projects that expose the students to various Civil Engineering disciplinesis an important activity for first-year students, since it mirrors the way engineers, scientists, andmathematicians work in the world, and stimulates student’s curiosity. The Freshmen Design Courseprovides the students with direction that gets the students involved in learning and increases theirunderstanding for the need of a varied and diversified learning experience prior to graduationBibliographic Information[1] http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-012-introduction-to-civil-engineering-design-spring-2002/projects/design_process/[2] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, www.abet.org[3] Bentley Systems, MicroStation CAD software
Paper ID #13547Spanglish Software Engineering: A Curious International Learning Experi-enceProf. Barbara Victoria Bernal, Kennesaw State University - Marietta Campus (formerly Southern PolytechnicState U.) Barbara Victoria Bernal is a Emeritus Professor of Software Engineering at Kennesaw State U. (formerly Southern Polytechnic State U. (SPSU)), where she has worked since 1984, serving as undergraduate co- ordinator for software engineering (2002-2005); undergraduate coordinator for information technology (2004-2005); and chair of software engineering (2005-6). She was awarded the SPSU Outstanding Fac- ulty Award in 1995
Paper ID #13980Instructional Videos in an Online Engineering Economics CourseDr. Letitia M. Pohl, University of Arkansas Letitia Pohl is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Arkansas, an M.S. in Systems Engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology, and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Tulane University. Dr. Pohl served as an officer in the U.S. Air Force for eight years. At the University of Arkansas, Dr. Pohl has served as the Assistant Director of the Mack-Blackwell Rural
’ epistemic thinking. Considering theimpact of students’ epistemic thinking on their academic performance, this study focuses onunderstanding the impact of international collaborative engineering education uponengineering students’ epistemic thinking. To achieve this goal, we examine engineeringstudents from an international joint program.Context of the StudyThe international joint program described here aims to help Chinese engineering studentsdevelop different global competencies through various in-class and out-of-class activities.The SPEIT (SJTU-ParisTech Elite Institute of Technology) program was established underthe strategic alliance of the Paris Tech Group and SJTU on 2012. The whole education lasts 6years, composed by two cycles (Figure 1
engineering significantly increased immediately after the Engineers Weekevent. This finding agrees with those reported in much of the literature1-13. Although,there is a significant drop in student interest in studying engineering one year afterparticipation in the Engineers Week activities, the percentage of students interested inengineering one year after the event was still higher than the percentage found in theinitial pre-exposure results. What is the reason for this decrease in interest? Based on theone-year after survey results, 11.5% (22 out of 192) of students said they had participatedin some other engineering-related activities during that year. These activities includedscience events held in another university, drafting and technology
. degree from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India in 1987 and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Michigan State University, East Lansing, in 1990 and 1993 respectively. From 1995 to 1999 she was with the Mixed-Signal Design Group at LSI Logic Corporation, Milpitas, CA where she worked on high-speed data communication IC design and testing.Dr. Tonya Lynn Nilsson P.E., Santa Clara University Tonya Nilsson is a Lecturer in Civil Engineering at Santa Clara University (SCU), where she is also one of six Faculty Associates in their Collaborative for Teaching Innovation. Prior to joining SCU, Tonya was an Associate Professor at CSU - Chico
and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8):810–834, October 2004.[22] Carol J. Burger, Joseph A. Raelin, Rachelle M. Reisberg, Margaret B. Bailey, and David Whitman. Self- efficacy in female and male undergraduate engineering students: Comparision among four institutions. In ASEE Southest Section Conference, 2010.[23] Ronald J. Burke. Women and minorities in stem: a primer. In Ronald J. Burke and Mary C. Mattis, editors, Women and Minorities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, chapter 1, pages 3–26. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2007.[24] Kelly Cannon, Monica Anderson LaPoint, Nate Bird, Katie Panciera, Harini Veeraraghavan, Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos
Paper ID #13517Evolution of a First-Year Engineering CourseDr. Noah Salzman, Boise State University Noah Salzman is an Assistant Professor at Boise State University, where he is a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department and IDoTeach, a pre-service STEM teacher preparation program. His work focuses on the transition from pre-college to university engineering programs, how exposure to engineering prior to matriculation affects the experiences of engineering students, and engineering in the K-12 classroom. He has worked as a high school science, mathematics, and engineering and technology teacher, as
Paper ID #11315Developing ”Critical Thinking Skills” in Graduate Engineering ProgramDr. Shekar Viswanathan, National University Dr. Viswanathan is a Professor at the Department of Applied Engineering at National University, Cali- fornia. Dr. Viswanathan is an educator, researcher and administrator with more than twenty-five years of industrial and academic experience encompassing engineering and environmental consulting, research and development, and technology development. Career experience includes teaching at the University level, conducting fundamental research, and developing continuing educational courses.Mr. Ben D
Paper ID #12856Educating Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Students about ExergyAnalysisDr. Farshid Zabihian, West Virginia University Inst. of Tech. Farshid Zabihian, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering West Virginia Uni- versity Institute of Technology Education: Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering,Ryerson University, 2011 M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, 1998 B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Amir Kabir University of Technology, 1996 Authored or coauthored more than 70 papers in Journals and peer-reviewed conferences
