, whether the first semesterexperiences increased the probability of staying in engineering, and the change in perceivedprobability of graduating with a degree in ECS.These surveys allowed examination of similarities / differences between the LLC and non-LLCstudents at the beginning of the freshman year, and longitudinal change in responses for each ofthese two cohorts from the beginning to the end of the first semester of the freshman year.Exploration of the Longer-Term Impact of the LLCAs this is the fourth year of this residential LLC, a survey was administered to the sophomorethrough senior students who originally enrolled in ECS disciplines in the fall of their freshmanyear. All students in this cohort were asked to complete the survey whether
participated in a build activity as partof the course.For the 2012-2013 academic year, Purdue University was added to the cohort; additionally,graduate students at the University of Washington who were also Boeing employees joined theprogram. Student participation almost doubled to a total of 16 undergraduate students and 3graduate students. While a design-build-fly activity was desired, it was determined to be toodifficult to achieve in this second project iteration. Instead, a design-build-test framework waschosen as an intermediate step on the way to a collaborative full design-build-fly activity.In order to avoid repeating the same student project every year, the project’s leadership teamsearched for a test activity template to best fit with the
Paper ID #13710Incremental Self-Assessment Rubrics for Capstone Design CoursesProf. James Trevelyan, University of Western Australia Professor James Trevelyan works part-time as a Winthrop Professor in the Mechanical and Chemical En- gineering School at The University of Western Australia, Fellow of Engineers Australia, and also practices as a mechanical and mechatronics engineer developing new air conditioning technology. His main area of research is on engineering practice, and he teaches design, sustainability, engineering practice and project management. He is well known internationally for pioneering research that
their projects, actions that had not previously beennecessary of instructors but further exercised their cross-cultural and communication skills.LimitationsWhile this paper highlights the expanded impacts to all those associated with the course throughan objective comparison between what has been done with the course in the past and what isbeing practiced now, a significant limitation is the lack of a systematic survey or evaluation ofthe course’s effectiveness. As such, the 2014-2015 offering has prompted the course instructorsto begin work that quantitatively and qualitatively evaluates the course’s impact to studentsthrough an assessment of their learning. This parallel research study (Improving the GlobalCompetency of Graduate Engineers
universities. Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology.65. Zydney, A. L., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., & Bauer, K. W. (2002). Impact of undergraduate research experience in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(2), 151-157.66. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The qualitative report, 13(4), 544-559.67. Brophy, J. E. (2013). Motivating students to learn. Routledge.68. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 299-323.69. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of educational psychology, 84(3), 261.70. Dörnyei, Z. (2000). Motivation in
matter knowledge of student participants is also discussed. The paper further highlightsbest practices that have been developed at the STEM Institute host college to assist otherinstitutions in developing a similar program to increase subject matter knowledge as well asinterest and self-efficacy in STEM.1. IntroductionIncreasingly publications describe our nation’s compelling need for “home-grown” STEMprofessionals while at the same time condemn the lack of preparedness of most graduates forthese jobs. Experts are also concerned that that the aging workforce and a reduced labor poolwill impact professionals available for the federal STEM workforce.1 Moreover, despite high
characterize engineering as a unique field, and what are the mechanisms by which these defining elements change over time? 2) How do elements such as innovation, critical thinking, systems thinking, biology, mathematics, physical sciences, engineering sciences, problem solving, design, analysis, judgment, and communication relate to each other to characterize the core of engineering as a profession? 3) What is the source of these core elements, and how are they shaped? Is engineering best characterized by the people it serves, the problems it addresses, the knowledge used to address problems, the methods by which knowledge is applied, or its social relevancy or impact? 4) What is the
support network that motivates them to succeed.Regardless of engineering discipline, students should graduate with engineering practice experience, theability to problem solve, and the ability to design. These three core competencies are also engineeringeducational objectives as dictated by ABET criteria21. Increasing the design component in theundergraduate curriculum better prepares graduates for engineering practice, the end result being a well-rounded engineer. Traditional engineering courses provided graduates with little, if any, experience inengineering application. Electrical and computer engineering courses and labs that have moved towardsan active learning approach through design and open-ended projects or labs offer the greatest
