(ST), which is why we propose to think how to include, in engineeringeducation, some of the abilities or skills from ST, and from the math education perspective. Thereport [2] explicitly mentions the work done by Senge [4] and motivated by this fact this paperaims to show the advantages and benefits of incorporating systems thinking in a math class. It ishoped that through this, it can be stated that the wealth of integrating the two seemingly disjointin two different disciplines (Systems Thinking and Mathematics). The present work shows theresults of the design of an innovative course of Differential Equations (DE), by means of usingmodeling and computer simulation, to have an active learning environment [4]. This course hasbeen taught for
, MADI Associate Professor of the Chair of Sociology and Management Page 26.1239.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Pre-admission education for better adapt freshmen Dr. Alexander Solovyev, Dr. Larisa Petrova, Dr. Viacheslav Prikhodko, Dr. Ekaterina Makarenko Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI)IntroductionUsually a person passes several levels of education. Transition from one educational level toanother is an integral part of youth’s life. In Russia there are 3 stages of school
visiting or tenure track positions.IntroductionInternational faculty join US institutions to teach in engineering programs among otherprograms. The positions they pursue could be permanent as in tenure-track positions ortemporary as the case in visiting positions or other forms of employment. An internationalfaculty member pursuing a career in academia is usually faced with a decision regarding the kindof position he/she plans to take. Those who love research activities will pursue a career ininstitutions that also value research activities more that teaching. Others who love teaching anddesire to keep it their main focus are likely to pursue a career at teaching institutions that valueteaching excellence and without great emphasis on research
Paper ID #13434Aligning ”making” with Manufacturing Technology EducationDr. Marilyn Barger, FLATE: Florida Advanced Technological Education Center of Excellence Dr. Marilyn Barger is the Principal Investigator and Executive Director of FLATE, the Florida Regional Center of Excellence for Advanced Technological Education, funded by the National Science Founda- tion and housed at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa, Florida since 2004. FLATE serves the state of Florida as its region and is involved in outreach and recruitment of students into technical career pathways; has produced award winning curriculum design and
and workstations and fast algorithms which simplify the FEsoftware. Introducing new material into the already packed 4-four year engineering programsposes challenges to most instructors. The need for integrating FE theory and application acrossthe engineering curriculum has been established and methods have been suggested by otherengineering authors 4-6 . This paper discusses the technique of designing finite element activelearning modules (ALM) across many areas of engineering and the success of these modules inimproving the student's understanding of the engineering concepts and of the finite elementanalysis technique. Previous authors over the past six years have reported their success in usingtheir finite element learning modules7-15.The
studentswho are behind in their degree progress. This includes first-time freshman who are not calculus Page 26.300.3ready, and sophomore students who do not have enough credits to be considered on tracktowards graduating in four years). As mentioned above, the program has two distinctcomponents: a year-long retention program, and a summer bridge program for incoming first-year students who are not prepared for Calculus I. Both programs are optional to those whoqualify.In the year-long retention program, students have one-on-one meetings with an academiccounselor to discuss academic concerns, personal and professional goals, campus resources
are degreeprograms commonly offered at other institutions. Mathematics, physics, and chemistry were alsoincluded in the study to gain an understanding of curricular choice opportunity in non-engineering Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) disciplines.The “Choice Value” term was developed as a quantified representation of the aggregatecurricular choice opportunity within a given degree program, and is a function of total coursechoice opportunities, the proportion of degree credit hours that provide curricular choice, and thenumber of courses from which students may choose. Choice Values were determined using thepublished curriculum in the 2013-2014 university catalogs, as well as counts for the number ofindividual course options
