serving. As discussed in Part 1, these purposes included: increasing awareness ofengineering, promoting engineering in the K-12 classroom, increasing diversity in engineering, andincreasing recruitment for the host institution.The table below shows correlations between types of events and these four purposes. Keep in mind thata single program might be reported as serving multiple purposes. To calculate the correlations, wegrouped responses by purpose and then totaled the programs reporting each type of event within eachgroup. The correlation value is the second number divided by the first number. For example, 44programs reported doing exposure events among the 65 programs working to promote awareness ofengineering. The correlation between
Paper ID #15172Failure and Idea Evolution in an Elementary Engineering Workshop (Fun-damental)Chelsea Joy Andrews, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Chelsea Andrews is a Ph.D. candidate at Tufts University in the STEM education program. She received a B.S. from Texas A&M University in ocean engineering and an S.M. from MIT in civil and environmen- tal engineering. Her current research includes investigating how children engage in engineering design through in-depth case study analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Failure and Idea Evolution in an
published in several congresses and he has organized more than 30 congresses around the world. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering Adventure for Young GenerationsAbstractThe Education Research Team of COPEC – Science and Education Research Council -has designed and implemented the K12 School Adventure Plan for a city, with the goal ofproviding better and effective knowledge for young students, especially those who willnot enter a University. The main goal is to help encourage more bright young minds topursue careers in engineering or technology, by providing K12 students, from publicschools of the city, knowledge about sciences and research methodology in a way that itwill
to build things.”These descriptions extend the previous fall 2014 focus group discussion by e+ students (notnecessarily + teaching), adding that they feel themselves to be “different” from their non-e+engineering peers and possess a shared experience of the difficulty of self-identifying as part of anew, unconventional engineering degree program.11 The CU Teach Engineering students notonly navigate the new Engineering Plus degree pathway, but also negotiate both the engineeringand education environments during their undergraduate years—campus entities that arephysically and culturally different from each other.Continuing to delve into the minds of engineering majors who are concurrently seeking STEMteacher licensure, the survey asked, “Do
Maple Place Elementary The primary data sources that informed this project were: (1) video-recorded EiElessons, (2) the written curriculum units, and (3) semi-structured interviews with theteachers. The six participating teachers video-recorded their EiE lessons using an iPad.The videos (n=31) averaged 34 minutes in length and captured the implementation ofEiE curriculum. We chose to focus on the EiE lessons as data because they weretaught after the science units per the materials arrangement through the district. It wasour hope that we would capture teachers incorporating their previously taught sciencecontent into the engineering units. The semi-structured interviews14 were conducted toinvestigate what was “in and on the minds” of the
Paper ID #15180The Roles of Engineering Notebooks in Shaping Elementary Engineering Stu-dent Discourse and Practice (RTP)Jonathan D. Hertel, Museum of Science Jonathan manages the Examining the Efficacy of Engineering is Elementary (E4) project (an NSF-funded study of the efficacy of the EiE curriculum), overseeing and organizing a research effort that involves 240 teachers in the different states. He also provides evaluation support for the Engineering Adventures and Engineering Everywhere projects. He holds an Ed.M. in learning and teaching from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. In 2013-2014, he was named a
Paper ID #16608Pre-College Science and Engineering for Inner-City Middle School StudentsMrs. Sahid Lin´es Rosado Lausell, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Sahid Rosado Lausell is the Outreach Coordinator for the College of Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). She received a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the Univer- sity of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez, and an M.S. in Environmental Engineering from UIUC. She is currently working on her second master’s in Curriculum and Instruction at UIUC, and working towards a Secondary Education - Mathematics Teaching Licensure. She has been
habits of mind.Engineering habits of mind refer to the values, attitudes, and thinking skills associated withengineering and include systems thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, communication,and an attention to ethical considerations. Wing (2006) also connects computational thinking toengineering thinking, as she defines computational thinking as not simply programming but theoverlap between mathematical thinking and engineering thinking. Likewise, Barr andStephenson (2011) compare computational thinking capabilities across computer science,mathematics, science, social studies, and language arts. For example, learning to implement aparticular algorithm in a computer science context would be analogous to following anexperimental
their experience.Summary and “Next STEPS”The reconstruction of the STEPS program was essential to recruit underrepresented students. Thenew format was well received and shows great promise. Key lessons learned in delivering thenew curriculum and key lessons learned in extending the population participating in the informalengineering outreach program will be incorporated in successive offerings of the program. Therevamped 2015 STEPS offering follows a 2014 STEPS offering in which the content anddelivery of STEPS was significantly updated to reflect current pre-college science andengineering education research. Specifically, engineering design, engineering practices,engineering habits of mind, and best practices for engineering career exploration
Paper ID #16796Promoting School Earthquake Safety through a Classroom Education Grass-roots ApproachDr. Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego Van Den Einde is a Teaching Professor in Structural Engineering at UC San Diego. She incorporates education innovations into courses (Peer Instruction, Project-based learning), prepares next generation faculty, advises student organizations, hears cases of academic misconduct, is responsible for ABET, and is committed to fostering a supportive environment for diverse students. Her research focuses on engagement strategies for large classrooms and developing K-16
