curricula. He is currently conducting research on an NSF project led by Dr. Stephen Krause, focused on the factors that promote persistence and success for undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Aca- demic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Cen- ter for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the
Paper ID #13361Assessing the Success of Programs for Women in EngineeringDr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Dr. Laura Bottomley, ASEE Fellow, is the Director of Women in Engineering and The Engineering Place for K-20 Outreach and a Teaching Associate Professor in the Colleges of Engineering and Education at NC State University. She teaches an Introduction to Engineering class for incoming freshmen in the College and Children Design, Invent, Create, a course for elementary education students that introduces them to engineering design and technology as well as various electrical engineering classes. In
Paper ID #13460Opportunity Thinktank: Laying a foundation for the entrepreneurially mindedengineerProf. Robert Gettens, Western New England University Rob Gettens is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering and the Director of the First Year Engineering Program at Western New England University.Prof. Jose Antonio Riofrio, Western New England University Jos´e A Riofr´ıo received his B.S. in Engineering Physics from Elizabethtown College in 2003, and his M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Vanderbilt University in 2005 and 2008, respectively. At Vanderbilt, Jos´e focused his research in controls
curriculum to support students in math-based careers at the community college level for nearly 20 years. She has been Co-PI and PI on NSF grants that seek to increase the numbers of professionals in STEM with focused recruitments on the underrepresented minority populations. Page 26.949.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Increasing Success and Retention in Engineering and other STEM FieldsIntroductionThe two prominent and related needs for solutions to climate change and more STEM andengineering majors, brought about the Science, Technology
, learning, and identity; qualitative methods; and discourse analysis.Prof. Mark Rentschler, University of Colorado at Boulder Mark Rentschler received an M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, in 2003, where he was a National Defense Science and Engineer- ing Graduate (NDSEG) Fellow, and a Ph.D. degree in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, in 2006. He is currently an Assistant Professor and Design Center Colorado Founder/Director of Graduate Programs in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado in Boul- der, CO. He also holds a secondary appointment in the Department of Surgery and an affiliate position in the
Lafayette Anastasia Rynearson is a Purdue Doctoral Fellow pursuing a degree in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received a B.S. and M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her teaching experience includes outreach activities at various age levels as well as a position as Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Kanazawa Technical College. Her current research interests focus on early P-12 engineering education and identity development. Page 26.698.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
– innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nathalie Duval-Couetil is the Director of the Certificate in Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program, Associate Director of the Burton D. Morgan Center, and an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation at Purdue University. She is responsible for the launch and devel- opment of the university’s multidisciplinary undergraduate entrepreneurship program, which has involved over 5000 students from all majors since 2005. She has established entrepreneurship capstone, global en
which learning, status, and grades are negotiated.Inspired by a novel theory from Science and Technology Studies (STS), we take an actor-network view of sophomore engineering, tracing connections between human actors and non-human elements including mathematical concepts, places, objects, and resources to demonstratehow students are translated to varying degrees through sophomore mathematics courses intoactor-networks of engineering. Actor-Network Theory encourages a fresh perspective ofsophomore engineering that affords researchers a systems-level view of these critical gatewaycourses and suggests fundamental questions regarding the nature of our courses and how they gotthis way in the first place. This paper introduces Actor-Network Theory
. Zavala is Physics Education Research in which he studies students’ conceptual understanding, designs and implements as- sessment tools in education, researches on the use of technology in the classroom and conducts research on the acquisition of skills by university students in active learning environments.Prof. Angeles Dominguez, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico & Universidad Andr´es Bello, Santi-ago, Chile Angeles Dominguez is a Professor of the Department of Mathematics within the School of Engineering at the Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico, and she is currently at the University Andres Bello at Santiago, Chile, for a sabbatical period collaborating with the School of Engineering. She holds a
first two years in order to successfully increaseretention in engineering.12A 2012 ASEE report entitled, “Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for RetainingEngineering, Engineering Technology, and Computing Students” highlights seven key themes ofsuccessful student retention strategies: 1) focus on student learning through tutoring andmentoring; 2) student programs and financial aid; 3) student academic enrichment programs; 4)student research and work experience; 5) curriculum and class enhancements; 6) institutional andeducational research; and 7) change in institutional policy and faculty development.12 Summerbridge programs are one of the strategies that fall under student and academic enrichmentprograms. Summer bridge programs
