-faculty and student-student engagement. Every effort was made to ensure thatthe speaker diversity reflected that of the REU students, so that students could envisionthemselves taking the speakers’ paths. Further student-faculty interaction was provided throughweekly faculty research seminars. Each week, one faculty member presented brief vignettes oftheir research interests to the group, enabling students to learn of other imaging related researchbeyond their own projects.In addition to the program-related activities, students participated in several University-wideenrichment events. These activities included a weekly brown-bag seminar series on topics suchas Ethics, GRE preparation, Getting into Graduate School, and Abstract Writing
be around developing a mock project proposal thatwould follow the guidelines of the real directed MS project proposal as were described in thegraduate program handbook in terms of sections, length, citation (IEEE), and format. At the endof the semester, each student would present his/her proposal to the fellow graduate students whowould act as the members of the examining committee. The author would compile theirfeedback, as well as his own observation, and share it with the presenter. A sample of proposalevaluation form is shown in Appendix A.The course contents and activities were designed to help students develop their proposal. Thesemester was divided into three sections, called units: 1) Introduction to research, ethics, humansubject
University. His upcoming dissertation will focus on how student’s connections of social responsibility and engineer- ing change throughout college as well as how engineering service is valued in employment and supported in the workplace.Dr. Nathan E Canney PE, Seattle University Dr. Canney teaches civil engineering at Seattle University. His research focuses on engineering educa- tion, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stan- ford University with an
tounderstand their leadership capabilities, rather than a series of training interventions such ascourses or lectures.2,3Leadership competencies such as teamwork, problem solving, ethics, and communications4 arevital for the accomplishment of any construction project.5 According to the ASCE Vision 2025,civil engineers will have to command the multidisciplinary and leadership facets of their work inorder to implement complex projects that include various stakeholders.6 Similarly, it is stated inthe ASCE BOK (2008) that 21st-century engineers must possess leadership competencies inaddition to technical competencies as the industry moves forward.7 Other reasons, including risingcomplexity and the rapidly changing nature of construction projects, have
, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Shuman is the Founding Editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press). He received his Ph.D. from the Johns Hopkins University in Operations Research and a B.S.E.E. from the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Shuman is an ASEE Fellow
participationUndergraduate research. Hirsch, Linsenmeier, Smith, and Walker investigated theeffectiveness of summer research experience in improving bioengineering students’ competencyin ethics and communication.17 Through comparing 39 participants’ assessment results at thebeginning and end of the summer research, this study revealed that students developed a greaterawareness of key concepts in ethics, and understood the importance of audience and themultifaceted nature of technical communication.Zydney, Bennett, Shahid, and Bauer investigated the impact of undergraduate research onstudent development by comparing 157 graduates with research experience and 88 graduateswithout research experience.18 They found that the graduates with undergraduate
International Communication Association, she has received numerous awards for her research, teaching/mentoring, and engagement. She is working on Purdue-ADVANCE initiatives for institutional change, the Transforming Lives Building Global Commu- nities (TLBGC) team in Ghana through EPICS, and individual engineering ethical development and team ethical climate scales as well as everyday negotiations of ethics in design through NSF funding as Co-PI. [Email: buzzanel@purdue.edu]Dr. Rebecca L Dohrman, Maryville University Rebecca Dohrman (Ph.D. Organizational Communication, Purdue University) is an Assistant Professor of Communication at Maryville University - St. Louis.Dr. William ”Bill” C. Oakes, Purdue University, West
hard work ethic, motivates people, initiates action • Director: Providing clear direction, clarifies priorities, Page 26.1057.4 communicates the vision, plans and prioritizesIn Becoming a Master Manager8, each part of the Competing Values Framework is described indepth. Human relation roles emphasize on participation, conflict resolution, and consensusbuilding. As a mentor a leader understands themselves and those around them, provides a sourceof communication, and develops others. As a facilitator they add to team building, encourageparticipative decision making, and manage conflicts. Open
4.1 4, 5 0.79 6. Determine open loop gain 4.4 5 0.64 7. Compensator design 3.4 3 0.77 8. Performance evaluation 3.9 3, 4, 5 1.00 c. ABET Outcome SupportAccording to the department ABET assessment plan, this course is supposed to provideassessment data for two ABET outcomes (Outcome f: ethics and Outcome h: impact). These twooutcomes were assessed through the incubator design project. To assess outcome h, the studentswere asked to conduct research and find out how their design may harm the embryo and lead topossible hatching defects if the steady-state-error or the overshoot of
and objectives. The design goal is usually revised through thebenchmarking process which is to explicitly comparing the design to that of the competitor whichdoes the best job for satisfying the customer requirements. The nature of aircraft design project;complexity, multidisciplinary, and various constraints; suggests that the systems engineeringapproach to be the best candidate. However, the systems engineering implementation is morechallenging than understanding the system engineering process. Aircraft design projects essentially include a variety of realistic constraints, such as economicfactors, safety, reliability, aesthetics, ethics, and social impacts. The value-free descriptorsassociated with each objective; criteria; are quantified
