreditation.Mr. Claudio Campana, University of Hartford Claudio Campana is a
. Page 25.1054.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Preliminary Development of the AIChE Concept WarehouseIntroductionThe AIChE Concept Warehouse is being developed with the goal of creating a community oflearning within the discipline of chemical engineering (ChE) focused on concept-basedinstruction. Many engineering educators and industry partners emphasize the need for students toapply their knowledge to new and challenging problems.1 In order to do so, our students mustlearn with understanding.2 A lack of conceptual understanding has been shown to severelyrestrict students’ ability to solve new problems, since they do not have the functionalunderstanding to use their knowledge in new
Page 25.1055.3green flames in Figure 1. With a little practice, students can quickly learn to manually land thespuCraft softly on a landing pad. There is another part of the game in which students/players cangain such practice.The tricky part of the challenge can be seen at the top and left side of Figure 1. As the craft isdescending, a roof is closing over the landing pad. Therefore, if the student slows down too soon,the roof crosses the spuCraft’s path and prevents it from reaching the landing pad. Conversely, ifthe student slows down too late, it will hit the landing pad with a lethal amount of speed. Figure 1: Screenshot of the
of those students inPREP programs around the state is shown in Table 1. Over the past several years the EdinburgPREP program has been steadily growing (approximately 190 students in 2007, 250 students in2009, and 347 students in 2010) along with many of the other 35 PREP programs around thestate and nation.The PREP program is a three to four year academic program that runs seven weeks each summerserving middle and high school students. Students take four classes each year including careerawareness seminars focused on STEM. Courses include Introduction to Engineering, Logic,Computer Science, Algebraic Structures, Introduction to Physics, Problem Solving, Introductionto Probability and Statistics, and Technical Writing. The curriculum for the