selection starts again. • The administrator is able to create/cancel events, and to view customer orders. They can also add content to events such as pictures or links, as well as change event location, date, time, etc.”Students were instructed to use an open-source tool, StarUMLc, although they were free tochoose another tool. During class, the instructor and undergraduate TAs provided assistance with Page 26.1026.6a http://www.acm.org/about/se-codeb http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/technology/software-engineering-ethics.htmlc http://staruml.sourceforge.net/v1/about.phpthe UML tool as well as guidance for the
competent field. The National Academy of Engineering, for example,have stated in their vision of “The Engineer of 2020” that engineering activities should beframed in the context of rapidly moving technological changes, global interconnection ofresources, and an increasingly diverse and multidisciplinary population of individuals involvedin or affected by engineering developments. Among the NAE aspirations for the engineeringfield is “a future where engineers are prepared to adapt to changes in global forces and trendsand to ethically assist the world in creating a balance in the standard of living for developing anddeveloped countries alike”3. This vision reflects the need to embrace global competencies framedwithin ethical considerations, where
professor with a joint appointment in the Bagley College of Engineering dean’s office and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Mis- sissippi State University. Through her role in the Hearin Engineering First-year Experiences (EFX) Pro- gram, she is assessing the college’s current first-year engineering efforts, conducting rigorous engineering education research to improve first-year experiences, and promoting the adoption of evidence-based in- structional practices. In addition to research in first year engineering, Dr. Mohammadi-Aragh investigates technology-supported classroom learning and using scientific visualization to improve understanding of complex phenomena. She earned her Ph.D. (2013) in
was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches human-centered engineering design and innovation courses in the engineering and manufacturing engineering programs. Dr. Lande researches how tech- nical and non-technical people learn and apply a design process to their work. He is interested in the intersection of designerly epistemic identities and vocational pathways. Dr. Lande received his B.S in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and
Paper ID #13206Work-In-Progress: Clinical Immersion and Team-Based Engineering DesignDr. Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan University Jennifer Kadlowec is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at Rowan University, Henry M. Rowan of College of Engineering. She is interested in design education in mechanical and biomedical areas.Dr. Tom Merrill, Rowan UniversityDr. Robert Alan Hirsh, Cooper University Hospital I am an Anesthesiologist by training. I have an abiding passion for non-invasive physiological monitoring technology, and I have several patents in this field. I am also an active Radio Amateur, WB2HRR.Mr. Sameer Sood
external accrediting body for applied science, computing, engineering, andengineering technology education, have established eight general criteria forbaccalaureate level programs. Student outcomes are one of the eight general criteria.Specific course outcomes and the relation to the Madison Engineering Department Page 26.509.4Mission, Course Goals and ABET criteria are displayed Table 1.Table 1. ENGR 101 course outcomes Project-based Learning The majority of the course is built with project-based learning strategies. These strategiesare designed to
interest in becoming engineers someday or in performing jobs related to engineering (even if they didn’t know what engineering was). But, the types of engineeringrelated work they were interested in changed slightly over time, from interest in cars and machines that help people walk in sixth grade, to an interest in medicines and computer applications in seventh grade. Student interest in developing technology that can help the environment persisted from sixth to seventh grade. Our findings indicate that, as children move through the middle school experience, they become more aware of and sensitive to the perceptions of their peers, while still aware of their parents’ positive perceptions about engineering. Sixth graders, who liked to design
influences and processes such as working with a group ofindividuals. All of these factors, plus many more, are what drive the demands of technology and productinnovation today. These demands have evolved the current practice of engineering in such a way thatthere now exists disconnect between engineering education and engineering practice. This disconnect hasresulted in today’s engineering students lacking the key skills needed to be successful engineers [4] andresulted in many prominent calls to reduce the distance between engineering education and engineeringpractice. The most notable call is perhaps from the National Academy of Engineering’s Engineer of 2020project [5], [6] which calls for the inclusion of interdisciplinary knowledge and teamwork
Paper ID #11860A Two Semester, Multi-Approach Instrumentation Project for MechanicalEngineering StudentsDr. Dale H. Litwhiler, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus DALE H. LITWHILER is an Associate Professor at Penn State, Berks Campus in Reading, PA. He re- ceived his B.S. from Penn State University, M.S. from Syracuse University, and Ph.D. from Lehigh Uni- versity all in electrical engineering. Prior to beginning his academic career, he worked with IBM Federal Systems and Lockheed Martin Commercial Space Systems as a hardware and software design engineer
National Science Foundation underGrant #DUE-1140852.Bibliography 1 The National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineeringin the New Century, The National Academics Press, 2004.2 J. Frolik, T. Weller, P. Flikkema, and C. Haden, “Implementing an Inverted ClassroomUsing Tablet PCs For Content Development”, in The Impact of Tablet PCs and Pen-Based Technology on Education: Going Mainstream, Robert H. Reed and Dave A.Berque, eds., Purdue University Press, 2010.3 P.G. Flikkema, J. Frolik, C. Haden, and T. Weller, “Experiential Learning of ComplexEngineered Systems in the Context of Wireless Sensor Networks