challenges concerning integration, efficiency, and creativity2.Communication is especially critical to effective collaboration in an engineering team, not onlyin e-mail messages, memoranda, and internal reports, but also in verbal communication thathappens in meetings that are the ‘lifeblood’ of contemporary professional life4. Althoughemployees and their managers in the workplace attend on average more than three meetings perweek, “the quality of these meetings is evaluated as poor in 41.9% of the cases5,6. Furthermore,dissatisfaction with the meeting procedure and results affects employees’ attitudes and leads to anegative and pessimistic perspective on meetings”6,7. The failure of teams to work togetheraffects more than individual attitudes and
and challenges of implementingthe first year in an experimental pilot program. As part of a set of initiatives to transform highereducation at Purdue University, the Polytechnic Institute (PI) was designed to be a multi-disciplinary, hands-on, competency-based experience for undergraduate students in technologyprograms. In Spring 2014, the PI began recruiting students, and in Fall 2014, the programopened its doors to its first cohort. The faculty who had taken a year to design and develop thefirst year curriculum eagerly awaited their new mentees. However, students came in with theirown hopes and concerns, which impacted their desire to join and remain in the program.Students were not alone in their decision-making. They were guided and
. Half of the initial 14 interviews were conducted inperson and half by phone to see what were the effects the different formats. The phoneinterviews were more candid, so the rest of the interviews were conducted by phone or Skype.In a previous paper, students were assigned an ‘SR Type’ that described how they envisionedengineering integrating with their own SR-related endeavors41. These types are shown in Table1. The majority of these students also repeated the EPRA survey, which included a new open-ended question that asked the students to identify any courses that had impacted their views ofSR.Table 1: SR Types Identified from Year 1 Interviews SR Type 1 - These students indicated that their reasons for choosing engineering as a major were or
. Some students begin to view SDL in terms of their own interests andlearning. The range of responses becomes wider as different individuals state different ideas ofwhat self-directed learning is and how SDL might be demonstrated. We see that students createtheir own meaning, and their conceptions often overlap with our working definition of SDL butmight not be as encompassing. SDL begins to show up as choices that students might have, interms of not only what to learn but also how.Defining SDL became an ongoing process as the research unfolded and as the studentsprogressed in the curriculum. They began defining the instantiation of SDL practices by the waysthey interpreted varying instructional models. For example, when students assumed
and developing arguments in writing. Thisstudy draws on experiences from changing a course previously relying onmandatory attendance towards challenging and encouraging the students‟contribution to each other‟s learning. Page 26.1586.21. Introduction: Tools For TransformationImagine coming into a classroom, an auditorium housing 150 students. After settingup your computer and PowerPoint-presentation, the bustle quiets down and you beginby welcoming the crowd to your country and university. Though they come from allover the world,from different societies, cultures and schooling, thestudents have twothings in common: all of them are engineering students, and; none of
the motor under various operatingconditions. Surprisingly, upon finalizing the laboratory exercise, a portion of the studentsreturned their reports with estimations of the power that were several orders of magnitude off thenominal motor values.An article written by Kay10 suggested that the robotics curriculum content of the course shouldbe focused on the topics that are interesting to the student, as an example she presented a list oftopics that would be suited to fit better the skills of a specific major, but not those of the othertwo majors. Kay’s argument for tailored curriculum content stemmed from her frustration intrying to find a robotics textbook that would cover specific topics relative to robotics forundergraduates in her major area
Paper ID #11218PROGRAMMING A SIX AXIS MOTOMAN HP3C ROBOT FOR INDUS-TRIAL SORTING APPLICATIONMr. Hamza Kadir, Purdue University Calumet (College of Technology) Alumni Hamza Kadir, M.Sc., currently works as a Controls Engineer in the Packaging Machinery OEM indus- try. He completed his Masters from Purdue University Calumet, majoring in Mechatronics Engineering Technology. He conducted his M.Sc. Directed Project at the Nick and Nancy Wilson Mechatronics En- gineering Technology Laboratory. This project involves integration of modern automation tools for an intelligent part sorting system. He has previously worked with use of
