rubric consistently. The rubric consisted of three information literacy criteria: accessing needed information, using information effectively, and accessing and using information ethically. Scores ranging from 14 can be assigned for each of the three criteria according to the rubric, with situations in which a 0 would be assigned defined during the norming session and noted on the rubric. Page 26.1663.6Identifying information, including name, group number, and course section number, was removed from the assignments and replaced with a code by a staff member who did not participate in assessment. Each of four librarians who participated in
and curriculum to provide students with opportunitiesto conceive, design, and implement engineering solutions to complex global issues. This paper describes the development and assessment of a redesigned first yearcornerstone course called Engineering Opportunities. The motivation for the courseredesign was to both be a pathway into the engineering community and to equip studentsfor success in both the classroom and the engineering profession. The course is built on alearner-centered platform that is intended to create an inclusive environment for first yearstudents to successfully transition from high school to college. The course content covershuman-centered design, systems thinking, professionalism and ethics. The intention ofthis
ABET Criteria Traditional AerosPACE ICED Capstone (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve
reflection component on personal development, social impact, academic enhancement,university mission, and ethics. A mixed-methods approach was used to examine differencesbetween first-year engineering students who participated in service-learning projects during thefall semester of 2014 and those who did not. Students participating in service-learning projectsshowed significantly higher gains in confidence in both technical and professional engineeringskills. Female students in particular showed the most dramatic gains, with an average increase of81.6% in technical engineering confidence as a result of their service-learning course. The highergains in confidence can be attributed to the students learning more about how to identify andunderstand
Task Planning, 2001 7–12 (2001). doi:10.1109/ISATP.2001.92895823. Elfes, A. Dynamic control of robot perception using multi-property inference grids. in , 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1992. Proceedings 2561–2567 vol.3 (1992). doi:10.1109/ROBOT.1992.22005624. Sugie, H., Inagaki, Y., Ono, S., Aisu, H. & Unemi, T. Placing objects with multiple mobile robots-mutual help using intention inference. in , 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1995. Proceedings 2, 2181–2186 vol.2 (1995).25. Lin, P., Abney, K. & Bekey, G. A. Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. (The MIT Press, 2011).26. Anderson, M. & Anderson, S. L. Machine Ethics
EngineeringLeadership, and (3) Engineering Leadership Capstone) within the minor are developed andtaught in-house. The final requirement involves experiential learning engagement. Studentprogress and leadership development are tracked as they complete the requirements of the minor. The elective courses are classified into four concentrations: (1) communication, (2)ethics, (3) creativity and innovation, and (4) global and societal impact. The four concentrationareas were created following research about other engineering leadership programs and thecourses available to engineering students across the university. The ‘communication’concentration includes courses that focus on the development of students' professional skills andengagement with technical
literature) that aredifficult to achieve in the rest of the engineering curriculum. These learning outcomes includestudent ability to function effectively as a member of a diverse and interdisciplinary team,student understanding of professional and ethical responsibilities, student ability to understandthe impact of technology in a societal context, and student ability to grasp engineering projects ina holistic sense. The course is designed to be a part of the project-based learning sequence and isexpected to prepare students for the challenging senior year projects where students are requiredto demonstrate a strong ability to synthesize and integrate the skills learnt from the previousyears. This course serves as a scaffolding2 to assist the junior
through multidisciplinary projectsand ethics from three students’ perspectives. From these case studies we examine the way we, asstudent engineers, reconcile technocentrism with ways of thinking utilized in liberal education.Analysis of the case studies imply a role for reflection and care in addressing technocentrism andour paper ends with a call for further studies analyzing these relationships.Introduction:“My app will change the world, my product is a disruptive innovation”―these are the mantras ofstartup founders, engineers, and computer scientists throughout the Silicon Valley. Writer JoelStein presents this profile of tech entrepreneurs in his Bloomsberg Businessweek article,Arrogance is Good: In Defense of Silicon Valley.3 This stereotype
chosen a different approach to this section,from teaching a broad overview using a seminar approach, to focusing on teachingspecific software necessary for future courses.Introduction to Chemical Engineering The department faculty has adapted a project-based learning approach due to thelarge success shown in many other similar introductory level courses(3-7). The goal was tointroduce different unit operations through a fun process example that was simple enoughfor the students to follow. The process needed to involve simple chemistry and provideopportunities for introducing different unit operations, teamwork, ethics andsustainability. The other challenge, due to lack of laboratory space, the process ideallywould not require the use of a
n % Literature review 7 78% Knowledge of research area 6 67% Independence 5 56% Technical presentation 4 44% Research ethics awareness 4 44% Data analysis and presentation 4 44% Networking 3 33% Scientific method 3 33% Creativity 3 33% Knowledge of bioenergy 3 33
Computer Engineering, 2) Department of Physics, 3) Departments of Biology and of Women, Gender, & Sexuality Studies, Portland State University, Oregon, USA j.e.morris@ieee.orgAbstractThe goals of the program described below are to: Address the need for greater technical awareness in the general student population Extend the breadth of nanotechnology education for science and engineering majors, and Expose both student groups to the social, economic, and ethical issues of nanotechnologies.This has been accomplished by three junior-level lecture courses and a