Engineering and her scientific research area focuses on neuro-rehabilitative technology. Her educational research interests include use of Tablet PCs and technology to better engage students in the classroom as well as pedagogical and advisement ap- proaches to closing the achievement gap for historically under-represented minority groups.Dr. Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering Department at CalStateLA and president of the International Society for Environmental Geotechnology (ISEG). Since becoming part of the faculty in 2009, Menezes has taught 9 undergraduate courses, is the current adviser of the American Society of Civil Engineers student
technology in the classroom.Mrs. Katherine Page McDanel, Dept of Chemical & Biological Engineering, University of Colorado BoulderMichelle Medlin, University of Colorado Page 26.1494.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Teaching/Learning Resources for Chemical EngineeringAbstract Additional teaching/learning resources were prepared for chemical engineering studentsand faculty and made available directly on www.LearnChemE.com or linked to from thewebsite. These resources include ConcepTests, screencasts, interactive Mathematica simulations,an interactive tutorial module
Paper ID #11689Students and Engineering Educators’ Feedback on DesignMr. Farshid Marbouti, Purdue University, West Lafayette Farshid Marbouti is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interest is first-year engineering and specifically how to improve first-year engineering students’ success. He completed his M.A. in the Educational Technology and Learning Design at Simon Fraser University in Canada, and his B.S. and M.S. in computer engineering in Iran.Prof. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a Professor in the School of
Paper ID #12746Not all curves are the same: Left-of-center grading and student motivationDr. Joanna Wolfe, Carnegie Mellon UniversityDr. Beth A Powell, Tennessee Technological University Page 26.1190.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Not all curves are the same: Left-of-center grading and student motivation Joanna Wolfe Elizabeth Powell Carnegie Mellon University Tennessee Tech
served either as PI or a co-PI dealing with the transportation field.Mr. Ossama E. Ramadan, University of Alabama at Birmingham Ossama E. Ramadan is a Doctoral Candidate at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB). His research interests include work zone traffic control, traffic safety, and, planning and scheduling of infras- tructure projects. He received his M.A.Sc. in Civil Engineering from Carleton University, and his B.Sc. (Hons.) in Construction Engineering from the Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT). Selected by UAB School of Engineering as the 2014 Graduate Student of the Year in Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering. Recipient of the 2002 Carleton University
]. Page 26.1519.9B OX 1 : S URVEY ITEMS U SED T O EVALUATE T HE SKILLS O F ENGINEERING LEADERSHIP EXEMPLARS A= Applying engineering knowledge • Solves problems using appropriate engineering principlesB= Using engineering tools, equipment or technology • Uses appropriate tools, equipment and technology based on a sound understanding of these principlesC= Protecting the public interest • Considers social, political and environmental implications of his/her work • Works in ways that serve the public good • Incorporates diversity and equity considerations into actionsD= Managing engineering activities • Helps team members adapt to changing circumstances • Works in ways that maximize the economic success of the business
engineeringstudents. Some evidence suggests that social messages affect women more than men. Womenwho pursued careers in mathematics, sciences, and technology consistently reported that themessages sent to them about capabilities in these male-dominated fields served as crucial sourcesof their self-efficacy21, a finding echoed in interviews conducted by Hutchison et al.15 withsecond-year engineering students. Other researchers have shown more generally that beingencouraged by peers and faculty makes students more likely to put forth effort and persevere intheir majors4, 11, 15.Fewer studies have focused on examining the influential role of emotional and physiologicalstates on the students’ sense of efficacy in engineering. Hutchison et al.20 found that
Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in evaluation and research in engineering education, computer science education, teacher education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer
relatively few students transfer into engineering from other non-STEM(science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) majors3,4, we only included students thatstarted in one of our mathematics courses required for STEM majors (those discussed in StudyOne).To increase the size of our cohort, we collected the same data for graduating engineers in Spring2013. We ran Fisher’s exact tests to compare the enrollments in each course and found that therewas not a statistical difference in course enrollment percentages for the two different years,allowing us to combine them to create a larger data set (𝑛 = 814).ResultsStudy One: Retention in Engineering One Year LaterTable 1 includes retention rates in engineering for students starting in different
students would like to learn independently and are lessinclined to work in teams. Typically, these students do not perform in a team-based and research-based learning environment. However, the above team-based and research-based laboratoryexercises can be very instrumental in improving the student learning of the subject matter.Especially, the engineering design courses are increasingly being recognized and taught as ateam process with multi-faceted socio-technological dimensions.Fig. 2. Assessment of laboratory activities - numbers represent percentages (As a result of theteam based laboratory exercises, Q1- Understanding of the environmental relevance of thesubject matter; Q2 - My interest in environmental engineering discipline and confidence