experiential, multidisci- plinary learning. Rogers co-developed the ABET approved year-long Capstone design experience. With a focus on pro- viding students with a broader experience base, the multidisciplinary program applies teams of engineers, business, design, and other students to work with Ohio companies to help them be more competitive and with local non-profits to help them become self-sustaining. Using a formal design process, teams develop new products to meet industries’ competitive needs or those of people with disabilities. Students learn to solve open-ended problems and gain skills in critical thinking, professional communication, ethics, and teamwork. Rogers recently expanded this one-year program to a
implemented as part of the Medicare programPET and SPECT imaging tracer decay and worksheet: creating a PET/SPECT: functional detection, functional vs. textbook-style application imaging beyond flow.9 anatomical imaging, half- box that describes how life, sensitivity PET/SPECT use radioactivityclinical trails phases, randomization, worksheet: designing a An overview of the drug FDA approval, ethical clinical trial based on a development
ortheir preference for aggregated or disaggregated data in a given project.3We see all such choices by STEM education researchers as powerful indicators of socialunderstandings of equity and inclusion and find the absence of routine inquiry about theseconditions of research to be concerning. As Riley writes of one ubiquitous methodologicalcommitment in particular, “The evidence-based process [of STEM education research] isinstrumental in that it is a means to a given end, and the ethics or morality of those ends is notconsidered.”4 We see “ethics or morality” configuring all research choices and along with Riley,envision a set of critical questions that could potentially increase the impact of educationalresearch upon social inequities. Such
that the Broader Impacts criteria of NSF grants in theCAREER program require a teacher-training plan26. Wankat goes further and links engineeringfaculty training with whether the faculty have the qualifications necessary to perform their jobfunctions in teaching26. He cites the AIChE Code of Ethics, which states that “Members shall:Perform professional services only in areas of competence.” The question here is obvious: Is itethical for a chemical engineering faculty member who belongs to AIChE to teach if they are notcompetent in that area? Of course, the next question is: what defines competency in the area ofteaching? Is it competency in the material or competency in the material and the delivery of thematerial? The former has been the
engineer- ing ethics, spatial visualization, and educational methods. She is an active member in the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE and is currently serving as the Associate Editor of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal.Ms. Amber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University Ms. Kemppainen is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals. Her research interests include the improvement of STEM education, ethics, and online/blended learning methods.Dr. Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University Gretchen Hein is a Senior Lecturer in Michigan Tech’s Department of Engineering Fundamentals. Since 1998, she has been working on first-year engineering courses and program development
theundergraduate major.” In a follow-on 2015 study by the same firm, the top five abilities valuedby employers were communication, teamwork, ethics, critical thinking, and application ofknowledge in real-world settings2. Similar results have been reported by studies of engineeringemployers in Australia, Asia, and the U.K.3, 4, 5 with each study finding that employers highlyvalue nontechnical professional skills for engineering practice.Indeed, much of the curricular reform in U.S. engineering education in the early 21st century hasfocused on more holistically preparing students for the profession of engineering. Theprofessional skills that ABET engineering criteria specify include communication, teamwork,professional and ethical responsibility, and an
Paper ID #11945Building a Summer Bridge Program to Increase Retention and AcademicSuccess for First-Year Engineering StudentsCaitlin Cairncross, University of Portland Caitlin is the STEP Academic Success Counselor for the Shiley School of Engineering. Her professional interests include retention, strengths-based advising, self-authorship, and inclusivity and access for un- derrepresented students.Dr. Sharon A. Jones P.E., University of Portland SHARON A. JONES is Dean of the Shiley School of Engineering at the University of Portland. Her research focuses on ethics and sustainability in terms of civil infrastructure
each of the eight recommendationsfrom SAChE, the following ideas are provided on how to integrate into existing courses: Page 26.1729.6 The importance of process safetyThe general importance of process safety should be introduced in the first dedicated chemicalengineering class. Similar to the principles used in industry, process safety must be considered avalue and therefore introduced early and reinforced frequently. An excellent way to begin thediscussion is with the AIChE Code of Ethics, which states that, “Members shall: Hold paramountthe safety, health and welfare of the public and protect the environment in performance of
newsletter editor. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics. Page 26.1739.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Why Not Ask Students to Explain Themselves? Enhancing Conceptual Testing with Technical WritingNote: Based on reviewer comments this paper is submitted to the ASEE 2015 Annual Conference as a “Work-In-Progress” that is intended to be presented at the ChE Division Poster Session.1. IntroductionRecently a great deal of