, religious, history, literature, fine arts, sociology, psychology, politicalscience, anthropology, economics, and foreign languages other than English or a student’snative language. Nontraditional subjects are exemplified by courses such as technology andhuman affairs, history of technology, and professional ethics and social responsibility. Coursesthat instill cultural values are acceptable, while routine exercises of personal craft are not.Consequently, courses that involve performance must be accompanied by theory or history of thesubject.I.C.3.d (2) (c) Subjects such as accounting, industrial management, finance, personneladministration, engineering economy and military training may be appropriately included eitheras required or elective courses
engineering departments to ensure that the course broadly meets the needs andexpectations across engineering disciplines. An ABET-style syllabus was also developed toidentify the student outcomes for the course and to help each engineering department understandhow they could use the course to support student outcomes a-k (Appendix). This course provided Page 26.651.4broad coverage of many ABET student outcomes since we included topics such as engineeringand research ethics and communicating research findings, in addition to the research processitself. The course is open to all engineering students and does not have prerequisites; however, itis a 400
instructors at four Canadianinstitutions.Although there is research on engineering ethics education3,4,5,6, there is a gap in examining howengineering instructors view the inclusion of ethics and the other hallmarks of STSE in their ownteaching. This research was designed to help fill this gap in the field, focusing on three keyresearch questions: (1) How do undergraduate engineering instructors describe their teachinggoals and practices?; (2) How do undergraduate engineering instructors describe their teachinggoals and practices with respect to exploring the relationship between engineering, society andthe environment (i.e. STSE)?; and (3) What are the specific challenges or enabling factors inexploring the relationship between engineering, society
, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context(i) a recognition of the need for
: technical coordination; understanding and negotiating engineering cultures;and navigating ethics, standards and regulation.16 Yet, the knowledge, skills, and attitudesrequired remain a subject of ongoing empirical research.17 Moreover, the lists of attributes thathave been developed suffer from methodological and theoretical concerns and are largely notgrounded in empirical research.18One broad definition of global competency is “the knowledge, ability, and predisposition to workeffectively with people who define problems differently than they do.”19 As this definitionhighlights, global competency requires not only specific knowledge, but also the ability andpredisposition to recognize that engineering problems are defined and solved differently
• Page 26.1461.3 MatLab and other Software Tools • Volume/Density • SI Units • Newton’s Laws of Motion • Material Properties • Ohm’s and Kirchhoff’s Laws • Ethics in Engineering • Engineering ResearchAs can be seen by the list of topics, the course is very ambitious in its efforts to expose thefreshmen engineers to the many aspects of engineering.Course logisticsThe enrollment for the course was very large, 221 freshmen engineers took the course in the Fall2014 semester. One of the priorities of the course was to offer the freshmen more personalizedinstruction than they typically see in their first year of college. Thus seven sections of ENGR100were offered. The enrollment in each section was targeted at 25
. Discussion.The field of engineering education has long focused on instilling a set of core ethicalprinciples in developing engineers28, 29, 30. Guided by the U.S. Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET), undergraduate engineering programs aim to helpstudents develop “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility”31. Ingeneral, however, engineering ethics have emphasized principles such as accountabilityto the client—defined as the people or organizations who have retained the engineer’sservices, not as the broader public for whom a given product or innovation will result ineither benefit or harm30. Some have critiqued this approach as insufficient for producingengineers who think critically about the social implications of
” [1].It is up to individual programs how they implement and assess ABET criteria, and manyprograms meet the non-technical criteria through service courses taught by other departments,such as a technical communication course taught by the English department or by specialized butseparate courses such as an engineering-oriented ethics class. However, there has also beenextensive work on integrating communication skills throughout the engineering curriculum andcourses, and that is the focus of this work [6]–[8]. Engineering faculty generally value written communication skills and recognize that theyhave a role in helping students to develop those skills. Many see their role as that of providingopportunities for students to write in their
for Contemporary IssuesAbstractAt the University of Utah, the required introductory course for students seeking major status incivil and environmental engineering utilizes the history and heritage of civil engineering to begindeveloping professional knowledge and skill sets. Topical areas include contemporary issues,leadership, ethics, professionalism, and the significant interactions of society and engineering.This paper describes the organization and delivery of the course, its connection to ASCE’s Bodyof Knowledge, and the means of assessment of student achievement.IntroductionAt the University of Utah, students interested in civil and environmental engineering enroll inCvEEN 1000, Introduction to Civil and Environmental Engineering. The
detailed data from the plant and interact with utility personal andpracticing engineers who work daily at the treatment plant3-5. Page 26.678.2The Water Environment Association of Texas (WEAT) student design prompt can aid faculty indevelopment of the course providing a realistic problem for students to work on during thecapstone design course. Additional advisement from practicing engineers can provide additionalresources and feedback for students. Practicing engineers provide students with guidance on howindustry works and can bring light to elements such as project management, economic, social,political and ethical considerations that are not
