1’s. I feel they are of great benefit to anybody who has not done DCG for leaving cert. I hope to further improve my sketching skills.”Discussion / ConclusionThere are a number of positives that can be extracted from the study presented in this paper.A unique spatial skills intervention [8] was successfully blended into a freshman graphicscourse in an Initial Technology Teacher Education program at the University of Limerick.The spatial skills intervention was integrated into a unique set of learning outcomes that alsoincluded the development of observational freehand sketching skills and the ability tocommunicate graphically using digital media.The level of improvement (Table 4) was very promising with a mean increase of 14.3
the early 1990s1 , Malcolm argued that students perception towards engineering was considered more of atechnically oriented, they did not understand the socio-economic context and benefits ofengineering. Accordingly, preferences of introducing of engineering design to K-12 educationprograms were emerged to provide a venue and experience demonstrating engineeringconnections to human needs 2. STEM is actually an integration of four disciplines in which technology and engineering arelayered onto standard science and Mathematics curricula resulting in cohesive curricula in whichbarriers are removed between the four disciplines. Although wide spectrum of scientific knowledge and socio-economic advances are based ontechnological developments
the middle of the pack in the final standings.One disadvantage they felt that contributed to their lackluster finish was that many other teamshad some form of course that went along with the competition so the unskilled students couldobtain background knowledge and have structured time to work on the project instead of learningand creating everything on an extracurricular basis. With this in mind this robot-based studentorganization looked to use the course described in the paper as the first step at forming the 2015ASEE robot team as well as an opportunity to recruit and mentor many future organizationmembers. The remaining sections of this paper will describe the curriculum of this course,learning objectives, and the mentoring structure
Paper ID #13068Improving the Global Competency of Graduate Engineers Through PeaceCorps Partnership and Long-Term International ServiceMr. Nathan Daniel Manser, University of South Florida Nathan Manser is an Environmental Engineering PhD candidate at the University of South Florida con- ducting research on the fate of pathogens in biological waste to energy systems. His research interests include the application of household engineered systems to recover resources in a low impact environ- ment, developing globally competent engineering graduates and integrating active learning methods into engineering curriculums.Ms
issues, and new technologies in the distribu- tion and logistics sector. She was one of three professors in the United States recognized in an Inbound Logistics Article featuring leading professors in today’s supply chain curriculum. She has worked with a team of colleagues throughout other colleges at East Carolina University to plan a STEM initiative for 8th grade girls. This initiative helps bring more than 100 Pitt County girls to campus to engage them in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math. She has also worked with ECU’s Global Academic Initiatives to collaborate with other institutions throughout the world. In addition, Dr. Pagliari collaborates with many external organizations. She is past president of
. Project supervisors, who arealso faculty members, advise students on their projects. However, in some instances, thecapstone instructors and project supervisors could be the same.Program Assessment Review (PAR)Each year, this program was assessed using an established program assessment review(PAR) process. The process included review of student learning using a variety ofevaluation methods including assignments, tests, and projects. The process started withan establishment of a curriculum map, which integrated the program’s learning outcomesto each course as shown in Figure 1. Then the assignments, tests, projects, and other taskswere created to augment the introduction, development, and mastery of the programlearning outcomes. At the end of each
for Medtronic as a full-time Integrated Circuit Designer until November 2003. Antonio started his pursuit of the Doctor of Philosophy degree at the Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University in January 2004 under the supervision of Dr. Reginald Perry. Upon completion of his PhD, Dr. Soares was immedi- ately hired as an assistant professor (Tenure Track) in the Electronic Engineering Technology department at FAMU. Dr. Soares received his Tenure and Promotion to Associate Professor in summer 2014. Dr. Soares is conducting research in education (STEM), Optoelectronics, nanotechnology and robotics.Dr. Doreen Kobelo, Florida A&M University/Florida State University Dr. Doreen Kobelo is an Assistant Professor at
