experience. This paper discusses the challenges and opportunities for instructors withinternational backgrounds as they teach at US institutions. The paper attempts to address issuesin temporary and permanent positions including diversity, teaching, professional development,mentoring, service, and communication. The authors share their own experiences and that of asmall sample of other international instructors who are teaching at US institutions. The majorityof international faculty who responded to a survey were tenured, full-time professors.Professional development appears to be the leading reason attracting international facultypursuing teaching careers in the US. The majority of those who taught in other countries used alanguage of instruction
experiences to help their graduates excel in their future workenvironment” [1]. Despite this need, only few students are able to or willing to have a studyabroad experience. The 2013 Open Doors report from the Institute for International Educationshows that nationally only 3.9% of engineering students studied abroad during theirundergraduate career [2]. In addition, despite the growing awareness of the benefits of studyabroad by students, the challenges preventing students from studying abroad are numerous andcomplex [2]. According to the IIE Generation Study Abroad White Paper Series, the primarychallenges for many U.S. students can be grouped into to three overarching categories: cost,curriculum and culture [2] .This paper contributes to the body
collaboration in engineering disciplines, and investigated thestate and trajectory of engineering education research collaborations [11, 12]. Other researchersalso explored the impact of international collaboration on engineering students’ learningoutcome and their learning experiences [6, 13, 14]. Specifically, McNeill used qualitativemethods to examine the experiences and learning outcomes of three groups of engineeringstudents involved in global engineering education programs. Dwyer suggested that studyingabroad has a significant impact on students in the areas of continued language use, academicattainment measures, intercultural and personal development, and career choices. Despite ofprior effort, little has been done as related to students
only 8-12 weeks while service is 27 months.Peace Corps training ranked significantly higher at greater frequencies in language and culturalskills over most elements, but this difference was not significant compared to the anthropologyand Sustainable Development Engineering courses. Thus, the pre-Peace Corps preparatorycourses offered through anthropology and the Sustainable Development Engineering coursesignificantly fulfill the self-reported global competency of language and cultural skills, which arethen reinforced during the Peace Corps. These results help reinforce the usefulness andimportance of pre-service MIP courses in preparing program participants for their Peace Corpsservice and future careers that may otherwise be lacking in the
ReadinessAbstractColleges of Engineering have increasingly emphasized the importance of engineering studentsobtaining professional skills relating to global readiness. This paper describes progress in a cross-sectional, longitudinal study to examine the impact that a College of Engineering at a large, mid-Atlantic public institution has on students’ global readiness and related constructs. Data werecollected from first-year and senior undergraduate engineering students for two years (2012-2013and 2013-2014). Research questions examined: 1) previous international experiences of incomingstudents, 2) international experiences that undergraduates have during their academic careers, 3)students’ perceived value of global readiness, 4) activities students perceive to be
, Andrea served as the Director of the Equal Opportunity in Engineering (EOE) Program at The University of Texas at Austin for 11 years. Andrea joined UT in 2001 after six years in industry, where she had a successful career as a structural engineer for Kellogg Brown & Root and HDR Engineering, Inc. As EOE Director, Andrea led Cockrell School of Engineering efforts to recruit and retain ethnically underrepresented students as well as students with backgrounds or experiences that contributed to the overall diversity of the School. During her term, Andrea raised more than $3.7 million in private and public grants to support the EOE program and its mission. While EOE was under her direction, UT Austin ranked as
different language.Additionally, a summary of the development of the educational program in the Dominican Republic,including organization of content, selection and admission procedures and the general goals of theprogram will be presented. Finally, data based on a pre post survey instrument evaluating students’engineering self-efficacy and understanding and interest in engineering content and concepts, futureeducational and career opportunities, as well as satisfaction of the program will be presented. Additionaldata regarding the tracking of those Dominican students who have graduated from the program will alsobe shared to highlight the potential benefits of building a similar program.General findings include that Dominican students participating
translation, butother projects have utilized students with no experience speaking Chinese. In one project,students traveled to China at the beginning of the semester to assess client needs by interviewingworkers, and on two projects, students did the bulk of the research, modeling, analysis, andprototyping at UD, but then traveled to the company location in Suzhou, China, to implement thesolution. In the case of students traveling to China, all expenses were covered by the industrypartner.Finding the right talent for employment at industry partners in China is especially challenging.During UDCI’s first year, a company information session and career fair was organized to bringtogether some of UDCI’s industry and education partners. About 150 students