profession involved in the application of mathematical and science for the needsof humanity10. Engineers may graduate from ABET accredited programs that ensure engineersmeet the standards of the profession11. One responsibility listed is understanding “professional,ethical and social responsibilities”11. Ethics for engineers deal with professionalism andunderstanding implications of their work12. The American Society for Engineering Education’sethics code appears to encourage safety by reducing conflicts of interests and partiality12.The disciplines of engineering can be put into 4 main groups; chemical, civil, electrical, andmechanical13. These groups are split into smaller concentrations with specific specialties. Despitethe concentrations
opportunities such as participating in after-school tutoring and clubs, coaching andjudging academic teams, partnering with teachers on classroom projects, and hosting workplacevisits and apprenticeships. Our focus is on increasing the quantity and quality of our STEMprofessionals’ engagement; therefore, we promote STEM volunteering opportunities as well asprovide sessions with a group of STEM mentors that require less time commitment and buildtrust for future opportunities. This, in effect, mentoring of mentors, will reduce the anxiety ofnew mentors and expand the acceptance of mentoring into the "new normal" of quality, highimpact STEM mentoring. Additionally, to raise the level of ethical responsibility of the mentors,mentors are required to review
businesses. 3. Analyze various energy sources and evaluate their advantages and disadvantages. 4. Calculate energy use, cost, and rate of depletion of energy sources under varying scenarios. 5. Obtain an essential understanding of the political, economic, environmental, and social issues related to energy production and consumption in the contemporary world. 6. Discuss U.S. and global trends on energy and sustainability related to policies, ethics, economics, politics, environment, and society. 7. Identify and locate the appropriate types of information for review, evaluate the information, and use the information effectively, ethically, and legally.DescriptionTopics for the course include the following: The
example study; and, Critically examine how the framework was used in these studies to explore, plan, Page 26.303.3 implement, reflect on, document, and demonstrate research quality.Ethical validation as a sixth validation construct and core aspect of research qualityBased on conversations at the first longitudinal workshop, over the past two years the authorshave collaborated with Dr. Alice Pawley from Purdue University to pursue the idea of ethicalvalidation as an additional, sixth dimension of the quality framework. These explorations wereprompted by the recognition in our own work that: i) ethical considerations extend
come from avariety of backgrounds, the range of students and abilities is advantageous to all concerned. Theengineering principles allow the instructors to make connections and draw analogies anddemonstrations across different areas. A course schedule is in the Appendix.Course Description: Introduction to Mechanical Engineering.The engineering design process is demonstrated through use of practical problem-solvingmethods for mechanical projects. Course subjects include mechanical engineering career paths,ethical canons of the engineering profession, and requirements for professional licensure. Courseassignments, conducted within a collaborative learning environment, focus on creativeengineering solutions through technical analysis, teamwork
engineers deal with a wide variety of information at various steps of a project. Time constraints imposed on the design team as well the need for diverse information challenges design engineers. Diverse information ranges from abstract ideas in the conceptual design step to the smallest details in the detailed design, from checking patents for new ideas to avoid any infringing of existing patents and trade names. Because of this need, the ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) has articulated the importance of student outcomes to include “(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility”, and “(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning.” [5] Design
, language and terminology for technical documents, preparing effective Page 26.1678.2figures and tables, interview development and structuring technical genres (e.g., reports,proposals, and memos). Furthermore, students were lectured on design topics ranging from needsidentification, development of design goals and criteria, use of Pugh and decision matrices, andthe iterative process. Several lectures also addressed the complex usability and ethical issuesassociated with designing devices for patients with disabilities.In an effort to provide students with hands-on experiences within the design process, multipleactivities were incorporated into the
to traditional approaches can increasestudents’ conceptual knowledge and their ability to transfer acquired knowledge to newersituations [1-3]. Furthermore, exposure to real-world challenges, especially when presented in anactive and practical learning environment increases both student interest and pedagogicaleffectiveness. The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) in its report, “Educating theEngineer of 2020,” contends that solving the Grand Challenges will require more than justproviding students with technical training. It argues that an engineering education must producegraduates who combine technical excellence with a multitude of other skills includingcommunication, teaming, ethical reasoning, and contextual analysis. Students
where learning may becompounded with new developments in electronic media. Sections 4 and 5 discuss theimportance of communications, ethics and accreditation which are important to have in aprogram competing in a global market. Section 6 provides suggestions, based on new trends and Page 26.337.3methodologies to meet the challenges in Pakistani engineering institutions having tremendousincrease in student enrollment. Section 7 summarizes the key points presented in the paper.2.0 Challenges of Teaching and LearningSeveral differences can be identified between the educational environments of developing andindustrialized countries such as