taught a wide variety of engineering courses in First Year Engineering and Mechanical Engineering at Ohio State. She has received four teaching awards in the last three years at both the College and the Departmental level at OSU.Dr. Sheryl A. Sorby, Ohio State University Dr. Sheryl Sorby is currently a Professor of STEM Education at The Ohio State University and was re- cently a Fulbright Scholar at the Dublin Institute of Technology in Dublin, Ireland. She is a professor emerita of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics at Michigan Technological University and the PI or coPI on more than $9M in grant funding, most for educational projects. She is the former As- sociate Dean for Academic Programs in the College
Paper ID #13316How Engineering Students Study: Alone, Together, or Start Alone, End To-getherDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of belonging, self-efficacy, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence.Dr. Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington Dr. Allendoerfer is a Research Scientist in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington.Prof. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State
Applied Science. Page 26.662.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Enhancing Retention and Achievement of Undergraduate Engineering Students (To be presented at NSF Grantees’ Poster Session)INTRODUCTION This paper presents the impact of three key strategies that we have implemented forimproving retention and student success for engineering undergraduates, as part of a NationalScience Foundation (NSF) project funded by the Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics Talent Expansion Program (STEP) at the University of
ASEE paper at the annual conference focused on servicelearning. It had 6 authors, including 2 engineering faculty, three non-engineering faculty, and anindividual from a K-12 school district. Engineering faculty included individuals with degrees inengineering, engineering technology, construction management, physics, and/or architecture.Additional data was gathered as benchmarks to compare to the LTS faculty. Faculty data wasgathered from the ASEE profiles, and more specific information from the ASEE EngineeringData Management System.36 This provided information on the ranks of engineering faculty forthe institutions with engineering degrees around the U.S. When combined with informationfrom the Carnegie Classifications, the distribution of
who’d submitted acommunity proposal around the topic of their respective choosing. The Office of FacultyDevelopment provided training for these selected facilitators, but otherwise left the running ofthe learning community to the facilitators and faculty. Each faculty learning community wasprovided with a small budget ($1500), was required to meet about every three weeks throughoutthe academic year, and was asked to provide a short report at the end of the year.The Flipped Classroom Faculty Learning Community, in particular, was proposed to explore thepedagogy of an inverted or “flipped” classroom and the technologies available to supportflipping. The community was facilitated by an engineering faculty member, and it attractedcommunity members
employed in the professionsand other non-engineering occupations did not. Additionally, graduates working in fields suchas informational technology, business, and the military tended not to perceive themselves asworking in engineering; nonetheless, many of these graduates self-identified as an engineer andhad plans to pursue engineering work in the future. Our findings demonstrate future researchdirections for the study of what it means to do engineering work. They also highlight a need forimproved career preparation, counseling, and development among early career engineeringgraduates and students.IntroductionSince a student earning an engineering bachelor’s degree no longer presupposes that he or shewill pursue an engineering job,1 finding ways
. Erdil, University of New Haven Nadiye O. Erdil is an assistant professor of industrial engineering and engineering and operations man- agement at the University of New Haven. Her research interests include use of statistical methods and lean tools for quality and process improvement, and use of information technology in operations management. Her work is primarily in manufacturing and healthcare delivery operations.Dr. Cheryl Q Li, University of New HavenDr. Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven Jean Nocito-Gobel, Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of New Haven, received her Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. She has been actively involved in a number of
Paper ID #12954Incorporating Sustainable Engineering Design Principles into Senior DesignProposalsDr. Ding Yuan, Colorado State University, Pueblo Ding Yuan received the Bachelor of Engineering degree in industrial automation from Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China, in 1998 and the Ph.D degree in Electrical Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, in 2006. She is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering at Colorado State University-Pueblo.Dr. Jane M. Fraser, Colorado State University, Pueblo Jane M. Fraser is chair of the Department of Engineering at Colorado State
Century, which undergraduate programs areadopting as evidence of continuous improvement in fulfillment of ABET, Inc. (formerly know asAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) Criterion 5 6,7. Roughly one-third ofASCE civil engineering outcomes, correlate with development of professional skills.Development of professional and leadership skills has been shown to improve through thecollege experience 8. Leadership principles covered in the curriculum have proven to makeimprovements in student development and studies have indicated faculty interaction also has apositive effect 8. Assessing student obtainment of fundamental professional skills and leadershipconcepts at lower levels of Blooms Taxonomy within the classroom is relatively
to thebelief that one can make a difference through engineering problem solving and is in support ofone’s perceived ability to engage in personal involvement in local, national, internationalengineering issues and activities towards achieving greater global good using engineeringmethodologies and approach. Engineering Global-centrism is the third subscale. This refers to aperson’s value of what is good for the global community in engineering related efforts, and notjust one’s own country or group. It refers to one’s ability to make sound judgements based onglobal needs in which engineering and associated technologies can have impact on globalimprovement. Finally, Global Engineering Community Connectedness is the last subscale. Thissubscale