Piedmont Megalopolis from South Carolina, North Carolina, Geor- gia and Tennessee utilizing this university-based product-development center to grow the economy and enhance the educational experience. Before Dr. Sanger entered the academic world, he had a very suc- cessful 25 year career in industry developing, launching and commercializing new technologies. Many of these technologies are now taken for granted: superconducting magnets for magnetic resonance imaging, high performance accelerator magnets for the Superconducting Super Collider, low cost power electronics for electric automobiles, high temperature power conditioning for the next generation Army tank, high power SiC switches for power utility energy
research experiencesspecifically identified as a necessary research agenda the need for studies that examined themotives for a scientist’s or engineer’s desire for international collaboration, including therelationship to education and career development. The report also called for studies to assessthe impact of international collaboration on the careers of scientists and engineers at all stages.243.0 The Framework of Global Competency for S&E graduatesGlobal competence, as it is most commonly used in the engineering literature, is alternativelyreferred to as cultural competency, multicultural competency, intercultural maturity, cross-cultural adaptation, cross-cultural awareness, or intercultural sensitivity. It assumes thatparticular
second languagesufficiently to allow for efficient social, cultural, and academic exchange [1], [11]. Languagecommunicative competence is the key factor for successful social and professionalcommunication in a cross-cultural environment. However, in practice linguistic knowledgeitself is a necessary but insufficient determinant of cross-cultural interaction. Psychologicalattitude, or readiness to communicate with people speaking another language, is alsoimportant. International academic mobility means more than just the possibility to study abroad.The mutual recognition of diplomas and qualification does not guarantee graduates’competitive ability in the professional sphere. Only professional competence assures asuccessful career in the
in Management (1998) and Psychology (1999) in Kazan State Technological University. Julia joined the team of Kazan State Technological University as an instructor at the Department of For- eign Languages and the School of Foreign Languages ”Lingua” in 1999 and was rapidly promoted to the position of Associate Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages in 2003. Her teaching career was perfectly balanced by the experience of a translator and an interpreter. She is a well-known person at Kazan international conferences and other events for her high quality consecutive and simultaneous interpreting, such as interpreting for the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan. The new
, it is no surprise that this stress onevaluating the effectiveness of educational programs has spilled over to international programs.A short discussion of this trend can be found in the essay by Darla Deardorff in The Practice andResearch in Study Abroad [8] or in the discussion of study abroad outcomes in Study Abroad in aNew Global Century [9]. Both of these summaries make clear that researchers have approachedthe assessment of international programs from a number of angles. These include looking at theimpact participating on an international program can have on career selection, time to graduation, Page 26.372.2or on career earning
most difficult to implement, due to thepractical limitations of student careers and engineering curricula. Yet reentry programminggreatly enhances the global competence that engineers can acquire by helping them adjustemotionally and behaviorally and by giving them the opportunity for transformative learning.This emotional, behavioral, and cognitive development enhances their global competence notonly by improving their ability interact across cultural lines, but also by helping them synthesizetheir experience into a new understanding of how engineers define and solve problemsdifferently across cultures. Educators have come up with a variety of strategies for solving thisproblem and understanding these different strategies might help overcome
also share their plan for the future research.IntroductionThe primary goal of engineering programs is to prepare the engineering students for theirprofessional careers in the global setting 1. Ideally, the educators should teach in a well-managed,student-centered environment with reasonably structured framework. They should stressfundamental knowledge, equip the students with solid skills and expose them to cutting-edgetechnologies 2. It has been found that obtaining practical knowledge from college is morebeneficial to the students’ professional career than mastering any new technology 3. An effectivelearning environment should help the students enhance their ability to solve practical problems 2.Globalization of the engineering enterprise
first-year engineering work- shops.Dr. Aditya Johri, George Mason University Aditya Johri is Associate Professor and Chair in the Applied Information Technology Department. Dr. Johri studies the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) for learning and knowledge sharing, with a focus on cognition in informal environments. He also examine the role of ICT in support- ing distributed work among globally dispersed workers and in furthering social development in emerging economies. He received the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Early Career Award in 2009. He is co-editor of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER) published by Cam- bridge University Press, New York, NY. Dr