Paper ID #17346Engineering Uncertainty: A qualitative study on the way middle school teach-ers incorporate, manage and leverage the uncertainty of engineering designtaskMr. Beau Vezino, University of Arizona Beau R. Vezino is a Ph.D. student at the University of Arizona’s College of Education. His focus is engineering and science education. Beau currently teaches the science/engineering methods course for pre-service teachers and works on several related research projects. Beau is certified teacher and holds a MS in Education in Curriculum and Instruction (2009) and a BS in Mechanical Engineering (2005). Beau’s research
260, 3512 33rd Street N.W., Calgary AB, T2L-2A6.AbstractFor this study interested parties, engineering university academics and K-12 STEMresearchers, have partnered in an attempt to impact high school physics enrollment byevaluating a 21st century teaching and learning tool that can act as an alternative toconventional teaching methods. The Digital Learning Management System (DLMS) hasthe potential to change the perception of high school physics and, ultimately, to improvestudent outcomes. This learning tool has been developed by a leading STEM educationalnot-for-profit Canadian organization. The tool appeals to digital natives (high schoolstudents) and incorporates: mind mapping (discovery based learning), experts on call,gamification, all
mindful of Engineering Design Process, but were given no additionalinstructions.Figure 3. Sample lot and residence for Design Challenge I. back porch 5’ House 15’ 20’ decorative blind door steps parking 6’ covered porch (3’ wide)Figure 4. Sample lot and residence for Design Challenge I.The campus “field trip” to use wheelchairs and explore ramp configurations, combined withinitial brainstorm sessions, took approximately 3 class
Paper ID #16895Developing a Questionnaire and Evaluation Methods for a High School RocketProgramMr. Ibrahim Halil Yeter, Texas Tech University Ibrahim H. Yeter is currently a PhD candidate in the Curriculum and Instruction program at the College of Education, and at the same time, he is pursuing his Master’s degree in Petroleum Engineering at Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education frame- work. Mr. Yeter plans to graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his
school and high school girls topromote computer science and robotics. 11 His Arts and bots is a combination of crafting andcommon robotics programming that promotes collaborative “expression-focused robots”rather than competition based robotics.12In our work, co-robots are introduced as pedagogical tools to utilize engineering design as amotivator to teach Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics through practicalhands-on activities to students. Engineering education assists development of engineering“habits of mind” including systems thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, effectivecommunication, and ethical considerations.13 This paper reports on the first year of a multi-year project to engage middle and high school students
instance,in project-based classrooms, instruction provides context that helps students connect what theyare learning to why it matters and what it is useful for [36-39]. Project-based courses can changestudents’ minds about the usefulness of content they are learning [40]. We asked students toevaluate whether what they were learning mattered for their future careers.Projective identification: knowing an engineer, or someone who knows about engineeringHaving a relative—not necessarily a parent—can strongly influence students’ choices aboutwanting to become an engineer [41]. Some studies have found a greater impact on women, andthat “engineering family members are passing on engineering-related knowledge, interests, andaspirations” [42]. Thus
Paper ID #16961Students’ Use of Evidence-Based Reasoning in K-12 Engineering: A CaseStudy (Fundamental)Corey A. Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Corey Mathis is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in biology and her M.E.D. in secondary education from Northern Arizona University and is a former high school science and technology teacher. Her research interest includes improving students learning of science and engineering through integrated STEM curricula.Emilie A. Siverling, Purdue University, West Lafayette Emilie A. Siverling is a Ph.D. Student in Engineering
framework for teaching the EDP to all students. Although there is no agreedupon standard for the engineering design process, 11,12 certain steps are recognized as essential for good engineering design. For this project, the 13EDP framework adopted is that developed by the Engineering is Elementary (EiE) curriculum team as shown in Figure 2. Although the EiE framework was developed with elementary students in mind, we like its simplicity and feel it is still an appropriate framework in which to cast this project. The EiE framework has just five oneworded
attitude toward the engineering design cycle not only made the learningmore fun, but also allowed students to take risks. Failure was always an option because learninghow to deal with failure is valuable, it helps students to recover faster the next time theyencounter a design issue. Encouraging students to build a skill set to diagnose issues was just asimportant as making sure they produce an end product.6 Understanding by Design (UBD) is a process where teachers create an educational unitwith the end goal in mind.7 In this work the end goal was for students to create a gourmetmolecular gastronomy (MG) snack created during a Cook-Off event. MG is a branch of foodscience that studies the physical and chemical transformations of food. The
psychiatry.Dr. Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University Muhsin Menekse is an assistant professor at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, with a joint appointment at the Department of Curriculum & Instruction. Dr. Menekse’s primary research investigates how classroom activities affect conceptual understanding in engineering and science for all students. His second research focus is on verbal interactions that can enhance productive discussions in collaborative learning settings. And his third research focus is on metacognition and its implications for learning. Much of this research focuses on learning processes in classroom settings. Dr. Menekse is the recipient of the 2014 William Elgin Wickenden Award by