Cynthia J. Atman is the founding director of the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a professor in Human Centered Design & Engineering, and the inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. Dr. Atman is co-director of the newly-formed Consortium for Promoting Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), funded by a $4.4 million grant from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. She was director of the NSF-funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), a national research center that was funded from 2003-2010. Dr. Atman is the author or co-author on over 115 archival publications. She has been invited
regulatory affairs.Dr. Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of Washington Alyssa C. Taylor is a lecturer in the Department of Bioengineering at the University of Washington. She received a B.S. in biological systems engineering at the University of California, Davis, and a Ph.D. in biomedical engineering at the University of Virginia. Taylor’s teaching activities are focused on develop- ing and teaching core introductory courses and technical labs for bioengineering undergraduates, as well as coordinating the capstone design sequence for the BIOE Department at the University of Washington. Taylor currently pursues educational research and continuous improvement activities, with the ultimate goal of optimizing
American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Teaching Teamwork: A Training Video Designed for Engineering StudentsAbstractThe ability to communicate and work effectively on a team has increased in importance in thefield of engineering as the demands of business and industry have evolved1. Engineers todayreport that communication is critical to their success and spend a large percentage of timeinteracting with others1 and working on teams2. Despite the need for interaction in practice,industry reports indicate engineering graduates show skill deficiencies in communication andteamwork3. Due to the importance of these skills, many encourage their integration into theengineering classroom, suggesting
tools to do engineering, it is engineeringdesign, not content, that the Framework recognized as the “defining feature of engineeringpractice”6 (p.2). Engineering design is the process of using iterative cycle of defining problems,gathering solution ideas, and systematically selecting, testing, optimizing and communicatingsolutions. Researchers stress that engineering design is not simply the application of sciencecontent1,10. Rather, engineering design is a particular problem-solving practice “involving acomplex mixture of knowledge, process, and the enabling of skills or graduate attributes neededfor professional practice”6 (p. 2). While there are a variety of models describing engineering
glaciology. In recent years, he has focused on issues of mathematical education and outreach and he has developed a wide range of K-12 outreach projects. His current interests include the mathematical education of teachers, the scholarship of outreach, computational mathematics, and complex dynamics. Page 26.896.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Fundamental Research: Impacts of Outreach on Entering College Students Interests in STEM (Fundamental)IntroductionThe need to train qualified science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM
description languages and microcontrollers. Formerly Mr. Van Ginneken was Chief Scientist and a co-founder of Magma Design Automation Inc. Before joining Magma, he was at Synopsys, where he worked in the Design Compiler group and the Advanced Technology Group. From 1989 to 1995 he was at IBM’s T.J. Watson Research Center, where he worked on logic synthesis. Mr. van Ginneken holds a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Eindhoven University.Nicholas James RiveraMr. Brian Michael Tugade, DigiPen Institute of Technology Page 26.90.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
consistently expressed that the program experiences with the faculty, graduate students, andpeers had an impact on their career choices. Students who had participated over 9 years agoconsistently supported this finding. Program alumni discussed how the program confirmed theirinterest in pursuing graduate school, exposed them to the nature of graduate school, built theirconfidence and increased their enthusiasm for scientific research. A number of the programalumni are currently in/have completed medical school (14.7%), with 4 in MD/PhD programs.Some alumni found that while the research experience was valuable it allowed them to determinea non-research career was a better option (“Helped confirm that I was most comfortable workingin…medicine.”). Some