rigorous research andincorporate it into teaching practices and learning processes in engineering contexts. Page 26.368.6ClemsonThe program in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education researchwas created at the Department of Engineering & Science Education, in the College ofEngineering and Science at Clemson University. The program includes both engineeringeducation and science education in a college of science/engineering. The program offers thedoctoral degree in Engineering and Science Education where students are able to developrigorous research in the growing field of engineering and science education. Faculty
engineering design process into their classrooms. Teachershave to apply and be selected to participate in the CEEMS program. In order to apply, theyneeded to teach science, math, technology, or engineering at the middle school or high schoollevel and teach in one of the program’s 14 partner school districts. Approximately 20 newteachers are selected to a new cohort each year, based on district recommendations and ascreening process designed to identify if the program is a good fit for applicants. This paperfocuses on the first two cohorts of teachers participating in CEEMS. Cohort 1 teachers startedthe program in June 2012 and completed the program in May 2014. Cohort 2 teachers beganCEEMS in June 2013 and will complete their requirements in May 2015
research fellow at the National Energy Technology Lab in Morgantown, West Virginia. Dr. Ranalli’s current research interests include development of tools and methods for solar energy resource assessment and the role of technology in engineering pedagogy. Page 26.64.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Mastery Learning Approach to Engineering Homework Assignments1. Introduction:In many engineering courses, homework assignments are intended to be active learningexperiences, where students are asked for the first time to grapple in depth with the concepts andmethods discussed
Attitudessurvey.Research ProblemThis paper examines the following research questions: 1. What are the professional persistence characteristics of present day aerospace engineering students? 2. How does the aerospace engineering education experience influence student perception of aerospace engineering?MethodsData Set The dataset used for this investigation contained the results of the 2009 administration ofthe web-based Survey of Aerospace Student Attitudes9, a cross-institution study administered bythe Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) to the population of aerospace engineeringstudents in aerospace, aeronautical, or astronautical engineering programs across the UnitedStates. Principle investigator for the project
Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Prof. Sang Eun Woo, Purdue University Sang Eun Woo is an assistant professor in the Department of Psychological Sciences at Purdue Univer- sity. She received her PhD degree in industrial and organizational psychology from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include construct validation, psychological measurement (fo- cusing on behavioral assessment), personality and individual differences, turnover
engineering.Acknowledgements:This material is based in part upon work supported by the National Sciences Foundation under aRIGEE Grant (L. Santiago). Financial support was also provided by a grant fromengageengineering.org and by the first year engineering program at West Virginia University.References 1. Melsa, James. “Transforming Engineering Education through Educational Scholarship” Journal of Engineering Education (2007): 171-172. 2. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997. Print. 3. Seymour, Elaine. “Tracking the Processes of Change in U.S. Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology.” Science Education 86 (2002): 79-105. 4. Crosling
professionals, and students can apply musical and other interests to engagea wider range of students in the study of engineering.BackgroundResearchers have identified several factors that influence student major choice; for example,career prospects, personal interests, parental influence, effects of climate and culture, prioracademic achievement, levels of self-efficacy, motivation, and demographic factors. Wade et al.determined that the choice of science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) wasdirectly influenced by high school math achievement, the intent to major in STEM, and a strongsense of self-efficacy related to mathematical achievement.3 Race and gender have also beenextensively examined as factors correlated with students’ choice of
Paper ID #11936Improving Engineering-Student Presentation Abilities with Theatre ExercisesMr. John W. Brocato, Mississippi State University John Brocato is the coordinator of the Shackouls Technical Communication Program in the Bagley Col- lege of Engineering at Mississippi State University, where he teaches technical communication and pro- vides writing/presenting-related support to the entire college. He is the LEES Division Program Chair- Elect as well as the Campus Representative Coordinator for ASEE’s Southeastern Section.Mrs. Amy Barton, Mississippi State University Amy Barton (M.A. in English from Mississippi State
Paper ID #12377Learning from Pell-Eligible Engineering Students’ Class StandpointDr. Coleen Carrigan, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Professor Coleen Carrigan is a feminist anthropologist and an Assistant Professor of Gender, Race, Cul- ture, Science and Technology at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. She investigates the historical and cultural dimensions of underrepresented groups’ participation in science, technology and engineering and the rea- sons why white males still dominate these fields.Prof. Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington Eve Riskin received her BS degree in Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. and her graduate
, 2015 Attracting Women to Engineering through Service Based LearningIntroductionThe National Academy of Engineering (NAE) points to enhancing student interest in engineering, scienceand technology entrepreneurship; and increased professional skills in design, communication andteamwork as some of the ‘Grand Challenges of Engineering’ (NAE, 2009). In response, the Departmentof Civil Engineering & Construction Management (CECM) at Georgia Southern University aims tosystematically integrate experiential and community service learning opportunities throughout thedepartmental curriculum in order to further the NAE vision of access to enhanced visibility andprofessional skills of its students. The objective of this revolutionary department