clinical trials, economics, ethics, and regulatorystrategies. Throughout the second year, students will continue working on their research project,with the culmination of the second year being a summer clinical or industrial immersion relevantto the project. In addition to immersion experiences, we are planning tracks: research,entrepreneurship, professional school, and industry; while these are at early stages indevelopment, they are being developed to integrate with other campus activities.Beginning junior year, students will continue undergraduate research while being extensivelytrained in engineering design, in contrast to traditional education which focuses primarily ondesign in the senior capstone course. The coursework for this year is not
—aredesigned to support participants’ developing expertise in knowledge and skills related to the fieldof sensorimotor neural engineering. Program evaluation is centered on these skill sets, as definedbelow. Page 26.894.2 Sensorimotor Neural Engineering Skill Sets1. Fundamentals of neuroscience, engineering, and neuroethics research: Knowledge of coreconcepts in neuroscience and neural engineering, designing and conducting experiments,analysis and interpretation of results, problem solving, understanding primary scientificliterature, building scientific knowledge, and ethical and responsible conduct of research.(Knowledge
system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability Page 26.52.3e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems2. Hands-on projectThe added hands-on project consists in basic laboratories to design and test an injection plasticmold. The activities will be carried out in groups of three students. Although there are severalpublications from previous ASEE Conferences related to capstone projects3 and Machine Designcourses4, this publication differs in that this work proposes a new
mechanical engineeringprogram for providing necessary equipment and funding to conduct the experiment,undergraduate research opportunity programs (UROP) with their support in collecting data.Undergraduate opportunity program trains students for ethical research behavior. Additionally,UROP encourages undergraduate students to get involved in the research activities by providingmonetary award.References1. AWEA, (2015). American Wind Energy Association. www.awea.org2. Buyung K. & Andrea T., 2012. Experimental study of a shrouded micro-wind turbine. Procedia Engineering; 49: 92-983. Dakeev U., 2011. Management of Wind Power Generation with the Attachment of Wind Tunnel. IBSU Scientific Journal; 5 (2): 71-824. Dakeev, U., (2012). “Secure and
learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. Page 26.1449.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Sustainable, Global, Interdisciplinary and Concerned for Others? Trends in Environmental Engineering StudentsAbstractIn this study the four affective attributes of sustainability value, global interest, interdisciplinaryvalue, and concern for others were explored among
Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Ms. Kavitha Durga RamaneProf. William G Graziano, Purdue University, West Lafayette Page 26.1501.1
implies consistency across multiple courses, larger course sizes and different subject types,such as Math or Ethics, are needed to validate the preliminary findings and the proposedapproach. Looking farther into the future, research involving this approach as a tutoring style couldbe beneficial for students who are struggling in a traditionally implemented course. Conversely,for implementing this method, resources such as trained tutors can offer a different teachingstyle, online references and homework, or in-class exercises can be used to supplement thispedagogy in order to provide assurance that every possibility of education has been met. Bibliography1 M. Alaradi, “Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs.” Online. Available FTP:https://lh5
engi- neering undergraduates, and data visualization. His teaching practice includes formal cooperative learning and integrating communications, ethics, and teaming across the curriculum. He is a founding developer of the CATME system, a free, web-based system that helps faculty assign students to teams, conduct self- and peer-evaluations, and provide rater training. He can occasionally be found playing guitar at a local open mic.Dr. David Jonathan Woehr, University of North Carolina Charlotte David J. Woehr is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Management at The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the Georgia Institute of
Performance as well as on the editorial boards for Organizational Research Methods, and the European Journal of Work and Organizational PsychologyRichard . Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Richard Layton is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology. He received a B.S. from California State University, Northridge, and an M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Washington. His areas of scholarship include student teaming, longitudinal studies of engi- neering undergraduates, and data visualization. His teaching practice includes formal cooperative learning and integrating communications, ethics, and teaming across the curriculum. He is a founding developer of the
lectures so that relevant material appears inlecture before lab continues. Laboratory activity still begins in the third week of the term. Inthis arrangement, lecture topics currently include: uncertainty (5 periods); report format and data presentation (2 periods); statistics (7 periods); curve fitting (2 periods); temperature measurement (6 periods); pressure measurement (3 periods); stress/strain measurement (3 periods); flow measurement (4 periods); tensile testing (1 period); vapor compression refrigeration cycles (1 period); engineering ethics (2 periods); Page 26.1341.4
course was complete using several qualitative methods: an anonymous on-line open-ended survey, a semi-structured focus group interview, individual interviews with students, the instructor and teaching assistants, and document analysis of student course work. The instructor was also asked to communicate his learning objectives in written form, and we took anecdotal field notes during our initial meetings when we discussed the possibility and implementation of the study. Two consecutive cohorts of students (N=80 per cohort) were invited to participate from two course offerings: Winter 2013 and Winter 2014. Ethics approval was procured from our institution’s Research Ethics Board. The