policies and procedures.While organizational behavior researchers have proposed various career and motivationmanagement practices, educational institutions do not seem to leverage these practices. Noe 12believes that the career management process involves career exploration, development of careergoals, and use of career strategies to reach the goals, and studies the relationship betweendifferent aspects of the career management process and employee development behavior andperformance. Sorcinelli, et al. address the top challenges facing faculty members, institutions,and faculty development programs 13. Greenhaus, et al. examine the conditions under whichcareer goal-setting contributes to effective career management 14. We posit that
intent(both in this paper and in the program we describe) to elevate the academy’s understanding ofthe value of teaching faculty, to promote inclusivity, and to provide encouragement to teachingfaculty themselves.Literature ReviewThe proportion of teaching faculty at U.S. universities has been increasing steadily since the1970s.2 In 2013, at doctoral universities, teaching faculty represented just over half (52.9%) ofthe faculty workforce, up nearly five percent from 2005.3 Although in 2013 over half of thoseteaching faculty were part-time, more recent trends in 2015 indicate a shift toward hiring morefull-time teaching faculty.4Teaching faculty are not heterogeneous in type of job responsibilities or career aspirations. Whileteaching faculty
Engineering Mentoring from the White House; the 2008 Hewlett-Packard/Harriett B. Rigas Award from the IEEE Education Society; the 2013 Distinguished Educator Award from the ASEE Electrical and Computer Engineering Division; and was named an IEEE Fellow in 2014. Dr. Schrader earned her B.S. in electrical engineering from Valparaiso University, and her M.S. and Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Notre Dame. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Listening and NegotiationAbstractNegotiation is an important skill for faculty at all stages of their career, but one that researchsuggests is often uncomfortable for women faculty to employ. This paper
. Throughout her career, Rachel and her team have provided education solutions for several industries including defense, life science, high-tech, energy, healthcare, manufacturing, and construction. Rachel currently serves on the Board of Directors of INCOSE as the Director of Marketing and Commu- nications. In addition, she is on the Board of Directors for AUVSI New England. Rachel has a B.S. and M.S. in the life sciences, as well as an M.B.A. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Piloting Accessible Engineering Education OnlineAbstractMaking engineering education accessible to those without the ideal background has long been achallenge. Faculty are looking to admit students
educationalsuccess than the historical undergraduate GPA or GRE. Undergraduate GPA and GRE scores, asadmissions criteria, further clouded the discussion by our desire as an academic unit to maintainhigh standards for admission.Other factors contributing to professional working adult learner success include, but are notlimited to, years since last degree, undergraduate field of study, reasons for undergraduate GPA(if low), GPA of classes taken more recently (post-undergraduate), GPA in the first two yearsversus the last two years, demonstrated application of undergraduate assimilated knowledgethrough successfully greater career opportunities, recommendations from supervisors and thirdparties and the potential students statement of purpose. In the final
. After that a newprogram proposal was submitted and approved by the institute’s governing body.Results and DiscussionThe selected Engineering Technology program has both major and support courses to preparegraduates for technical and supervisory careers in a variety of industries. The program combinestechnical knowledge with communications skills and teamwork to provide the flexibility neededin today’s rapidly changing marketplace. The selected program educational objectives are: Demonstrate technical proficiency in the field Apply quantitative reasoning and critical thinking in solving technical problems Effectively communicate technical knowledge, ideas, and proposals to others, including upper management Lead
Engineering from MIT and her M.S. in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include engineering design education (especially in regards to the design of complex systems), student preparation for post-graduation careers, and innovations in research-to-practice.Mel Chua, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Mel is an engineering education researcher with a focus on hacker/maker culture and faculty development. She is also an electrical and computer engineer and an order-20 all-pole auditory low-pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 250Hz.Dr. Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University Stephanie Cutler has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her dissertation
,others simply eliminated technology altogether.The College of Engineering’s Division of Engineering Professional Education (ProEd) and theCollege of Technology’s Center for Professional Studies in Technology and Applied Research(ProSTAR) share a common purpose, mission and vision. Underlying these is the fundamentalpremise that both serve the graduate educational needs of professional working adult learners inthe STEM disciplines; this through credit and non-credit program offerings spanning theeducational continuum of engineering and technology.Both organizations, ProEd and ProSTAR, recognize the similarities of their mission and sharedpurpose to provide learning opportunities to those in technical professions with careers inprogress. To this
', Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11 (2004), 247-72.8 Ruth Deakin Crick, and Guoxing Yu, 'Assessing Learning Dispositions: Is the Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory Valid and Reliable as a Measurement Tool?', Educational Research, 50 (2008), 387-402.9 S. M. Lord, J. C. Chen, K. J. McGaughey, and V. W. Chang, 'Measuring Propensity for Lifelong Learning: Comparing Chinese and U.S. Engineering Students', in Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2013 IEEE (2013), pp. 329-34.10 John C Chen, Karen McGaughey, and Susan M Lord, 'Measuring Students' Propensity for Lifelong Learning', in Profession of Engineering Education: Advancing Teaching, Research and Careers: 23rd
industry closely parallels the method for rubricdevelopment in academia. This section describes the need for rubrics in industry, and explores amethod for developing a rubric to assess the professional skills of engineers. The rubric isdesigned to evaluate professional skills in the context of playing team-building games during anengineering hiring process. First is a brief background on the need for rubrics in industry,followed by a proposed process for developing and using a rubric for assessing professionalskills in this context.Understanding the Need for Rubrics in Industry Growth in engineers’ careers relies on promotions and hiring based on evaluations at alllevels. Many companies have clearly defined values that guide company