. Additionally, he has six years of industrial experience as a Senior Engineer and 17 years of academic experience as a professor, Associate Professor, and Assistant Professor. Foroudastan’s academic experience includes teaching at Tennessee Technological University and Middle Tennessee State University in the areas of civil engineering, me- chanical engineering, and engineering technology. He has actively advised undergraduate and graduate students, alumni, and minority students in academics and career guidance. Foroudastan has also served as Faculty Advisor for SAE, Mechanical Engineering Technology, Pre-engineering, ASME, Experimental Vehicles Program (EVP), and Tau Alpha Pi Honors Society. In addition to Foroudastan’s
Paper ID #13280Engineering Rome: Assessing Outcomes from a Study Abroad Program De-signed to Overcome Barriers to ParticipationDr. Steve Muench P.E., University of Washington Steve Muench is an Associate Professor in the University of Washington’s Department of Civil and Envi- ronmental Engineering. His interests include sustainability, construction, roads, pavements, web tools and education. He is a licensed professional engineer in Washington State. Before his academic career, Steve spent 2 years as a transportation design engineer and 7 years as a U.S. Navy submarine officer. Steve lives in Seattle but likes neither
recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Natascha M Trellinger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Natascha Trellinger is a second year Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Syracuse University where her interest in the
glimpse the overall sense of a futureindustrial group project and see how their coursework (present and future) is related and relevantto their future professional careers. IGE begins to prepare students to meet the industrial needs oftechnical capabilities coupled with professional and social skills and hopefully further motivate Page 26.154.3students in their chosen field of study and help the students perceive themselves as confident andcompetent representatives of their field11,12,15,16,17.The task is designed to be open ended, complex, challenging, and similar to a team-orientedindustrial project to give students a better perspective on
on the job. We contacted all the 65 students of the class andsought updated information about their career journey, domicile and non-academic activitiesduring their college days. We received data form 43 students out of which, five were notemployed. Some of them had opted for higher studies and some others had decided to be full-time parents, resulting in 38 valid responses. This information along with the college recordsabout academic performance and family background provided us the required basis to decideresponse and explanatory variables that are described in the next sections.Response VariablesWe chose employability and on-job performance as two response variables and have describedthem in the next sections.Employability assessed
year to an all-time high. Study abroad byAmerican students has more than tripled over the past two decades1. Universities are realizingthe great benefits for their students to have an international experience while in college. Thesebenefits include but are not limited to, becoming globally aware and global citizens, morepersonally and socially aware, and strengthening their career and academic choices. A studyperformed by Williams in the Journal of Studies in International Education found that studentswho went on study abroad exhibited a greater change in intercultural communication skills aftertheir semester abroad than students who stayed on campus. They also found that exposure tovarious cultures was the greatest predictor of intercultural
Virginia Tech alumnus and Boeing employee.Virginia Tech student delegates were selected by the Aerospace and Ocean Engineering facultyand were required to have completed the department’s two semester senior capstone designproject. Students from UCI were selected from an aerospace engineering student club, DesignBuild Fly (DBF) and also from a student satellite club, CubeSAT (SAT). The students chosenfrom DBF were participants of the 2013 AIAA Student DBF competition where they wereawarded first place. The students selected from SAT worked closely with the Boeing satellitedivision. Boeing provided programming addressing both the business and technical aspects of thecompany. These included a panel on career and leadership development, a
as soon as they begin their academic careers andthe UoG staff can introduce its pedagogical approach to the students as well as to the UESTC staffinvolved in the Joint School. It has also meant that UoG teaching and administration staff havebeen actively involved in the day-to-day evolution of the Joint School from the day the JointSchool opened. With the enrollment of the second cohort of students, the Joint School has a totalof 379 students and 24 academic and administrative staff members – 21 employed by UESTC and3 employed by UoG.Advertisements of the UoG staff positions to support the UoG-UESTC Joint School were posted Page
interests include gender in engineering education research, interdisciplinarity, peer review, engineers’ epistemologies, and global engineering education.Dr. Devlin Montfort, Oregon State UniversityDr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize practicing engineers’ understand- ings of core engineering concepts. Page 26.680.1
emerged, what hasit meant to be an engineer, and what sorts of knowledge have engineers valued?; (3) What countsas a typical career trajectory, including education and worklife?; (4) What trends are emerging inresponse to the new emphasis on industrial competitiveness?14As may be clear from the above, the growing attention to the importance of global competencyfor engineers has not resulted in agreement regarding definitions, assessment criteria, and/orproposed mechanisms for achieving global competency (including what level of minimal globalcompetence is necessary prior to embarking on an international experience and the most cost-and time-effective mechanism to produce this level of global competency). At universities, thescaling of programs