Paper ID #13603Examining the use of engineering internship workplace competency assess-ments for continuous improvementDr. Mark A. Laingen, Illinois State University Mark is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Technology at Illinois State University. He holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Agricultural Technologies from Iowa State University. Mark currently sits on the board for the Illinois Drafting Educators Assocciation (IDEA), and the ISU Department of Technology Curriculum Committee. Mark’s research interests include 3-Dimensional Visualization & Solid Modeling, Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing, Additive
collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $14.5 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011. Dr. Ohland is Chair of the IEEE Curriculum and Pedagogy Committee and an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica E. Cardella is the Director of the INSPIRE Institute for Pre-College Engineering Education and is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University
in which co-designers are empowered to make real and substantial design decisions. Research in this area hasaddressed the cooperative process of design and development of expertise, while includingstudents in pedagogical planning processes. In particular, studies have found that students areable to play an important role as co-designers and the end products are better designed to meettheir personal needs and expectations [12].In our research, Participatory Design Approach was selected to redesign our instructional systemusing CPBL, since we believe that by engaging the target learners in the design process, we canshape a curriculum that better fits the learning characteristics of our students, and to promote“locality, diversity, involvement
1992 and 1994. Following graduate school, Amy worked for Hewlett Packard in San Jose, CA and in Colorado Springs, CO. She joined the faculty at Boise State as an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering in August 200. Along with Dr. Bill Knowlton, Amy founded the Materials Science and Engineering Program at BSU and served as the first chair. In February 2011, Amy was became Dean of the College of Engineering. Amy’s research interests include microelectronic packaging, particularly 3-D integration and ceramic MEMS devices. Amy especially enjoys teaching the Introduction to Engineering and Introduction to Materials Science and Engineering courses as well as engineering outreach activities
(ABET accredited), an M.S. in Computer Science, and an M.S. in Computer InformationSystems. The department offers many areas of concentration, including: Artificial Intelligence,Cloud Computing, Computer Graphics and Animation & Computer Visualization. It also offerscomputing courses to the entire university to satisfy a three-hour core curriculum requirement.The Department of Engineering Technology (ET) at Prairie View A&M University offers theB.S. degree in the Computer Engineering Technology (CPET) program and in the ElectricalEngineering Technology (ELET) program, respectively. Both programs are ABET accredited.The department focuses on offering practical, hands-on experiences in computer science andengineering. This project ties
the second and third year by integrating content, outcomes, assessment, and pedagogy. Think of it as design. Bring in engineering expertise. • Make the learner and community an integral part of teaching process beyond the first year. Address diversity as part of the equation, not as an afterthought. Learn from decades of research on gender and race.7This three-part call to action for the middle years curriculum is meaningful though not highlytargeted. The first part explicitly addresses the need for research on the sophomore and junioryears, while the second and third parts are practitioner-based, suggesting actions for engineeringeducators and administrators. While certainly warranted, this call to action is not
materials and teaching methods.1 While thesematerials and methods are evidence-based and shown to positively affect student learningand educational outcomes, they have been slow to be adopted or disseminated.In an effort to improve curriculum sharing, there is currently a two-part study underway forthe development and dissemination of a web based repository containing curriculummaterials and best practices. These two efforts are in place to understand, facilitate, andencourage sharing of materials and best practices between educators. The first is thedevelopment and refinement of the web-based repository for curriculum materials; thesecond is a study on the curricular decision-making processes of transportation engineeringeducators.The overarching
Midwest that combines an emphasis on teaching with emerging innovations in research, serving a regional student population. This institution offers over ten undergraduate degrees in engineering and computer science. Class sizes typically average 25 students, with upper division classes averaging about 15 students.• Women’s (Masters L): A small women’s college of approximately 1,792 undergraduates in the Northeast with fifty majors, including computer science, biology, biochemistry, bio- statistics, chemistry, environmental science, health informatics, mathematics, and physics degrees in STEM, but no engineering degrees. This institution offers a liberal arts education for its undergraduates integrated with professional work