focuses on human action, communication, and learning as socio- culturally organized phenomena. A major strand of his research explores the varied trajectories taken by students as they attempt to enter professional disciplines such as engineering, and focuses on the dilem- mas encountered by students as they move through these institutionalized trajectories. He is co-editor of a 2010 National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Learning Research as a Human Science. Other work has appeared in Linguistics and Education; Mind, Culture, and Activity; Anthropology & Education Quarterly, the Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science; the Journal of Engineering Education; and the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering
Missouri, where he also directs a maker initiative for the College of Education. He received his M.Ed. and Ph.D. in Information Science & Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri. His research/teaching focuses on engineering as an innovation in pK-12 education, policy of STEM ed- ucation, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering, engineering ’habits of mind’ and empathy and care in engineering. He has published more than 140 journal articles and proceedings papers (many with graduate and undergraduate students) and is the inaugural editor for the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research. c American Society for Engineering
characteristics of high quality STEM integration, including providing“opportunities for students to learn from failure and redesign.”18 Many in engineering educationpromote the idea of teaching it through the habits of mind, or how engineers think and do theirwork.19 These include: “systems thinking, collaboration, ethical considerations, creativity,communication and optimism.”20 Failure, although not explicitly named, is best exemplified aspart of the habit of mind of optimism. Resilient responses to design failure include an optimisticmindset that the problem can indeed be solved or that the failure can be overcome. Theseresponses are representative of a growth mindset, in which students learn from failure andbelieve that growth is a natural byproduct
. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 50-64.Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive integration: Mind and cognition unbounded. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Mentzer, N. (2012). Team Based Engineering Design Thinking. National Center for Engineering and Technology Education.Mosborg, S., Adams, R. S., Kim, R., Atman, C., Turns, J., & Cardella, M. (2005). Conceptions of the engineering design process: An expert study of advanced practicing professionals. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Portland, OR.Purcell, A. T., Gero, J. S., Edwards, H. & McNeill, T. (1996). The data in design protocols: The issue of data coding, data analysis in the development of models of the
an attempt to not only fill the holes regarding the topic ofengineering that the students might experience, but to also discover the most effective way toteach this growing subject area to a different community of students than typically considered.A Note on Deafness and Language FacilitationThis program is unique as we tailored each activity to the abilities, skills and interests weassumed might be present for the group of deaf students we worked with. Keeping in mind thelittle importance and relevance sound-related activities would hold with our students, wemodified existing activities to include as much visual interest as possible. Each module began byintroducing the engineering discipline of focus and related applications of that
Paper ID #16486Measuring the Impact of Service-Learning Projects in Engineering: HighSchool Students’ PerspectivesTamecia R. Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamecia Jones is currently a doctoral student in the Engineering Education department at Purdue Uni- versity with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and informal and formal learn- ing environments. She is a graduate of Johns Hopkins and Stanford University. Originally trained as a biomedical engineer, she spent years in the middle school classroom, teaching math and science, and consulting with nonprofits, museums, and summer
. However, traditional classroom activities emphasizewell-defined problems and encourage students to manipulate abstract symbols such as physics ormathematical formulas to identify solutions. Such reliance on abstract operation, along withhaving little experience of concrete modeling through embodied and prototyping techniques, hasled students to face great challenges when entering engineering programs2. Therefore, middleschool students need increased exposure to engineering design experiences that transform their“habit of the mind”—from fixating on thinking-before-prototyping towards prototyping-to-think.In this study, we structured a toy design workshop to provide hands on and engaging designactivities for middle school students, to help them
graduation. Somestudents also described their enjoyment of the camp, particularly the chance to learn from peersand make social contacts with a group of like-minded students.Concluding Remarks The design of E-GIRL curriculum successfully excited female students about engineeringcareers. The structure and activities provided participants with a unique opportunity toexperience a week as an engineering undergraduate student both academically and socially.Interactive lessons and the group project introduced students to engineering problems and currentproblems engineers (hydraulic fracturing) are working to solve. Since female students tend toprefer problem solving with real world and social connections,5 a project focused on hydraulicfracturing, a
Paper ID #14726The Engineering Design Log: A Digital Design Journal Facilitating Learningand Assessment (RTP)Dr. Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology Roxanne Moore is currently a Research Engineer at Georgia Tech with appointments in the school of Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC). She is involved with engineering education innovations from K-12 up to the collegiate level. She received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2012.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is Assistant Director
2005, and which has been held annually since that time. The outreachevent takes place in Boise, Idaho, and at the time of its onset was the only outreach or campactivity in the state focused on girls or young women. Across ten years, 510 total girls haveparticipated, with approximately 85% of them coming from the immediate metropolitan area.The program was developed with a mind toward marketing engineering as an exciting, creativeactivity; including activities developed specifically from that perspective.1 The specific topic ofthis paper is an investigation into the motivation for volunteers and students to support thisprogram. Our hypothesis is that, in particular, the women found this an experience that helped tocreate community among like