Paper ID #11535A Series of Singular Testimonies: A New Way to Explore Unearned Advan-tages and Unearned DisadvantagesDr. Julie P Martin, Clemson University Julie P. Martin is an assistant professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research interests focus on social factors affecting the recruitment, retention, and career development of underrepresented students in engineering. Dr. Martin is a 2009 NSF CAREER awardee for her research entitled, ”Influence of Social Capital on Under-Represented Engineering Students Academic and Career Decisions.” She held an American Association for the
, the length of the testscan be reduced and the precision of measurement improved. Computerized adaptive tests (CAT)have gained wide acceptance in high-stakes applications, including major admissions tests suchas the GMAT, the GRE, and the MCAT, and in vertically integrated assessment of studentproficiency in mathematics and reading, as in the MAP assessment widely used in K12 educationsettings. Computer adaptive testing is also a central component of many of the designs for thenew common core assessments.In a typical CAT, an examinee’s estimated ability is updated after each item response by takingeither the mode of the likelihood, or the posterior mean or mode. After ˆ k has been estimated(for the student after answering item k), the next
and acommunity college, we identify students’ funds of knowledge, or the knowledge gained fromstudents’ family and cultural backgrounds, that is crucial to engineering innovation but neglectedin the curriculum they encounter in college. These funds of knowledge include defining andsolving problems in the midst of financial and material scarcity; building, fixing, and adaptingtechnical artifacts and systems; and empathizing with marginalized groups and communities. Wesuggest that these knowledges position LIFGs as effective innovators of engineering design forcommunity development, though few pursue this path because of financial constraints. Finally,we identify future pathways of this exploratory research, including a) an
http://www.chapman.edu/wilkinson/research-centers/babbie-center/survey-american-fears.aspx. 2. E. Friedland. “Oral Communication across the Curriculum: What’s a Small College to Do? Report of a Collaborative Pilot by Theatre and Education Faculty.” The Journal of General Education, Volume 53, Number 3-4, 2004, 288-310. Page 26.916.13 3. D.M. Hardison and C. Sonchaeng. “Theatre voice training and technology in teaching oral skills: Integrating the components of a speech event.” System, Volume 33, 2005, 593–608.4. R.A. Berk, and R.H. Trieber. “Whose classroom is it, anyway? Improvisation as a
government agencies. In 2010, Dr. Lambrinidou co-conceived the graduate level engineering ethics course ”Engi- neering Ethics and the Public,” which she has been co-teaching to students in engineering and science. She is co-Principal Investigator on a National Science Foundation (NSF) research and education project developing an ethnographic approach to engineering ethics education. Page 26.322.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Canons against Cannons? Social Justice and the Engineering Ethics ImaginaryAbstractWhat if social
undergraduate program with little designexperience in between.In recent years, as conceptions of engineering design thinking have broadened and become morecomplex [3], the capstone-cornerstone curriculum model has been shown to be inadequate [12].Consequently, there are now programs that are taking an integrated design approach wheredesign experiences are incorporated throughout the curriculum [13], [14]. This gives students amore holistic engineering design experience, allows time for design thinking to develop, andexposes students to various design scenarios. For example, the biomedical engineeringdepartment at the University of Wisconsin-Madison requires that students enroll in six semestersof design courses. Students work in teams to solve a real
develop an attachment to the engineering department space, to be a showcase for theprogram, and to provide a 24/7 informal learning space when not being used by classes.Assessment of the space shows that it is pleasant and well-liked by both students and faculty andis working well for teaching a range of classes.At Michigan State University, a more comprehensive approach to first-year engineering wasestablished in 2008 which integrated cornerstone courses, an engineering living-learningresidence hall, computer labs, and a project work space.11,12,13 Similar to NortheasternUniversity, Michigan State’s enrollment is comparable in size (about 700+ first-year engineeringstudents each fall). Researchers discovered that engineering students living in
in undergraduate classes (problem based learning, games and simulations, etc.) as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the Chemical and Petroleum Engineering as well as broader engineering curriculum. In addition, she is actively engaged in the development of a variety of informal science education approaches with the goal of exciting and teaching K-12 students about regenerative medicine and its potential. Page 26.250.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Assessing the Impact of Game-Based Pedagogy on the Development