exhibiting for several days. Along the back of the contacts, connect your circuit wires tightly. You should now have an open circuit where connecting the two contact points will result in completion. Your human skin will act as a switch to control the circuit.v Carefully integrate your contact surfaces into the design elements you chose earlier. In Page 26.1119.5 Star Car, the baby alien was created from metallic thread so that just touching his body was enough to connect to the circuit. The rocket ship was decorated with conductive aluminum tape, requiring users to hold the main shuttle. v Once your design has been reinforced
styles, it is imperative that students understand how changes ineducation will contribute to their long-term development. Changes are commonly met withresistance, but opposition can often be diffused if students have some say in the process.Creating an environment that is engaging and energizing will improve student’s understanding ofthe material and retention rates after transitioning into the work force. Although flippedclassrooms require an adjustment period, this learning approach allows instructors to preparestudents for problems outside the textbook. Bishop and Verleger (11) addressed the concern thatengineering graduates lack the ability to solve real-world problems. Students commonly work ona senior-level end of curriculum problem, but
, innovation, and project management. They integrated the topicof leadership by focusing on the success of collaboration and knowledge transfer from prior teamleads. Furthermore, the presentation described the process from project initiation to completionwithin a relatively large group setting (approximately 20 students per project) under industrymentorship similar to an actual industry experience. The two different presentation approachesfrom VT and UCI provided a more well-rounded perspective for the student audience in China ofhow American engineering students applied problem solving skills, established effectivecommunications, interacted with industry, and moreover, developed student leadership. All students felt that the keynote speakers
others, curiosity, entrepreneurship, fairness, high expectations,honesty, integrity, intuition, judgment, optimism, persistence, positiveness, respect, self-esteem,sensitivity, thoughtfulness, thoroughness, and tolerance”. Those attitudes are built over a lifetimeand are a function of role models, mentors and experiences outside the curriculum. They are verydifficult to incorporate into a CEPC that is restricted to curricular issues. Still, it could be arguedthat this topic is embedded in several existing requirements in both the general criteria and theCEPC. By the time students have functioned on a multidisciplinary team, demonstrated anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility, recognized the need for life-long learning
]. As a result, global engineering courses and projects have grown rapidly.There has also been a simultaneous growth in engineering students looking for ways touse their engineering skills in service of improving the lives of those less privileged thanthem. Young students are eager to apply the engineering skills they are acquiring, toengage with these problems. This is echoed in the study conducted by Oberst and Joneson the megatrends in engineering practice, which identified social imperative as one ofthem [3]. As such, there has been a call for engineering educators to create opportunitiesfor students to learn how “engineering is an integral part of societal change” and be ableto accept “responsibility for civilization’s progress” [4].A set
Paper ID #14141Rethinking Technocentrism: Case Studies of Three Engineering Students’Social Sciences Approaches to the Sanitation CrisisMs. Devika Patel, Stanford University Devika is a third year undergraduate at Stanford University studying Mechanical Engineering: Product Design. She is an undergraduate researcher at the Kometsky Global Collaboratory, where she is looking at working with taboos in hygiene and sanitation in engineering contexts.Mr. Jonathan Edward Pang, Stanford University I am an undergraduate majoring in mechanical engineering and minoring in education at Stanford Univer- sity. Apart from design and
educational subjects. Most of the sessions were guided and led byexperienced faculty from the Education or Liberal Arts fields. There was a small numberof engineering faculty who would attend these meetings. In the early 2000’s, a Center forthe Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) was started for the entire campus bythe Dean of Academic Affairs, and a half-time position was created and staffed byAndrawis, a campus Electrical Engineering professor, who retired in 2013. For severalyears, she used workshops and seminars too stress SoTL as an area of research forfaculty, in addition to their professional field’s research. From Andrawis’s19 perspective,SoTL involves the integration of teaching with the scholarship of research. She furtherexplained
and live LEWAS data, watershed-specific case studies, and virtual tours ofthe LEWAS watershed. By using an HTML5-driven web interface, the OWLS interactivelydelivers integrated live and/or historical remote system data (visual, environmental,geographical, etc.) to end users regardless of the hardware (desktop, laptop, tablet, smartphone,etc.) and software (Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, etc.) platforms of their choice.We have built upon a prior study that used the expectancy-value theory of motivation to showthat exposure to live watershed data via the LEWAS increased students’ levels of motivation. Apilot test of the OWLS has demonstrated positive learning gains in engineering seniors and wasoverwhelmingly viewed by students as having helped