Meeting on the globalization of Engineering Education, edited by John M. Grandin and E. Dan Hirleman, 4(1) p22.8. Jesiek, B. K., Borrego, M., Beddoes, K. (2010). “Advancing Global Capacity for Engineering Education Research (AGCEER): Relating Research to Practice, Policy, and Industry.” Journal of Engineering Education. 99(2), 107-119 9. Chang, Y., Atkinson, D., Hirleman, D. E. (2009). “International Research and Engineering Education: Impact and Best Practices.” Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 4(2), 1-810. Groll, E. A and Hirleman, E. D., (2007). Undergraduate GEARE Program: Purdue University’s School of ME Contribution to Educating Globally Sensitive and Competent Engineers. http://globalhub.org
students towards Additive Manufacturing technologies for improving their interest inScience, Technology, and Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields. The instructional set upinvolved using of Solid Works® software by high school students to develop computer aideddesign models which were then visualized and printed using 3D Printers. Design of Experiments(DOE) based statistical techniques were then used to identify the best-built conditions for theparts developed by the students. The approach for creating an effective learning environment forhigh school students in a university setting along with the course structure used and projectfindings are presented in this paper. It is found that the students involved showed a basic level ofunderstanding
using BIMthroughout the design phase of a project and on the construction site have been researched andhave proven to be beneficial. The growing trend, especially in larger companies, is that mostmembers of a construction team will access a virtual building model in some fashion during thecourse of a project. With the growth of BIM use in construction, it is important for colleges anduniversities - with a construction, building, architecture or related degree - to properly exposetheir students to BIM related technologies and practices in order to prepare them for theworkforce [2]. Only a few of the stakeholders involved in the construction industry actually operate BIMsolutions at the building “process” level [3]. BIM is ultimately a
offered EngD. Many schools steer students who are not in astate-approved career and technology program and are unsuccessful taking a foreign languageinto the advanced technology education graduation option and choose to offer ATA which is notas rigorous as EngD to maximize their chances of success. On the other extreme, some schoolsoffer a more advanced Engineering Design and Research course and others offer Project LeadThe Way pre-engineering curriculum. With the new articulation option available, more schoolsare expected to offer EngD starting in 2015 as evidenced by the enrollment of as many as 13teachers in the summer 2015 EngD training.Professional Development for School CounselorsThe GET ET grant Co-Principal Investigator, who is CCBC’s
. Unlike the prevailing curricular model inengineering education—in which introductory courses teach basic science and mathematics,prior to the intense disciplinary specialization and professionalism of upper-level courses—thescholarship on sustainability education25, 26, 27, 28 points to the need for “learning for sustainabledevelopment [to be] embedded in the whole curriculum, not as a separate subject.”29 Authentic,transformative impact is only possible when the concerns of sustainability transcend theperiphery of a curriculum to pervade student skill development.The HERE (Home for Environmentally Responsible Engineering) program, a first-yearliving-learning community at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, was designed to introducestudents
always been chosen to address thecamp goals, as stated in the Introduction, but they have not always been well designed to do so!It is important to realize that this is not intended to be a research project. The assessments aredesigned to match how well the camps meet the camp goals, which can be modified if desired bythe team. Research can be (and has been) overlaid. A paper about a project done by our Collegeof Education partners has been submitted to this conference. In addition, the camps frequentlyencompass the broader impacts portions of grants belonging to fellow researchers byincorporating research-based activities. The camps make an excellent test bed for research, butthis paper does not incorporate those results.The first type of
Paper ID #12509Adaption and evolution of a first year design project week course-From Ger-many to the United States to MongoliaDr. Rebecca Jo Pinkelman, Technische Universit¨at Darmstadt Rebecca J. Pinkelman graduated from Chadron State College with a B.S. in Chemistry and Biology in 2008. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in 2010 and 2014, respectively. She is currently a post-doctoral research scientist in the Mechanical and Process Engineering Department at the Technische Universit¨at Darmstadt.Mr. Malte Awolin, Center for Educational Development at
Paper ID #13676Students’ Experiences with an Open-ended Client Project in a Graduate CourseDr. Jessica L. Heier Stamm, Kansas State University Jessica L. Heier Stamm is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Sys- tems Engineering at Kansas State University. She holds a B.S. in industrial engineering from Kansas State University and a Ph.D. in industrial and manufacturing systems engineering from the Georgia Insti- tute of Technology. Her research interests include the development of quantitative models and algorithms to design and improve humanitarian relief and public health logistics