Paper ID #12357Communication Class Size and Professional IdentityDr. Corey Owen, University of Saskatchewan Corey Owen received his PhD in English from Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada in 2007. Since then, he has been teaching in the Ron and Jane Graham School of Professional Development in the University of Saskatchewan’s College of Engineering. His research focuses on issues of rhetoric, identity, and learning theory, as well as medieval ethics and literature.Prof. Debora Rolfes, University of Saskatchewan Debora Rolfes is an assistant professor in the Ron and Jane Graham School of Professional
Paper ID #11775Does Motivation Matter for Conceptual Change: Developing Effective Qual-itative Research ApproachesDr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research
of the engineeringcourses throughout the curriculum. The courses include Introduction to Engineering, EngineeringGraphics, Calculus and Analytic Geometry, Problem Solving for Engineers (MatLabprogramming course), Materials Science and Engineering, Thermodynamics, Virtual MachineDesign, Engineering of Manufacturing Processes, Quality Control and Reliability, Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Controls I, Controls II, Senior Design Projects, and IndependentResearch/Design Projects.In education, in general, three sets of objectives can be identified: cognitive, affective (refer toattitudes and values), and skill learning22 (expertise gained by training and practice). Engineeringeducation emphasizes cognitive and (to a lesser degree) skill
of view, and to continually makethe concepts more personal. The point of the individual discussion was not to delve too deeply into a particulardisaster or individual ethical decision, necessitating a decision tree or other analyticalformalisms. Rather, the purpose of each debate was to extend the thinking of the students andinfuse an ethical framework from which to view historical and current events with theexpectation that this approach would follow the students to more focused case studies that theywould see in the latter part of the engineering curriculum. The students appreciated both thehigh- and personal-level ethical discussions and communicated their enjoyment of being able tosimultaneously appreciate the technical and human
engineering. Her research interests address a broad spectrum of educational topics, but her specialty is in how people learn problem solving skills.Hannah Christine Zierden, The Ohio State UniversityMr. Kevin Robert Wegman Kevin is a first year graduate student studying Nuclear Engineering. He graduated last fall with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering. Kevin has taught with the EEIC for the past three years, twice as a UTA and once as a GTA.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Engineering Education Innovation Center and the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering at The Ohio State Univer- sity. She earned her B.S. and M.S
resultingfrom primary stress. It would be appropriate to include a course in structural analysis usingFEA, but there is not time in the curriculum for it. Instead, the specialized ship structuralanalysis software MAESTRO is introduced in the ship structures course. MAESTRO is amodified FEA program developed by Professor Owen Hughes of Virginia Tech and currentlymaintained by DRS Technologies, Advanced Marine Technology Center where it has beenupdated and modernized over the years. MAESTRO analyzes ship and ship structures using apanel method (where the panel is in effect an element of the FEA). It was specifically designedfor ship structures. Because of this, it is relatively easy for students to use to conduct basic shipstructural analysis.MAESTRO is
, and applied ethics journals. Herkert previously served as Editor of IEEE Technology and Society Magazine and an Associate Editor of Engineering Studies. He is or has been an active leader in many professional or- ganizations including the Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum, the Society on Social Implications of Technology (SSIT) of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), the National Insti- tute for Engineering Ethics, and the Engineering Ethics and Liberal Education/Engineering and Society (LEES) Divisions of the American Society for Engineering Education. In 2005 Herkert received the Ster- ling Olmsted Award, the highest honor bestowed by LEES, for ”making significant contributions in
Paper ID #13565Learning from Senior-Level Engineering & Business Development Profes-sionals to Create Globally Competent Engineers via On- and Off-CampusActivitiesDr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is Chair of the Women’s & Gender Studies Department at California Polytechnic State Uni- versity, San Luis Obispo. She is also an Associate Professor in Ethnic Studies, Director of the Science, Technology & Society Minor Programs, and Faculty Director of the Louis Stokes Alliance for Minor- ity and Underrepresented Student Participation in STEM Program at Cal Poly. She