, but also, presents STEM in an accessible,engaging way, leveraging students’ passion and interest in music as a catalyst for learning. SMTis a unique STEM experience for high-school students who would not otherwise considersupplementing their education with STEM or even pursuing STEM careers.1 IntroductionThe Summer Music Technology (SMT) program offers a unique educational experience for risinghigh school sophomores and juniors. The week-long program, initiated in 2006 as part of an NSFCAREER award, aims to introduce its participants to the concepts underlying modern musictechnology through inquiry-based projects and activities, drawing upon common music listeningand performance experiences. Music continues to prove an integral part of
Paper ID #12230Spatial Visualization Skills Intervention for First Year Engineering Students:Everyone’s a Winner!Dr. S. Patrick Walton, Michigan State University S. Patrick Walton received his B.ChE. from Georgia Tech, where he began his biomedical research career in the Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics Laboratory. He then attended MIT where he earned his M.S. and Sc.D. while working jointly with researchers at the Shriners Burns Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital. While at MIT, he was awarded a Shell Foundation Fellowship and was an NIH biotechnology Predoctoral Trainee. Upon completion of his doctoral studies, he
, the value of establishing amathematical model became apparent; this proposed model is planned to account for andmeasure such phenomena. Toward this objective, introducing an expansion of the binary systemto include “depth of coverage” or emphasis of a topic is an integral component of the model.Application 2: Testing the SchemeAnother study of applying the classification scheme occurred during a National ScienceFoundation sponsored workshop at the First Year Engineering Experience Conference in 2013.During the workshop, samples from 28 different classified courses were collected and analyzed.4The study used two different methodologies, namely by course and by outcome analysis. Bycourse analysis involves the examination of the whole course
[32]; forexample, Clemson University has an ePortfolio program that is used to track student learning asthey progress through their undergraduate degree [44]. Badging is a more recent type ofcredentialing (e.g., Credly) that provides visible proof of participation, such as completingselected parts of the ePortfolio process[45].Promoting Feedback and Assessment ePortfolios can be used to provide both formative and summative assessment to graduatestudents. A “meta-rubric” evaluating integrative learning is one assessment method thatuniversities can adapt to fit their own needs[46]. Formative assessments can be provided via peerreview, which allows fellow graduate students to give feedback and observe elements in otherePortfolios that they
andgraphical work done mostly in MATLAB. Primary course topics covered in this survey courseinclude: (1) vector integral Calculus, (2) an introduction to Fourier series, (3) an introduction topartial differential equations (PDEs), (4) an introduction to complex analysis, and (5) conformalmapping and applications. Also, examples of student project work are shown. Lastly, usefulstudent feedback and lessons learned is shared that others involved in engineering mathematicsinstruction may find useful or be able to relate to.Keywords: Vector integral Calculus, Fourier series, partial differential equations, complexanalysis, conformal mapping, engineering mathematics education1. IntroductionDue to increasing undergraduate enrollments in both electrical and
courses creates an awareness of career path options.It is critical to create a flow of students into STEM fields in general and nanoscience specifically in orderto meet industry needs in the years to come. The modules are adaptable to multiple grade levels andaddress not only nanoscale concepts but also concepts in traditional science. The materials are provided tothe educators at no cost (free) and background information, Power Point files, worksheets and othercontent are downloaded from the website. Module content is being aligned with the Next GenerationScience Standards (NGSS) and the Common Core Science Standards. These alignments allow educatorsto effectively integrate the nanoscale content and enhances the use of the material to convey
similar to the research question of Baker, Cooley, and Trigueros (2000).This question is analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively by using the triad classification in Action-Process-Object-Schema (APOS) theory. Mathematics graduate and undergraduate students succeeded the most among all theparticipants.Key words: APOS theory, Schema, Triad Classification, Functions, Derivative, Limit, Asymptote, Critical Points. Introduction Function concept is an important part of cumulative blocks of concepts in advanced levelmathematics and engineering courses. In these advanced courses, topics of single-variablecalculus, such as limits, derivatives, integrals, and power series, require function knowledge. Thefunction concept also requires knowledge of