Paper ID #13944Student Led Example Problems in a Graduate-Level Advanced TransportPhenomena CourseDr. Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick received her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame and B.S. from Michi- gan Technological University. Adrienne’s research interests include electrokinetics, predominantly di- electrophoretic characterizations of cells, and the development of biomedical microdevices. She earned a NSF CAREER award and was nominated for Michigan Professor of the Year in 2014. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL
result oftheir summer research experiences, or the results could mean those teachers are more highly motivated,therefore encouraging their students to perform better in their classes. And it is likely that the moreeffective teachers are more likely to participate in a RET program.Standards-Based Lesson PlanningOur RET program was designed to provide:1. The teachers with six weeks of discovery-based research experiences in carefully selected projects from which they can develop new knowledge and skills that they can incorporate into their teaching practices.2. Guidance for the teachers to develop, during their summer internship, age-appropriate lessons, modules and other teaching materials that can be implemented in their classrooms and
for oneblock or neighborhood is not directly replicable at another. Sustainable housing is tied with manyother wicked problems such as issues of poverty, equitable education, resource conservation, andclimate change. As a result, any response to this wicked problem will impact the others. Withinthe participating WPSI courses, student teams were tasked to develop viable responses to thiswicked problem through staged design reviews, while being exposed to its overall complexityand interconnectedness of sustainable housing with other wicked problems.Our MotivationWPSI is organized through Engineers for a Sustainable World (ESW). As an organization, ourvision is for a world of environmental, social, and economic prosperity created and sustained
we focus on in this study is skills required for an engineering student to be innovative,what we call innovative design. We describe innovative design as the act of generating novelconcepts, processes, or designs. Innovative design is closely linked to creativity,6 using andimplementing creative ideas to develop something tangible, real, or meaningful in a societalcontext. This type of innovation may be described as incremental, leading to small changes, orradical, leading to a complete rethinking of existing practices and designs, or generating entirelynew concepts altogether.7Innovative design may be broken up into constituent components by identifying what skills ortraits are necessary for being innovative. For example, Eris (2004
Communities ofPractice (CoPs) to provide mutual support and training, and to encourage and facilitate theorganic dissemination of best practices across courses among the members of the community ofpractice. In particular, mentorship relationships within the community have provided readyavenues for the translation of best practices. In this paper, we describe and analyze the redesignof one such course in the WIDER community, highlighting how the redesign of this course wasinformed by its involvement within this larger community of practice.1. Introduction Since the 1980s the Computer Science (CS) department at The University of Illinois(UIUC) has offered a service course, “Introduction to Computing”, that was designed to servenon-CS and non
least two years of supervised professional service and internationalresearch experiences that includes specialized training in language, culture, participatoryplanning, and sustainable development practices through the Peace Corps partnership. Thisusually includes at least 8 weeks of intense language, cultural, and technical training and 27months of service in a designated community. The students also gain a global perspective whileperforming graduate level research in an international context of economic, social, andenvironmental limitations5,6. There are over one hundred7 MIPs currently operating at USuniversities; however, the specialization within engineering is currently limited to nine7campuses and typically includes mechanical, civil
Tech.Dr. Richard M. Goff, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Richard M. Goff is a former aircraft structural test engineer for the Navy, Peace Corps Volunteer, and com- puter entrepreneur; he holds a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering, and is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Richard has been teaching and engaging in research in multidisciplinary engineering design education for over eighteen years. Dr. Goff is the recipient of several university teaching awards, outreach awards, and best paper awards. His passion is creating engaging learning environments by bringing useful research results and industry practices into the classroom as well as using